

For a while, it was beginning to look like "the future of horror," Clive Barker, was becoming a thing of the past. While that blurb quote from Stephen King blitz-started Barker's career—"I have seen the future of horror, and his name is Clive Barker" on the Books of Blood anthology back in the '80s—the writer took some time off in recent years for such disparate things as children's books and male nude photography aimed at much more mature fans.
There were a few horror movies for television, but his admirers and critics were disappointed until the Midnight Meat Train film adaptation came out in limited release last year (the movie, directed by Ryuhei Kitamura, is now out on DVD). The groundswell of support seems to have started a new Barker boom. Directors started coming to him, and there will be a trilogy of Books of Blood films: the Book of Blood itself, and Dread.
"In both cases they were people who came to me with titles and said, 'I want to do this movie,'" Barker said in an interview. "John Harrison wanted The Book of Blood because he essentially saw it as a ghost story and a love story with horrific elements. But Dread's director, Anthony DiBlasi, came in essentially as an intern, a glorified intern, and then very quickly rose in the ranks. It became very apparent, very quickly, that this man had huge talent and huge motivation. So he was a natural, because, again, he came to me and said, 'I know how to make this movie.'"
Barker added: "All three of them—Mr. Kitamura, Mr. Harrison and Mr. DiBlasi—have completely different styles. You put these movies side by side, and .... they obviously have the same author writing the material, but other than that there's nothing in common. I like that. It's the way movies should be."
Fangoria has just announced that Dread and Book of Blood will be previewed at the next West Coast Fangoria's Weekend of Horrors convention, April 17-19 at the Los Angeles Convention Center. Harrison and DiBlasi will be on hand, as will Barker and some of the actors from the films.
By Mandy at 2:42 PM ON 02/19/09
This article sounds a little harsh in it's judgments of Clive Barker's other passions. I can't really say anything about his photography. I haven't actually seen it but Clive Barker is an artist. I've seen his work for The Thief of always. To make negative implications about his 'childrens' books' makes it clear to me the author of this article knows very little about Baker's works for younger readers. In example, his The Thief of Always is, in my opinion, a fantastic piece of work. Would you prefer it if he was writing Twilight!? I read The Thief of Always over twelve-years-ago and loved it and was very disappointed when the film adaptation fell through. It's very surreal and dark. It reads like an older Ray Bradbury short story. It doesn't condescend to the reader and it's hardly what I would call a conventional children's book. This was like R. L. Stine meets Lovecraft and The Brother's grim. In other words: Don't knock it until you've tried it.
By remixthis at 6:57 PM ON 02/19/09
I agree...The Thief Of Always was a very good book....
By Danny at 7:30 PM ON 02/19/09
There are a lot of schools that actually use 'Thief of Always' in their curriculum...that could be good or bad depending on your point of view but I'm rather impressed.
By Mandy at 6:02 AM ON 02/20/09
I love the Thief of always. Whomever wrote this article really needs to give it a proper chance. It's a very well written book.
Mandy:
I love the Thief of always. Whomever wrote this article really needs to give it a proper chance. It's a very well...More »