

Frank, buddy, we still love you. The man who's re-energized comics time and again with towering works like The Dark Knight Returns, 300 and Sin City is allowed a stumble or two.
So The Spirit tanked. Don't be discouraged! Would M. Night Shyamalan let one bomb stop him? Or three? No! Now is the time to look to the future, so to speak.
Sure, at first glance, a bright but crusty sci-fi cliffhanger like Buck Rogers seems like an unlikely comeback vehicle for the master of spare, graphic pulp. But beyond the outskirts of Sin City, we see all the skills necessary for you to devise a new Buck for the 21st century!
Or is that still 25th? (Wait ... 26th?)
May we suggest ...
1. Hot babes, obviously

Thanks to the 1979 NBC television show, Buck Rogers is known today for its female characters. If you can create modern icons on the level of by-the-book good-girl Erin Grey and royally-wicked sex-bomb Pamela Hensley, trust us, all will be forgiven—if not completely forgotten in some hormone-induced haze. Frankly, Wilma and Ardala are probably why you grabbed this project, so we have no doubt the casting here will be exquisite.
That said, don't forget about Buck! Dark Knight and Iron Man have underscored how casting the right lead can take a project to the next level; Sadly, The Spirit bears this out. But seriously, Gabriel Macht notwithstanding, you've chosen some really compelling actors to work with in the past, so we're actually looking forward to see who gets the 500-year nap.
2. Go back to the original

This is not a slam of your misguided take on Will Eisner's The Spiritwe mean literally go back and read Armageddon 2419 A.D. Or the early comic strips. The original Buck Rogers is a darker affair than later planet-hopping would have you believe, and a better fit for vintage Miller.
Long before Buck went to Vegas in Space on TV or fought the Tigermen from Mars in the funny papers, the original Buck woke from 500 years of sleep to help the broken and battered remnants of America against Earth-born foreign oppressors. Remember, Ron Moore didn't reinvent Battlestar Galactica so much as take its original concept seriously.
You did the same thing yourself in (arguably) your best works, Daredevil's "Born Again" run and Batman: Year One: These were brilliant recapitulations that used time-tested continuity as their foundation. Do that.
3. Call Lynn Varley

You are one of the few directors out there with the technical experience and creative imagination to even assemble one of these "green screen" movies. Now you just need to move beyond the desaturated work that you witnessed Robert Rodriguez creating when he adapted Sin City.
Enter Lynn Varley.
Your ex-wife has colored most of your graphic novels, and Zack Snyder smartly had her working on backgrounds for his adaptation of 300. Bringing her on board Buck Rogers would signal a real shift from the Sin City/Spirit school, but without abandoning your artistic identity.
Overall, the more you can leave behind the ghost of Robert Rodriguez, the more you will come into your own as a film director.
4. Use your imagination

We're still not sure what a hopping "headfoot" clone has to do with Will Eisner's The Spirit, but, hey, this sort of stuff won't be out of place 500 years in the future!
The eccentric old scientist Dr. Huer is an essential character in any retelling of Buck's exploits. Feel free to put Huer in an Octopus-style lab and turn it up to 11! Go crazy, man.
Oh, and about the tech: If you—or the money men—are worried about this ending up like Sky Captain, there's still one retro-future that hasn't been adequately translated to film: steampunk!
5. Don't listen to fanboys.

