

Building on 16 years of water-cooler programming and soaring ratings growth following its most-watched year ever, SCI FI Channel is evolving into Syfy, beginning this summer, Dave Howe, president, SCI FI, announced today.
By changing the name to Syfy, which remains phonetically identical, the new brand broadens perceptions and embraces a wider range of current and future imagination-based entertainment beyond just the traditional sci-fi genre, including fantasy, supernatural, paranormal, reality, mystery, action and adventure. It also positions the brand for future growth by creating an ownable trademark that can travel easily with consumers across new media and nonlinear digital platforms, new international channels and extend into new business ventures.
"Imagine Greater" will become the new brand message and tagline, inviting both consumers and advertisers into a new era of unlimited imagination, exceptional experiences and greater entertainment.
Syfy more clearly captures the mainstream appeal of the world's biggest entertainment category, and reflects the network's ongoing strategy to create programming that's more accessible and relatable to new audiences. Syfy will continue to celebrate the traditional roots of the genre, while opening the brand to accommodate a broader range of imagination-based entertainment.
"Without abandoning our legacy or our core audience, we needed to cultivate a distinct point of view with a name that we could own that invites more people in and recognizes our broader range of programming with literally something for everyone," Howe said in a statement. "Syfy allows us to build on our 16-year heritage of success with a new brand built on the power that fuels our genre: the imagination. Syfy ushers in a new era of unlimited imagination, exceptional experiences and greater entertainment that paves the way for us to truly become a global lifestyle brand."
Syfy—unlike the generic entertainment category "sci-fi"—firmly establishes a uniquely ownable trademark that is portable across all nonlinear digital platforms and beyond, from Hulu to iTunes. Syfy also creates an umbrella brand name that can extend into new adjacent businesses under the Syfy Ventures banner, including Syfy Games, Syfy Films and Syfy Kids.
Additionally, as the channel's footprint expands rapidly around the globe with the launch of more international channels, Syfy meets the need of a globally relevant, trademarkable brand that stands for something unique to the brand in each territory.
The new brand evolution will launch in July, in tandem with the premiere of the new scripted drama Warehouse 13 on air and at SCIFI.COM, backed by an aggressive marketing campaign, which will kick off this spring.
(SCI FI Wire's name will not change as a result of this new branding.)
[Update: SCI FI president Dave Howe responds to questions from commenters here.]
By Tokrath at 8:04 AM ON 03/16/09
Pointless yet interesting. I can't way to see how they explain wrestling as part of the new syfy.
By Paul at 8:05 AM ON 03/16/09
OMG! How stupid!!
By Varyar at 8:11 AM ON 03/16/09
man what
By Facepalm at 8:12 AM ON 03/16/09
I am glad to see that amidst this economic crisis a safe haven exists, employing people not worth a dime.
For the rest of the world, which generally is not into random leetspeak, the new name will sound more as if it was the Syphilis channel.
By psiwire at 8:13 AM ON 03/16/09
Pointless, I agree. 'Imagine Greater' might be the dumbest cable tag-line I've ever seen, though. Maybe they should put less thought into rebranding and more thought into programming since one of their three decent programs goes off this week.
By Rick at 8:14 AM ON 03/16/09
STUPID!!!!!
Siffy? That's how you want people to think of your channel? What a stupid, pointless marketing department idea.
DUMB DUMB DUMB.
By paul at 8:17 AM ON 03/16/09
I'm concerned that they don't want anything to do with traditional scifi at all, even whatever of it is still on the channel... also, guys, someone tried a channel with gaming stuff before, remember? That worked well! They merged with a viable tech channel, got rid of the tech, and then lost all of those viewers. Be careful Scifi! (Syfy)
By noneother at 8:20 AM ON 03/16/09
Just another step AWAY from what the initial charter of the Network was intended to be. Guess, that's the nature of things... Can't Wait for a reality TV show set in space.... might as well just be FOX...they don't like their SciFi programming either...
By captainproton at 8:20 AM ON 03/16/09
This sounds like the same group think that got Farscape cancelled in favor of cheaper reality TV. Sounds like Battlestar is leaving just in time.
By Jon at 8:22 AM ON 03/16/09
This is about the dumbest thing they have done yet. The stupid forays in to ghosts and paranormal is bad enough, but everytime they stray from Science Fiction, they go further and further down hill. Just like I miss to old MTV, I REALLY miss the old SciFi channel. Change is not always better.
By Weng at 8:28 AM ON 03/16/09
Another vanilla, identity less channel created. Friday's Last BSG will be the end of an era, where a radical, well done, inteligent series that happens to be "genre" will have a chance. Be prepared for wrestling and showings of "Enchanted" and "Big."
By Polymer at 8:32 AM ON 03/16/09
This is what happens when you mix business school graduates with science fiction - people who talk about sci fi and say "firmly establishes a uniquely ownable trademark that is portable across all non-linear digital platforms and beyond." What fracken BS! Someone is just trying to sound smart, while appearing ignorant. Next they will be talking about synergy and finally....government bailout.
By JavaDouche at 8:36 AM ON 03/16/09
One step closer to "Spiffy".
By ww at 8:37 AM ON 03/16/09
Not April 1st, is it?
*checks date*
This really is dumb. What on earth is the thinking behind this one?
By jtarheel at 8:38 AM ON 03/16/09
That's okay, the channel has had less and less of what I want to watch. They are just selling out to the sheep... err... masses. Almost to the point of deleting the channel from my favorites.
By Todd at 8:40 AM ON 03/16/09
Great. So now it's "uncool" to be the Sci-Fi channel, we want to make sure everybody else watches. I agree with most of the posters here: 1. Glad BSG is going off the air, otherwise, they would find a way to screw that up; 2. Sci-Fi used to be the only network without the dreck of reality TV, but I guess we'll get more of that and wrestling for all the trailer park crowd; 3. Why does science fiction have to be "not enough"? I remember getting cable for the first time and the only channel I could not wait to have was Sci-Fi. If it was called ScyFy or whatever this new name is, I definitely wouldn't have been excited. Way to rebrand an already known and appreciated channel into something that resembles an idea that someone in Marketing 101 might come up with. Oh, and way to alienate your core audience. I personally am a little insulted by the whole name change.
Good luck with that. I'm sure ScyFy kids will go over well, maybe you should just become another Lifetime channel.
By Kargg at 8:41 AM ON 03/16/09
I think it's pretty stupid. Like some of the other remarks, this is the same channel that eliminated Farscape and brought wrestling to a SCIENCE FICTION channel. I agree that wrestling is fiction, but SCIENCE FICTION???
I haven't watched SciFi in quite some time--probably when they brought wrestling to it. (Talk about a lame decision.)
The new name and caption are likewise dumb decisions from execs who haven't got a clue.
I remember demanding from my cable company many years ago that they bring on the SciFi channel. Today, though, I really could care less.
I think it needs to get back to its roots.
(I also remember when the creators of the channel actually responded to emails personally.) Ah, those were the good old days. Now they're just crappy.
By Harpo at 8:41 AM ON 03/16/09
I actually checked my calendar to see if it was April 1st after reading this. But I wasn't really surprised to see that it wasn't. More change for the sake of change. Boneheads...
By BackStJoe at 8:43 AM ON 03/16/09
Wow...marketing is a dead art. Sci-Fi seems to be going the way of MTV; when you hire people who have a distain for the genre, you kill the point of the channel.
By Bluntaxe at 8:44 AM ON 03/16/09
Their is nothing preventing them from putting any of the things they mentioned (fantasy, supernatural, paranormal, reality, mystery, action and adventure) on the air now. Heck, they play wrestling! What is sci-fi about that?
If they use this to ramp up reality shows on their channel, I'm dropping the extra $ I shell out for the channel through cable.
By Bluntaxe at 8:44 AM ON 03/16/09
Their is nothing preventing them from putting any of the things they mentioned (fantasy, supernatural, paranormal, reality, mystery, action and adventure) on the air now. Heck, they play wrestling! What is sci-fi about that?
If they use this to ramp up reality shows on their channel, I'm dropping the extra $ I shell out for the channel through cable.
By ecgordon at 8:45 AM ON 03/16/09
The only way this will make sense is if "Imagine Greater" actually translates to a greater imagination of the part of executives who give the greenlight to programming. But based on what has happened in the past few years I don't think that will happen. Might as well call it "Skiffy," since a lot of us have been doing that for some time.
By Todd at 8:46 AM ON 03/16/09
I could only see the irony of watching Idiocracy on the SyFy channel...
By MJCUK at 8:46 AM ON 03/16/09
Things in the uk have been going down the tubes for a while ! All we get are reruns of Thunderbirds and the Invisible man and films including Edward Scissorhands on what seems like every night.
By ctmm at 8:49 AM ON 03/16/09
syfyuless sound like vd sounds doomed
By wtf at 8:53 AM ON 03/16/09
This is TERRIBLE. SciFi was already mucking up with awful reality shows and completely inexplicable wrestling, but now you're obviously moving away from sci fi and we're going to get even less of the programming that drew us to your network in the first place. This is the most disappointing, dumbest idea you all have ever had. Way to sell out, guys.
By ex-fan at 8:57 AM ON 03/16/09
your new name sounds like a venereal disease- is that how you really want to be perceived? STUPID idea and bad move!!!! i hope everyone boycotts after this and i guarantee your core audience will bail on you.
By kyrion at 9:01 AM ON 03/16/09
The truth: This is purely a monetary decision and has nothing to do with whether the channel supports or denegrates a particular brand. It is not possible to own and trademark the term "Sci-Fi", because it is common usage. They wanted something they could brand, stamp on products, and attach intellectual property to. So, they had to come up with a name that could be trademarked. I think they could've done better than Syfy which is really odd looking but otherwise, I can see the reasoning. Would anyone have had a better reaction if they had changed it to PsiPhi? (Sounds like the frat channel).
By ecgordon at 9:01 AM ON 03/16/09
Hey, ex-fan, you know they don't care about their core audience or they wouldn't be doing this. They want a new audience, one that will watch any kind of junk they put on the air and not complain.
By hahnarama at 9:03 AM ON 03/16/09
Is it April 1st already?
By Rose at 9:04 AM ON 03/16/09
This is the dumbest idea in the history of dumb. You're not going to intrigue new viewers and you're going to alienate your core group. Yet another example of SciFi being the redheaded stepchild of the television industry.
And I checked multiple times - it's still not April 1. Dumb move, please to be getting over it now.
By Pillage at 9:04 AM ON 03/16/09
Very, very bad idea. As already mentioned the move to shows like Ghost Hunters and such was already bad enough. I have been a long, long time SciFi channel fan, but this move sounds like it will be time for me to just move on.
I really hope this is just an early April fools day joke because it is the worst idea ever.
By Rok at 9:05 AM ON 03/16/09
HORRIBLE!
Stick with what got ya here...
By Graham at 9:05 AM ON 03/16/09
I would have thought in these times of financial hardships for companies, the last thing that they need is to splash out on a rebranding. Spend the cash on programming.
By bubbleslayer at 9:06 AM ON 03/16/09
This is why I now rely on BBCAmerica for the majority of my Science Fiction programming. SciFi, or SyFy is now a misnomer....
By Informed Misery at 9:07 AM ON 03/16/09
I guess the changes here at scifi wire foreshadowed things to come. The site turned crappy, and now the channel will turn crappy.
PS.
If you could make those captchas a little harder to read, that'd be awesome
By crimsonking at 9:09 AM ON 03/16/09
I think we all agree that this is just silly. Now comes the deluge of reality shows. It'll be like MTV and music.
By Dingedarmor at 9:12 AM ON 03/16/09
Abandon Ship,Abandon Ship!!!!
Pretty sad--really. They had a few good shows, killed most of their best ones, and created some really lame tv movies. And now this. RIP our favorite viewing marathons: BSG, Eureka, Tremors, Stargate, Farscape, X-Files, Twilight Zone, Outer Limits.....
I guess steroid abuse for wrestlers is more sci fi than we thought..
By AY*KM? at 9:13 AM ON 03/16/09
That has to be one of the absolute dumbest ideas I've ever heard of, unless your site publishing tools have a glitch in them and published your April 1st story early. I can't imagine anyone coming up with an idea like this and actually getting it approved. Who's running this channel, Radio? It's like whoever approved Apple's the "funnest" iPod ever slogan. Stupid. The idea must have come from the top, because no one had enough guts to say how ridiculous the idea is. Well, there's still time to keep the name SCI FI and not change it to SyFy, which people could also pronounce as Siffy if they wanted to. I guess ideas like this also give us a glimpse into the kind of programming we can expect to see. If genius like this keeps up, network television won't have anything to be afraid of, that's for sure. Go Siffy!!!
By RobCoe at 9:15 AM ON 03/16/09
When i saw this yesterday I thought and hoped it was a joke. Apparently the same lame brains that cancled Farscape and brought in wrestleing, reality tv and game shows have found another way to screw things up with an instant message name and probably more of the type of programming that makes me watch DVD's instead. I am getting really close to just takeing this channel off my satalite list.
By Scott at 9:16 AM ON 03/16/09
I have a great idea for the channel. Show more actual science fiction.
By sherman at 9:16 AM ON 03/16/09
I think this demonstrates that the SciFi executives are not in touch with their audience or SciFi fans, but I think the presence of wrestling on the network has always demonstrated this. Wrestling. Idiots.
Your audience is deeper and richer than 12 year olds. Adults are science fiction viewers, adults who are educated, sophisticated, and intelligent. Instead of raising its standards, the executives here have lowered themselves (and the network) to the common denominator, in the mistaken belief that bad monster moving and wrestlers will have widespread appeal.
You've missed a real opportunity to grow and improve.
By Scott at 9:16 AM ON 03/16/09
I have a great idea for the channel. Show more actual science fiction.
By Scott at 9:17 AM ON 03/16/09
I have a great idea for the channel. Show more actual science fiction.
By rabidk at 9:18 AM ON 03/16/09
you've got to be kidding me...
is the marketing team actively trying to repulse anyone with a modicum of intelligence?
"ooh, lets be all web 2.0 ish, that's popular these days"
By anachronite at 9:18 AM ON 03/16/09
This is about the dumbest thing I have ever heard. It also makes me worry that we are going to have to watch more crap like ghost hunters, WWE, andDestination truth. When is someone at this network going to realize what we first loved about this channel was the SCIENCE FICTION! Not the schlock you guys have been churning out. Please, I'm begging you, give us Sci-FI not the stupid horror/paranormal crap. We want Science Fiction! Like BSG, Firefly, Star Trek, and Farscape! Even lord of the rings type fantasy would be ok. Just no more Ghost hunters and the like.
By JimJohnson at 9:20 AM ON 03/16/09
"Syfy"?
Why not just make your tagline "We r haxors, lol!!1"
Seriously, that's unprofessional and if your goal is to get the sci-fi genre to be taken more seriously, you're taking a step back.
Leave the cheap attempts at hip word play to Mountain Dew and Doritos. This is a professional group of people working for NBC Universal who are dedicated to producing high quality shows in the science fiction genre. Your marketing should reflect that. "Syfy" sounds hokey.
This is disappointing.
By Scott at 9:20 AM ON 03/16/09
Pay attention: This is not about attracting new viewers. This is about establishing a brand name. So they can slap it on other products.
And, here on this web site, the story pretty much a bit of self-advertisement of this (yawn) fact.
By setillm at 9:21 AM ON 03/16/09
Well, isn't that the best idea since Mansquito...
By ulic at 9:23 AM ON 03/16/09
Dear Sci Fi Channel (I REFUSE to acknowledge the incredibly lame new name and tag-line - it's almost as bad my city's tag-line - "Cleveland Plus..."),
I think it's time to fire your executives, your advertising agency, and most of your staff. This is about the most ridiculous thing I've EVER seen. Do you not realize how STUPID this new "wonderful" concept of your is?! Where in hell do you pick up these people and absolutely horrible ideas? I mean, seriously, these people WAY overpaid for their degrees!!
Please leave the name the way it is. It's great, we all love it, and we ALL hate this new plan of yours. The above (and probably below) comments ALL show this. There is not even ONE positive comment here.
Get rid of your ridiculous "reality" shows (Ghosthunters and Ghosthunters International? Seriously?! Do you hate and disrespect your audience THAT MUCH?!). Get rid of the wrestling. This isn't Spike. It's Sci Fi. We ALL expect INTELLIGENT and thoughtful shows, NOT the crap you've been trying to feed us. You've screwed up some wonderful shows (Sliders) and ended wonderfully successful ones (Stargates SG-1 and Atlantis, Battlestar Galactica, and others), and have ignored pleas from your viewership in the name of the Almighty Dollar you THINK you're making by completely screwing up this channel.
I remember when this channel first premiered. It was FANTASTIC! All the old shows were great to watch again. I remember when you started offering fresh new series, or picking up ones continuing from other channels (except for Sliders - you REALLY screwed that one up). It was great to have a Sci Fi safe haven, a channel one could almost always tune to, regardless of time of day, and watch something worth watching. Now, I only watch about an hour of Sci Fi per week. Currently, that hour happens to be BSG. In April, it'll be Eureka (assuming you ever bring it back - what the hell happened to the 21 episodes we were promised this season?!). At times, there might be two or three hours worth watching, but that's about it. Now, nearly every time I flip to Sci Fi, I get that idiotic wrestling (seriously - we're not beer-drinking idiots!) or some other stupid "reality" show. And DON'T make Stargate Universe be as stupid as it sounds (I mean, really! The whole POINT of Stargate is IN THE NAME, so WHY are you sticking people on a ship a la Star Trek: Voyager). Bring back wonderful shows like Farscape.
Please, just bring back SCI FI as it was meant to be. DON'T change the name. Get rid of the stupidity and start offering thoughtful and entertaining shows again.
I don't know where you found all these people to come and dictate to us what WE want to watch. I've seen stats that your viewership is going DOWN. Did you know the definition of insanity is repeating the same act over and over, hundreds of times, in the hopes of an eventual DIFFERENT outcome? Each time you guys change the format of the channel, you lose some of us. So why do you think this is going to be different?
Now, if you guys want to just quit BEING a Science Fiction channel, why not just tell us, go away, and leave the market open for media groups that WANT to offer a true and pure Science Fiction channel? That'd be fine with me and, I'm sure, with pretty much everyone else here.
Again, we're not watching Sci Fi because we want a Spike-like channel. We want thoughtful and enjoyable Science Fiction. In truth, I wouldn't even object if you offered more fantasy as well. They go hand-in-hand. But knock off the other crap, for God's sake!!!
Thank you,
A concerned and, quite possibly, soon to be ex-viewer of the Sci Fi AND SYFY channel
By jnorris at 9:32 AM ON 03/16/09
Sigh & fie.
Pathetic and utterly inane: exactly what you'd expect from a conflation of clueless suits and witless promodrones.
By RealityBytes at 9:33 AM ON 03/16/09
They hide the REAL reason for this switch in amongst all the other new formats they claim they will offer: "..supernatural, paranormal, reality, mystery, action and adventure..."
Forget the rest - it's the REALITY part that they are targeting. What format costs the least to produce, but has the potential to produce the most income for shareholders? REALITY TV
Basically, "SyFy" wants to be the NEW full service cable channel - Science Fiction and Fantasy will be abandonned in favor of CSI ripoffs and whatever lame crap the parent (NBC/Universal) wants to "test" on a "targeted" market.
Clearly, to SyFy we fans are now nothing but another market demographic to be strip mined by faceless execs in search of personal glory... nice
By ulic at 9:34 AM ON 03/16/09
Oh, and while we're at, that stupid "monster of the week" movie? DROP THAT DAMNED THINGS!!!
By Thresher_V at 9:40 AM ON 03/16/09
Looks like I'll be permentaly blocking the new "SYFY". RIP SCFI.....
By Thresher_V at 9:41 AM ON 03/16/09
Looks like I'll be permentaly blocking the new "SYFY". RIP SCFI.....
By carlalute at 9:43 AM ON 03/16/09
Please, please Sci Fi, don't do this. Who cares if you don't own the words "Sci Fi"? They're still what sets you apart as a channel. It tells what you specialize in. Syfy is meaningless and generic. It may sound the same but so do here and hear or see and sea. The meaning changes completely with a letter or two of difference.
Anyway, bad, bas marketing move. Back away now, while there's still time.
Focus instead on *quality programming* that will win/keep viewer more than anything.
By paithan at 9:44 AM ON 03/16/09
This is yet another example of a bored and stoned marketing staff. Wrestling wasnt enough! I had thought since they had plenty of cheesy monster movies to do a killer croc day then a killer snake day then lets not forget the disaster, asteroid diverting, earth core drilling movies... come on guys, lay off the sauce and get back to at least semi-decent programing
By ironwill96 at 9:44 AM ON 03/16/09
This is a really stupid move and just goes to show you that the network has lost its way. Don't count on me to be one of your "record ratings" viewers when you keep running things that have no place on the "Sci-Fi" channel such as wrestling. Instead of keeping BSG, we get BSG Soap Opera "Caprica". You cancel shows like Dresden Files even though they get good ratings and keep reality drivel instead.
This channel has really gone downhill the last few years, I guess I have to turn to video games for sci-fi entertainment since the joke of a channel that you are becoming apparently doesn't care about science fiction anymore.
By wasabijane at 9:48 AM ON 03/16/09
I've figured it out. By using a homonym of SciFi as the new name, Syfy has emphasized its point that it's become a hollow mockery of everything its fans have known and loved.
By Timbo at 9:49 AM ON 03/16/09
Looks like its time to find a new channel to watch. I have a feeling that "Imagine Greater" shows they will put on probably wont have anything to do with scifi. but the again scifi channel been gone for years since they canceled Farscape. I watched scifi still because of SG1 and Atlantis but now that is gone and i will give the new Stargate show a chance. But i really do think that Scifi channel started to go down hill when they got rid of Farscape and keep Ghosthunters and even put wrestling on it. Still been trying to figure out what wrestling have to do with scifi.
By Peter Prellwitz at 9:50 AM ON 03/16/09
I'm a published science fiction novelist. I currently have ten novels out now, with more coming. One of the little "perks" that come with writing is you have a never-ending lottery ticket. Just MAYBE someone in the TV or Movie industry would read my novels and sign me to that multimillion dollar deal. In my daydreams, it was Joss Whedon as the producer and SciFi as the TV station; a way to energize it and make it more popular.
I suppose I can still daydream the same thing about Syfy, but I've a hunch the "dumbing down" has already begun for them.
Hmmm... maybe if I just mashed my forehead on the keyboard I could turn out storyline that meets with Syfy's new "standards"...
By Edvydas at 9:55 AM ON 03/16/09
Sad day. Waiting for BSR to end run before canceling a portion of my cable -- the only reason I've kept it so far is for BSR. I don't watch Sci Fi any more -- and I used to have it on all the time. Folks, I'm not abandoning you -- you've abandoned me long ago. So much for more revenue from me.
By Thomas at 9:55 AM ON 03/16/09
This IS pathetic. I predict it'll be like "New Coke" was in the 80's...the public rejection will be so utterly thorough that they will quietly go back to the "old" Sci-fi with no fanfare.
And yes, I agree that the homegrown film fare on this channel has been disastrous - especially when there's so much really GOOD material sitting on bookstore shelves by topnotch authors just WAITING to be filmed! Fire your writing staff and start making film deals with real sci-fi authors.
Imagine seeing Heinlein's "The Moon is a Harsh Mistress", or Niven's "Ringworld", or Brin's entire Uplift series, for that matter. Enough with the prehistoric snakes, already! They went the extra mile to bring us BSG. They can do this.
By ulic at 9:56 AM ON 03/16/09
I wonder if anyone from "SyFy" (YUCK!!!) will actually respond the overwhelming objections to this further dumbing down of what should otherwise be a really wonderful channel with really wonderful (and nearly limitless) old shows and potential new ones and what has instead become a channel for the incredibly stupid.
Yeah, right.
By Marty B. at 9:56 AM ON 03/16/09
Can't say I like the new name all that much, but I think emphasizing the value of network "brand names" has been a mistake in the tv industry for some time now. You can call it "the absolute crap channel" and you'll still lead in the ratings if you provide consistently superior content.
Interesting that The Wire will be maintaining it's "scifi" name, for now at least. Maybe this way it'll be able to establish itself in its audience's mindset as an independent entity of the scifi channel. I believe that independence is currently the case, though I don't think the bulk of the site's readership believe so. (If it were, how come we never see the Wire shilling for Sea Beast 2 ... though I'd actually get a kick out of seeing someone write "serious reviews" of that schlock.)
By discusdiva1044 at 9:57 AM ON 03/16/09
While I enjoy some of the wider variety supplied on the SciFi channel, this idea of changing the name is one of the dumbest things I have ever heard. As a teacher, that is not "phonetically identical" and would be pronounced like Rick said as "siffy." My recommendation: keep SciFi and add the "imagine greater" or change it to something like "sci fi and beyond".
By dragonhung at 9:58 AM ON 03/16/09
Is this "rebranding" for real? All the doublespeak and insipid reasoning is sad and very transparent. Sorry, SciFi - or whatever you call yourself - we're not buying it. I do see one bright note in all this crap, it opens up the possibility of another channel starting up that actually does show science fiction. With the opening up of digital channels, I'm seeing more focused and specific topic channels starting to show up in my listing. Let's hope someone can get a real science fiction channel on the air. When I win the Publishers Clearing House sweepstakes - hey, it could happen! - I'll do it myself!!
Bye Bye Sci Fi - I'll shed a tear on what you started with, what you could have been, and the unfocused schlock you have become.
By toom at 9:59 AM ON 03/16/09
I agree that the name is silly and that if I didn't know that SyFy stood for "scifi" I wouldn't have a clue what kind of programming the name would include. But I don't really care about the name, if they've got shows worth watching, I'll watch them. BSG's the only thing this channel's got going for it at the moment, though, and that ends Friday. There's also nothing wrong with expanding one's horizons and incorporating new kinds of programming, but I agree with most that a channel that brands itself with a tagline, "Imagine Greater," would do well to steer away from wrestling and reality television. Please, imagine greater.
By ezzan at 10:01 AM ON 03/16/09
Well, after the last show of BSG this Friday, there will be no need for this channel anymore. Stargate gone, Stargate:Atlantis gone, BSG gone..... me gone !
By snds at 10:02 AM ON 03/16/09
Shitty rebranding is shitty.
I'm a designer who works with brands on a daily basis and looking at this brings fear of Armageddon for our beloved SciFi Channel. Other companies have tried this type of rebranding like Pepsi and Tropicana. Both alienate their customer base by chucking out everything that made them what they were. There was little brand recognition because of the changes they made. This new positioning for SciFi will end up the same way. I hope someone at the SciFi branding team will read this comment because the 2 brands I mentioned would be good case studies as to why NOT change the brand. Especially one so well established.
Now...if only they would get rid of the wrestling(...I mean come on...really?), the shoddy 1-2 tv specials and make some decent supplemental material to fill the void of BSG we'd be fit as a fiddle.
By Mike at 10:03 AM ON 03/16/09
So, since you're giving up on the name "SciFi Channel", does that mean I can pick it up and make a real version? Or do we still have to sift through all the crap to find real sci-fi gems?
Epic fail, Sci-Fi. And that's what I'll call you, not whatever new age feel-good crap your marketing reps thought would attract us.
Epic frakkin' fail.
By cogadh at 10:03 AM ON 03/16/09
Wow.
Just... wow.
I've seen some pretty dumb ideas before... I've come up with some dumb ideas before, but nothing, and I mean absolutely nothing, comes close to the sheer stupidity of this idea. "SyFy"... really? Do you seriously think that is brand name worth latching onto? It looks silly, it insults the intelligence of the viewers and does not even come close to evoking a single thought of the science fiction and fantasy programming that your network was built on. Pathetic, "Sci-Fi". All that NBC/Universal money and the only thing you could come up with is a lame channel re-name and the watering down of the content we love. I though NBC/Universal already owned the USA Network, we certainly don't need another one.
OH, BTW, for those of you playing "Buzzword Bingo" along with that press release, I got Bingo by the third paragraph.
By btgoss at 10:04 AM ON 03/16/09
Dave Howe, president, SCI FI, announced today "We are going to continue our drive to alienate our core Audience."
"We seek to reward 16 years of brand loyalty with a complete change of our programming." Added the soon to be unemployed Howe.
"Wrestling, Ghost Plumbers, horrible low budget films. This is what we want to be known for, and with the end of quality shows like Battlestar Galactica it is a goal I know we can reach."
By kenseido at 10:04 AM ON 03/16/09
Truly one of the stupider marketing ploys ever done. Like New Coke. Obviously the execs aren't serious about their image or sci-fi.
By Eric J at 10:05 AM ON 03/16/09
Next year's rebranding:
Skifee - Entertain Biggerer
By xadrian at 10:08 AM ON 03/16/09
This is utterly ridiculous. You should be ashamed of yourselves.
By ulic at 10:11 AM ON 03/16/09
Eric J,
Only if they hire George W. Bush to do their marketing... :)
By Braindonut at 10:11 AM ON 03/16/09
Screw you guys. Your channel has already been growing less and less engaging over the last few years. This is the last straw.
You're dead to me.
By FirstTime at 10:12 AM ON 03/16/09
I've never posted to anything before---but this is the dumbest thing I've ever heard. Sci Fi has always been a major disappointment---and I am a professional in the industry---such a shame....
By RORR at 10:13 AM ON 03/16/09
I think there seems to be a large public out cry against the stupidity of renaming the Scifi channel. Do you think the idiots that run this station will get the hint? I think not. Why is it that no one will stand up for Science Fiction and what it is at its core. As far as I'm concerned there is one show here I watch and thats Battlestar Galactica. When thats gone, the science in scifi will be gone with the name.
By vandal at 10:15 AM ON 03/16/09
As if my Monday wasn't bad enough. And now this drivel. wtf?
*Crawls into a corner and weeps.*
By danmac at 10:15 AM ON 03/16/09
Did a quick scan of the comments and they seem to be universally against this stupid, pointless, change-for-change's-sake. Just proves SciFi (or SyFy) doesn't listen to its audience. This will occur - guaranteed.
By TheLagBeast at 10:16 AM ON 03/16/09
It must be nice to know that we "scifi" folks really have no where else to go. syfy? Seriously? WTF is syfy? I know what scifi is and I cherish the fact that I'm a closet nerd.
If an outsider to this warren doesn't understand what the term scifi means changing the term will not endure them to our cause. It only causes the core to search for a medium which strives to be pure.
Good luck scifi. I'm off to find greener pastures as soon as they are available.
By James at 10:17 AM ON 03/16/09
So.... SCI FI channel is just going to be yet another channel with reruns of fing survivor? Great. Not renewing my subscription.
By Iourn at 10:27 AM ON 03/16/09
This is an April fool that leaked two weeks early, right?
By NietzschesGhost at 10:27 AM ON 03/16/09
Wow, just wow, I loved this channel when it first came on. Over the last few years I've seen all the shows that made watching the channel be replaced by crappy reality shows or snake vs boa 13(or whatever lame fake creature they think of that week). The network has strayed so far from it's purpose that I barely watch it anymore, and after Galactica is over I'll no more reason to watch at all. Goodbye Scifi, you've been dead for a while, but you've finally just announced it.
By Gojiro at 10:29 AM ON 03/16/09
The new name is ridiculous, and the tagline is beyond stupid. You people really have no clue who your core audience is, do you? Good luck finding viewers after the Galactica run ends this Friday.
By NietzschesGhost at 10:30 AM ON 03/16/09
Wow, just wow, I loved this channel when it first came on. Over the last few years I've seen all the shows that made watching the channel worth it be replaced by crappy reality shows or snake vs boa 13(or whatever lame fake creature they think of that week). The network has strayed so far from it's purpose that I barely watch it anymore, and after Galactica is over I'll no more reason to watch at all. Goodbye Scifi, you've been dead for a while, but you've finally just announced it.
By Elric at 10:31 AM ON 03/16/09
Science fiction as a genre has always been hit or miss. For every Dune there has been a Plan 9 From Outer Space. The programming on the Sci-Fi/SyFy channel has been no different. This channel has had its Dune's (literally, both miniseries were stellar by the way) and quite a few Plan 9's. From its inception I always expected this network to have a portion of "filler" material that was more fluff than substance. True creativity is hard, and the fact is that we must always pan the stream waiting for that one gold nugget hidden in the silt. One purpose for blogs is that the people may be heard. SCIFI I beg you hear the people. Listen to the people. These are the voices of your viewership. If you implement the changes you suggest, then you're just USA (yes, I know they're your sister station) Network. Enough has been said on this page for you to get the point. The question is: Will you?
By Jeff at 10:31 AM ON 03/16/09
This is what happens when you feed your marketing department after midnight.
By The HellJack at 10:32 AM ON 03/16/09
Like anyone who has anything to do with any sort of decision making will read this...
What a dumb, friggin' move this is. I mean, I can understand "The Nashville Network" changing it's name to "The National Network", then eventually to "Spike". But this, this seems like a needless change in some sort of effort to distance yourselves from what brought you to this dance in the first place.
Just another hipster move, in this hillbillys opinion.
By xored at 10:33 AM ON 03/16/09
This is BS. Well with BSG going off air this week I had nothing left I wanted to watch anyway so I guess it is best for them. Because spending money to make more good shows like BSG cost to much money.
By AngryJonny at 10:34 AM ON 03/16/09
IS THIS A FRAKKIN' JOKE?!?
"Syfy allows us to build on our 16-year heritage of success with a new brand built on the power that fuels our genre: the imagination."
Aw, shut up, Howe! You're babbling corporate nonsense and everyone at "Siffy" should be ashamed at themselves for not speaking up about how ludicrous this decision was.
By tappy at 10:34 AM ON 03/16/09
A difference that makes no difference, is no difference
By The Movie Whore at 10:37 AM ON 03/16/09
This is a joke right?
I mean no human being could be that stupid as to think this is a good idea right?
Holy WTF are people doing?
I want to know what drugs the people at corporate are on and then I want some of those drugs. Anything that could make this sound like a good idea has got be some heavy duty sh*t.
You people cancel Farscape, which is easilyt one of the greatest Scifi shows ever nd then you still have me scratching my head of the whole ECW thing and now this douche bag move. Seriously WTF do yo people think you are doing? You can't just change an entire genre like that for no good reason. I read your reasoning and it sucks. It is nothing but bullsh*t fluff to try and convince yourselves this is a good thing when everyone knows it is one of the worst f*cking ideas ever.
I guess that means we kiss any decent show that was on the channel goodbye.You stupid f*cks you had a great thing going and were really starting to turn the corner and know you have screwed the pooch.
Who ever the f*cktard is that came up with this idea should hung at the end of a short rope from a tall tree, then shot, then disemboweled, then skinned, then burned then buried in sh*t. For all of you that are going along with his bullsh*t, same treatment.
By Lazlo at 10:42 AM ON 03/16/09
Works for me. Now I simply cancel my expanded satellite channel selection since there WON'T BE a SciFi channel anymore. Hmmm. No SG-1. No Atlantis. No Farscape. No BSG. But there will be more pseudo exciting ghost cr@p. B-O-R-I-N-G.
Forry Ackerman is probably relieved they are no longer using his coined term -- afterall, he's ghost material now himself.
By Khozyain at 10:43 AM ON 03/16/09
I know this won't be answered, but did the Sci-Fi Channel actually do some marketing studies or actually speak to their viewers? This sounds like the whim of the moment, and a bad whim it is. Sci-Fi Channel has insulted the viewers that got them here, and the REAL genre of science fiction - not the big snake, spooky ghost, wrestle mania garbage.
By DUMBIDEA at 10:44 AM ON 03/16/09
LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME
By monkeybaby at 10:45 AM ON 03/16/09
For real? When a science fiction programming channel decides that 'SciFi' is not a term they want to be associated with, you have to worry. I'm sure your focus groups and your marketing department all had fantastic reasons for this idiotic change of name... but here's a radical thought... why not canvas the opinions of scifi fans? Or was that too obvious? Seriously... this is a joke, right?
