

As often as family-friendly movies are released, they're almost always as excruciating for parents as they are exciting for kids. Thankfully, that's not the case with Monsters vs. Aliens, Dreamworks' latest animated adventure. An effort that ranks among the top tier of the studio's remarkably inconsistent output, this tale of a plus-plus-plus-sized lady taking on extraterrestrial enemies with the help of some equally oddball friends is an entertaining, funny and emotionally resonant adventure for audiences of all ages.
In the film, Reese Witherspoon (Four Christmases) plays Susan Murphy, a bride who is transformed into a 50-foot behemoth when she's struck by a meteor on her wedding day. Renamed Ginormica by the government, she's detained in a military facility run by General W.R. Monger (Kiefer Sutherland) until an extraterrestrial threat demands that Ginormica intervene on humanity's behalf. Working with her fellow monsters B.O.B. (Seth Rogen), Dr. Cockroach (Hugh Laurie) and the Missing Link (Will Arnett), Ginormica fights off the attacking alien forces led by Gallaxhar (Rainn Wilson), in the process discovering that becoming a superhuman "monster" was in effect the only way for her to become her true self.
Dreamworks Animation has endured a lot of ups and downs since the studio's inception with the release of Shrek, not least because its emphasis is often on timely rather than timeless pop culture references. It's as if their business model was based on the appeal of an Aladdin-style blitz of impersonations and caricatures that lose their relevance by the film's second viewing.
Thankfully, Monsters vs. Aliens creates a world that is both modern and classic, normal but just enough larger than life to make us believe that monsters can exist, and that they would be the natural defense for Earth against any kind of aliens. Though the monsters are definitely inspired by old-school creature features of the 1950s, including The Fly, The Blob and Creature From the Black Lagoon, the film never emphasizes that cinematic background, allowing audiences to acclimate themselves to each character without needing a refresher course on their atomic-age mythology.
Naturally, it helps that directors Conrad Vernon and Rob Letterman enlisted a very talented group of actors to provide voices for their characters, and then allowed them to explore those characters so they're not only funny but sympathetic. As the amorphous B.O.B., Seth Rogen is hysterically, triumphantly idiotic, developing the creature's stupidity as an endearing quality even when he realizes that his outrage is based essentially on stealing another character's problems. Also good are Laurie and Arnett as Cockroach and Link, the brain and wannabe brawn of the film's monster coterie.
But it's Witherspoon's deeply evocative turn as Susan/Ginormica that really makes the movie work on both a visceral and emotional level; while there's certainly comedy to be mined from her evolving discovery of the advantages of being 49 feet, 11 inches tall, the diminutive actress gives Ginormica a sense of sadness and, eventually, empowerment that viewers can easily relate to.
It's also noteworthy that Monsters vs. Aliens is not only the best 3-D movie made thus far (it produced the least eyestrain of anything I've yet seen), but a rare example of an animated movie that features a strong, interesting female protagonist rather than a male one. But while either of those qualities is more than sufficient reason to see the film on an aesthetic or intellectual level, it's also an engaging, smart, funny and sweet adventure on a basic entertainment level. All of which qualifies Monsters vs. Aliens as family filmmaking and embodies the best and most essential aspects of that genre, because it reminds us that something that's designed to be exciting for everyone doesn't have to be excruciating for anyone.
By MichaelK! at 11:47 AM ON 03/27/09
I'm sorry, are you actually PRAISING something here? I mean c'mon!!
By Josh Man at 11:59 AM ON 03/27/09
While I haven't seen this yet, so I can't really claim that you're wrong. From this review I get the feeling that you didn't see Coraline, which in my opinion is the greatest 3D movie ever made. There hasn't been any real strain in a 3D movie since Beowulf introduced the new technology so that isn't really a good reason to proclaim this the best 3D movie of all time, so I figure more of it goes into the story and the film in general. I hope that this movie is as good as you're making it out to be, but I know that Coraline is. And it also has a female lead.
Before you proclaim something the best 3D movie ever made, you should probably see the one that came out last month and is equally (if not more so) deserving.
By frostygus at 12:06 PM ON 03/27/09
I think your standards are dated. There have been lots of family-friendly films in the past few years that an adult can enjoy - Toy Story, Shrek, , the Incredibles, Finding Nemo, to name a few. And what animated bombs has DreamWorks released? I can't hink of any offhand.
By Mandy at 4:21 PM ON 03/27/09
Joss, Coraline might be 3D but it's not computer animated, this is. Coraline is a 3D stop motion animated film. There is a huge difference.
By Jaxx at 10:26 PM ON 03/27/09
I'd just like to know when they are going to come up with something that we folks who wear glasses can wear while watching these movies. Glasses over glasses are uncomfortable and can scratch lenses. When they come up with that, then 3D will be for everyone.
By TheVok at 1:20 PM ON 03/29/09
What does CG vs. stop-motion have to do with anything?
This article calls Monsters Vs. Aliens "the best 3-D movie made thus far," which would cover CG animation, stop-motion animation, live action, everything.
So yeah, the first question that may come to mind is, is it better than Coraline, which received similar praise earlier this year from many reviewers?
That's up to individual opinions, of course, but if you aggregate the data, Coraline seems to come out on top.
Coraline Metacritic score: 79
Monsters Vs. Aliens Metacritic score: 56
Coraline Rotten Tomatoes score: 88
Monsters Vs. Aliens Rotten Tomatoes score: 69
Coraline IMDB score: 8.2
Monsters Vs. Aliens IMDB score: 7.4
By naimas at 3:07 PM ON 03/29/09
As someone who has seen BOTH Coraline and Monsters VS Aliens I can easily tell you that Coraline is better in EVERY way, including use of 3D. Monsters was not terrible, but if you search the reviews you will see that people are admitted that its 3D was passive and not in your face as others are advertising it to be. I have seen both with my own eyes. I am sick of the hype. Monsters wasn't terrible but, since it WASNT originally supposed to be a 3D movie you can see that there are many flat scenes that do not seem interesting or effective in 3D. Coraline was not jump out at you 3D ( except for the needle and the mice tricks during credits) but BOTH of those bits blew anything in Monsters out of the water.
By Starbuck72 at 11:45 PM ON 03/29/09
This was a horrible movie. Terrible plot. Questionable content for kids. My kids just barely enjoyed it at the ages of 3, 6, and 9. My husband and I wanted to leave but hung in there just in case they really liked it. Did they have to talk about boobies and relationships in a kids movie? What about the horrible names of the characters. Avoid this movie. Who cares if the 3D is "great" if the plot stinks!!!!
By joe3233 at 5:35 PM ON 04/14/09
This review is actually accurate and i never seem to agree with the crictics. its appeals to a large audience and is the best 3-D film i have ever seen
joe3233:
This review is actually accurate and i never seem to agree with the crictics. its appeals to a large audience and i...More »