This will be an easy one for you. Most of them have been gunning for you since The Dark Knight Strikes Back, so their impressions of The Spirit are colored. But there are a few without a chip on their shoulder; DO listen to them—or read a few movie reviewers. Take in what they have to say about the pacing of The Spirit.
As a big Christmas release, The Spirit may have come up short, but as the initial offering from a first-time director who skipped film school, it was extremely promising. The compositions of your shots are gorgeous, which is to be expected of a legendary narrative artist.
Now if you can just fine-tune the one element that comics don't have, namely time, you'll be completely fluent in the language of film. Learn from your mistakes, and your new career could really blast off with Buck Rogers!
By banthra at 12:14 PM ON 02/12/09
I dont care what anyone said. I enjoyed the Spirit. I have never read the comic but the movie was fun and entertaining. At times it was really damn weird but who cares it was enjoyable.
By thepicklebot at 12:39 PM ON 02/12/09
What a superb article. Please listen Mr Miller!
By darthbono at 12:42 PM ON 02/12/09
i'd rather see a live action movie based on pac-man than watch the spirit again
By Q at 12:58 PM ON 02/12/09
I'd rather cut off my own limbs and try to swim the English Channel in a ham suit than watch Frank Miller screw up Buck Rogers.
His comics are great, but his movies give me migraines. Sin City, 300, and The Spirit? Why don't they hand out spoons with tickets to scoop out your own eyes?
Buck Rogers doesn't need to be all ugly green-screen CG magic, nor does it need to be a splash of comic-effect color in a black and white frame.
Here's an idea: What if you tried just filming it? No lame-brained comic effects or high-wire stunts. No splashy gore. None of it. Just make a movie.
I fear the day this is released if only because of Sin City and 300.
By Al at 1:39 PM ON 02/12/09
The Spirit had all the elements of a good hero flick as well as a great deal of film noir elements to keep with the older style, but there were too many places where newbies would be unable to follow.
Yes, the nazi costume change was unnecessary and a little too out there and the whole cloning disposable henchmen would have worked better as disposable mindless robots, but the story of the spirit, the childhood love story and the drives of the main character had a great beginning.
I would have liked to see this as a television series rather than a movie. Smallville is going on its, what, tenth season and clark still hasn't learned to fly?
The Spirit is an ongoing character rather than a hero that battles one major character and then has a lull.
By Anachronite at 1:51 PM ON 02/12/09
While visually interesting, The Spirit sucked! This article hits the nail on the head. Mr. MIller, read, know it, live, film it and you will succeed!
By hal at 2:38 PM ON 02/12/09
Wow -- an SciFiWire article that I read all the way through without thinking, "Jeez -- this sucks!"
Right on with every point.
By sithpriest at 3:28 PM ON 02/12/09
While we all pat Mr. Miller on the back, lets not go too far and give him license for his vices in diference to his talent at writing. Mr. Miller's latent objectification of women is a theme that runs through Sin City and The 300. Slippery racism is another unsettling tenant of his writing. While everyone else cheered the jingo-istic, xenophobic message of 300, I swore-off ever again paying $7.50 to simply endure a movie. Best advice? Mr. Miller, don't do it. Leave hallowed properties to rest in our fond memories.
By Kyle Jelle at 5:01 PM ON 02/12/09
@darthbono - You know that's been done, right?
Pac-Man: The Movie
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hZWYwYqbfuM
By gorehound696 at 9:34 PM ON 02/12/09
I would love to see the original novel used for this film.it would be great to have a film made that truly recreates what the author did.
now that would be awesome.
By vwoman at 9:51 PM ON 02/12/09
I don't really feel that Gabriel Macht was what was wrong with the Spirit. It had much bigger problems than him and he is actually a very good actor. But you have to have something to work with in the beginning.
By Deven Science at 12:32 AM ON 02/13/09
Did someone just say that Buck Rogers was hallowed? You do know that we're talking about Buck Rogers, right? He can do whatever the heck he wants with it, and it'll be no worse than any other version. The novel has aged, and not well, the serials were horribly dated, and the TV show is only good with the rose colored glasses of youth. I think that this article is fairly accurate, but I have no passion for Buck Rogers that he can screw up, no matter how it ends up.
By Sparrownightmare at 9:16 AM ON 02/13/09
Oh well... Looks like Miller is going to get another chance to yet again, screw up a classic film franchise. Someone needs to fire this clown. Or, at the very least, relegate him to writing commercials for bath soap. It's going to be a real shame that they couldn't find someone with some real talent to do Buck... (bad choice of words but you know what I mean...)
By Mykl at 9:53 AM ON 02/13/09
How does Miller redeem himself? With all due love and respect for the work he has given people the only way is to STOP DIRECTING!
By DMood at 7:37 PM ON 02/13/09
PLEASE, Miller CAN'T make movies! He's proved that. He raped The Spirit and needs to leave film making to people who at least have a clue. He should stay in comics were he's got a nice little day job that's barely noticeable.
By Mars6540 at 7:47 PM ON 02/16/09
I wholeheartly agree with the article. Please Mr. Miller take it suggestions to heart. I read the original novel,and it has some prime elements for a great movie.
Mars6540:
I wholeheartly agree with the article. Please Mr. Miller take it suggestions to heart. I read the original novel,a...More »