By jeswel at 10:46 AM ON 03/16/09
This is ridiculous. You are ruining my favorite channel. first the programming and now you've even destroyed the name. What are you people thinking?!?!?!
By monkeybaby at 10:47 AM ON 03/16/09
For real? When a science fiction programming channel decides that 'SciFi' is not a term they want to be associated with, you have to worry. I'm sure your focus groups and your marketing department all had fantastic reasons for this idiotic change of name... but here's a radical thought... why not canvas the opinions of scifi fans? Or was that too obvious? Seriously... this is a joke, right?
By TC at 10:50 AM ON 03/16/09
Here's the problem: "something for everyone" isn't the way to win in the current media environment. Pick something - one thing - and do it *better* than anybody else.
It's as if the suits at SciFi fell into a time warp to 1950, and they think they're one of the three networks. At that time, you needed programming that had a broad appeal. But that ain't the game anymore, folks.
I'd be 100% ok with this branding decision if it hadn't have come with the marketing double-speak. I understand the business decision behind wanting a name that can be protected IP. I get that, so the name change isn't what bothers me. It's the douchey "something for everyone" language in the press release that's troubling.
Sci-Fi isn't going to keep its record viewership for long if it follows that strategy.
By bob at 10:51 AM ON 03/16/09
I don't have a problem with the change. As one of those "business school idiots" twice removed, it's the evolution of a brand - which is what the who release/article is about. It's not like they made up some crappy name like "Spike TV." It's still SciFi, just slightly different so that the channel can truly justify things like fantasy, horror, or different programming like the new gamer reality show.
I watch television for the shows, not the "network" name. If SyFy has shows you want to watch, are really going to say, "screw it, it's not spelled Sci-Fi anymore?" Come on, there's worse things in the word people...
By RORR at 10:52 AM ON 03/16/09
This just in, a random sampling of the comments on this thread seem to indicate that the execs have looked at far to much LOLcatz.
By Scott at 10:54 AM ON 03/16/09
Once BSG ends on Friday I will not need to bother with the network formerly known as Sci-Fi ever again.
By darkshdo at 10:56 AM ON 03/16/09
This will be when I finally cancel my subscription. The Sci-Fi channel has been getting progressively worse for years, due to out-of-touch programming an an inherent lack of ability to listen to fan's criticism. How sad - used to be a great channel!
By Spinster at 10:56 AM ON 03/16/09
My first thought when I read the article was that they hired a group of 12 year old girls to rename their channel.
"Let's put 'y's where the 'i's were. It will be totally wicked awesome."
To be fair, I can understand SciFi's reasoning. True science fiction fans are generally a loyal and intelligent group of people, but less popular and numerous than many other genres. That does not mean we should be belittled. I imagine it is too late to reconsider, but I wish you would.
By jaco1966 at 10:57 AM ON 03/16/09
OMG!! The Syphilis Channel? Did these execs get bailout money to be this fraking stupid? True enough that the canceling of Farscape what out of line....wrestling?? WTF? I thought I was going to keel over that day. Now...this BS!!! Profit before preference, I guess...this is what happens when a cable channel gets bought out by the network or when a corporate monstrosity tries to manipulate an orginal idea just to garner more ratings while losing the core of the story itself (remember TNT and Babylon 5???). This is just another sick and twisted concept from the people who brought you crap like "Snakehead Terror" and Anaconda 12!! As soon as BSG is over, we'll be tuning out...Stargate is dead and there isn't anything else except horrible movies that don't even deserve "B" or cult status. I don't mind Ghost Hunters, but I do mind having my intelligence insulted by a corporate entity that would rather cater to ignorant and easily entertainable masses. "So Long and thank for all the Fish" guys....you stink.
By darkshdo at 10:58 AM ON 03/16/09
This will be when I finally cancel my subscription. The Sci-Fi channel has been getting progressively worse for years, due to out-of-touch programming an an inherent lack of ability to listen to fan's criticism. How sad - used to be a great channel!
By angry_fan at 10:59 AM ON 03/16/09
please, please, please don't sabotage your image any further by making a stupid change like this!
it is already painful enough that the only 'science fiction' channel has stooped to the level of wrestling and trash reality show, don't try harder to drive the rest of your loyal (and vanishing) fan base away!
By darkshdo at 10:59 AM ON 03/16/09
This will be when I finally cancel my subscription. The Sci-Fi channel has been getting progressively worse for years, due to out-of-touch programming an an inherent lack of ability to listen to fan's criticism. How sad - used to be a great channel!
By Tempus13 at 11:00 AM ON 03/16/09
I find it curious that anyone is suprised by this. It's just an inevitable conclusion to where the programming has been going the past several years.
And despite our collective disdain for some of the really crappy programming they show, like the Monster Fests, the sad reality is that people are tuning in to watch them. If people watch them, they get advertising dollars, and the channel makes money. That's all they care about.
"Without abandoning our legacy or our core audience,"
The sad thing is they don't realized they've already done this. What few members of the 'core audence' remain will be switching off, probably with the end of BSG now that Atlantis and SG1 are also gone.
By darkshdo at 11:01 AM ON 03/16/09
This will be when I finally cancel my subscription. The Sci-Fi channel has been getting progressively worse for years, due to out-of-touch programming an an inherent lack of ability to listen to fan's criticism. How sad - used to be a great channel!
By mrz80 at 11:01 AM ON 03/16/09
Why are we on this motorcycle, and what's that shark doing there?
By honestpuck at 11:02 AM ON 03/16/09
The comments so far say it all. I'm more than annoyed to discover that my hobbies and interests aren't cool. I save up all year for "geeky" things like Dragon*Con and spend my minuscule amount of extra cash on DVDs and books in the sci-fi genre, only to have the channel that brought us shows like BSG and Farscape, and even fan favorites like Stargate and its spin offs is going to do something so very insulting and pointless.. This is a change that can only appeal to the 12 to 20 crowd who aren't watching anyway.
In this era of geek culture becoming more mainstream, there's NO excuse for the kind of disregard they're showing the core viewing audience: people who have loved the genre from Star Trek and Lost in Space to people who delightedly discovered it when their friends made them watch BSG. People who can spell, and insist on doing so, even in text messages.
Why aren't they becoming and enriching the sci-fi brand we all love and spend our fortunes on, instead of dumbing it down to make it more palatable to people who can't possible care anyway.
By wraithfodder42 at 11:03 AM ON 03/16/09
It's a joke, as in changing the name isn't going to do anything. Unless they drop the dreck like wrestling, hacked-up (edited) horror movies and the like, it's the same old channel.
WIthout Stargate and Battlestar Galactica, the channel will lose viewers, and I don't know if SGU is going to make up for those two shows.
I'd love to be the consultant that sold the channel this bill of foods.
Imagine greater? Sheesh.
By Tempus13 at 11:03 AM ON 03/16/09
If only they would at least launch a "SCI-FI Classics" channel that would feature true Sci-Fi programs that fans actually want to wact.
By DeaconBlue at 11:04 AM ON 03/16/09
This really could not be more lame. All this indicates to me is that you're not taking your audience or programming seriously. I expect that you'll start moving away from your core programming and offering more crap ala MTV.
By the Ramen Noodle at 11:04 AM ON 03/16/09
You're not actually serious, are you? Everything in all intelligence is screaming that this is just an early April Fool's Day joke.
Syfy. Seriously? Siff-ee? Sie-fee? See-fee? See-fie? Why not make another lame move and call it Psyfy?
What acne-faced, squeaky-voice, two-week intern came up with this ridiculous name? Come on, it's not even "cool"! If it was SYFY and that was somehow and acronym for something, then okay. But Syfy?
It's stupid. There. I said it in simple terms that people of all groups can understand. Or, should I say:
It Stupyd
Imagine Dumber.
By Tempus13 at 11:04 AM ON 03/16/09
If only they would at least launch a "SCI-FI Classics" channel that would feature true Sci-Fi programs that fans actually want to wact.
By AliensvsLordoftheTrekWars at 11:08 AM ON 03/16/09
Sy FRY!!
By shayd at 11:09 AM ON 03/16/09
Anyone remember a series called Earth 2? It was a short lived offereing by people who admitted in press conferences that they didn't really like science fiction (some of them taking pride in the fact that they'd never read Asimov, Clarke, Hienlein, etc) and that they'd created this "new" show to reinvent SciFi and open it up to the masses. What the created (by committe) was a pathetic (and occasionally unintentionally funny) popcorn ball of cliches, camp, and tired themes that had all be done before (and better) by people who actually DID enjoy Sci-Fi and actually RELATED to their target audiences at a basic level.
"SyFy" and the whole branding initiative is a clear sign that somebody in an oversized corner office not only does not relate to us, but doesn't even respect us enough to realize what a dumb and alienating idea this is.
I understand the business points they'd trying to make, but alienating an established customer base in a weak economy is bad business and whoever cooked up this "extend the brand" initiative should have noticed that (or at least run it by a few thousand focus groups before going public). "Imagine Greater" is the "new coke" of our time, it's cliche, condescending and, ironically, it lacks so much imagination it isn't funny (unless you count the fantasy land the marketing boys are living in when they thought this was going to be well received.
Here's a thought, if the parent company wants a SyFy channel, THEN LAUNCH ONE. Fill it with new programming, wrestling, Ghost Hunters, Who wants to be a super hero?, monster of the week films and all the other shlock that has marginal appeal to the die hard SCI-FI fans. Then, in the time slots openned up getting rid of all the "broad audience appeal" materials fill the Sci-Fi channel with the shows we know and love. I'd take reruns of Babylon 5, ST:DS9, and Farscape over half the stuff they're currently airing. For that matter, Wresting makes the "Pigs in Space" segment from the muppet show look good.
It's really hard to believe that the organization that brought us ten years of SG1 and the Dune miniseries has come to this. It's just one bad decision after another, green lighting garbage projects, cancelling their best shows and trying to market "imagination" to an audience that is smart enought to realize they're selling buzz words vaporware.
It this goes through, they'll have a brand all right; A WARNING LABEL, one that tells every sci-fi loving person in the world who dares to dream: "don't waste your time with this they don't understand you and don't respect you, they just hope your gullable enough to waste time and money on them."
I really hope somebody from Sci-Fi actually reads these things...
By hutch at 11:11 AM ON 03/16/09
Pointless change... but I guess with the exodus of the bulk of the actual Sci-Fi Programming it was inevitable... still not cool at all...
By BestBrainsInc at 11:12 AM ON 03/16/09
Well everyone, at least now they're doing what they'd planned all along. The programming will still be terrible, no doubt, but now the fact that the emperor has no clothes is in the forefront.
What I like to call "Bonnie Hammer syndrome" has been pervasive at that channel ever since she failed upward, from incompetent SCI FI President to incompetent President of NBC Universal Cable. They see no profit motive in the genre so they're "branching out". But why retain the name with different spelling? That's just bizarre.
In any case, it's all good, IMHO. I can count on one hand the number of times I've watched that channel in the past few years. What it was once to the genre has been dead and buried for more than a decade now. So now their intent is laid bare - once their new branding campaign and the relaunch happen - for all to see, and they can continue to program pablum with a shiny "new" moniker.
By brianh at 11:12 AM ON 03/16/09
I am not going to whine about it. I am just going to send a message the only way I can. Stop watching.
By BestBrainsInc at 11:14 AM ON 03/16/09
Well everyone, at least now they're doing what they'd planned all along. The programming will still be terrible, no doubt, but now the fact that the emperor has no clothes is in the forefront.
What I like to call "Bonnie Hammer syndrome" has been pervasive at that channel ever since she failed upward, from incompetent SCI FI President to incompetent President of NBC Universal Cable. They see no profit motive in the genre so they're "branching out". But why retain the name with different spelling? That's just bizarre.
In any case, it's all good, IMHO. I can count on one hand the number of times I've watched that channel in the past few years. What it was once to the genre has been dead and buried for more than a decade now. So now their intent is laid bare - once their new branding campaign and the relaunch happen - for all to see, and they can continue to program pablum with a shiny "new" moniker.
By Leah at 11:14 AM ON 03/16/09
What's the point in trying to 'copyright' the sci-fi genre with your new special phonetic spelling when you're not showing a whole lot of actual sci-fi on your syfy channel to begin with? I don't see the point, personally.
By NotAvailable at 11:14 AM ON 03/16/09
This is the dumbest thing I have ever read. I mean seriously, if SCI-FI did ANY kind of polling or focus studies about this proposed new name at ComicCon or another venue with SCI-FI's demographic, I would be 100% sure we would all say the same thing... "What a stupid F***ing idea!" Does this really need to be done? All the explanations in this article sound like marketing BS. Just because you want a unique, trademarkable name?!?! You've been SCI-FI for 16 years, stop trying to re-invent yourself! Just concentrate on what you do well and stick to that!
Oh and P.S. Wrestling has no place on Sci-Fi! Unless it is an ALIEN wrestling PREDATOR or ROBOCOP wrestling TERMINATOR, I'll never watch it. It is truly a waste of air time. Pretty soon you will be showing everything other than Sci-Fi, like MTV now barely shows any music videos. (I miss MTV, where they showed nothing but music videos 24/7... now it's another crap network.)
By Parafan at 11:16 AM ON 03/16/09
Can anyone say "the new Coke?" And we all know how well that worked out.
By rudy at 11:19 AM ON 03/16/09
Count me in as another long time watching saying BuhBye! The horror and wrestling were a deep erosion of quality programming, the new reality shows limited my watching to one night a week. Siffy?? That just means that after BSGs last episode I take the channel out of my remote's favorites scroll.
That's what you want right? Your goal was the elimination of longterm watchers, just like when NBC took over Bravo and gutted it of everything that made it Bravo. Hmm. Come to think of it, maybe I'll just take all the NBC affiliates off the remote, and torrent the one or two shows that survive NBC's idiocy.
By whahaa at 11:19 AM ON 03/16/09
hahahahaHAHAHAAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
By CopyChief at 11:20 AM ON 03/16/09
Beware the ides of March, for it marks the beginning of the end of common sense.
This channel does own the genre on subscription TV. It's called SciFi. Why? So fans of the genre know where to find it and know what to expect. Folks who don't like it will stay away.
OK, so the folks in the executive offices want to broaden the appeal of the station. It has happened numerous times on cable, really, so this isn't a first. It's understandable from a corporate perspective, but from a modern point of view, it doesn't make sense.
Media consumers are used to hypertargeted channels and messages, they don't want generic washed-out content. They want a station that speaks to them.
For example, SciFi fans want SciFi. People who don't like Science Fiction don't want SyFy, and still won't watch.
If you're going to rebrand (please don't), do it all the way. Embrace your old identity, or hold on to your current one. You can't have it both ways. And if you try, you're going to have a diluted product that alienates everyone.
So please... I beg you... go back to the drawing board on this one.
By Amazonagent at 11:21 AM ON 03/16/09
SyFy, really? That's just the hackiest of the hack names you can use. It's sad but that's how things are shaping up in the television world. Maybe SyFy should have taken their own newly branded tagline to heart and Imagined Greater when it came to trying to revitalize their name/channel. :-/
By Captain Jack Harkness at 11:23 AM ON 03/16/09
Well, the execs at SciFi cancelled MST3K and Farscape, now they've made the dumbest decision ever and cancelled their own channel and they've all got SyFy. Good for them. I hope it makes them rot.
When BSG ends Friday, so does my caring whether the channel and the website are still around or what they're called. Actually, my caring about the website ends now, I've seen too many of my comments deleted in the last few days. This one will probably be deleted in 3, 2, 1...
By ctmm at 11:24 AM ON 03/16/09
after Enterprise Series is done I am done with Scifi.
By Nelzie at 11:24 AM ON 03/16/09
SciFi Channel specifically states what the channel is about.
Syfy? What the hell does that mean?
This smacks of "Change for the sake of change!" and quite frankly, change for the sake of change is often the most foolish of things for any business/product to do.
This had better be nothing more than a "viral" marketing project for some actually new and unique SciFi Channel movie/show. If it isn't, then you have entered a realm of listening to stupid nimrods in marketing/advertising who are attempting to justify their outrageous paychecks.
Fire those idiots. Fire them now.
By closetotheedge at 11:25 AM ON 03/16/09
Dumb and dumber. Just when it has become cool to be into SCIFI (despite Wrestling!?!?! - what’s up with that?), now it’s shifting into some questionably pronounceable crap that divorces itself from the core content that has made the SCIFI channel so great. I have no problem with 'remarketing' when it is needed and warranted, but it isn’t in this case. Why not just change the name to PSIPHI (and spell it with the Greek letters). At least that would be true to the kind of people (ever growing) who actually tune in. Or… leave it alone like the other ‘real networks’ have done for 70 years. SCIFI has made it; don’t blow it.
By Monopoly_J at 11:26 AM ON 03/16/09
This is the most pointless name change for something ever. There is pride in being SciFi and enjoying Science Fiction.
It's not a lack of interest in Science Fiction that may be causing decline in viewers; its a lack of quality programming.
Don't assume that because you change the name people (including the female audience that you want) that people will suddenly watch the programming more.
By CPU-REV3.8 at 11:30 AM ON 03/16/09
Wow and I thought FOX was the only network that liked to sabotage themselves.
Well I hope you get crabs to go along with your syfilus.
By Air at 11:30 AM ON 03/16/09
Did anyone of your staff actually ask the public if they liked this idea? Because it's stupid. Literally, how this got through your marketing and PR departments is beyond me. You are going to lose viewers.
By Kaden at 11:31 AM ON 03/16/09
If a 9 year old doesn't get it ... it is an error. Don't be so clever that you muck it up.
By TVSciFi at 11:32 AM ON 03/16/09
Why not just call it "Imagine"? Syfy? How about WTF?
Anyone want to start a real sciFi and Fantasy network? I have the domain ;-) TVSciFi dot com
By RupanIII at 11:33 AM ON 03/16/09
How about No? No no no no no. We are a no nonsense people and this seems like Nonesense. Teleporter copy Rieker's = About time, Multiversing DS9 was mostly ho hum. Stargate did multiverse real well, considering they were shifting through using the power of black holes. Stuff like that make us sci fi fans among the most critical but loyal watchers in all of TV. I don't care if the Wire stays right, the whole network needs to get a nun in here and crack some knuckles of whatever buttplugs thought that was going to be a great idea. No, not interested in it. Reminds me of Mutual of Omaha Insurance becoming Conseco Life and having Alex Trebek shave his mustache. Nobody knew who they were anymore. It's dumber than naming your network after your dog (Spike TV).
By T.J. at 11:35 AM ON 03/16/09
Yet again we see how stupid the exec's at SCI-FI are.... Lets totally alienate all sci-fi fans... sure thats sounds great...... STUPID!
SO its phonetically identical... SO WHAT!
By thedevlin at 11:35 AM ON 03/16/09
This "innocent" re branding is obviously step one in changing the direction of programing. imagine Greater - I'm guessing that would be greater revenue from Wrestling? Certainly not greater quality sci-fi. i agree with Dumbidea: LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME LAME
By Michael Hinman at 11:36 AM ON 03/16/09
As the person who actually created the name more than a decade ago, although I no longer have any connection or ownership to it, I can guarantee you I was not 12 years old or a girl when I came up with it. =P
I am a bit biased, but I love the name. Of course, I lived with it for more than 10 years and that made a difference. People in the beginning in 1998 told me it was a dumb name, but it was a successful brand for my site for a very long time. We were hesitant to part with it ...
But I say let's give it a chance. I know that we, as humans, aren't a big fan of change ... but if we at least give it a chance to see where it goes, maybe we'll be surprised.
I've always been a big supporter of SciFi Channel, and while I wish they would sometimes make some better programming decisions, I still tune in as much as I can. :)
By CS at 11:37 AM ON 03/16/09
So, changing the name is going to make things better. Great idea! Let me try!
Here's a turd, but instead of a turd, I'm changing it's name to Sandwich. This will allow me to branch out and introduce something to people they never expected!
Have a bite!
I wondered how long the Sci Fi channel would last. It's the ONLY reason I ever bothered with cable, and now, satellite.
It's been proven time and again; if you stick to what you know, you'll be alright. If you try to be everything to everybody, you'll go right down the tubes.
Of course, what's proof to these guys?
Oh well. Times are changing. Soon, instead of paying money for DirectTV, TIVO, and all that jazz, I'll be able to watch my favorate shows for free on the internet.
And when some 14 year old kid hacks together some programs that allow me to download these shows and remove the ads, all well be well.
Meanwhile, Sci Fi will go straight to the toilet, like MTV.
It's a shame.
Oh, and that WORTHLESS Captcha nonsense is a perfect indicator of your contempt for your audience.
Good Work!
By Roger Workman at 11:39 AM ON 03/16/09
One Syfy exec's expansion of scope is another viewer's dilution of Sci Fi programming.
By Lummy at 11:39 AM ON 03/16/09
Overheard at the watercooler:
"Will this name change make us more popular than our original movies?"
"Dunno, 'siffy, at best."
It's ok, it's not like we had a "sci-fi" channel for the last few years anyway, this just makes it official. With the end of BSG and the Stargates gone, I'll be able to remove the channel from my list of favorites.
No, I have no faith in this new Stargate series.
I guess I can quit harassing Time Warner about obtaining the HD feed, too.
By BT at 11:40 AM ON 03/16/09
I was going to say this idea is pretty "stupid," but I think it would be better to write "stoopid," which firmly establishes a uniquely ownable trademark that is portable across all nonlinear digital platforms and beyond.
By nonfreak at 11:40 AM ON 03/16/09
This is how they'll get more people to watch perhaps? They've been expanding their programing thus far anyway. I don't see how changing the name to something I'm likely not to remember will expand what they show on the channel. YOU HAVE WRESTLING ON IT FOR GOD'S SAKE! Why not just call yourselves "the channel" and they just put any old thing on? Will we eventually be seeing old episodes of "all in the family" on the station as well? Crap, why not, we can watch wrestling now.
By nonfreak at 11:41 AM ON 03/16/09
This is how they'll get more people to watch perhaps? They've been expanding their programing thus far anyway. I don't see how changing the name to something I'm likely not to remember will expand what they show on the channel. YOU HAVE WRESTLING ON IT FOR GOD'S SAKE! Why not just call yourselves "the channel" and they just put any old thing on? Will we eventually be seeing old episodes of "all in the family" on the station as well? Crap, why not, we can watch wrestling now.
By BT at 11:41 AM ON 03/16/09
I was going to say this idea is pretty "stupid," but I think it would be better to write "stoopid," which firmly establishes a uniquely ownable trademark that is portable across all nonlinear digital platforms and beyond.
By nonfreak at 11:41 AM ON 03/16/09
This is how they'll get more people to watch perhaps? They've been expanding their programing thus far anyway. I don't see how changing the name to something I'm likely not to remember will expand what they show on the channel. YOU HAVE WRESTLING ON IT FOR GOD'S SAKE! Why not just call yourselves "the channel" and they just put any old thing on? Will we eventually be seeing old episodes of "all in the family" on the station as well? Crap, why not, we can watch wrestling now.
By Brucethespruce at 11:45 AM ON 03/16/09
This is a dumb dumb move. If there is any network exec out there who is reading these READ THIS. Whenever you google or search for the generic topic of Sci-Fi, the first thing that comes up is Sci-Fi network, which is free and easy marketing to a targeted population. I have not and will not be searching for SyFy, which in turn means the added specificity, LIMITS YOUR MARKETING POTENTIAL. Your vision is in your product, not your name.
By Jeremy from Seattle at 11:47 AM ON 03/16/09
Really? Like its been said above me (I assume because there are so many comments), this sounds like an excuse to dilute the already watery SciFi-ness of the channel.
How about spending some of that marketing money to get syndication of real SciFi shows, classics and newer series alike.
How about educating views on the history of SciFi by showing and critiquing classic movies.
How about getting rid of (or at LEAST cutting back on) the goddamned fakey GhostHunters.
And wrestling? Really?
By Al at 11:47 AM ON 03/16/09
Why ruin an accurate abbreviation to Science Fiction? Perhaps wrestling and reality shows are more interesting to the station now.
What will SYFY stand for?
Syonara to Fans of Yesterday?
I guess it's time to start looking elsewhere for great science fiction television.
By sparrrownightmare at 11:48 AM ON 03/16/09
Okay.. Now I know the management at SciFi is smoking crack or some other recreational chemical.... WHAT THE (%&^ ARE THEY THINKING!?!?!?!
Maybe if they tried actually putting on some decent programming, losing stuff like ECW, and actually stop mucking around with the programming schedule every other day, they would get some of their viewership back.
By serko92 at 11:49 AM ON 03/16/09
This "SyFy" channel is dead to me now, but the moment Time Warner comes up with an a-la-carte plan, it will be history as well.
By Bewildered at 11:50 AM ON 03/16/09
BAD MOVE.
Why do companies feel the need to change their well-known name and brand into something new and invariably ridiculous? Mid-life crisis?
Some years back a number of major British companies renamed themselves to be "hip", to universal derision.
If you have a good name and reputation, you don't throw it away!
By yyyyy at 11:51 AM ON 03/16/09
y kynd yf lyky yt mysylf
By Katmanken at 11:53 AM ON 03/16/09
Don't except this logo around for a long time. It will probably be re-branded to something like Adventure TV, NBC 2 , or something a little more mainstream. This is all about money and not providing good Sci fi for the niche fans of Science Fiction.
Wrestling and the reality shows (like Ghost hunters) bring in the most consistent high-ish ratings for them and is cheap to make. Unlike shows like Stargate and Eureka which are super expensive. Most advertisers want to reach the maximum number of people so "mainstream" shows are where they are spending their money now and not of the niche stuff.
Don't be surprised when shows like Burn Notice, Monk, or more cross showing of NBC shows like they did with Chuck and Bionic Woman start showing up as filler shows in prime time slots to draw more people into this channel.
By muckraker at 11:53 AM ON 03/16/09
Please, please don't tell me this is just a way for them to add more tasteless, inappropriate crap like wrestling, ghost hunters and that ilk. UGH!!!!
By BestBrainsInc at 11:56 AM ON 03/16/09
And the sad thing is that, though almost every comment illustrates how stupid and inane the name "change" to Syfy is, the suits at NBC Universal think this decision is a winner.
How deluded they are. The mind boggles at their level of incompetence.
By Horace at 11:59 AM ON 03/16/09
E-C-Dub! E-C-Dub!
I hope ECW gets expanded to two hours.
By BestBrainsInc at 12:00 PM ON 03/16/09
And the sad thing is that, though almost every comment illustrates how stupid and inane the name "change" to Syfy is, the suits at NBC Universal think this decision is a winner.
How deluded they are. The mind boggles at their level of incompetence.
By syfyisastupidname at 12:02 PM ON 03/16/09
Yeah, the paragraphy about "trademarks" is what it all boils down to. You think we're so stupid as to buy that you just want to "expand"? You ALREADY HAVE fantasy, mystery, etc. No. Sadly, this is all about the money and executive meddling. The SAME THINGS that killed the first two Stargate shows and countless others.
As for "growing ratings"...well, after killing the Stargates and your only other anchor (BSG), don't expect anything huge. I'll watch SGU, but you and MGM have infuriated a ton of the fanbase for killing SGA when it was doing the best it ever had (as far as story, etc.). If SGU fails, what are you planning to draw people in with? Ghost Hunters and Sanctuary? Good shows, but LAME anchors. (Dresden Files were better than Sanctuary and was basically the same thing.) Maybe when you trademark some more Megalodons it will bring in better ratings?
Please, we know where you're going with this and if you need the money through making easier trademarks, go ahead. Just don't insult the fans by making it sound like it's going to be something incredibly new and good for them. You're not thinking of the fans (no, thinking of ratings and demographics is not the same as thinking of fans).
Oh, and by the way, things like ECW and creature flicks are not good draws.
By Horace Heyman at 12:03 PM ON 03/16/09
I hope ECW gets expanded to two hours.
E-C-Dub! E-C-Dub!
By J. at 12:04 PM ON 03/16/09
That name change is just plain silly. Plus, "Image Greater" is, um, well, I'm not sure what it is.
By spaxspore at 12:04 PM ON 03/16/09
Wow just wow...
Canceled all the good show and brought on the Reality BS and wrestling...!!!!??? Wrestling...
Sci Fi (syfy) started going down hill when they canceled one of the best shows every to grace television - farscape.
This is just another nail in their coffin.
Congratulates you lost another loyal viewer .
By Stargazer72 at 12:05 PM ON 03/16/09
two words.... New Coke
By BestBrainsInc at 12:06 PM ON 03/16/09
And I don't know what's worse - this non-rebranding rebranding or the inane love letter David Howe, SCI FI/Syfy President, kept giving to text messaging in that New York Times article. What is he, fourteen?
By anachronite at 12:06 PM ON 03/16/09
I keep coming back to this thread and all I see is negative reaction. When I look at the 3d logo at the top of the page, I am in complete disbelief. What a bunch of morons. The person responcible should be fired, then tarred and feathered. What kind of frakking cesspool of idiots are running this channel? With BSG ending, wrestling showing, brain dead shows like ghost hunters and destination truth, and nothing else good in sight, it's painfully obvious they have no idea who their core audience is, and what they want to see. We want science fiction!!!!!!!
Then again maybe they are not stupid and they don't care about the sci-fi audience. They are dumbing down the channel to the lowest common denomiator and trying to appeal to an entirely different audience than the one that has been watching for the decade +.
If they are really going through with this ridiculous change, I won;t be watching anymore, and they should kick off SyFy premiere week with mulitple showings of "Idiocracy".
By ravenchild at 12:07 PM ON 03/16/09
Alas, poor Sci Fi. I knew him, Horatio. A place of infinite possibility, of most excellent fancy. Now he bores me a thousand times, and now how abhorr'd in my imagination is he. My gorge rises at it.
Farewell, dear Sci Fi.
With apolgies to the bard.....
By tcode at 12:10 PM ON 03/16/09
The channel has gone done hilll of late. i understand wrestling ( an easy paycheck and a few more viewers) i understand the horrrible original movies (limited budget, but occasionallly watchble and good). But the reality shows, the new web site, the disdain of what made the cahhel great to begin with, the majority of your audience won't stay.
I rember years ago. anme on Saturday, scifi weekly, old classic movies, classic dr. who, dark shadows, well written original movies; that was why people watched the channel. at this time next year will there be a difference betwen syfy and fx, tbs, tnt, or an other channel
By Roridge at 12:10 PM ON 03/16/09
worst, idea, ever
By Kevin at 12:11 PM ON 03/16/09
Considering all the paranormal crap for people whose IQ is closer to zero than 100, why not just call it "PsiFi"? Or didn't you know the "P" was silent?
Can someone PLEASE start a real SF channel?
By Gaivs at 12:11 PM ON 03/16/09
Hey, SciFi...or SyFy...whatever....I strongly suggest that whoever's ego got in the way of smart marketing best have a re-evaluation lickey split. The bleed of dedicated channel viewers will not even be close to being replaced by new demographics. Your statisical analysists are in La La land and have absolutley no clue of what the non-Neilsen viewers want. Particially with what SCI-FI can offer. Viewers will vote with their wallets on this and NBC/Universal will not be able to recover. The basics of Supply and Demand 101.
I strongly suggest to take to heart what is being written above and below me here...the masses are speaking.....
By spaxspore at 12:13 PM ON 03/16/09
LoL i had to check the calendar to make sure this wasn't some Aprils fools joke...
Guess not.
By Richtpt at 12:14 PM ON 03/16/09
OK. I can understand creating a term and brand that YOU own - you can't own SciFi or Sci-Fi as it is an entertainment category. HOWEVER, you ARE getting away from your roots of Science Fiction and becoming just another generic channel. Reality and wrestling having nothing to do with Science Fiction.
I was going to write up a big well thought out comment here, but then I realized no matter how many people speak out against the change - and more importantly the change in programming format - you won't listen to any of us, you don't care.
SciFi, it was nice knowing you.
By The Mike Vardy at 12:16 PM ON 03/16/09
WhyWhy?
By vfilipch at 12:18 PM ON 03/16/09
Absolutely stupid idea.
By this is stupid at 12:19 PM ON 03/16/09
Once again, corporate suits with dumb ideas.
You will alienate (no pun intended) your core audience.
DON'T DO IT!!
By ElementalAmber at 12:19 PM ON 03/16/09
This is ridiculous, and yet more evidence that SciFi is ignoring it's viewers. Wrestling and now, a stupid, senseless name change. It's as though they're actively working to lose fans.
By Jeffery at 12:22 PM ON 03/16/09
DUMBEST NAME EVER! Sounds like Zucker hired the same crack team that re-designed the abysmal new Pepsi logo. FAIL!
By frostygus at 12:23 PM ON 03/16/09
SyFy = "See you, Frack you" ?
By Krakn3Dfx at 12:23 PM ON 03/16/09
Wut?
Well, now that BSG is over, I guess they can concentrate on the real money makers, wrestling, crappy reality shows, stuff like that.
RIP Sci-Fi Channel, you've been on the edge of uselessness for years, now you've finally gone over the edge.
By Karl at 12:24 PM ON 03/16/09
Heh...way to completely alienate your viewership.
Nothing like a, "Hey viewers, you're all a bunch of losers so we've decided to change our name so that we can get a bunch of *other* losers to watch our channel." to tell us what you *really* think.
This would be more of a surprise if the "SciFi Channel" actually ever played any SF. (Other than BSG and Eureka...)
By Flat_File at 12:24 PM ON 03/16/09
Here's what i don't understand.... If you're going to launch some new channels, why not just move all the paranormal over to it's own channel? The ParaSciNormal channel or something . And still keep SciFi channel true to its name?
By wdwyer at 12:26 PM ON 03/16/09
Dear lord people, page after page of complaining & whining. Not one of you get it. It's about money, period. We've all known for awhile that "The Sci-Fi Channel" wasn't cutting it. All of you fans do not seem to understand that the Sci-Fi genre simply squeezes the demographic too thin to actually make a decent amount. They are changing in order to increase their "Sphere of Influence". If that means it pisses off the Sci-Fi hoard, so be it. We may not like Reality TV, I surely don't, yet even they out number us. Wake up people, you may not like it, but you can't exactly blame them. This has been a LONG, LONG time comming. If you haven't seen the writing on the wall before now, you have no one to blame but yourself!
By Debrevis de la Fontes at 12:27 PM ON 03/16/09
The logo looks like a baby product of some kind. And the name goes with it. Actually, it looks like a brand of baby powder that's trying to catch an exotic audience of mothers, but remain soft and fuzzy. This truly is one of the most boneheaded corporate decisions I've seen in my lifetime. New Coke level, boys. New Coke level.
By Ryly at 12:27 PM ON 03/16/09
"Without abandoning our legacy or our core audience..."
Sorry, Siffy, but that's what you're doing. What "creative" came up with this absurdity? Hello! Scifi fans are compulsive and fanatical. LAST thing you want to do is make a silly change like this! Wrestling was bad enough, but "imagine greater"?!?! wtf is THAT supposed to mean? What kind of testing was done with this?
Silly. Silly and stupid. Sorry, Siffy and Stupid.
By Paul Riddell at 12:30 PM ON 03/16/09
Ah. And so now I understand why I still haven't been paid for my "Christmas On Mars" review in "Science Fiction Weekly" five months ago. After all, we writers are disposable and replaceable, but good marketing drones had best get paid right away, eh?
By JayShadow at 12:34 PM ON 03/16/09
Wow, some marketing guy really ripped you guys off for absolutely no gain.
By IDIOTS at NBCUni at 12:34 PM ON 03/16/09
I knew NBC would eventually frak up this channel. It was fun while it lasted.
Time to reprogram the DVR.
By VZX at 12:35 PM ON 03/16/09
I got an idea: let the new "SyFy" create a new Boomerarng-like channel showing only old reruns of science-fiction and fantasy shows. Basically, be like the Sci-Fi Channel from the early 1990s. Call it, Re-Sci-Fi or something.
By britgeekgrrl at 12:35 PM ON 03/16/09
There's a saying in the marketing world: "Half of my work is cr*p. The problem is, I don't know which half!"
I think it's pretty clear where this bright idea lands. Whatever genius committee came up with this one - and you can bet it was a committee - needs to be shown the door.
"Syfy" - the network of the post-literate?
By scifiguy at 12:36 PM ON 03/16/09
Is it April 1 already? You must be joking!
By britgeekgrrl at 12:37 PM ON 03/16/09
There's a saying in the marketing world: "Half of my work is cr*p. The problem is, I don't know which half!"
I think it's pretty clear where this bright idea lands.
The genius committee - and you can bet it was a committee - that come up with this idea needs to be shown the door, asap.
Syfy - the network of the post-literate?
By Joe B. at 12:38 PM ON 03/16/09
Shoot! It looks like quite a few people beat me to saying what a terrifically stupid idea this is. Most of the human population already can't spell correctly. This will just confuse them more.
By Kym at 12:40 PM ON 03/16/09
Ugh. No thanks. I do not need the one and only fandom genre I have left with any smarts left in it "dumbed" down to text speak just to placate the attention deficit generation that can't add two two simple letters to spell something correctly.
Please don't do this. I value the brain cells I have left and I'm not going to waste them on a channel who'd rather appeal to the mass idiots rather then the intelligent market that is desperately seeking something that isn't as dry as the History Channel or as shock-jock as Bravo has become.
By Michael B at 12:41 PM ON 03/16/09
Wow... what focus group gave its nod to this onw? "Siffy" sounds like a venereal disease. On top of that, there is already a site called SyFy Portal... gotta pay them off too, you know.
Of course, based on SciFi's current programming, science fiction is the furthest thing from its mind... long live wrestling!
By dndgirl at 12:41 PM ON 03/16/09
FAIL! This is their dumbest idea since adding wrestling to the lineup. And BTW, dump the special guest wrestler on Halloween Live Ghost Hunters!
By agsb at 12:42 PM ON 03/16/09
SyFy is akin to New Coke and just a bad idea and a new name maybe part of some form of government bailout.
By Mad Dog at 12:42 PM ON 03/16/09
All the suits see is $. What a great idea a channel that runs quality STORIES ;{ (
By TWD at 12:42 PM ON 03/16/09
I think SyFy-Less would be a better name for the channel - especially with the introduction of wrestling.
By Gix at 12:43 PM ON 03/16/09
This is too painful to take.
By Mikey B at 12:44 PM ON 03/16/09
Man, I can't wait to watch the Syfylis channel come this summer.
What I want to know is who came up with this idea? Please tell me that this was meant to be posted on April 1st, but somebody hit the post button accidentally. But it really doesn't matter to me - with BSG ending Friday, there's no reason for me to watch the Syfylis channel now.
By Cris at 12:45 PM ON 03/16/09
You expected something better from the people who brought us the equally as pointless and lame Frankenfish and Megacroc?
By M at 12:45 PM ON 03/16/09
Never ceases to amaze that "marketing" people are paid sooo much, and given sooo much power in the business world. They are the stupidest least creative people and are the ruin of so much. I've seen so many millions of dollars thrown in the sewer by these people in their idiot campaigns. Ridiculous.
Oh, yes the whole wrestling thing, yes, well it is fantasy, so I guess it kinda fits.....
By Joe B. at 12:47 PM ON 03/16/09
Hmmm...reading through all the comments, some people here have said this is all about "branding" because the term Sci-Fi by itself is common usage and can't be turned into a brand name. Well, what the frak is wrong with "Sci-Fi Channel" for a brand name? As I already said in my other post...a terrifically stupid idea!!!
By Lamar at 12:47 PM ON 03/16/09
si-fee?
By ratskrad at 12:47 PM ON 03/16/09
As others have said this is is Frakking Lame. NBC or who ever owns Scifi these days has been killing off the real Scifi shows for some time. Can you saw Farscape, SG1 and SG Atlantis. Remember when they had real science fiction on and not the lame reality shows that are being shown. Well with the ending of BSG they will no longer have a scifi show on their network and thus I and many others will have no reason to watch this Frakking Lame excuse for a network.
Hope the rebranding and trademark works out for you as you are going to need all the revenue stream you can get. All in the name of trademarks and copyrights, just sad. Oh ya will the last real science fiction fan turn off the lights as they leave the room.
By mellystu at 12:48 PM ON 03/16/09
What new audience are they going after? The illiterate?
By wxman at 12:49 PM ON 03/16/09
NBC has killed every cable channel they've bought. This is just one more shining example. This just means less sci-fi and more wrestling and inane reality shows. Goodbye Sci-Fi Channel, I knew thee well.....
By Akula at 12:50 PM ON 03/16/09
I think they're trying to tell us something: SyFy = Shut Your Frakkin Yap and watch what we tell you to watch! Garbage in the marketing door garbage out the cable box. This goes so far beyond stupid it defies description. I have to admit its been brewing for quite some time but just like an accident you see coming and can't avoid the actual pain of the impact rattles the brain. I'll just turn my chair around and go watch the grass grow. Far more entertaining.
By NickelNDime at 12:50 PM ON 03/16/09
SyFy - Imagine dumber. Oh wait, you don't need to imagine it, it's here with the SyFy channel. Well, it was nice while it lasted, which wasn't very long.
By Nealzilla at 12:50 PM ON 03/16/09
See you, Frak you! Sounds about right.
SciFi/SyFy has become a media company which is run by mundane executives who really know nothing about the genre. They only care about mindshare among the average masses who can't appreciate intelligent programming which appeals to the true fans of science fiction and fantasy.
Suggestions for improvement:
Put Harlen Ellison in charge
Stop canceling the good shows
Stop making bad movies (or hire real SF/F writers)
Drop the wrestling crap
Cut back the paranormal shit
Add robotics competition (Battlebots)
Bring back space, science and technology
Don't be afraid to show the classics
By Trorb at 12:51 PM ON 03/16/09
You have GOT TO BE KIDDING. Though April Fools is still weeks away....
I mean I could not think of turning on a channel named that. Thank goodness BSG is over soon, so I will not have that problem.
Stupidest idea in a long while (oh wait, Tropicana Orange Juice changing their carton was too, but consumers managed to make them see the error of their ways.)
You can bet the network will be saying over and over internally "don't worry, they'll get used to it" I absolutely positively will not. Rather watch "Chiller" now, which is a stupid name, but a hell of a lot less stupid then SyFy.
By TreyRandom at 12:51 PM ON 03/16/09
This has FAIL written all over it. They truly don't understand their viewer base who has watched them for the past 16 years.
Go ahead, Siffy... drive the "geeks" away... they're "uncool", after all...
By AZEqualizer at 12:52 PM ON 03/16/09
And you paid someone to come up with this idea? Might as well do it... you have already drifted into the miscellaneous flotsam in a sea of Un-reality TV.
I always thought it was funny that SciFi wasn't in High Def.... after all that would be science fiction.
By ulic at 12:54 PM ON 03/16/09
So, are they going to change the name of this site to "syfywire?"
By Reaper2K at 12:54 PM ON 03/16/09
No. A world of no. This is what happens when you let the sales department come up with a marketing redesign.
As SciFi loses its biggest success with the conclusion of Battlestar Galactica, it is further diluting its product by moving away from its science fiction roots and "opening the brand to accommodate a broader range of imagination-based entertainment."
In short, it appears that science fiction is no longer a priority for the SyFy channel, so I will be taking my viewership elsewhere. Good thing I have a great DVD collection.
By Exscififan at 12:56 PM ON 03/16/09
If there ever a reason to use the worn-out internet phrase, WTF? this is it.
After BSG goes out this week, I'll never watch this ridiculous channel again. How far they've fallen.
Wrestling? Really?
By Mau at 12:56 PM ON 03/16/09
And here I was waiting to be able to pay for an HD feed. Forget that!
Another reason to support "non linear digital platforms" but not from big corporations out of touch with what people want but with actual fans creating podcasts, online video, fan made films and books.
I'm tired of everyone aiming for the lowest common denominator in their programming. I'm sure the real Sci-Fi fans will gladly pay MORE for a channel with true Sci-Fi content. It's not difficult to get fans to spend huge amounts of money on authentic Sci-Fi content as we all know.
As others have stated, I also feel insulted by this.
By trackfour at 12:59 PM ON 03/16/09
HORRIBLE NAME
By Jason at 12:59 PM ON 03/16/09
This is the stupidest thing since TNN (now Spike TV) did the "We've got pop!" add campaign.
I take that back. This is even stupider than that.
By Ziggy at 12:59 PM ON 03/16/09
Syph-Eye. Sounds like a venereal disease.
Stupid. Just stupid.
I like the comparison to stupid city slogans.
I'm from Atlanta...
For years the city motto was "The city too busy to hate".
The city government created a marketing organization to come up with a new motto. Now it's- "Every day is an opening day". Stupid. Just stupid.
By Vannysh at 1:00 PM ON 03/16/09
"We love being sci fi and we're still embracing that. But we're more than just space and aliens and the future – the three things most people think of when they think of 'sci fi.'"
This person has a great point. The word Sci-Fi does lead one to only think of space and aliens. This new name has a fantasy element to it that will draw in more people.
I like it. It is brighter with fewer letters.
By Scott at 1:04 PM ON 03/16/09
What? Really? I'm now embarrassed to be here. I'm guessing someone in a suit made this decision.
By Grid at 1:05 PM ON 03/16/09
AAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHA. oh wow... AHAHAHAHAH
By Ummmm at 1:08 PM ON 03/16/09
Worst
Idea
EVER
I hope you didn't pay someone to come up with that....
By feckineejit at 1:10 PM ON 03/16/09
This is dumb retarded this is worse than National Geographic changing their name to Nat Geo. WHo are they trying to appeal to? because it looks like desperation when none is needed.
By loki4ever at 1:11 PM ON 03/16/09
it is sad because that smell like the beginning of the end of my favorite channel :-(
By brentsg at 1:12 PM ON 03/16/09
Wow, stupid.
I guess I can watch the final BSG and kill the channel goodbye. So long to my favorite network... Though I guess once they started canceling all the shows I enjoyed the writing was on the wall. Now, make way for more stupid TV with a bad name...
By jmthane at 1:12 PM ON 03/16/09
I have a couple of suggestions for new taglines. How about "Imagine better", or "Imagine smarter"? Both of which you have failed to do for a number of years now.
I was really excited about the launch of Sci-Fi 16 years ago. Due to where I was working, I was able to pull down the satellite feed and taped the countdown to and the first broadcast ("Star Wars", for those who don't remember). I tuned into the countdown on occasion, and watched it "evolve". Unfortunately, over the years you've by and large dumbed down the original programming until, with the end of BSG this Friday, it's as barren as the rest of what's getting aired in the U.S.
Sci-Fi was a place where the SF/F fans could watch good SF/F programs. Now, we're stuck where we were before Sci-Fi started 16 years ago - scouring the airwaves for a few shining moments of hope.
"SyFy"? "Imagine greater"?
EPIC FAIL! You're all fired.
By antenius at 1:15 PM ON 03/16/09
This is pathetic.....
Just change the name to SPIKE TV and be done with it. I'm convinced that the execs at Sci-Fi aren't happy with alienating (pun intended) their audience but insulting our intelligence as well.
By Glad I Stopped Watching at 1:16 PM ON 03/16/09
Well, that's moronic, but what did you expect from the Wrestling Channel?
Seriously, why you even bother to have a sci-fi (excuse me, sy-fy) channel when you have contempt for science fiction and its fans is beyond me.
By RGE at 1:17 PM ON 03/16/09
This is what happens when marketing people are allowed to be anything other than hourly workers. They cost you a lot of money and make you look stupid in the process. Wouldn't "SFN" have worked just as well without alienating your audience?
As for "Imagine Greater"...it looks like George Bush english is still alive and well.
By antenius at 1:17 PM ON 03/16/09
This is pathetic.....
Just change the name to SPIKE TV and be done with it. I'm convinced that the execs at Sci-Fi aren't happy with alienating (pun intended) their audience but insulting our intelligence as well.
By ecgordon at 1:19 PM ON 03/16/09
Too bad Forry Ackerman is gone, or else he would be logging on here to tell you he is very, very disappointed.
By Ali at 1:19 PM ON 03/16/09
The proposed name change is ridiculous. Why try to cover the fact that you're a Science Fiction channel? If you think you can trick people into watching Science Fiction because of the channel name, I don't think it's going to work.
By dark_alone at 1:21 PM ON 03/16/09
"Siffy" it is than.
Can't wait til the Canadian station: "SPACE" changes their name to something just as awful, since they keep adding more non sci-fi (SCI-FI. Science Fiction, not syence fyction) to it. But it's just another step towards channel death.
SyFy... mmmmm Let's just all 'smile and say bai bai!'
By gldn at 1:23 PM ON 03/16/09
I know your new parent company wants to trademark and you can't trademark a genre. I get that, but siffy is plain stupid. As somebody who works in advertising and marketing, I can truly say, you got taken by your branding company. Did you not market test this? It truly does sound like a VD. You will increase your viewership by delving into it's core base not by whitewashing the brand to appeal to greater masses. As a sci-fi fan, I kind of find this new move insulting and as a designer I find your new logo lame. Either way you look at it you have lost me as a viewer.
By Cordwainer Bird at 1:25 PM ON 03/16/09
dont you think its a bit early for a April Fools' gag?
By Raskull at 1:25 PM ON 03/16/09
I rarely post comments to news items but I felt it necessary to add my name to the list of commenters here. It's all been said in the above posts. Lame Name, canceling great shows, wrestling and ghost busters suck, etc.
Read EVERY one of these comments, print them out, make the executives read them, and come to your senses. These are the fans that you haven't completely alienated so far. Can you afford to lose any more?
By bob at 1:26 PM ON 03/16/09
Another example of MBA's screwing the pooch.
I wish some guys with some cash would start a real SciFi channel. No reality shows, no wrestling -- run stuff like MST3k. the various Trek series, Dr. Who, Twilight Zone, Buffy, etc. There has to be enough of that to fill a programming day.
But no, we get some empty suits who have no idea what they are doing coming up with this moronic idea. I can understand the branding idea put forth by prior posters, but this has FAIL written all over it. And I'd say the chances of them actually reading all these comments and realizing this is a stupid idea they should not implement is about zero.
By Sid at 1:26 PM ON 03/16/09
This is sad and pathetic and in keeping with the cancellation of programs such as Farscape for dreck, producing and repeatedly showing horrid movies such as Ice Spiders and wrestling. The channel has moved far away from its original intent.
By paulw at 1:29 PM ON 03/16/09
So the USA Network will change its name too?
Oh, the excuses!
By michael at 1:29 PM ON 03/16/09
That's a horrible idea. It looks like SIFFY- IFFY- SISSY-SIPPY.
This is like a bad joke!!
What's wrong with the SCI FI corporate people?? Don't they have anything productive to do with their time like maybe come up with some decent programming instead of another giant crocodile monster movie?
By Helens at 1:30 PM ON 03/16/09
Wow, that's just horrifying. SciFi has been something I was willing to try out because of the positive connotations of the name; it let me know what I was going to find when I turned on the channel. Syfy? What that tells me is that SciFi is ashamed of showing science fiction -- the entire reason most of us are watching in the first place.
On the bright side, with BSG going away, there's nothing else on the channel worth putting up with this slap in the face for anyway. I'll be leaving SciFi as the name does.
By Someone Else at 1:31 PM ON 03/16/09
Have you gotten the picture yet? You execs have done something very stupid and lame here. You should redact the announcement and STICK WITH WHAT YOU ARE.
Sheesh.
By sci fi since Heinlein at 1:31 PM ON 03/16/09
Please don't do this--this has "New Coke" written all over it--a terrible idea on its face "validated" by dubious internal research. Fail.
By Azure at 1:32 PM ON 03/16/09
You've got to be kidding. Bad enough they've lost shows like SGA and BSG while keeping wrestling, but now they're going to more ghost shows and reality TV too?
No thanks. My SciFi channel viewing has declined since SGA was canceled, and I see no reason to continue watching the chanel for wrestling and reality TV.
By Babylon Man at 1:33 PM ON 03/16/09
What's everyone bitching about anyway? Sci Fi hasn't shown Science Fiction in such a long time. 95% of their programming is horror anyway. The New BG sucks and I stopped watching the Sci Fi Channel when they canceled such shows as Invisible Man and Farscape.
By Daystrom5 at 1:34 PM ON 03/16/09
WARNING!! WARING!! DANGER WILL ROBINSON!!
This is definitely the wrong direction. I remember when The SciFi Channel first started, I loved watching the old shows. Then those went away and the only way they redeemed themselves was with the Stargate series, Farscape, BSG, etc. But The wrestling shows and all of the infomercials in the nighttime hours (I love watching old SciFi late at night) it started to lose its gloss. Now as they move farther and farther away from the original blueprints, I think the amount of viewers the WILL lose will outweigh the POTENTIAL new viewers and then lead to the eventual downfall of the channel, which will be a sad day for us all.
By NINEv2 at 1:36 PM ON 03/16/09
Stupid. Do you think this excuses you all for the god-awful "Sci-fi Original Movies"?!?!?! Changing the spelling won't change the quality.
By Zaphod at 1:36 PM ON 03/16/09
Time for Viacom to step up and create its own sci-fi/fantasy franchise - "Imagine TV" or something. Hell, they could almost start an entire new cable channel with the six Trek series (the five live action and the animated series), the 11 movies and the countless specials, documentaries and features that have been done about Trek over the decades.
Throw in the other sci-fi/fantasy stuff owned by just by Paramount and you'd be off to a great start.
There you go, Viacom. Some marketing advice for no charge. On the house.
By rkf at 1:38 PM ON 03/16/09
Oh for pity's sake...another attempt to fix something that ain't broke.
Well, maybe somebody else will start another SF channel, without the wrestling and MOTW movies on the "scariest day on television."
I'd love to see a channel like TVLand for SF; one that would show old Twilight Zones, or Nightstalker, etc.
By plotwistie at 1:39 PM ON 03/16/09
I hope the idiot exec sees all the comments here saying how stupid an idea this is. Oh wait. Idiots don't pay attention to the smart ones.
By Eric at 1:41 PM ON 03/16/09
16 years of history and committment to bringing the highest quality of science fiction DESTROYED in one news article. I have always looked forward to the made-for-Sci-Fi-movies like "Chupacabra - High Seas Terror" or any of the After Dark movies, but to reitterate many others -- Where does wrestling fit in?
Making the trip toward MTV has started. I can tell my grandkids this, "I remember when SYFY use to broadcast science fiction movies." Oops! Appears I'm a relic, already.
By dougl at 1:41 PM ON 03/16/09
SyFy == Stupyd.
By Joe ASAP at 1:42 PM ON 03/16/09
BOOOOOOO! BAD IDEA! I DON'T LIKE IT. I WATCH THE SCI-FI CHANNEL BECAUSE IT HAS SCI-FI. OVER THE LAST FEW YEARS YOU HAVE SLOWLY CREEPED AWAY FROM THAT. I DONT WANT ANOTHER GENERIC CHANNEL.
ITS JUST LIKE MTV (MUSIC TV) DOESN'T PLAY MUSIC ANYMORE SO IT SUCKS. SAME THING WITH VH1 (VIDEO HITS 1). UGH!
PLAY MORE SCIENCE FICTION. THATS THE WHOLE POINT! YOU'RE GONNA LOSE YOUR CORE AUDIENCE CAUSE THATS WHY WE WATCH.
By KansasBard at 1:42 PM ON 03/16/09
Dear SyFy,
Whyle Y understand your yntrest yn attractyng a hypper audyence, Y hope to ympress upon the executyves who green-lyted thys decysyon that yt does not syt well wyth the fan base. Thys ydea has all the yndycations of beyng the braynchyld of some suyts who are out-of-touch wyth theyr vyewers. Next tyme, consyder focus group research that actually yncludes the target audyence.
By OutOfTouch at 1:43 PM ON 03/16/09
Is it April 1st? What in the gods name do they think they are doing. Next thing you know, Crest will have teeth whyting..
How much will this cost? Couldn't they buy some new programming with is or is this how they justify the head of marketings bonus.
By Joe ASAP at 1:45 PM ON 03/16/09
HA HA HA!
KansasBard got it right!
By Twinkle at 1:45 PM ON 03/16/09
So....if the marketing boys really do want a trademark-able new tv channel name, what could they do that would be right?
I agree with a lot of what ya'll are saying, but figured the thought experiment would be fun.
Let's say they implemented our suggestions.
Old classics
More science and tech
Intelligent, edgy programming
Battlebots!!!
What could they call themselves and what could their tagline be?
FGBG (FugBug?) - For Geeks, By Geeks?
ImagineTV?
Come on! Let's show them that we fans are smarter and know ourselves better than their marketing people!
Of course their goal is to make money and currently that happens through advertising. Unfortunately fans who like scifi are the kind who also DVR things and skip commercials entirely. So of course they have to appeal to a more mainstream, possibly less technically advanced portion of society. This is happening across the board. Dollhouse and Sarah Connor are getting low Nielson ratings because Nielson doesn't factor in that the people who love those shows also know how to rid themselves of commercials. So how do we solve this problem? How do these shows/channels make money when we're not willing to watch their commercials? It's not a complain; it's a challenge. If we can figure out a way for us to get intelligent programming and not watch commercials, we have to trade them a way to make money so they'll want to make the kind of programming we love! Otherwise we'll keep losing.
By Chris Papadopoulos at 1:45 PM ON 03/16/09
Changing the name of the channel in an effort to appear cooler is not only insulting to the millions of viewers that adore science-fiction, but a sign of an executive team that is fresh out of ideas.
Seriously, fire every single executive that thinks this is a good idea.
Here's some free advice to the Sci-Fi Channel. How about acquiring the rights to some real science-fiction and playing those shows? I'd love to watch reruns of past good shows instead of the utterly horrible monster movies and wrestling and other crap that's on.
By biodredd at 1:46 PM ON 03/16/09
Gee, SyFy. Not only is the new name dull and unimaginative, the new tag-line "Imagine Greater" is just lousy phrasing. Seems like a bunch of pre-teen schoolmates got together and worked out your new branding scheme. Abysmal and ill conceived are all I can think of when I see this image.
"We want to move away from the geeky..." Really? Have you thought about removing wrestling from your schedule? What does that have to do with action, adventure, fantasy, or anything else? Do we need another video game challenge show? Don't we get enough garbage like that from G4?
What could THE SCIENCE FICTION CHANNEL offer that they don't offer already... hmmm... older science fiction series? And I don't mean Twilight Zone and Star Trek. Its like the people in programming don't even know other programs exist.
Let's play the hell out of Stargate SG-1 again and run 8 hours of episodes every Monday! Only done it 100 times already, they'll tune in for 100 more...
Let's try grabbing runs of limited run series... um, The Fantastic Journey... Otherworld... Logan's Run... try running them uncut in a 90 minute slot.
Lots of opportunities here... a change of logo and tag-line is not the boost the channel needs.
By a different tim at 1:47 PM ON 03/16/09
So just because Universal owns you now, you have to do everything they say eh? There is nothing wrong with the Sci-fi channel logo looks right now. When you try to improve open things which have no history of problems you find that it creates problems. Syfy? Really? You might as well change your name to Hello Kitty.
By Geekfather at 1:50 PM ON 03/16/09
Worst idea since some moron put wrasslin' on a science fiction centric cable network.
Oh yeah...
By Michelle at 1:51 PM ON 03/16/09
What a stupid name. Is that the only domain name you could get or something? It looks like a text message misspelling. What's your new demographic - tweens?
By gg at 1:51 PM ON 03/16/09
i never seen so many ppl moan and bitch about a name.
By sol at 1:53 PM ON 03/16/09
Way to alienate your fan base.
By donw78006 at 1:53 PM ON 03/16/09
The idiot executives that came up with this idea must be the same #@$@#$# people that run AIG! Oh I forgot this company is owned by NBC which is GE. They already have ruined GE, a 125 year old brand with their lousy management! They probably will change GE, to GeeEee.
By biodredd at 1:55 PM ON 03/16/09
I almost forgot... they could also play older films.... Forbidden Planet, When Worlds Collide, War of the Worlds, It Came From Outer Space, This Island Earth...
By John Duncan Yoyo at 1:55 PM ON 03/16/09
Yuck. How is trashing your whole history for a really stupd web2.0 name. It would be ok as the Sci-Fi channel 2.
By bmh at 1:55 PM ON 03/16/09
First these pages and now the channel goes down the pan,
This is a very bad idea,get rid of wrestling and put more sci fi on.
R.I.P.SCI FI
By a different tim at 1:56 PM ON 03/16/09
to gg:
It's just the point that now even more people aren't going to take this channel seriously. I mean did you even see Rock Monster!?!
By Zorz Muaddieb at 1:58 PM ON 03/16/09
Apparently for the people who have been supporting the network it stands for screw you, f*ck you.
-Z
By Ra-Amun at 1:58 PM ON 03/16/09
Today it was announced that the SciFI Channel died....After yrs in a coma, the executives pulled the life support.
They will "rebuild" using NEW NON-Original ideas from other networks.
Cue the funeral march.....
RIP SciFi channel...you will be missed!?!?!?
By westmorland at 1:59 PM ON 03/16/09
Wow. Just wow.
Quite possibly one of the dumbest things I've ever seen a network do.
By FSM at 1:59 PM ON 03/16/09
Just had to comment to say, this is a terrible idea.
Just in case that's not obvious from the many comments above mine.
Listen to your viewers is my humble suggestion....
By smegforbrain at 2:01 PM ON 03/16/09
Imagine greater... amounts of crap.
Hopefully somebody will come along and give us the sci-fi/fantasy channel we deserve, as Sci-Fi Channel hasn't deserved the name for many years now.
By Horace Heyman at 2:01 PM ON 03/16/09
I
By Midas68 at 2:02 PM ON 03/16/09
This is how downfalls get started.
You create or monopolies a niche in that large sections of the public are interested in.
You get Rich off of it and you think they would be happy because they are right where they wanted to be when they came up with the idea.
But in Comes Greed.
They get a taste of some Fools Gold by ratings of some Fake Reality shows and Fake Wrestling and you get a Moron thinking. Ahhh theres more money that (could) be made.
All of a sudden their too good for what they previously represented and Think they can be much bigger.
Plans of mice and men.
The Heads of SCI FI have a lot of Dumb a$$ decisions in there past. but nothing on a grand scale such as this.
If they want more they should start another channel with nothing but WWE and Fake Reality Shows (im sure they have)
By gmoore at 2:02 PM ON 03/16/09
WTF? In the annals of incredibly stupid marketing decisions, this will proudly takes it's place amongst the worst.
By papadiabolous at 2:03 PM ON 03/16/09
Sounds like an attempt to further divorce the channel from its original content. It's like they're trying to dumb it down. Apparently people can't wrap their head around SciFi, so now the channel will provide everyone with a phonetically correct misspelling that's easy to text. Give it a year, and nobody will be texting it at all.
By Midas68 at 2:03 PM ON 03/16/09
This is how downfalls get started.
You create or monopolies a niche in that large sections of the public are interested in.
You get Rich off of it and you think they would be happy because they are right where they wanted to be when they came up with the idea.
But in Comes Greed.
They get a taste of some Fools Gold by ratings of some Fake Reality shows and Fake Wrestling and you get a Moron thinking. Ahhh theres more money that (could) be made.
All of a sudden their too good for what they previously represented and Think they can be much bigger.
Plans of mice and men.
The Heads of SCI FI have a lot of Dumb a$$ decisions in there past. but nothing on a grand scale such as this.
If they want more they should start another channel with nothing but WWE and Fake Reality Shows (im sure they have)
By atomic at 2:03 PM ON 03/16/09
This is inane. I'm and MBA and am truly embaressed by the Network Execs (aka Chuckleheads.) You have a brand that has been established for 16 years, and you're throwing it away. Is this the same marketing team that dreamed up "New Coke"?
By Jeremy from Seattle at 2:05 PM ON 03/16/09
"Imagine Greater...drops in viewership"
By Ra-Amun at 2:06 PM ON 03/16/09
Someone wrangle the giant snake and put it in the executives office....No not that one, the other one...NoNo the other one....who cares there all the same!!!!
Slogan "Death to Originality"
By tabicat at 2:07 PM ON 03/16/09
This is a really stupid idea. Dave Howe needs to be fired and replaced with someone who actually cares about science fiction.
Then again, what difference does it make to me? I stopped watching the SciFi Channel a long time ago. Now I just rent DVDs of the good shows (BG, Eureka, etc) when they come out. No commercials, no editing, no stupid logo in the corner, and a sharper picture to boot.
By Grace at 2:11 PM ON 03/16/09
What a horrible idea.
"Syfy" looks like a typo to any actual sci-fi fan, and like the catchy new way to refer to the latest venereal disease to the rest of the population. Not enough vowels, too much idiocy. And "imagine greater"? That does not even sound like proper English.
Take a page from the Canadians and call it "Space", both a sci-fi term and a concept of area. Stick with a logo or image rather than some fruity new-age phrase.
And for heaven's sake, stop obsessing over crap like this and start focusing on actual quality programming, with plot and acting and themes and BSG-quality intellect. Employ Bear McCreary immediately to score all the channel bumpers.
If this is a last-ditch effort to retain the BSG audience, it's a poor one. You knew this day was coming; should've started looking at serious epic dramas two years ago. "Syfy" is just... moronic.
By mikey at 2:11 PM ON 03/16/09
Its all about advancing a gay agenda - duh
By Bigg at 2:12 PM ON 03/16/09
How does spelling it wrong attract more viewers? I get the fact that they want to have a "brand" now, but this is just kinda dumb.
By PatrickD at 2:12 PM ON 03/16/09
I'm sure that fans who know Polish will LOVE to tune into a channel that is the plural of the word for dirt, filth, grime, pimple, spot...
...and SYPHILIS!
Seriously. Look...
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/syf
I'm thinking that the marketing team did 10 seconds of research, because it took 11 seconds to find this in Google. Fans need to advertise this fact. If we start associating Syfy with syphilis, we can stop this change dead in its tracks.
By a different tim at 2:16 PM ON 03/16/09
Ok, instead of the new spelling just keep it the same and instead of the slogan saying Imagine Greater have it say "Cool Beans"
By PadrePedro at 2:17 PM ON 03/16/09
Why not just cut to the chase and call it G4-2 since that is what your are turning yourself into? Very original.
By Syly at 2:17 PM ON 03/16/09
What an unnecessary corruption of a classic abbreviation. Our youth who took "creative spelling" classes have finally grown up and landed jobs in marketing. What a glorious day! The sarcasm shouldn't have to be implied here, but I suspect otherwise. This is just syly.
By HtheG at 2:18 PM ON 03/16/09
This is just stupid.
The guys who think this up will probably get a bonus and then proceed to run the sci fi channel into the ground.
By Taura_g at 2:19 PM ON 03/16/09
You have got to be kidding me!!!
Nice way to continue alienating the original core viewers. Nothing like being told we are geeks... As if that is a bad thing. Thanks SyFy...
By maglore at 2:20 PM ON 03/16/09
When are they going to actually put a real scifi movie on Saturdday??
Always the crappy b movie monster type and they are always horrible.
Then they cancell all the good shows they have !!
By Glith at 2:20 PM ON 03/16/09
As everyone else here as already said - SyFy is not a good name. Sci-Fi already has a good name. There is no reason to change it - unless you want to shed a ton of viewers.
By Freedom Eagle at 2:20 PM ON 03/16/09
"SyFy: We don't get it!" or how about, "SyFy: Like Science Fiction but a lot more crap mixed in!"
Like Diamonelle and Tofurkey, it's not the real thing, but an incredible simulation!
By Pixel at 2:20 PM ON 03/16/09
Utterly hideous.
I read and watch (quality) science fiction with pride, not shame. Still, as so little of what this channel broadcasts could ever hope to be regarded as quality, perhaps the move away from that strong literary heritage towards populist oblivion should come as no surprise.
With Galactica finishing this week, I don't know when I'll next be tuning in at all.
By Kasson at 2:21 PM ON 03/16/09
I always wondered what happened to the guy who invented new coke. Now we know.
By Steve at 2:24 PM ON 03/16/09
Wow. That's... terrible.
I understand the desire to have a unique, marketable name, but make it a good one, at least.
It's a shame that what was once a good channel (even with the occasionally unintentionally hilarious made-for-Sci-fi movies) will be devolving into yet another Reality TV/mindless garbage channel.
Though Syfy *does* sound like a euphemism for a venereal disease. May want to get someone to look at that.
By SuperJoker at 2:29 PM ON 03/16/09
It's still Sci-Fi on Dish Network and since It's FREE, I don't think It'll change anytime soon and SyFy isn't even a word and yet It defines SUCKS!!!
By tati at 2:32 PM ON 03/16/09
MISTAKE.
The person or persons that thought of this don't know jack about scifi or the people that love it. They're trying to jump on some bandwagon. I hope they fall off it and break both legs :(
SciFi had a nice little niche that appeals to--not a majority of viewers--but certainly a more discerning class of viewer. People looking for vision and creativity on television.
They're going to become another A&E--another station that I used to love and now disdain. Wrestling? Pseudo-reality? Paranormal? Yuck.
We don't want you to be more than space and aliens and the future. THAT is what we were tuning in to see--not frakking wrestling or other crapola.
You're not competing with Fox and the networks. Let those idiots continue to cancel shows that we, SCIFI fans love. You guys can pick them up and give them new life (hi, Firefly, NightStalker, Moonlight, and a million others).
UNIVERSAL, ARE YOU LISTENING TO US?
By grayone at 2:33 PM ON 03/16/09
This is stupid and pointless. Way to suck. I hate it enough that I might stop watching. Certainly I'll stop going to this website, if it's called that.
By Syly at 2:34 PM ON 03/16/09
It doesn't even sounds like "Sci. Fi." to me. To anyone from the Mid-West US, it's probably going to look and sound like "Sif-ee".
By jaco1966 at 2:39 PM ON 03/16/09
And one more thing......
"Imagine Greater".....is that like....Think Bigger?? I'm thinking thier marketing staff needs "Greater Imagination" to get this schlock off the ground.
I'm also going to consider the fact that since SciFi Wire is to remain "SciFi" that the new "SyFy(llis)" execs WON'T be catching much wind of the hundreds of posts here that are decrying the blatant ineptitude of overpaid, overdressed, overconfident overlords who think they can use an anomolous cross section of viewership to make decisions for the CORE fans who DON'T watch wrestling or any of that other mindless drivel that they used to draw in substantially more viewership. We're already well aware of how much "dumb" is out in the world....we're supposed to be making American more intellegent not dumbing it down even more and taking the rest of the world with it.....or perhaps, that's their plan!!!!! Dumb down the rest of the world so we can look smarter!!...That's it!!!..............*hack*
By patrulje at 2:39 PM ON 03/16/09
How to win friends and influence your base…not, I truly think this is the nail in the coffin, I’ll have to review my cable plan to see if I can drop the new syphilis channel. Let your local cable provider know what you think of the format and name change. I can only hope that some smart entity steps in to fill the SciFi void soon.
By Capt. Jack H. at 2:41 PM ON 03/16/09
Totalli rytarded decision. So now, what, you're the Scynce Fyction network? It's hard enough to get people to spell correctly in this country!
By ronscifi at 2:42 PM ON 03/16/09
I remember watching the SCI-FI CHANNEL from the beginning. I loved it. The movies and TV shows weren't Star Wars and Star Trek, but they were real science fiction which inspired the better film makers of the present. Over the years, very little real science fiction is played anymore and the emergence of SyFy confirms my suspicions that TV execs don't really know what science fiction (scientific fiction) is all about. What the execs don't understand is that their fanbase does know. I see this as an end to commercial TV viewing all together. Even though commercials pay for the programming. I still have to pay to get the channel. I would rather just pay for the DVDs.
Goodbye, SyFy....
By Pauly at 2:43 PM ON 03/16/09
I guess I look at this way....
It's like a marriage that's just gone downhill. Communication is one-sided and you wake one day and realize you just don't know her anymore. So you file for divorce and she changes her name. You move on with your life while she just WHORES herself out to any low-budget incoherent script she can wrap her legs around.
What did I ever see in her ?????
By durr at 2:43 PM ON 03/16/09
Not a great idea guys. The world is pretty much into the idea that focus groups are stupid and just an excuse to get easy positive reinforcement for bad concepts.
By Nebula at 2:45 PM ON 03/16/09
Sounds like the geniuses who thought "New Coke" was a good idea. Or the ones who think Dumbing Down is good!
Bad Idea
By Rob at 2:45 PM ON 03/16/09
Absolutely THE DUMBEST THING SciFi has EVER done! Hopefully it isn't too late to rectify this INCREDIBLY STUPID decision.
By AntiM at 2:45 PM ON 03/16/09
...adjectives formed with -sy may be ironic, implying that the quality in question is self-consciously assumed or feigned (artsy; cutesy; folksy).
Fy\, interj. [See Fie, interj.] A word which expresses blame, dislike, disapprobation, abhorrence, or contempt. See Fie.
What do you know, it fits.
Wrestling, reality drivel, infomercials, soft core horror schlock are not science fiction. Sci-Fi Channel has never lived up to its potential. There are hundreds of old movies and series that a science fiction audience would love to see if the network is unwilling to spend the money on quality shows to fill the schedule.
I'm not sure which is sadder, that a show like Ghost Hunters exists or the fact that people watch it. It is however cutesy and abhorrent, so I guess SyFy works.
It's not the name change that's sad, I could live with that, it's the programming.
By platzen at 2:48 PM ON 03/16/09
Great idea! I think all well established companies should make similar innovative changes - like maybe Coke can get rid of that stale old formula and come out with some kind of "New Coke"
By theApocalypse at 2:48 PM ON 03/16/09
Dear Marketing dumbass,
Nevermind, I think the salutation says it all...
Sincerely A SCI FI channel viewer.
By Scully at 2:50 PM ON 03/16/09
After the BSG finale this Friday, I am through with SciFi (or SyFy!!) for good. You've ticked off your fans by canceling really good programs like "The Dresden Files" yet hanging on to ridiculous content like wrestling. I guarantee your viewership will plummet after BSG finishes its run. The only thing mildly interesting you have coming up is "Caprica," but like a lot of other fans instead of actually turning on the TV to watch your awful network, I'll just watch it on Hulu or rent the DVD.
By JIm at 2:52 PM ON 03/16/09
From all the comments so far, it looks like SyFy's "core audience" will be going elsewhere. It's really stupid and pointless.
By BigDog2 at 2:53 PM ON 03/16/09
We should look at this as a blessing.
There is now a opening for a real Sci-Fi Channel !!! This group of @$@$#$% can either ride this into Spike TV 2 or the sink the dead ship. Then a new group can start this idea again (new channel & name) with this as a model of what not to do. Also stop bitching to them here this group NEVER hears its fan unless they say what they want to hear.
By Chewbubba at 2:54 PM ON 03/16/09
Hahahaha!
SieFie!
Silly. Somebody in marketing is hoping to save their job in the recession, eh?
By Liam at 2:56 PM ON 03/16/09
Did you guys hire G.W.B.? Only he could come up with something as stupid as "Syfy." Remember the Tropicana O.J. fiasco? How about the New Coke fiasco?
By DeanBear at 2:57 PM ON 03/16/09
One comment:
Fire the twit who though this up. It's "SCIENCE FICTION," not "SYENCE FYCTION." Someone at NBC-Universal has to get their cranium removed from their rectum.
By Y Not at 2:57 PM ON 03/16/09
Dear SyFy Channel,
I love this move, because Y is my favoryte vowyl. I use it whenever I can, to replace the other, more borying vowyls, which are for geeks and squares. Y is bettyr than all of them combyned. Y is awesyme.
By pjsmith at 2:59 PM ON 03/16/09
What difference does their name make? They haven't been the Sci-Fi channel for a long time. They've been the schlocky-horror-reality-wrestling channel that occasionally shows some science fiction.
After BSG ends on Friday, I won't be watching them anymore.
By Eclipse at 3:00 PM ON 03/16/09
Instead of 'Syfy' rename the channel USA Network 2. That way you can show all the wrestling, Law and Order episodes, and paranormal travel shows you want and the average viewer will know exactly what to expect.
By Oo-ob at 3:01 PM ON 03/16/09
Lame, Lame, Lame, Lame, Lame...
By Grid at 3:02 PM ON 03/16/09
SciFi viewers will keep watching SyFy while they keep reruning stargate and bsg, so all this is pointless people will just get used to this because we have no options otherwise. we all can scream, but yet they are gonna frak us all. just saying
i dont like this either. but there is nothing we can do. you think that producers care about us? have you seen the new trek movie? the dragon ball movie? all this wave of reboots and "new versions". Frak this shit. have you seen The Day Earth Stood Still? HAHA... sad.
By KITTFan at 3:04 PM ON 03/16/09
SyFy = EPIC FAIL
Seriously, how much did you all have to drink over the weekend when changing the networks name to "SyFy" seemed like a good idea?
I know people really got trashed at St. Patty's Parties and probably made some HUGE mistakes this past weekend, but this takes the cake...
By 3dollarwm at 3:05 PM ON 03/16/09
I don't see how naming the channel after a venereal disease will attract more viewers. Why don't they focus on good programming instead?
By Upset at 3:06 PM ON 03/16/09
This is just amazing. Every post on here is negative and for good reason. We want the SCI FI channel with stargate, bsg, atlantis, eureka. We DONT want SYFY wrestling, and reality. Now i am not sure about the rest of you, but all the sci fi fans i know hate those damn ghost hunter baloney shows
please get rid of whoever had this bright idea. Create another channel and call SyFy and keep SCI FI!
By CD at 3:07 PM ON 03/16/09
What a stupid change. Get wrestling off the channel, bring it back to the sci fi and fantasy it was supposed to be about, and create more quality shows like BSG, Farscape, etc... and stop with the really horrible CGI monster of the week that eats random teens/campers/towns. Show the same vision and imagination in your programming that you want to portray rather than taking on a stupid name and filling the hours up with something that has NOTHING to do with SCI FI and Fantasy. If I wanted to watch wrestling I'd go find a sports channel. And nice going insulting your audience. Lots of us are over 30, our own homes, and pay our own bills.. thanks. It's good to know you hate your own audience and consider us basement dwelling dysfunctional teens.
By Feldspar at 3:08 PM ON 03/16/09
This is ludicrously stupid.
By frank at 3:08 PM ON 03/16/09
change is just the illusion of progress this new "syfy" channel is going to be absolute crap
we should boycott it as soon as it changes
By E3Jeremey at 3:08 PM ON 03/16/09
you know half way through the article I was waiting for the page to load rick astley singing "never gonna give you up" in hopes I had been rick rolled. This is Epic Fail Sci Fi/Scyfy.
As a lifetime fan I have been dissapointed over the years but this does it. Really as others have said fire your marketing dept and executive staff and get a clue!
By Eddie Vertigo at 3:16 PM ON 03/16/09
I think the name change is the symbolic final straw of the overall treatment for the past few years; less science-fiction, more generic television. I, for one, love all genres of storytelling, including science fiction, and am disappointed in the squandering of this network's potential.
By wraithfodder42 at 3:21 PM ON 03/16/09
In response to Michael Hinman's response that we give them a chance...
You see, fans are griping about the name, the new slogan/logo because overall, the channel hasn't changed for the better. In fact, it's gotten worse over the years. Without Stargate and Battlestar to bolster it, it has a tough fight ahead of it. It's obvious that the network doesn't have a clue about its viewers (aka clients) who pay to watch their channel. I know more people than I can count who dumped the channel once Stargate Atlantis got axed, and suspect even more will bail out when BSG does its swansong this week.
The enormous amount of money spent on this’branding’ is a waste. People who like scifi will watch the network, people who don't will NOT watch a channel devoted to science fiction because it's now spelled differently.
That money could have been spent better in creating actual programming instead of changing legal documents, advertising information, magazines, etc. etc.
By scifi-ED at 3:23 PM ON 03/16/09
First, guess I should change my name to syfy-ED.
Second, I worked for a pro sports team during their 1-15 season a couple of years back. And their slogan for the next season was Respect the Code. They revealed this slogan at the draft party and everyone laughed at them.
The execs quickly fired the firm that created the slogan and went back to something that appealed to the core fans.
For the past few years, your record in decision making has been 1-15, and these responses, is us laughing at you.
Don't be stupid, well too late. But don't continue to be stupid. Listen to your fans and get back to what WE want.
I don't understand how everyone knows how to run your channel, but you.
By Sharon at 3:27 PM ON 03/16/09
That's got to be the biggest load of crap I've ever seen. What sets Sci-Fi apart is its emphasis on science fiction. To forsake that uniqueness for a new name is a shame. To do so for a name that implies no one at the network can spell is pathetic. You just lost another viewer.
By Ring at 3:28 PM ON 03/16/09
from the people who ax'ed farscape, SG, SGA and BSG................
By JK at 3:31 PM ON 03/16/09
Bye Bye, Stargate. Steeerike 1.
Bye Bye, Stargate Atlantis. Steeerike 2.
Bye Bye, Battlestar Galactica... Steerike 3.
Bye Bye, SyFy. (It hasn't been the same for a while anyway... we've grown apart. Best of luck.)
By Branden at 3:32 PM ON 03/16/09
Dave Howe and his cronies should be taken out and shot. If they did not have an interest in Sci Fi and wanted a more generic audience why did you ever get involved with the Sci Fi Channel to begin with? Why not just play around with the USA channel instead?
By cpukill at 3:33 PM ON 03/16/09
Morons. The whole lot.
By Homer at 3:34 PM ON 03/16/09
See Fee?
Fire your marketing team.
By LOL at 3:35 PM ON 03/16/09
Do you know what means "Syfy" in Polish language?
It means "mess". :)
You want to make the mess from this channel? LOL!
By LOL at 3:35 PM ON 03/16/09
Ok so this change will allow them to show more 90210 shows, soap operas and game shows, less science fiction and become another useless channel to skip over.
By Tag at 3:36 PM ON 03/16/09
Hahahahahahahahaha *cough cough* hahahahahahahahahaha
This is either a joke or one of the worst marketing decisions since "New Coke". Good luck with that guys.
However, to be honest, I rarely watch the Scifi channel anymore due to the lousy programming.
By outlander at 3:36 PM ON 03/16/09
Somebody needs to drop the turds and tards who dreamed this one up down a blackhole. Can anyone out there name one decent product owned or operated by a company that has microsoft or NBC in it? I learned a long time ago that when it comes to SCI-FI that it is always about the $ with these people. I took my money for the last 42 years and built my own science fiction collection that these Syfy / NBC idiots couldnt match with a 100 million dollar bankster bailout! Its time to cut the cable,satellite, and network feeds and spend your money on something worthwhile. These people have never been able to come close to what the minds eye can create anyway
By NRJ at 3:37 PM ON 03/16/09
I hope they enjoy losing their fanbase.
By AlBme at 3:37 PM ON 03/16/09
Someone is lying. Either the pinhead executive who said, regarding trademarks: "We couldn't own Sci Fi; it's a genre...but we can own Syfy." Or, some other pinhead lied to him. Either way, those pinheads deserve to be fired. (But, that's just a fantasy -- isn't it? It's sure as hell not sci-fi!)
"The Weather Channel" is trademarked. True, you can't trademark natural phenomena. But you can trademark "The Weather Channel".
"Microsoft Windows" is trademarked. You can't trademark architectural elements. But, you can trademark "Microsoft Windows".
"Apple" is trademarked by two companies! You can't trademark fruit. But, you can trademark a record company and a computer/and other stuff maker.
A pinhead decision has led to a campaign of lies and deception. They know that they messed up -- big time! So, they're trying to cover up with the lamest reasoning:
"We couldn't own Sci Fi; it's a genre...but we can own Syfy."
By really at 3:37 PM ON 03/16/09
I'm surprised anyone cares one way or the other. as long as they put caprica and stargate universe on, i'll watch. if they don't have shows i like, i won't watch. the name is irrelevant to me
By outlander at 3:38 PM ON 03/16/09
Somebody needs to drop the turds and tards who dreamed this one up down a blackhole. Can anyone out there name one decent product owned or operated by a company that has microsoft or NBC in it? I learned a long time ago that when it comes to SCI-FI that it is always about the $ with these people. I took my money for the last 42 years and built my own science fiction collection that these Syfy / NBC idiots couldnt match with a 100 million dollar bankster bailout! Its time to cut the cable,satellite, and network feeds and spend your money on something worthwhile. These people have never been able to come close to what the minds eye can create anyway
By KrimZon at 3:38 PM ON 03/16/09
Nameinvent greater
By delam3 at 3:40 PM ON 03/16/09
This is mind blowingly stupid, really who came up with this? By the way April First is not for a couple more weeks but I hope you are still joking.
By Phred at 3:40 PM ON 03/16/09
I can only imagine that this will make it easier for them to sleep at night after they switch to showing nothing but "reality shows" 24/7.
By PhogoX at 3:41 PM ON 03/16/09
I hope your executives have the balls to admit this is a craptastic idea and then reverse course.
By Austin Storm at 3:42 PM ON 03/16/09
You're gonna get a lot of grief for this.
By Strongbow at 3:42 PM ON 03/16/09
Let me guess...this is the brain child of the same marketing genius that decided WWE wrestling was a good fit for Sci-Fi too.
I keep scanning the program listings hoping to see some classic Science Fiction features on the Sci-Fi channel. Things like the old Flash Gordon serials (or any of the Superhero serials from the 30's and 40's). Sci-Fi classics like "It Came from Outer Space", "The Day the Earth Stood Still". Vintage series like Space 1999. Even the old Godzilla/Monster movies, or Horror movies from the Red Genre (Dracula, Black Sunday, The Mummy, etc) would be welcome.
Instead we get things this Ultimate Gamer series, or Who wants to be a Superhero.
I will give props where they are due, with series like Stargate, Sanctuary and BSG, but so many with potential got killed before their time (Dresden Files).
By abeery at 3:43 PM ON 03/16/09
A real shame... My biggest complaint against the SciFi channel was that they ran all this non-scifi crap... now it looks like we will get more of it
By Mandy at 3:45 PM ON 03/16/09
DOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMMMMMMMMMMMED!!!
(Someone had to say it)
By Danubus at 3:46 PM ON 03/16/09
This has to be one of the dumbest marketing PR moves in the history of tv. This is like watching the younger generation butcher the english language like they do on the internet nowdays. They can't spell so they change it all up. Seriously, whomever though of this should just quit now. Sci-Fi Channel should always remain the Sci-Fi Channel. Your stupid gimmicks aren't going to keep folks watching your channel. Get some decent programming on again (after BSG is over) and stop making retarded B movies. The average Sci-Fi viewer isn't 10 yrs old anymore.
By WHMacy at 3:47 PM ON 03/16/09
Good, cause they never showed SCIENCE FICTION anyway.
Would be neat if someone started a Sci Fi cable channel sometime. That would be cool.
By Mandy at 3:51 PM ON 03/16/09
The 'genius' who came up with this probably was the one who did not renew The Dresden Files because despite it's large audience we were 'the wrong demographic.'
By dyspar at 3:52 PM ON 03/16/09
terrible. just terrible. i'm done. thank goodness the better shows have all fallen away so that i don't feel compelled to keep "syfy" programmed in my channel line up.
By Mandy at 3:53 PM ON 03/16/09
Warehouse 13?! That's going to be your flagship show! The insulting off spring of Friday the Thirteen the series and The Dresden Files after a drunken night together in Vegas?!
By Jake Lockley at 3:54 PM ON 03/16/09
Stupid, yes. Idiotic, yes. But now they can show more wrestling without looking like they are exploiting the viewers.
By Myke at 3:54 PM ON 03/16/09
Yes, it's stupid. Yes, most of their programming is crap. Wrestling? Scare Tactics? Ghost Hunters? Bleah. Their Saturday night waste of money? Pointless. Frankly, there are times I think the Sci-Fi Channel exists to keep Stephen Baldwin and Eric Roberts employed.
But are you really going to stop watching? No. You're going to TiVo Caprica, you're going to TiVo Stargate Universe, and you're going to ignore the rest of the dren, just as you currently do.
That said, SyFy is stupid. "Imagine Greater" is stupid. You've had a fantastic recognition campaign this entire time, with the "iF" bumpers. Imagine Greater? With wrestling and "ooh look, a ghost!" programming? Bleah.
By AlBme at 3:54 PM ON 03/16/09
The Sci-Fi Channel is dead.
Since they wouldn't trademark "The Sci-Fi Channel" that means that another company is free to start a new "The Sci-Fi Channel " -- emphasis on "The"
They cannot go through all the trouble of changing the name to Syfy and then claim later in litigation that the new "The Sci-Fi Channel" infringes on their (crappy) brand name.
Would any one mistake "The Sci-Fi Channel" for "Syfy"?
Morons.
By smiruz at 3:55 PM ON 03/16/09
Just like “pleather”, I don’t expect it will be as good as the original.
By what. at 3:57 PM ON 03/16/09
This has to be a joke.
Well, with Battlestar over, I guess I have no reason to watch anymore anyway. RIP, SciFi. I'll miss you. :(
By Stan Lee at 3:57 PM ON 03/16/09
New Coke
By LREKing at 3:58 PM ON 03/16/09
Feh.
By tater at 4:01 PM ON 03/16/09
Idiotic. Can read every reply here, but how did they find anyone who thought this was a good idea?
By mulad at 4:02 PM ON 03/16/09
Contrary to the opinion of marketing people, you don't need to change your logo and/or name every 3-5 years.
By DaHoot at 4:03 PM ON 03/16/09
Okay Sigh-Fy! I'll play! I guess this change will justify all those horror movies, Sci-Fi original one star monster movies and wrestling programming. Why not add a soap opera about a wrestler who murders ratings during the night. Or maybe call the channel SlyFi because you think you are so clever in playing on words??? My preference would be to have my old Sci-Fi channel back (1998-2003) plus Battlestar Galactica and a great Sci-Fi mini series like the Dune remake, Children of Dune and Taken.
By batch at 4:03 PM ON 03/16/09
this is a terrible idea
By m1a at 4:06 PM ON 03/16/09
woooow, that just hurts my eyes, and my brain. bad, bad move. I suggest you steer off this course immediately or accept responsibility for creating TVs "crystal pepsi." Seriously, I'm not a super fan and I'm FEMALE, which would presumably make me more of whatever new demographic you're trying to attract, but this just feels like you're taking something that is supposed to be cool, intelligent and futuristic and trying to make it cute and relatable - it's a completely transparent move and it's offensive.
By vanyel at 4:07 PM ON 03/16/09
In other words: we want to try to hang on to the pretense that we're a science fiction channel while we branch out more and more into stuff completely unrelated.
I mean really, if you want to be a wrestling channel or a psychic scam channel, then create a brand for them and leave scifi alone. with dvrs it doesn't even really matter when things air any more, just be consistent and predictable.
By mhochman at 4:08 PM ON 03/16/09
SyFy..Imagine Stupid
By kidslikeus at 4:08 PM ON 03/16/09
Proof that people desperate to seem hip, edgy and youth oriented will buy any line of crap. I'm sure whoever sold Sci Fi this rebranding told them it was "cool" and with it. Too bad they were wrong and this is just kind of sad.
By Nealzilla at 4:11 PM ON 03/16/09
It's not so much the name change, but the crappy programming.
Time to send in the Klingons, Romulans, Imperial Storm Troopers, Browncoats, Cylons, Shadows, Vorlons, Goa'uld, Replicators, Ori, Asgard to straighten out their programming department and kill the Saturday night movie writers.
By inerlogic at 4:13 PM ON 03/16/09
SYFY huh?
does that stand for "Shut Your Frakkin' Yap?"
i mean..... gods forbid the sci-fi channel ACTUALLY CARRY sci-fi programming.....
ECW? give me a goddamned break.....
ghost hunters is pushing it... but ya... let's not make a bid to pick up "Enterprise" for new seasons, and how about we cancel the stargates and BSG...... makes sense to me.....
at least now they can counter "but you don't show sci-fi programming" complaints with "we're not the sci-fi channel anymore"
By Scotchy at 4:14 PM ON 03/16/09
Like another commenter alluded to above, this name change and 'broadening' of content does remind one of the Violence Channel from Idiocracy.
Well at least Battlestar is over this weekend.
By Dect at 4:14 PM ON 03/16/09
THEIR WWWYYVVVEERRNNSSS!!!!!
By Julia at 4:20 PM ON 03/16/09
YOU ARE ALIENATING YOUR ENTIRE VIEWING POPULATION YOU STUPID IDIOTS.
By jeda21 at 4:21 PM ON 03/16/09
Expensive.
By Geirahod at 4:21 PM ON 03/16/09
Once again, the people running this network demonstrate they have NO FRAKKING CLUE about why the network was ever popular. Once upon a time, SF fans had a haven. That haven was destroyed several years ago, and only shows like SG1 and BSG kept the network from becoming yet another irrelevancy in the great cable wasteland.
Now, the network executives themselves have hammered in the final nails in the coffin of what was once a source of hope for fans of science fiction.
By The Voice at 4:22 PM ON 03/16/09
I think we should look at this the other way. "SyFy" could be a good thing.
Reading that part, "Syfy more clearly captures the mainstream appeal of the world's biggest entertainment category, and reflects the network's ongoing strategy to create programming that's more accessible and relatable to new audiences. Syfy will continue to celebrate the traditional roots of the genre, while opening the brand to accommodate a broader range of imagination-based entertainment."
Could very well be an attempt to go back to their roots, without looking dated, or "out of touch".
We should also look at the current viewers on the Sci-Fi Network. Para-normal based reality shows, reality based game shows, sports (yes wrestling is still considered a sport), and yes of course Sci-Fi based shows. By re-labeling themselves as "SyFy" they could be returning to a stronger Sci-Fi showing without having to dump it's non-Sci-Fi viewing base.
If this is nothing more then "just marketing" (which nothing really is "Just Marketing"), then hopefully they take advantage of this chance and go back to it's roots while looking ahead.
By MadKaugh at 4:22 PM ON 03/16/09
"For the rest of the world, which generally is not into random leetspeak, the new name will sound more as if it was the Syphilis channel."
Considering the quality of the fare they typically offer, that's not an inappropriate name.
By Bob53186 at 4:28 PM ON 03/16/09
Guess that means more wrasslin, and less aliens. Or maybe alien wrasslin!
By Torsus at 4:28 PM ON 03/16/09
Well I must admit that I am not surprised to see this. For the past couple of years I have watched this channel slowly go down the drain. Wrestling? Come on, we are actually intelligent viewers. Reality TV? Garbage. Monster of the week movies? Worse than garbage.
The only thing that kept me watching this channel at all was: Stargate SG-1, Stargate Atlantis, Eureka, and of course BSG. Which, except for Eureka, you have all cancelled in the past 2 years. The writing has been on the wall for a long time that something like this was coming. As soon as BSG ends this Friday, I will never watch Sci Fi, oh excuse me, SyFy again.
Great job ruining a once great channel.
By Highway Man at 4:29 PM ON 03/16/09
Clearly whoever came up with this is out of touch with the base. I think it's time for a new sci-fi channel that actually supports quality sci-fi/fantasy shows and not crap reality tv and over terrible "original" movies.
By CharleN at 4:30 PM ON 03/16/09
I've never commented here, but I have to say this is the stupidest marketing ploy I've ever seen or heard of. Syfy? REALLY? How much did the network pay for someone to come up with this name? It was a complete waste of money whatever it was.
By Typical at 4:31 PM ON 03/16/09
makes perfect sense, its not as if its really shown much sci-fi on the channel anyway in the past decade.
By Invisigoth at 4:32 PM ON 03/16/09
I agree with EVERYONE here. This is a terrible idea, and I too have been lamenting Sci-Fi's regrettable decision to steer away from science fiction programming. Whoever came up with this idea is a complete and utter moron. Did they even attempt to do a market test among their core audience? Wow. I used to watch this channel all the time; now I hardly do. BSG is pretty much the only thing I watch anymore and now that's going too. Great job, idiots.
By Dusty Boots at 4:32 PM ON 03/16/09
W.T.F.? The mind wobbles...
By bob53186 at 4:34 PM ON 03/16/09
Actually, I've always had the feeling that the people directing the SciFi channel movies, either didn't KNOW any science fiction, or were focused on and 'anti" ending, where they it seemed like a satisfactory ending, then almost everyone dies ... pretty shoddy.
By face at 4:35 PM ON 03/16/09
noooooooooooooooooooooooo
By JJP at 4:36 PM ON 03/16/09
I'm confused SciFi executives? Science Fiction is about the genre. Its about shows like Star Trek and Stargate. I can understand that horror & fantasy get lopped right in with the rest of your programming, but how does wrestling fit into your network and to the new image of SyFy? Branding or not, I am trying to understand the marketing value you have placed on four little letters. I hope the people who make the programming decisions can actually understand the difference between reality programming vs Science Fiction, Fantasy, and Horror which is what your network should be programming in the first place. Dont screw this up!
By Hardhat at 4:36 PM ON 03/16/09
Well, here's the weird thing....
SCI-FI (as they are for the next ten minutes according to this) has obviously gone the whole mile in order to get in marketeers, designers, focus groups, cheerleaders (yaay!), brainstormers and feng shui experts....
Unfortunately: it obviously hasn't worked.
The important thing would seem to be, as so many other posters have made the point, the name change is so not good that, when it does take place, viewers and subscribers will be almost reminded to look at what the service is actually providing them. If the premium products - a la 'BSG', or hopefully 'Caprica' - aren't there, then you make a choice and maybe choose to not use that service any longer.
As with some of the posters here: I don't want to beat on the idea of the SCI-Fi Channel. Far from it. At it's best, we've got hold of solid gold genre entertainment.
But this new name - assuming this post isn't a deliberate joke - is pretty dreadfully insulting to the kind of people who would opt to tune in to the channel.
The really bad bit?
...right now some SCI-Fi / NBC Universal execs are being quietly whispered to by the marketing bods: "...it's OK...they'll come around...3 years from now they really won't care about the name!..."
Oh, and SyFy doesn't mean a thing...
Just FYI...
By JackShadow at 4:36 PM ON 03/16/09
Wow, please tell me an April 1st post ran early. This is truly a bad idea. Their original programming has been sliding downhill for a while, and the addition of wrestling was just an insult. Once BSG is gone next week, this will be the icing on the cake.
R.I.P. Sci Fi Channel
By James Mac at 4:39 PM ON 03/16/09
This is my third attempt. I'll briefly summarize previous comments. Commercial suicide, DyFy. Ion Television redux. You need to listen to the backlash.
By Hardhat at 4:40 PM ON 03/16/09
Actually how about a different name:
E N C
That's right: the Emperor's New Clothes channel...
Any takers?
By EverythingIlikegetscanceled at 4:42 PM ON 03/16/09
Does that mean SciFi will be available as a channel name and url? Let's start an actual SciFi Channel.
By ddh1969 at 4:43 PM ON 03/16/09
Well...maybe they will quit making stupid movies like 'MegaGator' or 'SuperGuppy' or 'BigAssSnakes'....There's never anything on anyway...I used to watch Ghost Hunters but...
By EverythingIlikegetscanceled at 4:45 PM ON 03/16/09
I'd watch SupperGuppy if it eats professional wrestlers.
By ChyronGuy at 4:48 PM ON 03/16/09
I can understand the spelling change for the sake of copyrighting (though I think it's stupid and, yes, sounds like a disease). I am deeply concerned that there seems to be a push to expand programming beyond sci-fi, fantasy and horror. I seem to remember that MTV did the same thing with the addition of the Real World and My So-Called Life, and now MTV doesn't stand for Music Television (since the no longer play music videos), but Mediocre Television.
By Marketing_Genius at 4:50 PM ON 03/16/09
Actually I'm the amazing marketer who thought of this brilliant idea. Here's a sneak peek at the other re-branding changes coming to TV:
The Food Network --> Fude
The Learning Channel --> LurnN
USA --> US
Lifetime --> LyfeTyme
Also, I was paid $1,000,000 for the SyFy rebranding effort so it must be a good idea.
By labelreader at 4:51 PM ON 03/16/09
I'm sorry that today isn't April 1st. I remember signing a petition to get the Sci-Fi channel carried by our local cable operator way back in the early 1990s. It's sad that they don't want to stick with us geeks who helped get them started.
Abandoning their niche isn't the way to gain ground, they should be bettering their niche instead. With the budget they currently spend on the CG equivalent of rubber monster movies, they could hire real SF writers to create high-quality Science Fiction -- less frequently than the crap, sure, but it would build an audience. Imagine two BSG series and no weekly monster movie. I think tha'ts a win-win.
Seems like it's too late now. The Sci-Fi is dead. Long live the next Sci-Fi (pass the petition, willya?).
By Stupidity at 4:53 PM ON 03/16/09
This is the worst. idea. ever. I too checked to see if it's April 1st.
A "broader range of imagination-based entertainment?" What? That would include pretty much any programming that's fictional. They might as well start running Murder She Wrote and feature stories from Fox News.
By iLuvBooks at 4:54 PM ON 03/16/09
"By changing the name to Syfy...the new brand broadens perceptions...beyond just the traditional sci-fi genre, including fantasy, supernatural, paranormal, reality, mystery, action and adventure."
We already got a name for that. It's called speculative fiction/spec fic.
These assholes are so dumb. No wonder their original movies suck. They're too busy focusing on marketing when they should think about the quality of their CONTENT.
By ddh1969 at 4:56 PM ON 03/16/09
checkout syfy.com...looks like they are serious about this...
By Isaac at 4:57 PM ON 03/16/09
I laughed at the "Syphilis" comments so much that I registered SyFyL.US and have set up a forum there for anyone to discuss their opinions on the matter. I would also welcome any SciFi-soon-to-be-SyFy staff/employees that would like to express opinions there as well. I think the change is a little silly, but I'll get used to it. I understand the desire for a trademarkable name, for sure... But I still think Spike is stupid. SyFy is a bit silly, but... meh. So come on over and discuss! I won't be running ads on the site, I'll make NO MONEY from this project... Just to provide a place to speak out and discuss...
By discusdiva1044 at 4:57 PM ON 03/16/09
on a positive note, if the magazine becomes "the SyFy magazine", I guess that's one less magazine I'll be buying, and I'll use that $20 to buy Eureka season 2 when it goes on sale.
By datarat at 4:59 PM ON 03/16/09
Hm. Long thread, so I hope I didn't miss somebody pointing this out:
"“The name Sci Fi has been associated with geeks and dysfunctional, antisocial boys in their basements with video games and stuff like that, as opposed to the general public and the female audience in particular,” said TV historian Tim Brooks, who helped launch Sci Fi Channel when he worked at USA Network."
Yeah, I'm insulted.
By jimspar at 5:00 PM ON 03/16/09
Dear SciFi, SyfY, Sify, management,
Look at all these negative posts! Look back at our (your viewers) biggest bitches! We (your viewers) have not been happy with you for a while. We appreciate you trying to fix things to increase our viewing pleasure, but we (your viewers) do not think this latest idea is a very savvy business decision. If you do decide to move forward with this plan, I believe you will see a decrease in your ratings, which in turn will reduce your advertising income thus causing you to tank, fail, plummet to the abyss of Hell.
Thank you for your time,
A long time viewer
By Erik at 5:06 PM ON 03/16/09
This is beyond idiotic. I guess we can expect more of the lame B- horror movies and less real scifi. It's too bad as well considering the vast amount of really good scifi that could be used for mini series, movies, shows, etc. Was bound to happen with NBC at the helm (just need to take a look at all the "wonderful" scifi NBC has produced the last 20 years).
By mirrorwars at 5:06 PM ON 03/16/09
WHHHHYYYY! I USED TO LOVE THIS CHANNEL! NOW THEY CANCELLED EVERY GOOD SHOW THAT I LOVED ON IT!!!!!!! WHY WHY WHY!!!!!!!!! YOU WERE MY FAVORITE!!!!!! Now your almost as bad as FOX.
By realbigbrain at 5:07 PM ON 03/16/09
Dumb, dumb, dumb. Yet another step on the journey of alienating your core fan base. I, for one, will avoid SyFy like the plague. Good thing BSG ends this Friday. Because I'm done after that. You guys just don't get it.
By Anonymoose at 5:10 PM ON 03/16/09
I heart groupthink.
So.. you have a specialist channel (e.g. sci-fi), but what you WANT is to have a generalist channel (e.g. USA (or You Essay?). Good luck with that. You'll lose the core audience (e.g. wwe - wtf?) but without adding any compelling differentiator (general = not focused or unique) to draw in joe or jane sixpack.
Why not lose the fluff and just come out and say 'we couldn't TM a general term like Sci-fi, so we made one up'?
Epic fail.
By Seanbtwo at 5:14 PM ON 03/16/09
ENOUGH!! What damned idiot has taken over this network? Ever heard the one about leaving well enough alone???? *sigh*
By Aramanthus at 5:14 PM ON 03/16/09
I think it is another sign that SciFi channel really doesn't want us SciFi fans watching it. I mean after they cancelled Farscape, I really limited what I watched on theeir channel. The stupid reality shows blow! Wrestling is not Science Fiction or fantasy that I want to see. I don't want Lost either! The Horror is ok if it isn't some cheap arse movie that took less time to film than it's script took to write. I like Stargate and it's spin-offs. Finally SciFi brought Doctor Who, which was a promise the network made early on before it began production. I miss those little news blurbs from the future. I want more programming like Doctor Who, Stargate, Farscape, Eureka and their kind. Don't get me wrong I love Anime and want to continue seeing Anime on the network too.
By Mike at 5:16 PM ON 03/16/09
this is so a move towards completely getting away from Scince Fiction programming. I forsee them in moving away from SyFy meaning SciFi meaning Science Fiction and move to more common place cable channel. next they be running Magum PI reruns.
I thought I had landed on "the Onion" news site when I read this news at first.
By John at 5:18 PM ON 03/16/09
Dumb. No, not dumb, stupid. But actually no dumber than running wrestling, Ghost Hunters and the unbelievably bad "original"movies we've been blessed with lately.
By john at 5:18 PM ON 03/16/09
I thought this was stupid enough when I heard about it, but that logo is even worse. I'm not going to be watching anything on this channel after Battlestar Galactica ends on Friday anyway, so I don't really care. Do whatever you want with your now-terrible network.
By SyGy at 5:21 PM ON 03/16/09
Awful idea, Dave Howe has lost his mind.
How much will the rebranding cost, has already cost? Pointless.
By praetorian at 5:22 PM ON 03/16/09
anyone want to start a betting pool on how long it will be before David Howe, President of syfy is in the unemployment line. cause this channel is getting canceled from my sat next month reality tv and wrestling sucks this channel looks like mtv and it sucks too
By madwolf at 5:24 PM ON 03/16/09
Holy crap. They continue to destroy themselves. This isn't even remotely within the realm of ANYTHING that could be considered intelligent.
I used to love this channel. Now, when BSG ends I will have NO reason to watch this channel. At all. Not a single one.
I tried hard to like Sanctuary but I failed. Everything, and I mean EVERYTHING else is horrid.
Atlantis was slaughtered and given the worst series sendoff I have EVER seen.
It's finished, it's done. It's over. Just do us all a favor and pull the plug. Please do not subject us to this utter insanity.
It's dead. Let it go.
By Viss at 5:25 PM ON 03/16/09
How effing depressing. This has got to be one of the more ignorant marketing ideas I've encountered. It's right up there with New Coke and Pepsi Clear. Well, I guess it opens up the possibility for someone to start a new Sci Fi channel that gets back to its roots. Welcome to Phail, Mr. Howe.
By Meggery at 5:26 PM ON 03/16/09
This is the dumbest thing I have ever heard. Hell if I'll be watching a channel called SyFy.
By Viss at 5:27 PM ON 03/16/09
How effing depressing. This has got to be one of the more ignorant marketing ideas I've encountered. It's right up there with New Coke and Pepsi Clear. Well, I guess it opens up the possibility for someone to start a new Sci Fi channel that gets back to its roots. Welcome to Phail, Mr. Howe.
By CaptXpendable at 5:31 PM ON 03/16/09
It's funny, there are already people who look down on the term Sci-Fi, and they want to dumb it down even more? They should just give up the pretense, it's clear that the suits they hire to run things don't really care about the genre. They aren't interested in creating a first rate SCIENCE FICTION channel, they just want to put up any cheap, third rate crap that they can find.
By remixthis at 5:31 PM ON 03/16/09
What the FRAK are the "powers that be" at SciFi thinking??? Or better yet NOT thinking????
By SavvyDuck at 5:35 PM ON 03/16/09
“The name Sci Fi has been associated with geeks and dysfunctional, antisocial boys in their basements with video games and stuff like that, as opposed to the general public and the female audience in particular,” said TV historian Tim Brooks, who helped launch Sci Fi Channel when he worked at USA Network.
Thank you so much Sci Fi for letting us know that one of your former minions thought so highly of the viewership! We watch the and the advertisements that bring in your revenue and pay your jobs so it makes perfect sense that you resent us all.
On the bright side, I have tivo and I skip all your commercials. I would find programming elsewhere if you went out of business tomorrow and I hope you last just long enough for the last episode of BSG.
However, it would be great if the last job of your marketing team was to write the press release announcing their terminations for insulting their viewers!
Have a spiffy day!
By Mandy at 5:35 PM ON 03/16/09
Warehouse 13 with an aggressive marketing campaign? You mean what you SHOULD have done with The Dresden Files. No thanks. I'm not interested Sam the wallet boy. I liked Bob.
By Argent at 5:41 PM ON 03/16/09
I don't see this posted here, but on some other sites it's been pointed out that Syfy is a word in Polish which can lead to this other new slogan - SyFy: It's Polish for "Crap"
SyFy International will be known in parts of Europe as "The Crap Channel".
By gorehound696 at 5:41 PM ON 03/16/09
imagine greater a world that has an intelligent science fiction channel.
and that is all you will get a fantasy cause it sure is not here on the SY(URGHH )FY(YURGG)
we will be lucky to get any decent shows on this channel.
By jbs780 at 5:44 PM ON 03/16/09
WOW!!! didn't think I would ever get to the bottom of this thread! Yo Sci-Fi Channel Peopple!...there seems to be an ummmm...negative response to your rebranding idea. That tell ya anything?
To answere a question posed at the top of this never ending thread...Now the don't have to come up with an explanation for having wrestling on the channel...fits right in..sorta..kinda...maybe...maybe just a little...well no it still doens't fit does it. Never mind.
Maybe you Sci Fi Channel Exec-typtes should, oh I don't know, RETHINK this whole thing. Just sayin' so don't be hatin'.
Sci Fi Wire people! For the LOVE A HEAVEN...FIX THE CAPTCHA FEATURE! GEEZ...EVERY FURSHURLGENER TIME!!!
By zapwiz at 5:45 PM ON 03/16/09
Welcome to Spike TV 2.0!!!!
So now we get wrestling with a side of stargate instead of star trek.
I am glad this is happening after BSG is done.
By Rick at 5:46 PM ON 03/16/09
"SyFy" reads like the name of a retarded dog on a children's cartoon. Honestly, what a terrible, terrible idea. After this Friday, I'm done with the channel anyway. Enjoy your new stupid name, losers.
PLEASE FIRE ANYONE WHO APPROVED THIS NAME CHANGE!!!
By bignutball at 5:48 PM ON 03/16/09
Let me add my voice to all those who hate this latest attempt at brand extension. There was a time when you turned on the SciFi Channel and recieved some blast from the past as well as the occasional new bit of programming. Now we get reality tv and monster movies so bad Roger Corman wouldn't make them shoved down our throats. Perhaps if more resources should be put into original programming than into stuff like bad tv and pointless name changes. Maybe they should go back to their roots and put on some old stuff during the day rather than marathons of rejects from the now defunct UPN. At some point in the future this network will have as much to do with what originally brought it into existence as what was once known as TNN (now Spike TV). The name will be changed completely and scifi will be gone from the schedule. I guess we can only hope that whoever starts the next science fiction themed channel will stick with it.
By jim at 5:49 PM ON 03/16/09
This is the lamest idea the operators of this channel have come up with, to date. How many of GE's subsidiaries are run by idiots these days?
By commenter at 5:53 PM ON 03/16/09
This is a moronic ploy -- typical of "suit thinking", insulting to sci fi fans, and stupidly confusing to everyone else. The spin of calling it "forward thinking" is weakly pathetic. Welcome to the "everything" channel -- where we (NBC) plan to shuffle whatever we choose. The Haunting of the Real Wrestling Housewives of Andromeda -- now that's entertainment!
By Alan at 5:55 PM ON 03/16/09
Sounds like New Coke to me. We've known this was in the works for a long time with the insipid wrestling shows and big snake movies and endless drivel that has nothing to do with Science Fiction. The only time I watch any more is to see the merciful end of a promising BSG series that hasn't been any good since the middle of the first season, SG1 reruns, and the occasional Twilight Zone marathon. Hopefully another channel will fill the void created by this homogenized corporate marketed buffoonery so we can all be appreciated again.
And by the way, New Coke is dead, Classic Coke still rules.
By Rick at 6:03 PM ON 03/16/09
To the moron "SyFy" execs who approved this:
Imagine Failure.
By mocoso at 6:05 PM ON 03/16/09
Well, the channel has slowly detiriorated to reality tv show crap and little on scifi. The only thing I was watching on that channel was BSG and a cool Sci-Fi movie every once in a great while. I remember the days when all I ever watched all day was the sci fi channel. Alas... they find a way to screw things up much like G4tv which used to be geared for gaming only. That chanel has gone to crap too. Pity.
By CelebrateLD at 6:07 PM ON 03/16/09
Syfy? Siffy. Sniffy. Stiffy. Spiffy. Hmmm... I'd seriously re-think trying to brand 'Sci Fi' phonetically. LOL!
By lol at 6:08 PM ON 03/16/09
FAILURE.
By Zerion at 6:09 PM ON 03/16/09
Wow... of all the dumb things I've seen this network do.. this has got to be the top of it all!
I mean.. wow.. this is dumb
By skyrous at 6:10 PM ON 03/16/09
It is amazing that scifi has treated their fanbase so crappy over the years no one believes their "commitment to the core fans" garbage for even a second.
"moving beyond scifi" means they want to start showing either CSI or Law and Order everyday just like EVERY SINGLE OTHER CHANNEL ON MY CABLE SYSTEM! I promise you they'll be doing that within a year.
Last month when it looked like my job might be going away and I'd have to cut back i considered the idea of getting rid of cable. Although my job is safe after the galactica finally on friday I can't think of a single reason to shell out $137/month since there is nothing left on cable i want to watch. I'll get myself a $30 DSL connection for internet and turn off my entire home entertainment center (except for the occasional DVD) and save a bundle on electricity too.
By wagguy at 6:11 PM ON 03/16/09
Come on!
Do you really expect us to embrace you ideology that you are trying to escape the non-portability of the term sci-fi, and replace it with SyFy---a much more user-friendly, well known term...not.
But, I guess you need to expand your roundness, while being able to contract the edges of the reality that is being transposed by its very lack of opaqueness in a world of transparent squares and globes (hey, if the dude in the article can babble a bunch of crap, so can I.
I hate the idea...and have hated all of this extra crap that has gone on lately...wrestlling? Really? You have to introduce the one thing that is probably furthest from a sci-fi fans mind when he/she wants to tune to the sci-fi channel.
Get rid of the moron that had this bright, skippy idea and bring back sci-fi to the channel.
Gotta love this stuff:
Battlestar Galactica
Star Trek
Stargate
Sanctuary
Twilight Zone
Outer Limits
Dark Shadows
The Time Machine
Land of the Giants
scifi movies
Gotta hate this stuff:
Wrestling: Morons of the shallow end
Ghost Hunters
Reality Games
There is plenty of sci-fi to go around, without this other crap...you have sister channels for that stuff.
Out
By Tamisan at 6:11 PM ON 03/16/09
sigh-fie!
By gordol at 6:17 PM ON 03/16/09
http://www.tvweek.com/news/2009/03/sci_fi_channel_aims_to_shed_ge.php
----quote---
"The name Sci Fi has been associated with geeks and dysfunctional, antisocial boys in their basements with video games and stuff like that, as opposed to the general public and the female audience in particular,” said TV historian Tim Brooks, who helped launch Sci Fi Channel when he worked at USA Network.
---and---
"We spent a lot of time in the ’90s trying to distance the network from science fiction"
--- end quote---
Gee, thanks for the insults. And don't think we haven't noticed the drift away from science fiction ON THE SCIENCE FICTION CHANNEL, and hated the station execs for it (you reading this, Ms Hammer?).
By lord of cake at 6:19 PM ON 03/16/09
Wow that's horrible. We can expect more lame content I'm sure. Maybe now we can get a different, real SFF channel from a different group of people, becuase these guys can't deliver.
By lord of cake at 6:21 PM ON 03/16/09
Wow that's horrible. We can expect more lame content I'm sure. Maybe now we can get a different, real SFF channel from a different group of people, becuase these guys can't deliver.
By Azgoroth at 6:21 PM ON 03/16/09
This smells fishy. Though it is in line with the Scifi content being made utterly generic, split into categories, (Dvice, Fidgit, Wire) neutered and watered down so it fits with more mainstream channels.
By Paulo at 6:23 PM ON 03/16/09
Perhaps heres an idea, for a program to be on the 'new improved' SyFy Channel is needs to have a 'SCIENCE FICTION' component !
Another suggestion SiFi exec's...Why not run a viewer vote to see what the viewers want to watch
By Syuffy at 6:26 PM ON 03/16/09
Syuffy is a stupid name. Glad to hear you dislike Sci-Fi fans so much. Makes it a lot easier to go out of my way to not support your advertisers.
By CouchPotato at 6:34 PM ON 03/16/09
Lame. Misguided. This is regrettable. Dave, your bright idea smacks of a certain smug "new way of thinking" that humiliates the foundation on which Sci Fi built its reputation. Sci fi IS what it IS. Discovery Channel. Food Network. There's no confusing what they offer. If they altered the spelling of their names, their target audience would certainly question each channels ability to intelligently present the subject matter. Changing the name in this manner just opens the door for a more genuine entity to swoop in and assume the Sci Fi mantle you've so conveniently dismissed. Sy Fy will soon be looked at as a successor to the ridicule which MTV received when they stopped focusing on music. You may be lucky to get that broad an audience, and if you do, you deserve all the distaste we heap upon it as well.
By cranny777 at 6:35 PM ON 03/16/09
That is not a good name. Booo. Sci fi channel should stay the same.
By SyfyIsLame at 6:36 PM ON 03/16/09
DUMB! Seriously. Dumb. A Name thought up by people who know nothing about pop culture and trends. Old people with marketing power in a new world = hahahahaha.
By RogueGeek at 6:37 PM ON 03/16/09
WTF! My first reaction was that I was reading an article on the Onion.
But alas it was not so. Now I must part with what remains of an old, dear friend; beaten and battered though he was, from years of decisions made by the dark minds of the network executives and their hordes of minions. Alas, my friend is gone and so I have little need nor desire to associate with the pale and lifeless likeness that has been thrust upon me in his place. I shall instead retreat back to the books and DVDs from which I came and shall forever leave SyFy to ROT upon the mindless wasteland of wrestling and reality shows so loved by the dark and foul executives. Goodbye SciFi you shall be missed.
By Subversive at 6:40 PM ON 03/16/09
...because "SCIFI" doesn't cheapen "science fiction enough" (and now retarded children won't be intimidated by the silent "C").
By Ravix at 6:45 PM ON 03/16/09
"Without abandoning our legacy or our core audience", They have already done that. Once BSG is gone, there is nothing left to wath but re-runs of SG-1( haven't seen Atlantis since the final episode).
By plasma at 6:47 PM ON 03/16/09
This explains why Battlestar Galactica is such a lame excuse for a show. All fluff with no substance.
By kubiaka at 6:48 PM ON 03/16/09
Wow, looking at all the comments here, perhaps the marketing department should have done a focus group or a survey or something to see what the reaction to this would be ahead of time. Clearly someone did not do their homework. I realize all you want is a name you can trademark so you own it... sometimes you don't need to clearly own everything to profit from it.
By antenius at 6:50 PM ON 03/16/09
Hey Mr. Howe it's not nice to call Sci Fi fans dysfunctional and anti-social boys in basements.
But its really stupid to say it out loud and then announce your new SUBSCRIPTION based MMORPG .
Apparently you want to distance your network from us geeks but not our wallets?
In the Immortal words of Stewie Griffon
"Aaaah Hows that workin out for ya?"
By squirrel at 6:52 PM ON 03/16/09
April Fools day is April 1st.... Thats what this crap sounds like to me. Scifi means something "science fiction" channel. what the heck does syfy mean....
You guy are really getting dumb, but I got the next idea for you while you're on the roll lets completely abandon all your "scifi" shows and I mean everything. And lets put on nothing but the rediculous biased programming that makes absolutely no sense at all on the channel similar to the rumors and ignorant reviews that your writers have posted on this web site lately.
"Imagine Greater" hahaha don't even get me started on that one.
By SyFylisChannel at 6:55 PM ON 03/16/09
By jbkellers5 at 6:58 PM ON 03/16/09
This is just awful. I just hope that the powers that be read all of these comments as they are all accurate.
By katylava at 7:09 PM ON 03/16/09
I agree, this is bad. Combined with the shift in programming over the last few years, it's INSULTING TO SCIENCE FICTION FANS.
Does anybody know how many comments on are on this page. I had to stop reading them but it looks like they are all vehemently against this change. Please, someone tell me this is getting sent to SyFy's marketing department... and lots of other people who work there.
By tim at 7:10 PM ON 03/16/09
Frak you.
By Grid at 7:11 PM ON 03/16/09
el oh el
By BralenX at 7:12 PM ON 03/16/09
Once BSG goes of the air I'm done with the Scifi channel.
By thanatos at 7:13 PM ON 03/16/09
"Syfy—unlike the generic entertainment category "sci-fi"—firmly establishes a uniquely ownable trademark that is portable across all nonlinear digital platforms and beyond, from Hulu to iTunes. Syfy also creates an umbrella brand name that can extend into new adjacent businesses...."
What a load of Feldercarb!!! You want to 'brand' something sci-fi, you call it "Isaac" or "Hugo" (okay, that one's taken) or "Ray" or "Jules" or "Wells" or "124C".
WTF is a Syfy??
Watch where you stick it, you might get Syfy!!
By victoriakm at 7:13 PM ON 03/16/09
Marketing in the bane of humanity.
If I hear/see/experience one more asinine "re-branding" my head will likely explode.
I'm done with "Syfy"
By TVThemeGuy at 7:15 PM ON 03/16/09
You know, I haven't watched Sci-Fi since October of last year. What I really wanted to see, I can watch on Hulu or buy/rent on DVD. I thought I'd miss Sci-Fi, but I really don't. For me, this is just the death knell. I could never understand the rationale behind airing a WRESTLING show on Sci-Fi.
This name change... stupid. Just stupid. "Sci-Fi" had become a brand over the last 16 years. For that matter, when they were known as "The Sci-Fi Channel," they had a brand. At one time, it was all I watched because... well... they aired science fiction shows.
Now... not so much.
Bye-bye, SyFy.
By Praetorian at 7:17 PM ON 03/16/09
I think the syfy channel should have to pay me to watch the crap they want to show like reality tv and wrestling, also you should try some common sense instead of college smarts because the college part isnt working for you Howe
By barry at 7:19 PM ON 03/16/09
I'm not going to say this is a stupid idea, because I think that's already been said ad nauseum.
I will say that I have come to expect this sort of stupidity from the execs at SciFi. After Ghost Hunters, Wrestling, the douchebag psychic guy, Scare Tactics, and those lame monster movies they make, it's only par for the course that they woudl do this. This is their attempt to slowly divorce the network from "Science Fiction". When last I checked, reality shows are not fiction, and certainly not science related.
You CAN make a load of money on a network based entirely on Sci-Fi. I wish I lived in Canada where I could get Space: The Imagination Station on cable. They at least seem to play popular sci-fi shows.
If I could, I would cancel sci-fi after BSG is over. Alas, it's part of my cable package and my hands are tied.
I have nothing but hate for the execs at Sci-Fi and have for years. This changes nothing. It only brings out into the open what we're already known for a long time: they are stupid douchebags.
By rayhigh at 7:20 PM ON 03/16/09
Stupid. SciFi or whatever retarded name is next sucks anyway. Jeez, they could have brought back Firefly instead of the lame junk they trot out. They had a shot at it, and passed. Also canceled MST3K. Yep, I have a loooong grudge against this lame channel. I never watch it, just torrent, baby. Screw SciFi.
By Omen at 7:20 PM ON 03/16/09
Yeah,if it's working you can always count on some Frelling Dranhead to fix it.
Motherfrakkers!
By Scigirl at 7:20 PM ON 03/16/09
As a 43 year-old female geek, I can assure the network-formerly-known-as-SciFi that my disposable income will in no way be used to support their advertisers in the future. Like many dysfunctional spazzes, I generally can't wait to buy the latest and greatest science fiction or tecnology merchandise and won't be bothered to wait for a sale or a price drop. Say bye-bye to that cash sponsors and advertisers! Hope some of it was used to pay the salaries of the odious "executives" who have driven this network into the dirt...
By davidhoy at 7:20 PM ON 03/16/09
Douglas Adams in "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" defines the Marketing Division of the Sirius Cybernetics Corporation as "a bunch of mindless jerks who'll be the first against the wall when the revolution comes." It seems to me that Mr Adams had foreknowledge of this idiocy when he wrote that!
By ronbo at 7:22 PM ON 03/16/09
This is what happens when marketing is ran by people who have no clue about the market they work in. I will take a wild quess that all the exec. at "syfy" got their start in marketing, so they will believe anything these liberal arts grads shovel out. All those old "sci fi" programs and all those great novels looking to be adapted to tv and this is what we get. Long live the mundane.
By Predacorp at 7:22 PM ON 03/16/09
LOL! EPIC FAIL!!! Disenfranchise your viewer base and make more room for Informertials! Great strategy. Since the only movie worth viewing on a saturday was "splinter" and I had already seen it. are you guys really trying to kill this channel? why?
By kc at 7:24 PM ON 03/16/09
Syfy that rolls off the tongue well. /sarcasm
This i think is a step in the wrong direction like "cough" canceling farscape
By Sly at 7:26 PM ON 03/16/09
May as well rename the channel "penis."
By Slander at 7:26 PM ON 03/16/09
Wow. I knew the rage would be flying in these comments, and I'm glad to see that I underestimated it. This is a stupid, stupid move. When your fans are raging because you've got off-genre programming on the network, you don't change the network branding so the points of objection are no longer outside the channel's scope.
Are there any cable channels out there that haven't succumbed to the urge to appeal to the slavering masses in a desperate bid for ratings? Are there any channels with integrity left?
By squirrel at 7:29 PM ON 03/16/09
"The name Sci Fi has been associated with geeks and dysfunctional, antisocial boys in their basements with video games and stuff like that, as opposed to the general public and the female audience in particular,” said TV historian Tim Brooks, who helped launch Sci Fi Channel when he worked at USA Network.
Wow.... Nice way to keep your audience hangin around lets just insult them. I would think if I was CEO of the network I'd be finding ways to kiss these people's asses after all they pay your salary by watching the same aged-old episodes of star trek, twilight zone and low rated b-movies noone really likes every week.
All we need now are writers to insult your readers in the commenting area who diss their posts each day.
If you people had any intelligence whatsoever you'd fired the moron who changed this site and the name of the channel and get back to the original way things were.
If it ain't broke don't fix it. I can't "Imagine Greater" ways into screwing up this network more than it already is, but I'm sure you guys can find a way. I have absolute confidence in that.
By jack at 7:30 PM ON 03/16/09
OK...I've now read about half the comments.
The're more fun than 90% of the stuff on your channel. Is that the reason for the story? To inject life, albeit vitriolic, into the lackluster world that is now your stock in trade? SciReal. Bah, humbug. With all the scifi material, much of it in the publc domain, (read: costs nothing), on the market, why can't you just be who you are. The only TV network catering to fans of this genre. If you want a new channel, start one. But, leave this one alone. PLEASE!
Ps. I don't wanna even get started on how you've mucked up this website.(mostly ,cause, apparently, noone's paying any attention.
By kabs at 7:36 PM ON 03/16/09
FAIL
By Hatari at 7:40 PM ON 03/16/09
this is just stupid, but ever since they were bought years ago they have be on a long slide in to &%$%&^%&^%!
By AdmNaismith at 7:41 PM ON 03/16/09
What this really means is an end to quality scripted shows like 'BSG' and a new cheaper line-up consisting of:
-10 new Ghost Hunter shows ('Ghost Hunter:Alabama'!)
-wrestling 3+ nights week
-and 'Stargate: Universe' aka 'SG-Voyager'.
Meanwhile 'Stargate:SG1' repeats will be spun off onto it's own 24 hr channel.
Actually, a 24-hr retro science fiction/adventure/60's spy channel would be pretty cool.
By NoLongerWatching at 7:42 PM ON 03/16/09
Man, this channel has been slowly dying ever since they cut Farscape. Nice way to treat your fans. Forget us leaving our money on the nightstand after this.
By Sylvia at 7:43 PM ON 03/16/09
OK, first you killed Farscape, then SGA and now you make a stupid move like this?
Is there anyone with 2 brain cells in your orgainization?
I won't be watching any future programming, as you seem to be very disdainful of Science Fiction fans. Who should be your base audience. If you didn't want them, why did you even create this channel in the first place?
By toadthetoad at 7:45 PM ON 03/16/09
Why not concentrate on getting good programming back on instead of wasting your time changing your name to the stupidest, least descriptive name in the history of television? Might as well rename yourself Stupid F*cking Television...at least it has the same initials as SciFi. Seriously, stop with the "reality" crap and other bad programming and drop this asinine idea.
By Ranga14 at 7:54 PM ON 03/16/09
First wrestling, now this?!!??!?
I can somewhat understand having a show like Ghost Hunters since it deals with the paranormal which is sort of attached to "Science Fiction" but changing the name to L33T Speak isn't what I'd call a good idea.
I mean I somewhat see part of the point in that they can copyright the name but I actually think it will be more difficult for people to remember. And is Howe smoking crack? I can't remember one time I've seen a text or I've sent one saying "Check out the syfy channel", lol, come on now, we're not stupid.
My guess is they're going to venture into airing reality tv as well as some sappy dramas. Just look at Caprica and how it really doesn't have much to do with battlestars. I mean, it looks like a good drama sure but when I dive into that universe, I want to see Battlestars! lol
Also, as many have said, I was also one of those people that miss the old Sci Fi. Back when there was mostly sci fi programming on. The downfall began with the butchering of Sliders and then continued with the cancellation of Farscape and First Wave, two of the best shows Sci Fi has ever had. If I were to jump ahead in time from back then to now, I simply would not recognize the channel.
Wouldn't it be great to have a channel in which they viewers decided what kind of shows should stay and go in regards to genuine science fiction? One can only hope that with the ever evolving Internet that maybe a new channel could spring up that could be half Internet / half tv based that the viewers controlled. Wishful thinking indeed.
So yeah, you have the winner;
(SyFy) Stupidity & Short sightedness: 1
(SciFi) Common Sense: 0
By Blackpool9 at 7:59 PM ON 03/16/09
Dumbest.
Idea.
Ever.
By Banbha at 8:00 PM ON 03/16/09
"Without abandoning our legacy or our core audience"
Man, this is a COMPLETE insult to that core audience that this company is lauding for. *snort* This whole 'marketing and peer groups' is crap. They don't take into account the REAL people who DO watch this network. But this is more typical corporate network tv that ignores the base for which they started on and have supported them through the years.
The last of intelligent and well-written television is now gone. Thanks, Dave Howe.
By Myke at 8:03 PM ON 03/16/09
@kubiaka - The sad thing is, Howe claims in the press release that early focus testing of the new name was positive. He comments on how there will be complaints, but points out that there were also complaints about the re-imagining of BSG, and that fans accepted it in the end.
By angie at 8:04 PM ON 03/16/09
Still waiting on that TIN MAN series.
By dispairing at 8:08 PM ON 03/16/09
It is too early for April Fool's Day. What is going on here??? Was Sci Fi too cerebral?
By KEN ALMIGHTY at 8:11 PM ON 03/16/09
SCI - FI Channel Jumps The Shark...
Looks like The Jonas Brothers will soon be playing a halftime show during wrestling.
ScFy? The dumbing down of America? Here it comes now... "Git R Done, Robot!"
Get ready for reruns of well, CRAP.
By KEN ALMIGHTY at 8:15 PM ON 03/16/09
Another thought - do we start sending them bags of peanuts??
By Ranga14 at 8:16 PM ON 03/16/09
@ Myke
I wonder what "demographic" this "focus group" consisted of? Wrestlers? LMAO!!!!
By trollwar at 8:19 PM ON 03/16/09
I think this is the most posts a story has received yet. Plus they are all negative. Does that tell you something and will it make a difference??? Please don't do this name change because it will eventually take away what is so special about this channel.
By TK at 8:26 PM ON 03/16/09
Scifi fans are an under-served market, and we are HUGE, we watch stuff like HEROES (doing well), LOST (doing well, heck my town shuts down for LOST), BSG, etc...
There are a LOT of us, and we spend money, we spend money on high tech, we spend money on DVDS.
We'd LOVE to see more classic sci fi, we'd love to see things like the DUNE miniseries... we'll watch Plan 9 from Outerspace before we'll watch wresting. We'd love to see FARSCAPE, and Stargate, Star Trek, Star WArs. (ok Star ANything)
We'd like stories with complicated plots, interesting well developed characters. If there are dragons/hobbits/elves/wizards, that's cool.
Please NO More "reality" game shows, no more cheesefests like ROCKMONSTER, and SNAKEHEAD TERROR (which rerun a million times a year). We'd like MORE stuff like DUNE, like Grendel, like STargate and BSG.... and Twilight Zone, Next Step Beyond, and Outer Limits, and Amazing stories...
How about Nerd-News about SciFi conventions?
How about stuff about SciFi clubs, New books, New games, New Movies, New shows... or even reviews of Old stuff that shouldn't be forgotten
By SteveDC at 8:31 PM ON 03/16/09
Are you kidding me.... It's a Sci-Fi channel, and that in itself sets it apart from every other channel. Take that away and it will melt into oblivion. Silly, very silly!
By JPyke at 8:31 PM ON 03/16/09
Amazing! 500+ comments in one day. Not one positive response. How did the marketing people not anticipate this? What an absurdly stupid move on NBC/Universal's part. It'd actually be kind of funny if it weren't also sad. Way to go geniuses. No one is impressed.
By Zillatain at 8:32 PM ON 03/16/09
There use to be a website named SyFy Portal, which changed its name to Airlock Alpha a few weeks ago. And I thought the reason they gave for changing it was odd/stupid. Now I know the real reason it was changed.
By Nausicaa'sLover at 8:42 PM ON 03/16/09
WOW! I've never seen so many comments posted for any one single article before! Just something to be noted here: From what I've learned so called "true" science fiction aficionados of past never cared for the term "sci fi", poking fun by pronouncing it as "skify" and preferring to use the acronym "SF" instead. "Sci fi" is apparently a term that's been exploited purely by the media over the decades and hence it's become the accepted norm used by the masses. Using "SyFy" instead is merely an extension of this media exploitation. So all of you ranting and raving as if you're purists-- do your homework.
By Maudite at 8:45 PM ON 03/16/09
Look into the face of the new SyFy demographic of the illiterate tween.. the add for twilight is as big as the name change announcement.
They forget its us the parents who actually have the $$.
By STUPID! at 8:46 PM ON 03/16/09
Same dumb thinking that relaunched this site as a crap-fest. Way to go, brains.
By DynaMike at 8:49 PM ON 03/16/09
This is 16 days early.
Unless you're NOT joking.
By Mandy at 8:52 PM ON 03/16/09
Ah, welcome to my island of hate, Scifi fans. I haven't had any faith in the Scifi Channel since they didn't renew The Dresden Files.
By Jon S. at 8:53 PM ON 03/16/09
Moronic. Completely and utterly moronic.
Do the universe a favor and just cancel this channel now. Maybe then we can get Canada's Space channel, and some decent programming.
By cgp at 9:00 PM ON 03/16/09
How useless! They should worry more about programing. What a foolish idea to waste money on.
By TimMcCloud at 9:11 PM ON 03/16/09
This is the most stupid thing I have ever heard of. Way to alienate your loyal base, way to appear stupid, way to blow useless amounts of cash on a mistake. There has been so much blowback on this, I'll bet they don't go ahead and do it.
By detroitB at 9:18 PM ON 03/16/09
Well it sure looks like they meessed up big this time. All of these negative responses and i bet they are just going to ignore everone and go ahead with whatever crazy idea they. I have been a huge sci fi fan for years so i think and hope that they fail at this.
By Spaceman Spiff at 9:22 PM ON 03/16/09
Maybe it just means they don't know how to spell.
Actually I don't think the SciFi channel has ever been very much in touch with the fans.
I remember when this channel first started thinking I didn't like the name because SciFi had always had a negative conotation.
By primortal at 9:25 PM ON 03/16/09
In other words. More reality shows and less shows with substance. Oh and more cheesy movies to boot.
No thanks SciFi, your network in already in the crapper ever since Universal took you over.
By Bill at 9:31 PM ON 03/16/09
SyFy???? You CAN'T be serious!!!!
By Juan Valdez at 9:32 PM ON 03/16/09
First TechTV now Sci Fi. This kind of stupidity and a deep hatred of commercial advertising is why I download the media that entertains me.
By Rav at 9:33 PM ON 03/16/09
So long, Skiffy. It's been nice knowing you. I'll tune in for the finale of BSG, then I'll find my SCIENCE FICTION elsewhere.
By Corey at 9:36 PM ON 03/16/09
Ha! This probably won't change much for me, I don't watch Si-Fi that much, but this change to syfy may be a good thing, who doesn't want to check out the syphilis channel?
By Mandy at 9:39 PM ON 03/16/09
'who doesn't want to check out the syphilis channel?'
I always knew this channel was a plague!
By abster at 9:40 PM ON 03/16/09
I think its funny that people here are bashing Sci Fi. Yeah. It's the Sci-Fi channel! YOU WATCH THE SCI-FI CHANNEL! The joke is on YOU. haha.
I watch the SciFi channel because I KNOW what to expect. Get over yourselves people! YOU WATCH THE SCI-FI CHANNEL!!!
By KC at 9:44 PM ON 03/16/09
Sy Fy? That's the most frakking retarded thing I've heard!
By Rick at 9:47 PM ON 03/16/09
"I think its funny that people here are bashing Sci Fi. Yeah. It's the Sci-Fi channel! YOU WATCH THE SCI-FI CHANNEL! The joke is on YOU. haha.
I watch the SciFi channel because I KNOW what to expect. Get over yourselves people! YOU WATCH THE SCI-FI CHANNEL!!!"
Haha, what a pathetic and lazy line of reasoning. The new name stinks of wasted marketing dollars and brainless exec-think.
You came to Sci-Fi for the wrestling and can stay for the funeral. Enjoy your stupid self.
By dumb at 9:50 PM ON 03/16/09
That is the WORST, lamest name ever.
And it insults our intelligence. SciFi is too nerdy?
Prepare to have all the content worth watching removed from the schedule. Paranormal (anti-sci) ghost hunters, macho-man reality series (Dumpster Wrangers!), anything Nazi, and fashion makeovers shows are on the way.
Horrible news.
By Mandy at 10:00 PM ON 03/16/09
Back when the Scifi channel was new it was stated that 'It's called Scifi and not The Scifi Channel' because we cover Science fiction, fantasy and supernatural horror.' Clearly they don't think anyone's left who remembers these things have ALWAYS been on the channel.
It's the reality TV and wrestling we don't need.
By pat at 10:08 PM ON 03/16/09
Embarrassing,ridiculous,and confusing.
Is it April 1st today?
By pj6159 at 10:08 PM ON 03/16/09
Syfy? Sounds like a venereal disease.
By SPD_GM at 10:12 PM ON 03/16/09
Expanding the material for Sci-Fi, I mean SyFy, is a good thing. Honestly, moving into something more than outer space and starship battles would be great. But I draw the line at reality tv. You bean counters smeg off, and keep the least common denominator off Sci-Fi Channel.
By Ikthul at 10:15 PM ON 03/16/09
wow, "syfy"? What a cool name....
By squirrel at 10:18 PM ON 03/16/09
Well if they don't pull away from this idea they got, then well after over 500 negative comments it's obvious they don't care what their audience thinks. Especially after that insulting comment "antisocial geeks that live in their basements" lol, what kind of moron insults his fanbase.... even a 5 year old has more sense than that. There are some stupid people in this world, but I think the majority of them work for this network.
By Solonor at 10:19 PM ON 03/16/09
This is similar to Tech TV announcing that it was "too techy" and morphing into the inane ramblings of G4. It's not unexpected. Sci-Fi lost me a loooong time ago. This is just the period at the end of a really depressing sentence. At least (between the ridiculous announcement and the hilarious comments in reaction) they gave me a few laughs on their way out the door.
We still have BBC America for our Doctor Who and Torchwood fixes!
By gigshaft at 10:22 PM ON 03/16/09
Oh dear God.
Has the Sci-Fi Channel just plain given up on ever trying to capture an audience of Science Fiction fans? The only reason they have to fall back to wrestling as a ratings-grabber is because none of the people in charge understand what science fiction fans like. This is tantamount to putting interior designers in charge of ESPN. (And no, that's not a veiled anti-gay statement, even though I realize it could sound like one.)
Memo to the Sci-Fi -- er, "SyFy" -- execs: The reason Wrestling worked for "Spike" when nothing else was is because it's the "manly" network. The cross-over is obvious. I defy you to find the cross-over between wrestling and your average "Doctor Who" fan.
Why have you given up on the Science Fiction audience? It's not hard to get them, you know.
Stop the crappy reality TV. (Yeah, I know it's cheap. So are talk shows. How about one that interviews people in science fiction?)
Stop the b-grade horror original movies. ("Mansquito?" Really??)
And LISTEN to science fiction fans to figure out what they respond to. (Where's the sequel to "The Lost Room?" People were RABID about it, and it couldn't be any more expensive to make than "Mansquito II" would be.)
I hate to say it, but "SyFy" is an admission of failure. The people behind the Sci-Fi Channel have failed to on deliver on the network's mandate. It should have been a place for science fiction classics, pulp favorites, and innovative new programming. It's sad that they're just throwing up their hands and walking away from something that could have been a no-brainer if the right brains had been in charge.
By Neal Snow at 10:24 PM ON 03/16/09
Haha...here's a tagline for you're channel - SyFy, Home of Frankenfish
Why don't you just cut to the chase and rename yourself Mtv4.
By Sileas at 10:26 PM ON 03/16/09
Dear Bonnie:
Please go read some Peter Drucker (the father of modern management and the godfather of marketing). What is the point of a business? To determine what is of value to your customers, and then innovate to meet that value.
Based on this malinspired marketing move, I think Drucker is spinning in his grave right now.
If your intention is to finally kill this network and rebrand it as something new with different content, a la The Nashville Network (TNN) turning into The National Network (TNN), then into Spike, then please just do it now and go find your new core audience. You are obviously not interested in the college educated, affluent, and literate audience you already have.
Frankly, as a viewer, I'm insulted by both the childish name, the manner by which you have presented it in one of the most unprofessional and amateur press releases I have ever seen, and the completely off-point evaluation of your audience. I think this Friday's finale of BSG will be my last screening on your network.
Los Angeles, CA
By Mandy at 10:27 PM ON 03/16/09
I just checked. Syfy or Syf is Polish for dirt or waste. That certainly is the right name. Of course I've been calling Scifi similar names ever since they did not renew The Dresden Files. The name finally suits the product.
By longbowhunter at 10:32 PM ON 03/16/09
Syfy is Sci-Fi...TO THE EXTREME!!!! It speaks of corporate synergy as well as being proactive and a whole new outrageous paradigm...TO THE EXTREME!!! Congratulations Sifee...you're now the Poochie of television networks......
P.S.-DO THE DEW....TO THE EXTREME!!!!!!!!
By ChuckyMMM at 10:32 PM ON 03/16/09
Okay, I have to join in with the rest of the Sci Fi community in saying how completely and utterly stupid and ridiculous this whole idea is straight from the beginning. I seriously started laughing when I read the first article about this fiasco. For a moment, I thought I was reading an extremely early April Fools' Day joke, but knowing you guys, it obviously isn't. Honestly, I can't get enough of the severely negative comments people are leaving! Absolutely none of them are far from the truth.
Tim Brooks' comments about Science Fiction fans to TV Week are absolutely disgusting at best, alienating and back-stabbing to the community of people who support the Sci Fi Channel through its advertising dollars. If you thought the genre was so "dirty" as you put it, why did you ever use the term in the first place?
But there's one person that can't be let off the hook so fast, and that's Mr. Dave Howe. Obviously a change of this magnitude wouldn't go without approval from the network's president. Apparently you guys are came off your best year so far. I do have to give congratulations to that, but at what cost has it been to the network? I know that Sci Fi Channel is about being able to make a profit, after all, most business are, and I don't have a problem with that. However, there is a line between the want for profit and the alienation of your customers (psst, I'll give you a hint, it's those people who are your viewers).
But the writing has been on the wall for a LONG time. With the cancellation of so many hit shows, or axing of shows before they even had a chance, none of this comes as a total surprise. I, along with so many people here, will obviously have little use for Syfy after the end of Battlestar Galactica this Friday. After all, it will be the #1 "Crap" network.
I end this comment with a link to a little freestyle music video on YouTube describing the decision behind the rebranding and the behavior of the executives:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q6dJtScSnxM
LOL MONEY
MONEY LOL
MONEY MONEY MONEY
LOLOL
MONEY LOL
LOL MONEY
MONEY LOLOL
By Dumbfounded at 10:34 PM ON 03/16/09
End of an era. Ultimate slap in the face and kiss off to sci-fi fans who have supported the network since Day 1.
By cynikkle at 10:41 PM ON 03/16/09
Seriously stupid idea. Sci Fi means a lot to a lot of people. SyFy means nothing. Changing the name to seem less geeky is really a lame excuse, too. Hello.. geeks are watching the channel.. well, they were. Very lame idea. Like a slap in the face, as said before me.
By Sparkygod1 at 10:45 PM ON 03/16/09
WHAT THE FRAK, JACK!!! A name change! Did that work when the WB went CW. What you people need to do is ask us first when ever you get a bonehead idea and we(the viewers), can help you out.. SYFY...REALLY! I'm sure there are lots of shows you can find for us that don't insult us....cough..ECW! Help US help YOU.
Nuff Said.
By Jennifer at 10:45 PM ON 03/16/09
Please don't do this.
By Horace Heyman at 10:50 PM ON 03/16/09
I
By surrealistgirl at 10:53 PM ON 03/16/09
EPIC FAIL.
Reconsider your decision. I've been a fan since the beginning. This is a joke.
You obviously don't care about the true science fiction fans that have been behind you for years. Hey I can catch most scifi on BBC America or Hulu. I don't need no silly syfy.
By Praetorian at 10:53 PM ON 03/16/09
We should boycott NBC and this SYFY they are both run by NBC and if I was on the NBC board of directors I would ask for the removal of the NBC president because NBC sucks and now they want SciFi to suck like them IM done with both
By Jason B. at 10:54 PM ON 03/16/09
What the frak? I know it's way before April 1st, so this can't be a joke. This had to have been thought up by a bunch of suits that never watch their own networks. I'm guessing MBA students that are now patting themselves on the back?
Seriously though, this is one of the WORST marketing ideas ever. This ranks below the Quizno's sponge monkeys...and I hated those things.
By Jason B. at 10:58 PM ON 03/16/09
You know, it just dawned on me too...I wonder how long it tok them to come up with this crappy idea. And how many thousands of dollars they coughed up to some marketing company to come up with it.
By Mandy at 11:01 PM ON 03/16/09
By b003 at 11:05 PM ON 03/16/09
The Sci Fi Channel also ran into problems with trademarking the Sci Fi brand!
"We're going to have upwards of 50 Sci Fi Channels in various territories and yet you cannot trademark 'Sci Fi' anywhere in the world," explained Howe.
If you can't brand SCI FI, brand "SCFI Channel" If Marvel and DC can trademark "Superhero" maybe you should hire their legal team.
I agree with the above posts this is really really "STUPID"!
By Praetorian at 11:05 PM ON 03/16/09
Aliens is on Fox Movie channel if anyone needs some real SciFi
By Trillian42 at 11:06 PM ON 03/16/09
Wow. It's as if you're activly trying to kill off the last bits of a decent station.
I've been watching this station for over a decade and for the past few years it's been going down hill.
For my entire household, the tv was almost always set to Sci-Fi. I would move my friday's around things like Battlestar or Secret Adventures of Jules Verne. I loved them. But once BSG is over, I can't really think of a reason to watch anymore. I'll get my Dr. Who from the internet and if Joe Mallozzi does a good job on SGU, I'll get that from the net too.
I refuse to support a station which does such poor branding and marketing research.
I would rather turn on TNT or USA and watch Law and Order episodes I've seen 3 times already then a lot of your programing. And the fact that I frequently do is sad.
You used to stand for science fiction. You used to show counter culture shows. Things that really were outside what the mainstream cable station would air. Now you've got paranormal shows, which A&E does better with Paranormal State. Wrestling, which spike does and an untested afterthought show called Stargate Universe.
Thanks for really making geeks and sci-fi fans a minority again. After BSG I don't think I've got a desire to check the lineup anymore. And depending on how dissapointed I stay, I may take scifiwire off my news reader.
Hope you network types get the response you wanted.
By Praetorian at 11:13 PM ON 03/16/09
BBC america has DR. Who Ill probly go back to renting fox scifi movies
By Sniffy at 11:26 PM ON 03/16/09
HAHAHAHAHAHA!
You will forever be known as Siffy. Like everyone else, I thought it was an April Fools joke.
This is about the silliest TV move I've ever heard. Admittedly, SCI FI is the *only* reason I have digital cable (to catch the shows and even record them).
Guess it's time to get a lyfe.
By rtavi at 11:31 PM ON 03/16/09
Imagine Greater?
Yeah! and THINK MORE BIGGER AND GOODER TOO!
My God! I didn't think you guys could get any more cretinous than snake movie of the week and wrestling ghost hunters,but I was wrong.
By laurasvn at 11:33 PM ON 03/16/09
Soon enough, some genius at NBC Universal not unlike Mr. Howe will reach the conclusion NBC Universal doesn't need/can't afford two channels with similar programming. Therefore, SyFy and USA will be merged into [insert stupid name], that, of course, after a bunch of good people lose their jobs.
SCIENCE FICTION is the sole reason the SCI FI Channel has been around for 16 years. If the suits overlook this fundamental truth, they're bound to disappear along side their precious Syfy Channel.
http://www.tvweek.com/news/2009/03/sci_fi_channel_aims_to_shed_ge.php
^ I find what was said in this article about this channel's core audience appalling. Apologies are in order.
By frood at 11:38 PM ON 03/16/09
What a bunch of greenblatts!! Not a wise move at all.
By Scanner at 11:55 PM ON 03/16/09
Most of these posts don't offer anything critically intelligent to say, just "that's dumb!"... which has a net value of zero as far as I'm concerned.
And yet... I can't help but agree with them. Taking a tried and true name and changing it to something incongruous, obstinate and (need I say it) lacking in class when the original name is quite distinctive in it's own right appears to me to be a sign of desperation and lack of understanding of it's audience.
Changing to SYFY to me is like painting a rolls royce neon green. Yeah it's different, but it totally misses the point of it's own existence.
By Type40 at 11:57 PM ON 03/16/09
Great markyting. Nothing will stand in the way of Wrestlyng and Ghost Huntyrs now.
By Lamar at 12:02 AM ON 03/17/09
No, really. Si-fee? I had to come back to see if that was a joke or something.
By Tim at 12:14 AM ON 03/17/09
This is the single stupidest thing I've heard in a decade. And hey, I've listened to Rush Limbaugh for five minutes, so if it's worse than that, you have a disaster of unimagined proportion happening.
Egads, stop. Just... no. Shoot your marketing department now and spare us the agony.
By Benwah at 12:16 AM ON 03/17/09
LAME!
I began subscribing to satellite TV ten years ago, specifically for the SciFi channel (RIP Farscape). It had the shows I love to watch that I could not find anywhere else.
Syfy? It looks more like a weird vanity license plate than a "brand". Who came up with this? Was it the SciFi president's six year old when he texted his dad with, "wen wil u put wreslyn on syfy?"
By Mandy at 12:18 AM ON 03/17/09
They're practically dancing on Forrest J. Ackerman's grave by doing this. And then posting his final words to fans, the man who coined the term Scifi... This is low, Syfy. Even for a channel named after the Polish word for dirt. This is low.
By remo at 12:19 AM ON 03/17/09
The ONLY reason I still have cable (after many financial setbacks) is for the SCIFI channel. If this change goes into effect I will have absolutely NO reason to keep cable. This sucks big time!
By GryphonHoS at 12:33 AM ON 03/17/09
nice guys...
Good way to get your name spread around...
Alienate your core audience, then have them spread word on how freaking lame your new name is.
And FYI (or FYy as ya'll may prefer): Noone likes little cutesy names to go with good science fiction. Oh, wait... nevermind... last time I saw good science fiction on sci-fi was the last episode of Stargate Atlantis. But everytime shows get good on sci-fi, production costs lead to cancellation. Then as filler we get reality TV and wrestling. Woopee.
Thanks, Mr. Howe. You've taken a channel I really liked and killed it. Please feel free to give the reigns to someone who gives a flip about science fiction and go apply for a job or at Hallmark or Lifetime. Crummy original movies seem to be a favorite of yours. They have an ample williness to shovel that stuff out on their audiences over there. Plus, most of their stuff has a budget you'd be happier with too.
By SCIFIFAN68 at 12:36 AM ON 03/17/09
This is a dumb move IMHO it's been the scifi channel for this long & they have already screwed things up a number of time they need to stick with what works.
By Shadowcat at 12:37 AM ON 03/17/09
Brilliant.
Are you sure you don't want to go with "SyPhi"?
After all, if you're going to come that close to renaming your channel Syphilis, you might as well spell it correctly.
By stoicviking at 12:40 AM ON 03/17/09
First I checked the date to see if it was April 1st.
Then I thought: "See Fee?"
Then I felt nauseous.
Seriously guys...
By RicePaddyDaddy at 12:52 AM ON 03/17/09
"Without abandoning our legacy or our core audience"
Lemme see....
First the Nashville Network went Spike. What a great network that one is...
That left GAC and CMT to carry the banner.
CMT has become just another fluff network.
GAC is now showing entire evenings dedicated to Bull Riding...
Guess SYFY will show entire evenings dedicated to Bull SH*T?
Everytime one of these guys tries to "improve" any of these channels, it's down the tubes.
Wish the old SFAN network attempt had flown.
By Homer at 1:01 AM ON 03/17/09
"Imagine Greater" -- Well, there's a grammatical tagline.
You should replace it with a more accurate tagline:
SyFy -- "Polish for syphilis"
By blizzarddemon at 1:09 AM ON 03/17/09
Wow this reminds me of when MTV stop showing music videos. F$^## you Real World, F$^## you....
By Praetorian at 1:11 AM ON 03/17/09
Boycott NBC and SYFY
By seawolven at 1:22 AM ON 03/17/09
I work in the gaming industry and I can say that we are pretty appalled. Nothing like marginalizing your core audience........
Anyway, after MTV stopped being a music video channel we got VH1, BET, and MTV2 (until they mostly stopped playing videos).
I guess we just have to wait for SciFi 2: Electric Boogaloo.
By AstroRob at 1:23 AM ON 03/17/09
ACK, that's horrible! I do NOT want to watch the Syphilis Channel! I'm sorry, but that's just about the most insanely idiotic marketing decision I can imagine from a roomful of overpaid pinheads!
Even "Imagine Greater" is an uncompelling tagline.
By Sean at 1:31 AM ON 03/17/09
Boooo! This sounds like a horrible idea. I watch SciFi because I'm into science fiction and like the current format of the network - except I'd like to see more old sci-fi. Not sure what to expect from SyFy...
By LassieWho at 1:33 AM ON 03/17/09
We have too many science fiction shows for them to become broader! You can only put so much on one channel! Now, instead of finding Doctor Who, I might find Lassie instead!
By EDX at 1:47 AM ON 03/17/09
hey scifi, while you're at it, why don't start showing reruns of i love money, for the love of ray j and rock of love bus. but it could be worse, they could have given mad mad house another season
By DarkHawke at 1:48 AM ON 03/17/09
The irony of this entire talkback is that it will reach exactly NO ONE who's in a position to reverse this gawd-awful decision. And if trademarkable "branding" was a concern, why not just go back to when it was called the Sci-Fi Channel? Remember, with the rocketship logo? It's truly a sad thing when with all the damn cable channels full of vacuous nonsense, there can't be at least ONE channel that caters to geeks. TechTV got bastardized into G4, which doesn't even focus on its original charge of video game "culture" anymore. Now the only channel that even gave a slight emphasis on science fiction is poised to go the way of the dodo, at least in spirit if not in flesh. Well done, you fools. Now that you've entirely torpedoed your base viewership, prepare for years of sucky ratings and COPS reruns until NBC/Uni wonders what this crap called "SyFy" is that's caught in its collective shoe. Beware the Great Scraping, you blistering morons. Beware the Great Scraping!
By Jameson281 at 1:53 AM ON 03/17/09
SciFi has been insulting science fiction fans for years by flooding the channel with cheap, idiotic monster movies, moronic "reality" shows and wrestling. Now they spit in our face by abandoning their identity to "appeal to a broader audience." I can hope some other broadcasters decide to create a REAL science fiction channel.
Dear Universal: Since everyone is laying people off in this economy, why don't you save some money by laying off Bonnie Hammer and the other bozos behind this brilliant move?
By tati at 1:55 AM ON 03/17/09
I watched the Last Frakkin' Special tonight and had to laugh over the comments Bonnie Hammer made about BSG; about how people realized that they were offering quality program or some such syfy.
That's it! I will give up my use of the word $hit and just use syfy. Four letters, begins with S....a great use for that new name :P
By Praetorian at 2:00 AM ON 03/17/09
wonder if we can put scifi on the oxygen channel so guys have something to watch on a womens channel
By first_post_ever at 2:03 AM ON 03/17/09
Do they SERIOUSLY think anyone will be drawn to watch the "Siffie Channel"???
Aaarrrgghhhhh!!!!
By Mandy at 2:06 AM ON 03/17/09
I'm female. I watched the Scifi Channel since the start. I'm twenty-seven-years-old. Scifi doesn't know what it wants. When they did not renew The Dresden Files (despite high ratings) we fans were told we were the 'wrong demographic' (They wanted younger males and not adult females). Yet with Battlestar Galactica they sexistly condescend and think that's what women want! And then they pat themselves on the back about it. They think the term Scifi alienates them from women... sorry, it's the dumbing things down that's alienating this channel from me.
By Perry Justus at 2:10 AM ON 03/17/09
Another network fully ruined, along the lines of TechTV, TNN, MTV, A&E, and TLC. Unthinkably stupid. My god, it's really been a horrible era for television.
By Preatorian at 2:11 AM ON 03/17/09
new reality show on syfy called reality check NBC and SYFY suck also scifi is anything science fiction not just space morons dracula is sf along with dungeons and dragons and others that aren't space not to bright are they
By EMKAY at 2:11 AM ON 03/17/09
This is ... silly. You are a niche market. Most channels are these days. Stop alienating your niche. Seriously.
The stupid. It hurts our eyes.
By Tigerclaw at 2:28 AM ON 03/17/09
I can understand why they did it, but it is stupid to go away from your roots. Dance with the one who brung ya!
Also, don't give us the recent graduate BS. Tell it like it is. Say "'SciFi' is too generic a name for business, so we needed something that distinguishes us from the category itself. 'Syfy' is the best we could come up with after a night of drinking."
By ByeByeBye at 2:36 AM ON 03/17/09
Nothing more to see here. Move along.
By Volkai at 2:37 AM ON 03/17/09
The verb: Fail.
The adjective: Epic.
The brain: broken by stupid.
By netdeco at 3:16 AM ON 03/17/09
I can't say much more than what has been said...and I'm in advertising and marketing. Fail. Sigh.
So, since no matter what we say will convince them to revoke this branding suicide (apparently it was talking to the fans that brought them to this brilliant idea in the first place) who is going to take on the mantel of the true Sci-Fi audience and start a rival station? Perhaps 'Space' from Canada will venture south?
Suggestions anyone?
By SkullDuggerT at 3:25 AM ON 03/17/09
Seriously?! Do you people even know who your fanbase is? Dumbest move ever. I really can't see any reason to watch your channel ever again. Toss the cheezy movies, toss the crappy "horror" shows, toss wrestling. Put some actual science-fiction on, bring back Farscape and do good productions like Dune & BSG, and I *might* consider it.
By Gill Avila at 3:34 AM ON 03/17/09
I lost count of all the negative comments about this totally arbitrary, mindless decision. You didn't even poll your "core audience" regarding any proposed changes--no input from the very ones you depend on for an audience. Do you even have any conception of who we are? Perhaps I should say, who we WERE. Now the question is, will you pay any attention at all to this tsunami of outrage, or will you continue thinking that you know what we want, if what we want has EVER factored into any of your programming? It's really too bad that ratings can't sink a network like they do shows. You'd be gone faster than The Tammy Grimes Show.
By syzygy at 3:37 AM ON 03/17/09
Good God. Talk about jumping the shark.
What drug addled, clue free, anencephalic crotch stain came up with this utter loser of a name change?
Let me guess, the high point of the day for your marketing department is when they get to have their milk and poke each other with nerf sticks after lunch.
Your complete and utter sucking up to the lowest common denominator has already basically driven me away from your channel, with a very few exceptions, and they're not enough to keep me around with this travesty of marketing vomit.
You started sucking, hard, when you decided that moron wrestling and 'ghost' hunting should be used for anything other than toilet paper (except that even used toilet paper has more intrinsic value).
And that 'tagline'. "Imagine Greater"
Yuck.
When I imagine something 'greater', it isn't SyFy.
Oh, and by the way, that word SyFy? It's a polish word meaning dirt, or waste. It's also a slang polish word for syphilis.
So, it sounds like you actually *do* have a good grasp on the value of your channel.
Apparently, you've decided that you want to contribute to making the future, as described in 'Idiocracy', come true.
Although, if you do decide to air a version of 'Ow, my balls!', I might actually watch it if the victim is your president and the marketing department, and the audience that you threw to the curb gets to do the kicking.
Good luck with your new 'Fart Joke' channel. We wouldn't want you to hurt yourself attempting to actually think.
By Gill Avila at 3:39 AM ON 03/17/09
I lost count of all the negative comments about this totally arbitrary, mindless decision. You didn't even poll your "core audience" regarding any proposed changes--no input from the very ones you depend on for an audience. Do you even have any conception of who we are? Perhaps I should say, who we WERE. Now the question is, will you pay any attention at all to this tsunami of outrage, or will you continue thinking that you know what we want, if what we want has EVER factored into any of your programming? It's really too bad that ratings can't sink a network like they do shows. You'd be gone faster than The Tammy Grimes Show.
I hope this is a double post!!!
By Elderwyrm at 3:50 AM ON 03/17/09
Who did NOT notice that this is more likely to be pronounced like the beginning of "Syphilis" than Sci?
Man, I glad I have Net Flix, because I don't want to catch Syfy.
By HowManoid at 3:52 AM ON 03/17/09
Their rational says it all. They care more about the ability to brand the name than they do holding true to the genre. I guess this is what you get when you hand the reins over to faceless drones with no soul. Sci Fi has been on the skids ever since some fool handed it over to Ms Hammer. Corporate FemDrone that she is. Seems she hired in her own image. Anybody want to chip in to have several tons of animal waste delivered to her office?
By Shinigami at 4:06 AM ON 03/17/09
You have GOT to be kidding me.
Guess I'm down a channel. I'm not feeding into this garbage.
By Purple Tentacle at 4:15 AM ON 03/17/09
One hopes that their target demographic goes elsewhere for their entertainment.
That's the BEST way to catch their attention, when all else fails.
As for why they added wrestling to the SciFi Channel? I'm assuming it's because it's all basically fantasy to begin with...
"What, Siffie? There's a little Asian boy trapped at the bottom of the mine shaft and he's going tinto a diabetic coma?"
Arf Arf!
Whoever came up with this dog of an idea needs to be hounded out of the building.
By The Grim Reaper at 4:25 AM ON 03/17/09
"and on this day we lay to rest the last bastion of hope for an intelligent network." ~ the last SciFi channel fan
i have come to reap your soul and bring you to the nether realm, but it seems that you have beaten me to it.
yours truly,
DEATH
By Chandy at 4:37 AM ON 03/17/09
No need to change the name (and to something so incoherent.) What’s next for summer 2010? Another name… Like “Blah” lol.
By Snarky at 5:10 AM ON 03/17/09
Time to write Cox to lose this from the upgraded package I pay for. I was so hoping someone that actually *read* SciFi/Fantasy would take control - yes most people that watched and paid extra to watch SciFi in the beginning actually *read* it too. Pity that the twits that be won't listen to all of us. Look what happened to Moonlight - instead of renewing a show that was winning it's time slot Tassler threw them yet another CSI clone. Even those of us that didn't watch Moonlight heard of that idiocy. Guess NBC wants to keep up with the idiots at CBS.
By Rogue3000 at 5:14 AM ON 03/17/09
The name is stupid, but it fits the direction the channel has taken. .. to not be sci fi. Wrestling, ghost hunting, dragons and Charmed are not sci fi.
By TimmyNoir at 5:18 AM ON 03/17/09
Asinine. Branding asinine.
Your car's transmission is sticking, the tires are bad, the interior is a mess, one headlight is out, and the engine is probably going to give out this Friday. What's your solution? Change the paint-job and detailing.
I read it as "see-fee" and "sigh-fee" initially before I knew what it was. This is not good branding.
By Mandy at 5:30 AM ON 03/17/09
'dragons and Charmed are not sci fi.'
Actually Rogue I agreed with you until you said those words. Fantasy IS a sub-genre OF Scifi. Back when the Scifi channel was new it had three main catagories. Science fiction, Gothic supernatural horror and fantasy.
Without fantasy a LOT of science fiction wouldn't exist. Not all science fiction is space ships and time travel.
Now the reality TV and wrestling, that's not Scifi. The first show Scifi ever aired was the Gothic Soap Dark Shadows. Back when the Scifi Channel was new it had a LOT of fantasy. Dark Shadows, Forever Knight, Highlander: The series, She-Wolf of London...
God, I miss when the channel was new. Of course I'm still annoyed about the sheer stupidity behind not continuing The Dresden Files a few years ago. That was their now second stupidest move for the channel.
By sadforthedeathofscifi at 5:30 AM ON 03/17/09
SyFy Imagine Greater?
more like SyFy @& the fans
By Mandy at 5:35 AM ON 03/17/09
Snarky, not sure if you'll read this but if you liked Moonlight I highly recommend the old Canadian series, Forever Knight from 1992. Moonlight was very much a remake of it, (Just no refrigurator thing which I never thought made much sense anyway). Forever Knight lasted three seasons (used to air in rerun on Scifi) and the only real big difference between it and Moonlight was it was a little more intellectual and the hero was named Nick instead of Mick. The pilot plot was even identical.
By Steve at 5:54 AM ON 03/17/09
WTF?? Really!!
Looks like there will be no more Stargate SG1 or Atlantis, Farscrape, Firefly, BSG.
Looks like i will have to just buy them all on DVD... Sigh...
By Randy at 6:45 AM ON 03/17/09
Moronic. It's not going to drive me away, if they keep showing the things I want to see... but it's certainly not going to attract new fans looking for good science fiction.
By RC at 6:58 AM ON 03/17/09
I guess they can't justify using the term SciFi if they are shutting down their last decent SciFi show...
Farscape
SG1
Battlestar Galactica
RIP
By Thekeeper at 7:08 AM ON 03/17/09
Read the above post NBC sponsor's, we buy cars, we buy big ticket item, we don't like the move from a narrowcast to a broadcast audience. SciFi has lost it's focus, it's vision. It used to be they owned Friday night, well that's over. When the ratings die maybe someone else with some geek gred will pick up the torch.
By Doug at 7:12 AM ON 03/17/09
Sounds like "sissie" but put a pair of f's where the middle s's are. This has got to be an April Fools joke. I thought they had already abandoned sci-fi since they shpw those loser ghost programs where everyone runs around in the dark yelking that the saw something and all the horror genre stuff. Maybe it is the sissie channel.
By TTanner at 7:15 AM ON 03/17/09
Is this a joke? Are you serious?
Worst idea ever LOL
By gnaythan at 7:17 AM ON 03/17/09
so, now there isn't a reason to watch it at all... I'm about to give up on cable completely. Is there a web site, like hulu.com devoted to only scifi? I'd prefer legit, but if there isn't any I'll go to a torrent feed instead. good bye scy fy, you did not age well.
By Kwayera at 7:18 AM ON 03/17/09
Daft.
That's pretty much all there is to it.
By alaethancar at 7:19 AM ON 03/17/09
Agreed w nearly 100% of the posts here.
Not that scifi will recognize the quote, but...
"this is the worst idea in the long sad history of bad ideas." -ian malcom
ill add my name to the list of 500+ insulted by this. I'd actually watch legend of the seeker over 99% of the $#!T they have put on the scifi channel lately, and anyone who's read the books knows my hatred of that tv series.
I will pirate SGU, Eureka and Sanctuary's creators and mail them the $ directly before i will allow these morons to profit off of the people who deserve my appreciation.
By andrewh7 at 7:24 AM ON 03/17/09
That is the dumbest idea I have ever heard. The name is fine as is. DO NOT CHANGE!!
No one wants to watch the Syphilis Channel. Why take a well-known name and replace it with an STD? Who is running Scifi - a brain damaged chimp?
By elguapo at 7:37 AM ON 03/17/09
After years of watching this channel. I think it is time for me to move on. With Farscape, BSG, SG, SGA, and Eureka all gone, there is nothing new or worth watching.
By DanielB at 7:40 AM ON 03/17/09
what's wrong with you people?!? there is a shockingly large amount of material out there to turn into movies, tv series and mini series.
this is the best you can come up with?
the channel isn't watchable in the prime time except for BSG. in regard to the writing, all of the Stargate crap is formulaic, self-referential and dumb.
this is what's driving people away from the channel and tv in general.
i'm at wit's end. i won't be watching the channel anymore. i'm less and less interested in even having cable tv.
By Rosie at 7:43 AM ON 03/17/09
I'll be the seemingly only person to say that I actually like this idea! I'd love if MTV changed it's name to RTV or something more suitable. I actually am pretty surprised people are so upset, cause I hear people complaining all the time about channels not showing what their names describe, though I guess the backlash against this name change probably isn't really about the name but the ever-changing programming represented by the name change.
But, I don't really have a problem with it, cause X-Files has been shown on Sci-Fi for quite a while, and it's not in the genre.
Also, when you google "SyFy movies," it'll come up with the crap you're looking for like Megasnake and Ice Spiders.
Maybe this will open it up for the better. Maybe they'll start rerunning Buffy or Supernatural. I can dream!
(I do think the tagline is right stupid though.)
By Welleran at 7:47 AM ON 03/17/09
Well, if you want truth in advertising (or channel naming) then why not SCIFI-LESS
By Woody at 7:52 AM ON 03/17/09
Absolutely one of the most stupid ideas ever. Sounds like phase one of getting rid of actual Sci-Fi and Fantasy. Next it will be wall to wall reality that has nothing to do with either genre.
By Nope at 8:01 AM ON 03/17/09
Utterly stupid idea. Now people watching their plentiful advertising and informercials at 3am will Imagine Greater.
By FrodoLives at 8:04 AM ON 03/17/09
Of all the pointless marketing decisions I have ever heard of this ranks right up there with Dell's refusing to use the word "Laptop" for their laptop computers because they had some battery fires. I mean I will NOT watch the stupid wrestling although I agree it is 99% fantasy. But "SyFy" Come on people stop acting like idiots it will cost more changing all the letter heads than you could possibly gain in such a move I really have no faith in your judgement anymore at all
By Slaptacular at 8:10 AM ON 03/17/09
BSG is over soon. The last episodes of Eureka will show this summer. After that, there's nothing till Caprica next year. Guess it's a good time to cancel the channel.
By gunboatwillie at 8:11 AM ON 03/17/09
One more example of how the industry is completely out of touch with the real world. It's Sci Fi, always has been and always will be.
By Xdisk at 8:15 AM ON 03/17/09
Between wrestling and those horrible CGI "Monster of the week" shows, Scifi's programming has gone steadily down the crapper.
Don't even get me started on all the Ghost Hunters drivel. "Did you feel that cold spot? OMG!"
Scare Tactics?
Give me a F$%KING BREAK!
You feed us crap while canceling anything remotely intelligent or entertaining.
WTF was wrong with Stargate Atlantis, The Dresden files, Farscape, Eureka. etc?
Let the networks run all the so-called "reality" shows.
YOUR VIEWERS ARE NOT IGNORANT SHEEP!!!!
If your intent is to alienate your viewers and drive us away then guess what? Your succeeding!
You are steadily becoming just another random generic cable channel.
Fire the idiots in charge, restructure your programming, and DO MORE INTELLIGENT SHOWS before it's too late.
R.I.P. Sci Fi, you will be missed, you were loved.
By ulic at 8:23 AM ON 03/17/09
It's really interesting that there has been absolutely NO response from Sci Fi/Syfy (what an incredibly stupid name!!!) about all the outrage. Either what we've all been saying here is true, that they just don't give a sh#t, or, they just don't give a sh#t about giving a sh#t. Or maybe they DID listen and are preparing a response AND a retraction. Yeah, right. I'll just go with the first two...
By Kyle at 8:31 AM ON 03/17/09
This has got to be some sort of a sick joke
By chaitanyak at 8:32 AM ON 03/17/09
i don't like it...
sounds incredibly wrong...
for a more elaborate reaction, read the above posts..
By aberzombie at 8:34 AM ON 03/17/09
Well, so much for this channel. Maybe someone who actually cares about science fiction can start the Sci-Fi Network or something. This makes as much sense as AIG giving employee bonuses, or Congress giving themselves a pay raise.
By MErnst at 8:43 AM ON 03/17/09
Sci Fi has had so little of interest airing these past few years, their web site is useful only for what they want you to know, and their ideas of what actually should be on a channel devoted to SF about 75% lame that I wasn't even aware they were changing the name. But the new name pretty much follows suit with all the other stupid decisions they've made in the past (Cancelling Stargate, cancelling Farscape, broadcasting Who Wants to be a Superhero and wrestling, and a slew of "reality" programming, etc.) I once fought to get Sci Fi on my cable network many years ago. If it went away today I'd only miss Eureka - which I still can't find out if it is coming back or not.
By OracleMSU at 8:48 AM ON 03/17/09
Wow, this turns me off of SciFi. I hope they reconsider.
:barf:
By XDisk at 8:49 AM ON 03/17/09
>>It's really interesting that there has been absolutely NO response from Sci Fi/Syfy (what an incredibly stupid name!!!) about all the outrage
As far as I know they never commented on all the outrage over including wrestling in their line-up so why should they start caring now?
They just don't care about their viewers anymore.
By commuterkid at 8:50 AM ON 03/17/09
I'm in agreement with the above posts. I thought we were in a recession, so we should save money, this is just pointless. I enjoy SciFi being it's own entity. You wanna watch kid programs? Switch to Disney. You wanna watch games or video game reviews? Go to G4 or ESPN. Man, Syfy sounds very similar to Sissy. "Sissy Kids," "Sissy Games." Was ANYONE THINKING HERE?!?!?!
By JOhn Davis at 8:52 AM ON 03/17/09
I have always been a big fan of the SciFi channel.
RT
www.online-privacy.pro.tc
By Michael at 8:53 AM ON 03/17/09
Obviously your marketing people are way overpaid. If you have to change the name SFTV or SFN or SFF (Sci Fi Fantasy) would all have worked. But SIFFY?? That's just insulting. It shows no respect for your audience.
By Tbrockus at 8:55 AM ON 03/17/09
This is incredibly stupid. Is it now an embarrassment to show Sci-Fiction material? This channel has cancelled Stargate, Stargate Atlantis and Farscape so that they can show Wrestling and Who wants to be a superhero. Incredibly stupid! Hopefully another network will decide there is money to be made in a dedicated SciFi channel. Good Luck SyFy.
By Nathan at 9:04 AM ON 03/17/09
After the Battlestar Galactica finale, I REALLY have no reason to ever watch this channel again, which is a shame considering it used to be my favorite channel back when they actually aired more than 3 science fiction shows. Their programing is ridiculous, and wrestling is unforgivable, not to mention Ghost Hunters, which is wrong on so many levels. Thanks for flushing a great channel down the toilet over the last five years.
By Zeigy at 9:08 AM ON 03/17/09
Well, considering that all the science fiction we see that is now becoming science fact, SciFi is simply paying homage to the progress we're making as a species, and taking it's "science fiction" more seriously.
Besides, I don't like a lot of science fiction which makes me pass over a lot of the great programs on the SciFi channel. With this name change I may just do a double take.
By Former SciFi Licensee at 9:09 AM ON 03/17/09
I actually said "Oh my god" out loud when I read about this. I had to laugh at myself and you.
Then I thought about the business ramifications of this. You are gaining the "Sigh Fee" brand and losing the "SciFi" brand. There is now no legal barrier to stop, for example, Rupert Murdock from starting the Fox SciFi Channel with a Saturn based logo. You have given up your options, instead of expanding them.
You could have rebranded as the Universal Sci Fi Channel, with Saturn logo. Your name and logo are memorable. The "Fox" example would continue your brand - the brand you are giving up.
Whoever counciled you to brand this way, was not doing you any favors. The NBC-Universal lawyers who OKd this travesty did not earn their money this week. There are ways to trademark supposedly generic terms. Get some experienced "in the trenches" lawyers, you greenhorn neophyte marketing "geniuses".
I liked the New Coke comments left here. At least, Coke acknowledged it was New "Coke", not Neue Koook.
Overall, a lost opportunity really. It's sad.
By slimbilly at 9:09 AM ON 03/17/09
while i don't particularly like the name, i understand their motiviation for doing it. they may be the first major "network" to change their name because it will be easier to find in google. you type in sci-fi and you get a hundred different results from magazines to movies to whatever. it's not a real enforceable brand. but "syfy", as stupid as it looks, is a brand that can be googled, won't get confused with sci-fi and phonetically communicates the old name.
By F at 9:13 AM ON 03/17/09
I must agree with all the others that feel the name change is unneccesary and stupid. Then again, much of the programming on the channel has been bad lately. While I of course applaud shows like BSG, Star Trek TNG, and Star Trek: Enterprise, wrestling and all forms Ghost Hunters must go. At the very least, they should stop showing so many promotional commercials for Ghost Hunters.
By Bone at 9:14 AM ON 03/17/09
Changing the name is completely ridiculous. You created this brand to market to a specific set of people (Science Fiction) and now you want to go outside of the group that got it where it is. All you will do is alienate people and move them to the web that much quicker. Your demographic tends to be technicaly adept. What kind of idiot marketer came up with this and ignored the fact that there are now alternatives that are on a different distribution model. Hulu comes to mind.
By Elizabeth at 9:14 AM ON 03/17/09
Siffy? Really?
Good thing my new cable company has BBC America. With all the interesting, intelligent shows ending, the only reason I had left to watch Sci-Fi any more was because with Comcast (which didn't include BBC America standard) it was the only way to see the new series Doctor Who.
Great job, Sci-Fi, alienating your viewers in order to get the reality show crowd. I mean, it makes perfect sense to drop loyal viewers like those of us writing with disdain for this decision here. We've only been devotedly watching these programs you're now dropping in favor of crappy monster of the week movies, Ghost Hunter, and reality crap like Scare Tactics.
But who cares about us? Now you'll have the reality show idiots whose fickle viewing habits and American Idol obsession will throw your ratings in the toilet from January to May every year and will abandon the network whenever something better comes along.
But WAIT! I'm sure the gaming audience you're going after will absolutely abandon G4 for you, right? RIGHT?
Siffy =/= Spiffy.
By xforce11 at 9:18 AM ON 03/17/09
My issue with Syfy is that they are showing stuff they should not. There is too much good Sci-Fi out there that is new or re-runs. I don't understand why they make and show so many in my opinion C and D grade movies. Most of them are more horror than anything else. Now there is the cable network called Chiller (also owned by NBC/Universal) that would be a better fit. The channel could take shows on NBC & USA or other networks that are struggling and give them a home. Imagine if Firefly had come to Sci-Fi instead of being canceled.
By apple4ever at 9:22 AM ON 03/17/09
Just one more reason I'll stop watch SciFi (or now the SyFylis) Channel. Now the BSG is done, and Atlantis is too- and there is no re-runs of old Star Trek. I'm done.
By Matthew at 9:23 AM ON 03/17/09
Really? Your marketing team was really desperate to keep their jobs, weren't they? Well fire them anyway - that's idiotic. What you need is more quality and less crap, not a dumbed-down name.
By andytk at 9:29 AM ON 03/17/09
Stupid.
This name is just another example of the dumbing down of our society. SciFi was at least a shorting of a proper spelling. SyFy is at best texting shorthand, which is maybe their point, a lame attempt to be young and hip.
For me one of the joys of Science Fiction is that it doesn't try to talk down to reader/viewer, that it presents intelligence as a virtue.
Given some of the cringe worthy "original" programming on this channel I guess this isn't too surprising. I had hoped for more of the good stuff, less of the bad, this announcement doesn't give me much hope.
By Matthew at 9:30 AM ON 03/17/09
New tagline?
Syfylis...Catch It!
By racerosx at 9:30 AM ON 03/17/09
SciFi channel is trying so hard to widen their viewer-ship, they're completely ignoring their core base viewers. After March 20th, no one will be interested in watching (Wrestling? Really? Do people who watch that even know about the Scifi channel?)
By Machismo at 9:39 AM ON 03/17/09
This is just the networks way of getting away from SciFi programming and doing more general programming.
A terrible move, IMO. I can tune to any station for other garbage. I watch SciFi for scifi, paranormal, fantasy programming.
By jnorris at 9:40 AM ON 03/17/09
Aside from anything else, the name looks weak, with its pair of dangling Ys. It would look and work better, and might provoke less disdain, if they'd simply gone with "sifi", in parallel with hifi and wifi. But that might have been too simple for the numbnubs in Marketing.
By LogynxRunn at 9:40 AM ON 03/17/09
Sci-Fi becoming SyFy = Joaquin Phoenix's new career
By ntp at 9:42 AM ON 03/17/09
Boring and suggests one more step toward irrelevancy.
By Lord Elrond at 9:42 AM ON 03/17/09
I think SciFi is a perfectly appropriate contraction.
Because of the overlap between the genres that is why it is always known as Science Fiction & Fantasy. If they must must change the name, and I personally think it's an unwarranted and stupid decision, why not change it to SciFan which is at least a little closer to it's roots.
SyFy is a spelling for people who can't read.
By ulic at 9:48 AM ON 03/17/09
Hey, everyone! I just posted a poll on Facebook. Check it out and PLEASE VOTE!!!
By Former SciFi Licensee at 9:49 AM ON 03/17/09
I just Googled "SciFi Channel". Guess what came up? It was www.scifi.com, the SciFi Channel web site. There was no confusion, no need to rebrand because of search engines.
What was the real reason for the rebranding?... a new executive's need to make his mark, marketing execs looking to justify their jobs, attorneys lacking conviction who are afraid to fight or fail, foreign Universal execs who do not understand the US connotations of the word "SciFi"? We will never know. It's Chinatown, Jake.
By BooBoo at 9:49 AM ON 03/17/09
This might not be the best move because viewers were expected to see sci fi movies on this channel. With this move, some might be upset because the only thing they want on their channel is sci fi.
By Real Madrid at 9:50 AM ON 03/17/09
Fire the person who decided this was a great idea.
Then do everything in your power to overtake the company they end up working at just so you can fire them again.
Then sleep with their husband/wife.
Then apologize only so you can offer them a job which they'll take.
Then have someone else fire them and film it.
Then superimpose Donald Trump from The Apprentice firing them.
Then show it on primetime.
By Rick at 9:51 AM ON 03/17/09
They're just getting everyone worked up so they can come out of the closet on April 1st...... April Fools I hope anyway!
By bob at 9:52 AM ON 03/17/09
I give it 6 months before either it's changed back, or the channel gets shut down cos no-one watches it anymore.
By ulic at 9:53 AM ON 03/17/09
Oh, and I might add: I wonder if the execs at Syfy (UGH!!!) did a simple poll like the one I posted above. Bet they didn't.
Please make your voice heard! Vote: Hey, everyone! I just posted a poll on Facebook. Check it out and PLEASE VOTE!!!
By AndyNova at 9:54 AM ON 03/17/09
I can remember back when "The SciFi Channel" premiered by showing Star Wars. It was great. They were actually >gasp
I wonder what they will program that will show first when they become SyFy? Survivor-Alpha Centauri?
By StunGod at 9:58 AM ON 03/17/09
This is hilarious. Do you guys really think this is what your audience is looking for? You haven't figured out yet that if you have quality programming you can call your channel whatever you want? Really?
OK, here's a clue for you: it won't matter to me what you call your channel. As soon as BSG ends this week, I won't have any reason to tune in. And since the only way I learn about new programming on your channel is from the ads that run during shows I do watch, the likelihood that I'll be back is pretty small.
I didn't know you guys ran wrestling. Are you really doing that? There's no other channel that might be more appropriate for wrestling, or already have a viewer base that watches that? Are you kidding?
But yeah, that explains a lot. Same thing goes for reality shows...it's a good thing you guys are pioneering that genre, since nobody else is doing it.
But credit where it's due: SciFi has produced some original movies. They really suck, but at least you're trying. And I'm sure a small number of people are really excited about yet another Stargate series. But think what you could do if you focused more on being different from all the other channels clogging up cable/satellite right now.
So good luck with the rebranding...you'll need it. And I'm sure SyFy Kids will be a ratings bonanza for you.
Fools.
By balazar at 9:58 AM ON 03/17/09
That's the stupidest thing they could do.
By Wedge at 10:13 AM ON 03/17/09
I'm not sure if anyone now this, but in Poland (where Sci Fi is quite a popular channel) word "Syfy" means "Sh*t" (in plural) :P
By art at 10:18 AM ON 03/17/09
Worst idea ever. Please dont do this! SciFi actually means something, syfy is just branded crap that sounds like a teenager came up with it.
By Wedge at 10:19 AM ON 03/17/09
* anyone know, of course :)
By curbside at 10:20 AM ON 03/17/09
Dumb move NBC Universal. When newbies are channe surfing and see Sci-Fi they know exactly what it is. Whey they see SyFy what will they think? ... another food channel, some ethnic channel, siffy... what is that? good lord, what were you thinking?
By Patrick at 10:20 AM ON 03/17/09
This is exactly what I expect from the programming geniuses that put wrestling on SciFi.
There are plenty of brilliant SF writers who would work for pizza to provide stunning content for a true SF channel. When will someone ever figure out that good writers are not hard to find and not too expensive. You've just been looking in the wrong places.
It astounds me to think of what you could do with a modest budget by inviting great writers to participate.
From my work with the studio and hollywood types in the past, it was always clear that they had no real clue about what the SF community is really about. There have been, what, *two* shows with decent writing in the last 15-20 YEARS. The SF community is so used to drivel, they accept whatever drips out of the tail end of the beast.
So many opportunities lost.
By Former SciFi Licensee at 10:20 AM ON 03/17/09
Thank goodness you waited until Forrest Ackerman passed away before you made this change. He coined the word "SciFi". In my opinion, he would not like what you have just done with it. Of course, your lawyers and most of your staff have probably have never heard of Mr. Ackerman. That's another one of your problems. You don't know your market.
By dumdum at 10:22 AM ON 03/17/09
in Polish "syfy" is a plural form of "syphilis" :)
By TSG at 10:22 AM ON 03/17/09
This is the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard.
By SyFy #2 at 10:22 AM ON 03/17/09
Get ready for the sh*t channel :D Cosmic SyFy (sh*ts)
By MoovieStarz at 10:22 AM ON 03/17/09
It is really stupid to rename the network after all these years unless they were going to change the direction of the network like "Spike" did. The name was already in use for years at SyFy Portal.com and although it looked and worked good as a name there, looks stupid here as if they are trying to "dumb down" the network. But that is believable when you add wrestling to a network when it has nothing to do with Sci Fi. The name has been Sci Fi Network for years. It is stupid to change it now after all these years to just this simpler spelling. NBC/Universal you make enough money without trying to brand the network with a stupid looking name which in essence will make the channel look like a joke. If it had been called this from the start, it would have been a different story. And by the way quit lieing about where the name came from. We SciFi fans have been familiar with SyFy Portal for years. We know where the name originated.
By Jaster at 10:24 AM ON 03/17/09
Effing stupid idea. Sci-fi works. Don't change it. All you're going to do is confuse and alienate people.
By TheFuzzball at 10:31 AM ON 03/17/09
@JavaDouche If that were a channel, I would watch it...
By Roto Rooter at 10:31 AM ON 03/17/09
Dont worry, this channel has so many great shows to keep its audience around. "I work at roto rooter!"
By Lord Elrond at 10:31 AM ON 03/17/09
Imagine Greater
(We do, we did, and we were!)
By eee at 10:33 AM ON 03/17/09
Talk about biting the hand that feeds you.
Bad move, "SyFy."
By commonSense at 10:40 AM ON 03/17/09
What the heck is wrong with you guys?
Someone should be fired on recommending that name. Why dont you just change it to SyeFye, or how about EyeSpye or PsiFigh or SlyFive or Stu-Pid.
Leave the original name alone. It has a brand and following.
By TheCOLTMan at 10:42 AM ON 03/17/09
This is just another attempt on the part of the idiot woman running the network to tak the network further away from actual Sci Fi. With Sci Fi as the name it limits what can be shown on the network. By renaming the network they can now feed us more crap like they do on Saturday night by claiming they now have a broader definition with their name change. Go back and take a look at how the channel started and return to tha. And by the way what ever happened to you all broadcasting all of the Star Trek shows like you claimed you were years ago. Why does Spike get to broadcast them and Sci Fi doesn't. I suggest everyone keep referring to Sci Fi Channel as that even after the name change. Don't spell it their way. We all know how to Spell Sci Fi and it isn't SyFy. Thanks a lot Hinman for selling them the name. Now we have to put up with what will likely result in fewer quality shows. And to the people running the network. I am a big Sci Fi fan. But I do not watch your channel nearly as much as I used to for one simple reason. You have forgotten what the channel is about. Maybe if you refocused the channel back to it's original idea things would improve. And start airing quality programming. BSG is one of the few well written programs on the network. The rest of the time we get crap like the saturday night movies and Ghost Hunters. We Want Quality. Not the cheapest thing you can produce.
By Rollo at 10:43 AM ON 03/17/09
I feel dumber for having read this. SyFy? Really? REALLY???
How about, instead of spending money on bad marketing advice, you invest a little more in your programming? All the "SciFi Channel exclusive movies" that just SUCK (Frankenfish? Really?) could instead be replaced with, oh, at least C or D grade movies instead of the crap you're currently producing.
By Horse at 10:51 AM ON 03/17/09
Imagine Greater?
Greater What?
Greater Sh*t?
More than likely!
By Fine at 10:52 AM ON 03/17/09
If they get rid of the Twilight Zone marathon on New Year's Eve, I am so totally out.
By Syfy? at 10:55 AM ON 03/17/09
As a long time Sci-Fi channel fan and marketing major this is very disappointing. The entire purpose of having different TV channels is to have different types of programming on each one. By changing to an all inclusive generic channel they will lose viewers instead of gaining them. People want to be able to turn on a channel and have an idea of what will be on it. They are taking a brand they have built up over 16 years and completely changing it, which will eliminate their major viewer base in the process.
If I worked in their marketing department, I would have them immediately drop all the stupid reality shows, wrestling, ghost hunters, etc. and focus on Sci-Fi. They will have no competition since no other channels have regular Sci-Fi programming.
By Where's my remote at 10:55 AM ON 03/17/09
So typical. Why not give it a stupid name to go along with the stupid programming.
SciFi channel jumped the shark when it cancelled Farscape, SG-1, Stargate Atlantis and so many more.
If it weren't for reruns I doubt I'd ever watch this channel anymore.
By Tedly at 10:56 AM ON 03/17/09
This is GREAT news for producers. Can't wait to pitch my "syfy" movies to them!
Bravo to the suits for breaking out of the pigeonhole. :-)
By l33tAng3l at 10:59 AM ON 03/17/09
I bet the reason they did this is cause kids these days don't know how to spell anymore. Why don't we just switch up the rest of the English language to be strictly phonetic... oh wait... "ph" makes an "f" sound...? How degrading.
By thadius ghostal at 11:00 AM ON 03/17/09
this feels so much like idiocracy its almost funny... if only it werent so sad.
By Horse at 11:05 AM ON 03/17/09
This is typical of most of the cable networks. Soapnet now shows programming that is not not Soap Opera related. MTV show too much programming that doesn't contain videos. And Fox News doesn't contain News. The problem is there are just too many Networks out there vying for the same ad dollars and there just not enough to go around. As a result we get programming which is cheaply made and usually the quality suffers. Close down some of these extra Discovery, ESPN, MTV and other channels when all we need is one of them. Shut down the CW. If anyone wonders why Network programs don't do as well as they used to why programs on the SciFi network to don't do better. It's because there is just too much out there to watch now, and unfortunately most of it is crap. Fewer Cable channels will result in more money for the rest and in some cases better quality programming
By Corwinnx at 11:06 AM ON 03/17/09
Just unbelievable. The Channel that I started out loving is now full falling apart. I think my biggest question might be is, Mr. Howe, do you, or for that matter have you EVER not only watched SciFi shows? Or EVER liked them or been a fan? Because from what you have been doing the last few years the Obvious answer is NO.
SciFi fans are not like regular TV watchers, we are loyal to the shows we love, voice our opinion when we are unhappy and truly mean what we say when we tell you that we LIKE science fiction.
We don't want to watch wrestling, or reality shows, there are plenty of networks that do that. We came here because you said you would provide quality SCIENCE FICTION programming, but while you have had some good programs, you have this bad habit if canceling them too soon, and from a marketing stand point that is just stupid.
Take the Star Trek model. Did you EVER happen to notice that approx. around year 5, they started a new spinoff, ran the new show for the last 2 years of the first show, then when the first show ended, the spinoff had it's audience. Did you not notice how well that worked with SG-1 and Atlantis? so you thought by ending a great show like SGA early, then waiting 9 months to show the new spinoff it would endear people to you?
I cant even fully express my disappointment in your channel, and now to hear the stupidity of changing the name of the channel, that name that has gotten you the fans you have (that you are driving away mind you). Did it ever occur to you that when someone does a search for Scifi on the internet your website now comes up first. So, thankfully, in the future when someone does a search for it..at least your stupid new name SyFy, will not hopefully show up so we can at least find REAL science fiction.
By a different tim at 11:06 AM ON 03/17/09
Attention SciFi channel:
People keep commenting on this even though you put a bunch of new articles up. Take the hint.
By Are You Kidding? at 11:07 AM ON 03/17/09
Are you kidding!!!
"...beyond just the traditional sci-fi genre, including fantasy, supernatural, paranormal, reality, mystery, action and adventure."
I watch this network to see sci-fi shows - not fantasy or paranormal. I want to see space ships and aliens! I want to see outer-space, the future, alternative time lines, nano-tech and robots!
The great Rod Serling said: "Fantasy is the impossible made probable. Science Fiction is the improbable made possible."
By Singe at 11:11 AM ON 03/17/09
"nonlinear digital platforms" is a HORRIBLE bit of marketspeak and anybody who uses it should be shot.
By Youfools at 11:12 AM ON 03/17/09
Whoever is responsible for this cackup idea should be fired.
Whatever focus group said it sounded like a good idea should be retired.
This is how new channels are born- when existing channels do stupid things like this.
By Scott at 11:19 AM ON 03/17/09
Why not just make it SiFi
By tAsarlai at 11:20 AM ON 03/17/09
SyFy has been and always will be the name that I connect to Michael Hinman. They would have done wise by actually offering SyFy Portal a chance to Merge and combine efforts.
By CrackerTracker at 11:20 AM ON 03/17/09
What a bunch of Corporate stupidity. Thanks for your socialistic attitude boo boo boo. I have been a long time fan of Sci-fi as well as many of my friends and this idea is the worse any of us have ever seen.
Its as bad as the baloney that MTV, G4, and some of the major channels I used to watch but no longer do because of their ignorance.
As for other stupid things.... GET WRESTLING OFF SCI-FI and RECONSIDER the name change.
GET RID OF DAVE HOWE if he really is that stupid and does not know his own market or group. Get on track for the future, don't suffer the idignities and errors made by others.
I realize making money is important during hard economic times, but changing the backbone of a company begins to unravel all the support that you have gained.
Think about it, I like "Imagine greater" but build off what works not "Imagine More Because we are Stupid"
By Thintalle at 11:21 AM ON 03/17/09
Syfy? Way to lame up the channel's name.
Can't think of anything good to say about this change.
By Lelo34 at 11:23 AM ON 03/17/09
This is beyond retarded.
By no_more_garbage at 11:27 AM ON 03/17/09
and you wonder why my handle says "no more garbage". that's exactly what this network run institution has given us since this website went live! it's not the first time either!
a few days ago there was another in a LONG line of articles on this site about how horrific 'Watchmen' would be. as someone pointed out NBC/Universal--err, "sci fi network" has been saying for a good 8 months why the film will tank.
I say to everyone who is posting here JUST STOP! they don't care what your opinion is. if they did a response would've been drafted after 500 negative comments, but it hasn't been. there are no real writers working on staff. only raving fanboys who do what they are told and if not their cool toys are taken away.
stay away. STOP posting and hopefully another network will offer a legitmate science fiction channel in the future.
By GottaBeKiddingMe at 11:31 AM ON 03/17/09
I don't know what's more embarrassing, how stupid the new name is, or the fact that a company full of supposedly educated people don't know that the new name is pronounced "Siffy" not sci-fi, like they want it to be. It's like calling someone named Fred the name Bob, and saying it's the same thing. I can't believe not one person at SCI FI Channel didn't catch that. Aside from that, everyone is already referring to the new name as Siffy, or Sfy-eye (which should be treated immediately if you ever get it, by the way), so the new name is already a joke, and it hasn't even launched yet. I can only "imagine greater" how much money is being wasted on this ridiculous rebranding. It really is shocking how anything like this could have been approved at any level.
Also, it is mentioned that SCI FI Channel wishes to continue to "embrace its core audience," but what you've done is just the opposite, proven by all of the posts here. None of the posts, which come directly from your viewers (your core audience) are favorable. They are all negative, which should tell you something. This is a BIG mistake. If the name must be changed, simply change it to something like SFN, which could stand for Sci-Fi Network or Sci-fi/Fantasy Network, and not be so ignorant and childish looking, like Syfy. Syfy looks like someone can't spell sci-fi, or has no idea what sci-fi stands for. It's just promoting ignorance, which is sad.
If SCI FI Channel no longer wants to be associated with sci-fi, then move away from it completely. Don't try to keep your foot in the door with that laughable new name. All you're doing with the Syfy name is exploiting the genre. You're not only destroying a brand you've been building for sixteen years, but tainting the science fiction genre in general. You're making it look childish with that ridiculous Syfy name, chipping away at the respect that has been building for the genre in recent years.
You cancelled Farscape, cancelled Stargate SG-1, and cancelled Stargate Atlantis. Those were all bad decisions as well. And you're losing Battlestar Galactica. You've made the decision to get rid of all of your best shows, while keeping lesser shows on the air. I like BSG, but Caprica looks questionable, as does Stargate Universe. Warehouse 13, frankly, looks like a low budget bomb. I hope I'm wrong about all of those shows, but I know I'm not wrong when I say the last thing this channel needs is more idiotic reality TV or 100 ft. snake of the week movies. Who watches that? What the channel needs is more quality programming. How sad is it that some of the best sci-fi/fantasy shows in recent years haven't even been SCI FI Channel shows, but shows from other networks? Firefly, Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles, Legend of the Seeker, Heroes, and Chuck, for example. All good shows, but not SCI FI Channel shows. I know Heores and Chuck are NBC, which owns SCI FI, and that SCI FI shows Firefly reruns, just as it shows new Doctor Who episodes from BBC, but none of them are original SCI FI Channel shows. The original shows are pretty much all gone now, except for Eureka and Sanctuary (which actually started on the Internet).
I hope someone at SCI FI Channel is seeing these posts, and realizes that the posts that are here are giving you valuable information about just what a bad decision this move is. If not, this Web site should pass these posts along to someone with the power to stop this before it happens (How long do you think it will be before the Siffy name comes to this Web site?). Like I said, the Syfy name is already a joke, being called Siffy, Syf-eye, etc., before it's even launched. It's not too late to change your minds, and save face. Don't become a laughing stock. If you must change your name, change it to SFN and keep your diginity.
Siffy - Imagine Lamer... Trust all of us, your core audience, on this one, before you no longer have an audience at all.
By phobos at 11:34 AM ON 03/17/09
wow, a channel that will show sci-fi, fantasy, supernatural, paranormal, reality, mystery, action and adventure. That totally doesn't sound like every other channel on television.
I shed a tear for the loss of a good channel
By Rocky at 11:35 AM ON 03/17/09
Yeah, this is dumb! Stop listening to broadcasting consultants "Experts" and executives. They don't know what their talking about. Syfy makes it look like you were in public schools over the last 8 years. It is insulting to Sci-Fi fans everywhere. You had the coolest name ever, and now you throw it away. Any publicity is good publicity, but this is STUPID publicity and makes you guys look like dummies.
By tituscooker at 11:35 AM ON 03/17/09
Terrible. It's all been said, but the day they stopped showing quality science fiction, and started showing non-stop, scripted reality-like TV shows (ghost hunters?) and wrestling, they lost a fan. My wife and I were considering dumping cable, but SciFi was the one channel I held out hope for returning quality. Now that they are SyFy, I'm finally able to dump my cable and not care. I've worked with re-branding organizations before. This is called putting lipstick on a pig. You can't rebrand yourself out of stink without ponying up for quality entertainment. Let the other channels have the schlock and stop this madness before you wither away and die. This reminds me of just about every decision the company Palm made in recent years. Just digging yourself deeper into a hole, not innovating, and complaining that no one gets your new "image." -- disappointed former fan of Sci Fi
By crosswiredmind at 11:38 AM ON 03/17/09
yuck
By Nick Chhan at 11:41 AM ON 03/17/09
Seriously Mr. Sci-Fi channel, you're changing your name to SyFy? Who gave you a ride in the lame-mobile?
By Lapislaz at 11:43 AM ON 03/17/09
Listen to me. People who read science fiction want to watch it on TV. They want the intelligent, wondrous, plot-filled, well-constructed stuff they read ON THE SCREEN. They do not want to watch wrestling.
You folks have been the "Sci-Fi-Less" channel in my house for some time now. I very much doubt this name change will change that fact.
Somewhere, Bjo Trimble is alternatively laughing her ass off and crying in her pretzels.
By jack at 11:44 AM ON 03/17/09
Uhhh...Editors...Anybody...Are you guys getting this? Any comments from you?. About a billion nos. And no yeas. Anything to say. Respond please.
By apollo at 11:45 AM ON 03/17/09
They are building on their success, and then undoing it completely with this awful, awful, awful, awful, horrible rebranding. Seriously, whoever you hired to come up with this needs to be barred from branding forever. "Imagine Better" makes "Think Different" Shakespearean in comparison.
I hope this is a joke.
By JERSEYDEVIL0912 at 11:45 AM ON 03/17/09
DIDNT SUPRISE ME AT ALL CONSIDERING SOME OF THE MOVIES THEVE BEEN SHOWING I'LL MISS YA SCIFI CHANNEL HOPEFULLY SOMEONE ELSE CREATES A CHANNEL TO TAKE SCIFIS PLACE
By Jakub at 11:46 AM ON 03/17/09
Wow.. I read this today on DIGG and felt physically sick. And like many others, I did check if it was april 1st already... but alas like many others before me, it wasn't.
Whoever is the moron exec that authorized this name change, should be tossed into the street, way to alienate your customer base. Who came up with this turd? SyFy? wtf... insult peoples intelligence and then toss on wrestling and call it SyFyMania!
Its really sad to see that SciFi is going downhill like this, its one of the last channels that I watched regularly due to the great SciFi shows like BSG, SGA and Eureka.
By Force3dfx at 11:47 AM ON 03/17/09
Is it april fools or are the same fools who didnt keep BSG going forever running this channel now. This could be the dumbest idea of all time
By Elisant at 11:47 AM ON 03/17/09
Bloody retarded.
Wrestling and Ghosts/Paranormal crap has slowly rotted away at the SCI-FI (!!!!!!!!!!!!!!) heart of the channel.
There is no decent source for this anymore.
Syfy, you are dead to me. I'm glad Battlestar is finishing so that it's not sullied by this stupid change.
Also, I hope Stargate moves permanently to a new home.
Can't believe you stupid people doing another step away from the MAIN PURPOSE of your channel and further alienating your viewership.
By Olivander at 11:52 AM ON 03/17/09
You have got to be frakking kidding me. Oh, well. As far as I'm concerned, Sci-Fi stopped being a science fiction channel the moment it began broadcasting pro wrestling. Might as well stop pretending and follow the dumbing-down branding trend of deliberately misspelling words for effect.
By Denda at 11:56 AM ON 03/17/09
Idiots. Is there one positive comment in all this? looks like you marketing boys and girls missed the fallout on this one in your weekly dashboard meetings!
What a shame....
By JJ at 12:00 PM ON 03/17/09
I hope the SYFY idiot execs take the time to read each and every post (doubt it), or maybe count the amount of negative to positive posts.
I agree with everyone here that it all started with trying for ratings grabs with wrestling. However, though I used to leave scifi on all the time, I now have to switch it off.. happens more and more often as they ad more and more junk
By Husker at 12:02 PM ON 03/17/09
This is a case of moron executives and bean counter run amok. SyFy? REALLY? Are we that retarded? BSG was the only reason I watched this channel. Now with wrestling and the steaming pile of shit movies of the month they make, I'll have no reason to waste my time on this channel. I have a feeling that in their attempt at finding new viewers, they will find the back of the unemployment line.
By curbside at 12:04 PM ON 03/17/09
It's the New Coke of television. Looks nice, but tastes bad.
By fmayhar at 12:05 PM ON 03/17/09
I've known this for a long, long time. The new Battlestar Galactica was an accident. The place has been run by idiots and fools since the beginning and it has only gotten worse. Now, "Syfy." The name now reflects the content: A steaming, putrid pile of refuse.
Yet this decision is still remarkable for its sheer, inspired idiocy. The SciFi channel was why I had cable in the first place. Without BSG and with "Syfy," there's no point in keeping it.
At long last, they've succeeded in destroying themselves.
By Dr_Moffett at 12:05 PM ON 03/17/09
Once BSG is done this Friday, I am done watching the syfy channel.
By Rick at 12:07 PM ON 03/17/09
That logo is terrible. The only thing it's missing is a stupid "BETA" sticker on the side...you should add that in to get that oh-so important tween crowd to watch your stupid channel.
By What? at 12:07 PM ON 03/17/09
How utterly, utterly pointless.
By donewiththis at 12:09 PM ON 03/17/09
terrible. i'm done with this channel. first wrestling. then stupid super hero reality shows. now this? i'm out.
By tampamartin at 12:10 PM ON 03/17/09
OK, 3am and the marketing people are all coked up this must have seemed like a greate idea. Now in the sobering daylight admit your mistake and back away from it quickly.
dumb, dumb, dumb
By tampamartin at 12:11 PM ON 03/17/09
OK, 3am and the marketing people are all coked up this must have seemed like a greate idea. Now in the sobering daylight admit your mistake and back away from it quickly.
dumb, dumb, dumb
By Huh? at 12:13 PM ON 03/17/09
What focus group did they pass this by who thought this was a good idea? Were they on X? or were they preteen school girls?
Please, please tell me this is a joke! For the love of GOD!
By Nod at 12:15 PM ON 03/17/09
Bottom line SciFi.... When you go SyFy, we go ByBy.
By X-SciFi-Channel-Viewer! at 12:15 PM ON 03/17/09
DEAD AND BURIED!
I couldn't believe it when I read this. I had to read it twice to believe it. What an unspeakable disaster this is!
How could this have happened?
The one channel in a sea of crappy tv networks that I USED TO look forward to watching. I waited years for the SciFi Channel to make it to Boston and when it finally did around 1998/99 (round about the time Farscape debuted) I was thrilled to death. I religiously watched that station for years and years. At first it was a rewarding experience--only diminishing a little bit over the years until about few years ago.
When they started putting the aforementioned reality shows like Ghosthunters, Mad Mad House, Who Wants To Be A Superhero, etc., and then WWE Wrestling, that was really the beginning of the end of this once venerated network. It didn't help matters either that every movie of the week was Monster X vs. Monster Y, or a new disaster flick, etc.
What happened to Farscape, First Wave, Good vs. Evil, Invisible Man, The [new] Outer Limits, the Stargates (that are about the stargates, I'm not bothering with SGU or should I say, SG Voyager), Firefly, Babylon 5, Highlander, Night Stalker, Forever Knight, The Chronicle, and a host of good shows? Some of these were from other networks and either rebroadcasted on SciFi or moved over to it, either way, that's what was so great about the channel: it was a "safe haven" for awesome science fiction/fantasy shows to continue on.
And God bless Ron D. Moore for ending Galactica this Friday on HIS OWN TERMS. He has the guts to do what's right by the show he nurtured and made us all love and never regret investing 6 years our lives into it!
This cross-branding channel-marketing BS is not SciFi. Heck, it isn't anything but a paltry attempt to make a quick buck off of our hopes and dreams. It's extortion! Plain and simple. We waited years for a channel like SciFi to come, and when it finally did, we had a brief honeymoon, but now the marriage is "frakkin'" over.
Divorce!
That's it. And I thought Bonnie Hammer was a bad top exec over there back in the day: she killed Farscape if you recall.
Now the "emperor finally has no clothes." This is it. Once BSG is done; so am I. I'm not bothering with Caprica either. I'm just going to have to start my own SciFi Channel. Thanks to the Internet that is going to be so much easier to pull off.
Good bye "SyFy-iis!" We don't need you any more...
[As I play Triumph's, Say Goodbye in the background!]
By js at 12:16 PM ON 03/17/09
Less science fiction content -- I dub thee "siffy-less."
By Dr_Moffett at 12:17 PM ON 03/17/09
The Syfylis channel...Blahahahaha.
I love it Mikey G.
By KrazyKelli at 12:19 PM ON 03/17/09
Don't become what G4, MTV, Discovery, and other channels have. Stay with your roots. Hopefully once the realization sets in that the name change and program liquidation are going to make things worse, the channel owners can be rest assured that changing back is still an option. Don't bullhead your way into loosing everyone important. I always considered SciFi (and I will continue to call it that even after the change) to be a safe haven amongst the channels. Now, seeing this, I am loosing faith in television as a means of good entertainment.
By elecorn at 12:24 PM ON 03/17/09
Before when it was called "sci-fi" I wouldn't go near it. But now that someone is calling it "syfy", now I want it! It's cool now! Oh, oh, AND look at all the neat things it now incorporates!
So when I talk about it, make sure you don't misunderstand when I say "sci-fi" I really mean "syfy".
By gandy909 at 12:28 PM ON 03/17/09
I frakking swear the first time I see a 'reality' show listed on that channel, i'm dropping it forever. Dumbasses.
By Target222 at 12:28 PM ON 03/17/09
I LOVE IT
...no...wait...uh...
Bad idea. Terrible tag line. So sad...
By LordOfChaos at 12:28 PM ON 03/17/09
This better be an early warning for an april fools joke.
By umy at 12:33 PM ON 03/17/09
Really? They want to become another generic cable channel? Why? Dont these idiots know the only reason they are successful is because of SciFi shows like Stargate and Battlestar Galactica? What a bunch of idiots executives shooting their network in the foot.
By malohombre at 12:34 PM ON 03/17/09
I actually heard someone pronounce sci-fi as "skyfi" once.Are these the people you're hoping to attract?So, when it comes down to it,all this is about is a brand name to make money off? I guess we should be thankful the nutsacks that came up with this weren't smart enough to put an "X" in the name. You know they tried,
By areyoukidding? at 12:35 PM ON 03/17/09
Thats ok...BSG will be over soon. Its the only reason to tune in to the channel anyway. I mean unless you want to watch Stealth Pterodactyls starring Coolio. NBC should just pull the plug all together.
By GroomCamper at 12:37 PM ON 03/17/09
I’ve been following this discourse since the article came out yesterday and I’m surprised at the number of responses. Most are heartfelt and erudite. Well written criticism that is sincere and strikes at the heart of the matter. And that’s exactly why we’re losing the battle. The execs want to dumb down the content, broaden the base and make the whole mess more acceptable to the mindless masses. They will figure out too late that when you make your programming indistinguishable from that of the other channels you’ll just get the 30 second look from the channel surfing illiterates with zero disposable income and no viewer loyalty. It all comes down to dollars and cents and when those dry up (and they will, I promise you) your staff members can use ‘Imagine Greater’ and all those other lovely buzzables in their résumés.
By crownroyal77 at 12:43 PM ON 03/17/09
Going the way of MTV I see, a channel that doesn't show what it's named after. So change the name to something mispelled, that'll attract the audience of people stupid enough to watch the reality bullshit.
Genius, the channel will be off the air in no time.
By 13th Cylon at 12:55 PM ON 03/17/09
Well you can call it the XYZ network for all I care it still doesn’t address the problem. You want to have a marketable brand name that’s fine, go for it… SyFy it is. But the problem is you have NOTHING to market. You currently produce ONE marketable show, BSG. That show ends this Friday. After that all you have is a full slate of Grade-D but edible Sci-Fi shows, really bad reality programs, and wrestling.
The follow up announcement from the Executives at the SyFy network had better be a fall programming slate with at least 2 hours of prime time programming a night, that will contain meaningful, well produced, well written, imaginative, intelligent, and engaging programming or all of this will be for not. You all currently have a slate of pure crap, and like so many of the other posters here on this thread, I only tune in your network for Battlestar, and Dr. Who. Oh wait, that’s right, BBC produces Dr. Who you all just air the US First run.
Take the hint SyFy programming gods. Your views are not happy with your network, and if you are going to try to take a brand name global, make sure you have a fracken product to market, rather then just a silly play on words “brand name.”
By malohombre at 12:57 PM ON 03/17/09
Ghost Hunters wouldn't be so boring if they actually found a ghost.
By Cochituate at 12:58 PM ON 03/17/09
GOOD GOD that is a dumb name! Siffy sounds like a venereal Disease, for god's sake. Did you guys actually pay someone to come up with a spelling that needs to be mispronounced to be your name so you can copyright it?
"Image grater" indeed! You've shredded your brand.
By Andela at 12:59 PM ON 03/17/09
This is a joke...right ? Somebody please tell me the Sci-fi channel is not stupid enough to think that this new name Syfy is a good idea...Oh wait these are the same people that added wrestling and cancelled Farscape...my bad.
By Solique at 1:00 PM ON 03/17/09
I'm going to second everyone's opinion on this page for safety but hold to the idea this is just too stupid to be true.
By elfennau at 1:02 PM ON 03/17/09
"Without abandoning our legacy or our core audience..."
Bull.
By Peaceruler at 1:04 PM ON 03/17/09
Its obvious that these corporate knuckleheads don't know or care what their viewers want... Please someone forward these comments to the fat heads who are destroying good peoples lives....
By TheGigaShadow at 1:04 PM ON 03/17/09
Wow. What a terrible idea.
Dave Howe and whoever else came up with this should be fired immediately.
Bad name. Worse tagline.
I can't "Imagine Worser" or "Imagine Stupider" than this.
By Kym at 1:08 PM ON 03/17/09
Lets not forget this little gem that Tim Brooks said before:
“The name Sci Fi has been associated with geeks and dysfunctional, antisocial boys in their basements with video games and stuff like that, as opposed to the general public and the female audience in particular,”
As a self-professed geek and female at that, I take umbrage at your gross stereotypes, your assumptions about what a fan of sci-fi is, your blatant attempts to dumb down content that couldn't get dumber if it tried, and the fact that you clearly don't understand or appreciate your own market.
I'll download my shows from the net from now on, and no longer support this channel, since it clearly is not looking for an audience with brains.
By rookroc at 1:10 PM ON 03/17/09
biggest waste of time and money EVER!
By loungbaby at 1:15 PM ON 03/17/09
Employee: "Hey, boss, we're having some issues with the SciFi channel.
Exec Boss: "What seems to be the matter?
Employee: "Well, we've lost funding on some really great shows over the years and instead of putting effort into getting the station back to its roots, we're just putting lame fluff shows as filler."
Exec Boss: "Hmm, I don't see any problem in that.
Employee: "Um, we're getting a lot of complaints and are losing viewers. You know, we have a list of some sci-fi shows and scripts in waiting that I think might be just what the station needs.
Exec Boss: "I know! Let's change the name to 'SyFy'....yes brilliant! That way we have no restrictions as to what we put on air!
Employee: "But, um, don't you think that's a bit of the 'Lowest Denominator' tactic? We’ll lose our core demographic…”
Exec Boss: “…and we’ll need a catchy tag line…”
Employee: “But, boss, I can imagine greater possibilities than what you’re about to..”
Exec Boss: “That’s it! “Imagine Greater”. Good work, grunt.
Employee: “But…I didn’t…I mean, I don’ t think this is a good…”
Exec Boos: “We’ll need to order new mugs with a snazy new logo…”
Employee: “Sigh”
By baloney at 1:15 PM ON 03/17/09
Now can they get rid of fricken ghosthunters and wrestling. Oh and I am sure they will air a good sci fi program, then after a couple of years decide its too expensive to make, cancel it and then create a lame reality series that is cheap and makes you entirely braindead while watching it.
By cyndie at 1:16 PM ON 03/17/09
OMG! This is SUCH a great idea! Now I can actually watch the Syfy channel without my friends thinking I’m, like, such a total dork! I can finally fully enjoy quality movies like Ice Spiders and Mansquito knowing that I am NOT a geek. I heard there were some good shows on the Food Network, but I’m not a hardcore “Food” person. I imagine the Food Network is mostly Porn for the Portly where obese people fantasize about food all day (so gross!)! So maybe if they rebrand it to the Füd Network and distance themselves from food and cooking and all those fat people I can actually watch it, too, without my friends making fun of me for it. I can’t wait until every channel is exactly the same… then I won’t ever have to use my remote control—Sweet!
(yes, this is sarcasm....)
By Endymian at 1:16 PM ON 03/17/09
Yeah, I'm gonna have to go with the crowd on this one. This new branding is senseless, unnecessary, and pretty confusing.
Can we try a little harder to not actively retard the process of clean, clear speech and writing?
Also, Wrestling? Honestly. You cancelled Farscape for this garbage?
By jSin at 1:23 PM ON 03/17/09
Oh. My. God. Uncle Forrey must be spinning like a top right about now. This is the STUPIDEST thing I've heard in a while. And let's not overlook the sheer grammatical repulsiveness of "imagine greater"...that's as bad as saying "more better". Does this mean the trend of GOD-AWFUL giant animal/pathetic monster movies is going to increase? Wow. I am shocked.
Shame on you SciFi. Shame.
By Adama at 1:28 PM ON 03/17/09
How to make a movie for the SciFi ^H^H^H^H^H^H SyFy Channel:
Hire waitress or lingerie model, add geeky eyeglasses, cast her as "Pretty Female Scientist".
Hire D-list celeb - perhaps a lesser Baldwin or has-been. (But not Abe Vigoda - not after last time ... no.)
If all suitable candidates are in jail and/or rehab, hire an actor that kind of looks like another more famous actor.
Hire ECM wrestler (on contract to parent company) to portray "Contrarian Big Guy" that comes around in the end.
Hire an actor with English/Australian/South-African accent. If none are available, hire an actor that can maintain an English accent, however badly, through at least 80% of the dialog. Will portray either a villain or self-import obstructionist who dies in the second half.
Hire a minority actor and/or dog as first victim. If a dog, remember to have it miraculously survive, popping up at the end of the movie.
Rent GreenScreen studio in frozen wasteland of Canada.
Pose the "actors" against GreenScreen, have them point and recite lines like "What the hell is that!?" and "We've got to get out of here .... NOW!"
Foreach threat in ("Giant Mosquitos", "Giant Alligators", "Bees", "Tornados", "Asteroids", "Big Snake") {
Composite CGI image of threat onto GreenScreen behind actors;
Include meticulously detailed CGI castle/mansion/cave;
Re-record some dialog;
Advertise heavily during BSG episodes;
Release film;
}
By StarMoonCali at 1:34 PM ON 03/17/09
This is an incredibly poor choice. Have you forgotten what the whole point of the channel was? It seems you are purposely removing the heart of the channel so you can broadcast whatever crap material you can get for cheap. This is called "selling out".
Seriously - you have betrayed everything we have come to love and cherish about the SciFi channel and turned it into another generic nameless channel. Science Fiction isn't some small niche to be filled. It has come into its own and can now be considered mainstream.
This is like Deja Vu for me. I remember having these same kinda thoughts when MTV stopped playing music and started with all their "reality" tv show crap.
My point is that there is already hundreds of generic, low-quality programming channels out there - please don't destroy this channel just because you are tired of SciFi. Buy another channel and funnel all your non-scifi crap into that.
By Miraxian at 1:36 PM ON 03/17/09
I have not posted before, and may never again, but this move warrants it.
What a terrible idea by the executives. I fear they have some grand plan to make the channel in to a large, popular outlet that can complete with the other top cable networks. It is an interesting idea, but a failed one for one simple fact: science fiction is a niche market. It is perfectly OK to play to a niche market and play to it well. Be super popular and well loved in that niche. You will never get the viewers that the top cable channels get, but you will get respect from the viewers and the industry.
I challenge the executives at SciFi to be the top science fiction outlet. Dominate this market. Even if you do not have the numbers some others do, you will have respect. When people talk about science fiction on television, be the name that they associate with it. Be the name that even those who are not science fiction fans reference and know of as producing a top quality product. This is the brand recognition you seek.
The reality shows and wrestling are not the answer. You do not need to have something for everyone. Something for everyone means that you are just like all the other channels out there. It is exactly what you do not want. This will not create the global lifestyle brand you speak of. This makes you one of the rest.
I understand that you cannot copyright the name scifi, but that is OK. Be the outlet for science fiction, dominate that market, and people will think of this channel and its shows when they hear the words science fiction.
People still say "SciFi should pick this up" when their favorite network science fiction shows are canceled. Though that is slowly changing because of the recent years content actually being less science fiction, fantasy, and core product, it can easily be brought back into full reverence. Again, this is true brand recognition. When other channels have a science fiction show, be the outlet where they say "I bet the SciFi Channel could do this better."
I truly hope the executives see the outrage of their core fans at this and rethink the plan. Yes, the core fans do not get it. The ones who are this niche market and call themselves science fiction fans. These are the people who constitute the main viewership of the channel. Without whom, there is no brand to recognize.
By OptikPhiber at 1:37 PM ON 03/17/09
DUMB. Changing the spelling of the word is not going to convince my girlfriend or mom they like the channel more. Quit it with this bad idea and as everyone else is saying the Wrestling stinks too, that is when I will ALWAYS turn the channel until it is over. Here's my .02 scifi.com, I hope someone is listening.
By Friend at 1:37 PM ON 03/17/09
Increase quality programming; that will strengthen your core viewing audience AND attract a new audience!
Libraries don't mix knitting and automotive because broadening a genre only requires further diversification. That's what the other channels on television are there for!
What does SyFy stand for? The same thing Wi-Fi stands for. Nothing, it's just marketing. Two thumbs way, way down.
If you say wireless fidelity, the makers of Wi-Fi will change your WEP/WPA key and not tell you what it is :-P.
By Andy at 1:42 PM ON 03/17/09
this kind of crap is why as soon as BSG is done, i'm not watching any more from this channel.
"Without abandoning our legacy or our core audience, we needed to cultivate a distinct point of view with a name that we could own that invites more people in and recognizes our broader range of programming with literally something for everyone"
TRANSLATION: we're ditching you but saying it in a way that you can't bitch about it without looking like an idiot, and totally being exactly what you came to us to avoid. loves and kisses, frak off.
By Syanara at 1:45 PM ON 03/17/09
See you later Sci-Fi - it was fun while it lasted. First you slowly get rid of all your quality programming, replace it with horrible monster of the week movies, then you drive the nail into the coffin by alienating your entire core audience. Have fun and enjoy your Ynternment.
By Mandy at 1:48 PM ON 03/17/09
By saddened at 1:49 PM ON 03/17/09
I guess I can cancel the cable. Very bad decision. Ask your audience and you'll have the best channel on cable.
By Maltheus at 1:51 PM ON 03/17/09
Sounds like something a shot of penicillin might clear up. Someone actually got paid for this idea?
By saris at 1:58 PM ON 03/17/09
Wow, quite the number of angry replies, of course they will ignore everything said here as they have for many years now. Heck, they cancel all the great shows despite them being popular.
I have no problem with the name, it is just a name. The programming, however, has been going down the tubes for several years. I used to have Sci-Fi on all the time, was the only channel I watched. Then they brought the morning soap opera, and the stupid wrestling, and the horror. They also started displaying the stupid ads at the bottom of the screen when a show is on, that is the most annoying thing in the universe. I an trying to watch the dang show, screw the stupid adverts, they are blocking what is on the screen.
I no longer watch Sci-Fi, in fact, I no longer have cable. I just rent the DVDs or watch the stuff online.
Way to go Sci-Fi..and here I thought we already had a Spike channel. Guess one is not enough.
By BurgerBoi at 2:05 PM ON 03/17/09
OMG, everyone needs to calm down. I love how everyone complains about wrestling, yet it's only on 1 HOUR every week. 1 HOUR.
Also, everyone's ready to bail on the channel huh? What are you going to do when Caprica and Stargate Universe premiere? Not watch? Yeah....ok.
By Vivek M. Chawla at 2:06 PM ON 03/17/09
HA!
This is one of the most retarded things I've ever heard of. I can understand some of the trademark / branding issues here, but come on guys! "SyFy"???
Too funny!
Too sad for words.
Just one more highly disappointed fan.
Vivek
By FuhQueue at 2:07 PM ON 03/17/09
You idiots, at the SyFy channel, deserve all the bad things that are a coming! All the good shows you have axed before their time. Looks like the axe is gonna fall again, the question is it going to be a hand, a foot or your neck?
By psilage at 2:09 PM ON 03/17/09
SuperFly
Mo' Betta
By Mike at 2:23 PM ON 03/17/09
@BurgerBoi: One hour of wrestling on a SCIENCE FICTION channel is one hour too many.
As far as watching Caprica or Stargate Universe, I will catch it on hulu.com or after the DVDs are released. SCI-FI has finally revealed how impotent it truly is when it comes to understanding its core audience.
As a result, we don't need them anymore, as they apparently don't need us. After all, they are pursuing that 18-24 year-old cool texting crowd, not the 0-100 intelligent science fiction fan.
By hjk at 2:28 PM ON 03/17/09
Maybe you should take a hint from the fact that there is ZERO positive feedback on this. Huh?
By R3MY at 2:29 PM ON 03/17/09
"Syfy more clearly captures the mainstream appeal of the world's biggest entertainment category, and reflects the network's ongoing strategy to create programming that's more accessible and relatable to new audiences."
Oh yeah? How?
By Icio at 2:35 PM ON 03/17/09
Wow, this is great. The only reason I actually watched SciFi is because it didn't have any wrestling/sports. Guess I'm gonna start watching Oxygen. Lulz I'd rather stop watching TV altogether. Wait... what's not a half bad idea considering there's nothing good on any more.
By greekboy at 2:38 PM ON 03/17/09
The Syfyluss Channel.
That's appropriate
By Alienn at 2:39 PM ON 03/17/09
The idiot that decided this brilliant move seems to really hate science fiction and wants to make it the channel into somethingelse...anything but sci-fi.
They should replace him with someone who loves sci-fi...
By Zero at 2:46 PM ON 03/17/09
I hate to say it guys, cuz I hate this crap too, but somewhere, out in this horrible worl we call home, are people who like wrestling and reality shows on channels with stupid names. People watch this crap, they love it, and sadly my friends, they out number us. We are losing...so please, do your part in the war on Stupidity and educate random children on the street....otherwise even Cartoon Network will fall into animated reality shows....oh crap, it is already starting...
By Slides at 2:49 PM ON 03/17/09
I understand why using a generic term as a brand is a problem, but you guys couldn't come up with a better brand name? Really?
By yougottabefugginkiddingme at 2:51 PM ON 03/17/09
This has to rate right up there with as one of the dumbest marketing decisions in History!
FAIL!!!
By 5thLimbInTheKisser at 3:05 PM ON 03/17/09
By yougottabefugginkiddingme at 2:51 PM ON 03/17/09
This has to rate right up there with as one of the dumbest marketing decisions in History!
FAIL!!!
***********************************************
No, EPIC FAIL!!!
By Average Joe at 3:10 PM ON 03/17/09
By changing the name to Syfy, which remains phonetically identical, the new brand broadens perceptions and embraces a wider range of current and future imagination-based entertainment beyond just the traditional sci-fi genre, including fantasy, supernatural, paranormal, reality, mystery, action and adventure.
*********************************************
Oh, I really don't like the sound of that...
By naysayer at 3:16 PM ON 03/17/09
honestly, i don't know what is up with all you haters out there. i don't think the name change is so HORRIFIC like someone stabbing you or something. it's just a name change FFS. If you want to complain about the programming or wrestling and such, go ahead cause at least that makes sense. but to ramble on about the name being changed? I just don't get it. who cares.
By IdahoSmally at 3:28 PM ON 03/17/09
The effort to avoid alienating the core audience seems to have backfired. Also frustrated with such things as wrestling and fake ghost shows, I think this will drive me away completely as well.
By disappointed at 3:32 PM ON 03/17/09
what's the point now? first you guys started canceling all the good shows. then you started canceling them after only a few years so you could create new, less interesting shows. then you started with the wrestling bullsh*t, and all the stupid monster movies that are like h-grade. then you started making lame copies of other scifi movies. i can tolerate ghost hunters, and destination truth is good if purely for the fact that josh gates is hilarious, but....what's the point? why should i even bother with your channel anymore? used to be such great shows and awesome content. now....i don't know. i'm so disappointed i can't even begin to describe it accurately, i don't think there's even a word for it. after friday i don't think i'll be watching your channel anymore. back to the books for me. at least they're written by people who care about the genre. good job scifi, you're all a bunch of idiotic azzhats and have probably lost half your viewership.
sidenote: your captcha system is completely flawed
By Centsmar at 3:32 PM ON 03/17/09
Really? are you frackin kidding. Another marketing ploy for bad programming....Sci/Fi ...excuse my SyFy has lost its way.4v4nbg
By retropert at 3:36 PM ON 03/17/09
does not compute? bad idea.
Dont think I saw a positive anywhere on here. Guessing that doesnt matter.
By nerv at 3:36 PM ON 03/17/09
I must say...This is the most retarded idea ever. And the bloated superficial marketing lingo that drones on attempting to excuse this mockery is just pathetic. Thanks for killing my favorite shows(I-Man, Farscape, etc) and now totall shitting on the entire idea of what was once upon a time fondly known as the SCI FI channel. FAGS
By DeadGuyLurking at 3:38 PM ON 03/17/09
After years of watching the SciFi channel introduce some of the worst shows in history and kill some of the best shows on television, my frustration came to a head when Tuesday night wrestling appeared on the schedule.
At that point I remember commenting that SciFi would go the way of other dedicated channels and abandon their concept. The Learning Channel had abandoned all learning to become TLC, the decorating channel, and Arts and Entertainment had abandoned both the arts and entertainment to become the all CSI channel. I figured it would become just the SF channel and start hosting reruns of Friends or Seinfeld or whatever it decided was more profitable.
Well, I was close.
By Maudite at 3:40 PM ON 03/17/09
Lets read that again "a wider range of current and future imagination-based entertainment beyond just the traditional sci-fi genre, including fantasy, supernatural, paranormal, reality, mystery, action and adventure."
This says to me they want to replace all of that .. replace SCI-FI including replacing fantasy, supernatural, paranormal, reality, mystery, action and adventure.
It appears the intent is to dumb it down to normal TV. "Imagination based entertainment". Well that is fiction right... Like 90210, the OC.. etc etc..
Tween-tainment Channel here we come
By Mandy at 3:42 PM ON 03/17/09
Fantasy was always a part of Scifi, back when the network was new. The first show they ever aired was Dark Shadows. You're the ones who STOPPED showing fantasy when you abruptly canceled The Dresden Files over a year ago.
Oh, by the way, guys, I seem to recall that Dave Howe used to work for BBC. Keyword 'Used' to. Clearly there's a reason the BBC didn't want him.
By barcher at 3:42 PM ON 03/17/09
First you insult your viewers with wrestling, now this moronic moniker? Are you trying to go bankrupt?
By DK at 3:44 PM ON 03/17/09
LOL, takes to the end of the article to get the true reason:
"Syfy—unlike the generic entertainment category "sci-fi"—firmly establishes a uniquely ownable trademark that is portable across all nonlinear digital platforms and beyond, from Hulu to iTunes. Syfy also creates an umbrella brand name that can extend into new adjacent businesses under the Syfy Ventures banner, including Syfy Games, Syfy Films and Syfy Kids"
By NW at 3:48 PM ON 03/17/09
Dear God! Fire whoever came up with this turd bomb.
By Portico at 3:50 PM ON 03/17/09
Holy Cow! Is the world ending??
..."Sy Fy"?
Worst Idea ever..... Christ...
By Sabben at 3:56 PM ON 03/17/09
First, the name change is a poorly thought out idea that will just alienate your hard earned audience.
When you first came out the Sci Fi Channel was the reason I wanted cable and could not wait to get it. Sadly in 17 years you have not grown into what you should be. You have proven that you can produce quality mini-series and a few shows. Battlestar Galactica, Stargate, Stargate Atlantis, Farscape come to mind. But you cancel some of those shows too early. You have really managed to populate one night a week with the quality shows you should have. The Saturday night movies are just downright bad. And you have let wrestling and bad reality tv creep onto your network. And don't you think we are all tired of the Twilight Zone on holidays? You should be concentrating on giving us the quality and type of programming we want and not on a lame name and tag line change.
If I did not know what you showed and I saw "The Sci Fi Channel" I would get it and want to watch it. If however I saw "SyFy: Imagine Greater" I would just be confused. Don't mess with a good name just improve your programming.
By Nedburt at 3:57 PM ON 03/17/09
Sci-Fi hasn't been scifi in many years ever since a woman took over the programming, that channel has gone downhill. With only a few exceptions, there is nothing scifi about that channel. As for me, I'll look for my scifi in movies-dvds, books, and old tv shows. pity..
N.
By Bored at 4:02 PM ON 03/17/09
I remember when I used to watch SciFi channel almost 24/7. A few years ago I worked out of the home and kept my tv on SciFi while I worked. It was great! Mostly it was reruns of shows such as Dark Shadows, Lois and Clark, Highlander, Hercules, etc. mixed in with some replays of movies. The big days were watching Friday night for the original shows and Saturday night for original movies or at least replays of great ones. If there was nothing else on tv you could at least switch to SciFi and watch television that wasn't boring and stupid, though you may have seen it a dozen times.
Now, I rarely watch SciFi channel. What's the point? The series they develop are terrible for the most part. If it is decent they will either kill it, i.e. Dresden Files, or spread it out so you get one new episode with the change of seasons, like Eureka. If it's an "original" SciFi movie, then it's probably a Canadian made movie so bad no one else would buy it.
I really would like to see the SciFi channel return to being the SciFi channel instead of the SiFi/SyFy (as in syphallus) channel. All garbage, all the time.
By littlegeek at 4:03 PM ON 03/17/09
(@N it is disrespectful to blame the death of the channel on the sex of the person responsible, its their mind and mentality that is the driving force, it could just as easily have been a man who destroyed our channel.)
back to the new 'Siffy'
Honestly, i don't care what the hell you guys call yourselves all that matters is the programming.
the 'new' viewers you're looking to bring in with your reality shows and trailer trash mindless crap already have their own stations that they are very loyal to and likely wont change unless there is nothing better on anywhere else, and for people who like those kinds of shows that is rarely the case. There are ALWAYS shitty shows on TV its the quality ones that are rare and will attract the greater audiences.
what you have here is a chance to redeem yourselves before it is too late! Go back to sci fi!! go way way sci fi overboard, you would be surprised how many people there are in the world who would gladly increase your viewership (and help bring new viewers) if you actually provided quality programming and stuck by your good shows, it its too much cost shorten the seasons do something, anything to keep them on the air and the viewers watching YOUR station!
We all realise good sci fi shows cost a lot of money, the special effects alone are a fortune let alone everything else that goes into them. Spending that money now is what will make you far greater a return on investment in the future than any instant-gratification reality show ever could, in the end this current direction will drive away far more viewers than it will gain.
As stated in the 200th episode of Stargate:
"NEVER underestimate your audience, they are generally sensitive INTELLIGENT PEOPLE who RESPOND POSITIVELY TO QUALITY ENTERTAINMENT."
You would do well to take these words/comments to heart. You are currently digging your own grave, and if you keep going this way i sure hope you are fully prepared to lie in it.
By Mandy at 4:08 PM ON 03/17/09
Ah, the reign of Bonnie Hammer that lost classic shows that weren't yet on DVD (in 2000), ditched anime (for several years), canceled Mystery science Theatre, Farscape, and later The Dresden Files. And refused to carry Torchwood because 'Americans aren't ready for it.'
But she's not at fault for this. This is her replacement's fault. I thought he'd correct her mistakes.
By ronbo66 at 4:09 PM ON 03/17/09
It would be great if this ploy was reported by John Stewart or Stephen Colbert on their shows. Maybe they can save the channel for sci fi fans by pointing out how stupid this move is.
By Waldo at 4:11 PM ON 03/17/09
Okay, i can understand that the name worked for a science fiction news site, they came up with something original that would be identifiable to its readers, BRAVO. But when relabeling a major cable channel that used to act as the face of science fiction entertainment on television... FAIL. fail for desecrating a good science fiction sites ex-name, and fail for doing it for monetary purposes.
By Nvisible at 4:12 PM ON 03/17/09
I have to say that this is probably the most idiotic idea I have ever heard of. *checks calendar* Nope not 01 April. Damn.
By SvenKyUm at 4:20 PM ON 03/17/09
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF FAIL
By Nightbird at 4:20 PM ON 03/17/09
Again, as someone said earlier, Sci Fi may not even care about these rants, but I will pipe in.
This really is a bad decision, and its not just the name change. Firs off, why keep the name phonetically sounding the same, when for all intensive purposes you are getting rid of Science Fiction shows and introducing far more "non" Sci Fi shows.. That, is just plain stupid.
We all know the Sci Fi channel has been slowely, and systematically ruining its chances at getting back its demographic, and they just took a turn for the worse with this.
I honestly don't understand why Wrestling, Reality TV, and/or Game show etc are watched..... BUt my opinion.
The reason I'm mostly pissed has to do with the idea that they arnt even coming up with new shows to air. As loungbaby brilliantly came up with that Dialogue, wouldn't that have been the better idea.
Hell, even continuing Jericho (even though its not really Sci Fi) would be a step up from airing all the crap that's gonna be on here now. Just a sad decision by marketing execs who are worried about the upcoming financial status of the US.
Its off to watch MXC on Spike TV now, hah.
By phunk at 4:32 PM ON 03/17/09
This is the dumbest thing I've heard in a while. I'm glad the only show left on this channel that's worth watching is done in a couple days, because I'm done with it.
By MathManHC at 4:32 PM ON 03/17/09
This new title is an insult to the people who pay extra on their cable television bill each month to keep SCI-FI in their television line-up. The new title is an example of “text-message” spelling, and it is a sign that NBC Universal does not respect the intelligence of the average SCI-FI Channel viewer. The average viewer is educated and has high expectations for their evening entertainment. In recent years, the SCI-FI Channel has canceled several quality programs. In addition, several high-quality, well-written programs have sought SCI-FI as their home only to end-up in cancelation. Keep the old title, start broadcasting quality shows like Dr Who, Battlestar, Farscape, Firefly, Invasion, Crusade, and Sanctuary. Create a second channel with this “new” title and put ECW, Ghost Hunters, and all the other reality tv programs onto that channel. This will create more spaces in the weekly schedule on SCI-FI for quality science fiction and fantasy programs.
By Hookedonphonics at 4:40 PM ON 03/17/09
Reaching out to the hooked on phonics generation is a poor idea. Why not make it xxSyFyxx14 and add an umlaut to reach out to the dot com generation.
By kymbakhan at 4:42 PM ON 03/17/09
I'm a woman, and you're trying to appeal to "my demographic" by taking away the SCARY Science Fiction connotation of SciFi? WTF.. SyFy looks bizarre, immature and a poorly conceived corporatization of something a jerk in a suit thought of as "cutting edge", for the chicks, yanno. Congratulations, you have pissed off and alienated your new target market (chicks dig ghost shows, nostradamus & pseudo-science, and Y's for I's, hur hur hur) in ONE MOVE.
BYE!
Some of us are able to handle the hard stuff.
By scifi-ED at 4:46 PM ON 03/17/09
INT. SYFY HEADQUARTERS
The SCIFI FAN glares across the table at the SYFY EXECUTIVE.
SYFY EXECUTIVE
The new network will come on line soon. And will have new none science fiction programming on air six or twelve weeks after that. Absolutely spectacular non Scifi programming, we spared no expense.
SCIFI FAN
Gee, the lack of respect towards your core audience, being displayed here, umm, staggers me.
SYFY MARKETER
Well thank you, Scifi fan, but you haven’t even seen the programming yet.
SCIFI FAN
Yeah, don’t you see the danger, uh, in the path your pursing here?
SYFY MARKETER
It’s hardly appropriate to come in here and--
SCIFI FAN
--Hold please, if I may... I’ll tell you the problem with the television channel your running here, it didn’t require loving scifi to preside over it... You stood on the shoulders of innovative thinkers and you took the opposite step. You don’t understand the knowledge of what a real scifi channel is, so you don’t take responsibility for destroying it.
SYFY EXECUTIVE
No hold on, I don’t think you’re giving our executives their due credit. We have accomplished something that no one has ever don in the world.
SCIFI FAN
Yeah, but you’re executives were so preoccupied with wether or not they could destroy a channel, they didn’t stop to think if they should.
SYFY EXECUTIVE
Spike! If Spike tv were to put wrestling and game shows on their network, you wouldn’t have anything to say.
SCIFI FAN
No hold on. The scfi channel isn’t some network that was created for all audiences, or idiots that want reality tv. It was a network that was founded to cater to fans of Space travel, paranormal adventures, and hearing words like Frak and Frell. Scifi lover flocked to this network and selected it for their genre viewing pleasure.
SYFY EXECUTIVE
I simple don’t understand the view point of a scifi geek, uh, fan. I mean, how can we stand in the light of alienating, uh, expanding the core viewers, and not act.
SCIFI FAN
Well, what you call alienating, I call the rape of the Frakking world.
A man enters and whispers in the ear of the SYFY Executive.
SYFY EXECUTIVE
Ah, our core audience is here.
Several teenage girls, with SYFY backpacks skip in chanting for the a viewing of “HOW TO SCARE A TEENAGE GIRL”.
Right behind them, ten boys, aging eight to twelve trample in, carrying SYFY wrestling lunch boxes, and wearing costumes from “Who wants to be a boy wonder”.
The SYFY Marketer turns to the sad Scifi fan.
SYFY MARKETER
You see, we don’t need to spend money on scripted television. We can put out any old crap we want, and people will watch it. The lunch box merchandising was my idea, nice touch, huh?
SYFY EXECUTIVE
I think you can go now; you’re no longer wanted here, uh, I mean. We hope you’re dumb enough to overlook the crappy programming as you have done so far and join us in this new age Scifi, uh, SYFY.
By Bobcat at 4:46 PM ON 03/17/09
I'm a big fan of the SC-FI channel and I think changing the name to Syfy is absolutely ridiculous. First of all, the current name is perfect in my opinion. Why change a good thing? Secondly, if the name was to be changed "Syfy" simply looks cheesy. Third, out of everything on SCIFI channel I am most interested in the SCIFI content!
Although I will watch the occasional fantasy or adventure program the reason I watch the SCIFI channel is to watch SCIENCE FICTION.
That's right, Star Trek, X-Files, Babylon 5, Dr. Who, Battlestar Galactica, STAR GATE SG1, STAR GATE ATLANTIS, etc.
I'm a big fan of SCIENCE FICTION and I HATE The idea of the SCIFI channel changing over to "syfy."
By gmknobl at 4:49 PM ON 03/17/09
Okay, I understand how you guys put such shows like Ghost Hunters on. After all, even though you were a Sci-fi channel, every bookstore on the planet and much of the general population sorts fantasy in with science fiction. Of course the media and Hollywood in general bears a great deal of responsibility for foisting this confusion on everyone with bad, illogical, poorly thought out content. But when an entire channel dedicated to sci-fi (and fantasy) shows came on cable it was wonderful. So, with Ghost Hunters, I sorta went along with it.
But then you started putting really schlocky not even remotely fantasy shows such as "professional" wrestling on I couldn't understand it. It's not sci-fi, it's not fantasy, it's just there to turn the bucks in from the low level morons who get hyped up on the stuff. And I guess it worked 'cause now we have a slew of shows from constant after-hour product advertisements to fake "reality" shows no one in your original support base really care about. Y'know, if you'd put old grade z movies from the 40's and 50's on you'd play to your audience and I bet get more eyeballs than the schlock ads for SHAMWOW! But then again, it's clear you don't now care about eyeballs from intelligent individuals, do you?
Now comes the big screw. You ditch all pretense to support true science fiction and fantasy and change your name to something no one knows the definition of 'cause it's not a real word or even a real acronym or abbreviation!
Dudes, stupid move.
This reminds me of the Outdoor Life Channel changing to Versus and moving away from their former dedicated base of outdoor enthusiasts (such as myself). Down went the cycling related events. Down went running events. Down went other interesting outdoor oriented programs. Sure, they put some back on but who cares, 'cause they showed they responded someone and something other than their dedicated audience.
Again, the same thing happened with ZDNet/TechTV as they moved away from their base and started programming non technology related material. Their ratings died and then the entire channel died. Does anyone else notice how this is a broken record? You go away from your dedicated mission and you loose audience. Dumb. Idiotic. Very much a sign you play to the lowest common denominator.
Now, you show you don't care about science fiction. Nor about the intelligence of your audience. Are we the anti-social nerds some of your top brass have made us out to be? No. This "nerd" earns his modest living in the I.T. field sure, but has a nice wife and kids, all three normal and not the least bit nerd-like, and I personally ride bike like crazy, work with and ride in charity bike rides every year, and am an active member of a thriving church community in my area. Not very nerd-like, huh!
To sum up, you've insulted your base once again, shown you don't know who we really are, have canceled many, many good shows and replaced them with lower than the lowest common denominator shows having nothing to do with sci-fi nor fantasy and now change your name so no one with think you are a channel for nerds. It's actions like these that promote the idea that media is all about sensationalism and not about truth or real quality programming, whether in fiction, non-fiction or hard news. You are a part of the reason people like George W. Bush get elected (well, not really elected - but that's another subject) and help him pull wool over a collective public's eyes.
This is a dumb move. This is insulting. This moves you off anything resembling your core audience. This SUCKS! I only have one thing to say to you; in the immortal words of Archie Bunker "Stifle it," SyFy!
By kymbakhan at 4:51 PM ON 03/17/09
SyFy = it's "Sih-Fee", AMIRITE?
I don't even see "Sci-Fie" phonetically.
By Rob at 5:01 PM ON 03/17/09
Odds that they'll change their mind before 7/7/09?
I see all the reasons they chose to do this listed in the TV Week article and elsewhere, but in my opinion the name change will accomplish almost none of those goals. Given the backlash online, I'm now wondering what the odds are that they'll change plans and either keep their current name or create another new one.
By Native Texan at 5:13 PM ON 03/17/09
Betcha the child of one of the SciFi Channel's bigwigs ordered new stationery with the the logo spelled "ScyFy" instead of "SciFi" so they're changing everything!
By Firestorm at 5:32 PM ON 03/17/09
Ridiculous move, waste of time. If there is more non science fiction and non fantasy the more I'm watching somewhere else... Hear me, advertisers!
By Chris M. at 5:34 PM ON 03/17/09
Instead of taking the time and money to re-brand Sci Fi Channel, why don't you hire some programming talent? You know, someone who might actually program some science fiction. We don't need a "reality, supernatural, action, wrestling, giant critter Science Fiction" channel. We need you to live up to your original name and actually show some science fiction.
By Leinad at 5:41 PM ON 03/17/09
Not cool! I feel abandon.
How about something simpler like "The Imagine Network"?
SyFy looks like it's trying to hard. It's almost text speek/eubonics...
By biznatch at 5:44 PM ON 03/17/09
SyFy, funny joke, haha...but you're a little early for April Fools. ...it is a joke, right?
By hmmdar at 5:45 PM ON 03/17/09
To who ever though this was a good idea: "Are you retarded?!"
That is actually a serious questions. Sci-Fi is about the only channel keeping my cable TV subscription going. If this is a read decision move Sci-Fi plans to make after the next episode of BSG my cable tv sub will be canceled.
By Misa at 5:47 PM ON 03/17/09
Wow. This new name and tagline is just insulting to SciFi fans. Thank God Battlestar Galactica is over on Friday and I can move on from the terrifying badness that SciFi... er SYFY has become. *shudder* I suppose I will cancel my extended cable, the only reason I was paying for it.
By elderwitty at 5:54 PM ON 03/17/09
1) SyFy. International acronym for "So you F*ck yaks"
2) synergy, syzygy, sycophant, syphilis
It's obviously pronounced Siffy, which rhymes with sippy (cups), which are used by the demographic they now seem to be targeting.
3) I can only assume that f*cking the yaks is how they contracted SyFyLys. (Or that photos of same were used to push through this name change.)
4) My money and my mind will be watching any channel but this one and any program but Stargate: 90210. We're too smart for this crap.
By Someone who Used to Support You at 5:56 PM ON 03/17/09
I remember when I was in high school, I participated in a petition to get our local cable company to carry the Sci-Fi Channel. Over the years I have watched as the shows I've loved have been dropped and replaced with the most moronic programming this side of E! Entertainment.
I went for years without cable and then I discovered BATTLESTAR GALACTICA. I had the option to order cable, and I did so for that show alone (not the complete truth, but BSG pushed me over the edge). I then gritted my teeth as the Sci-Fi Channel bled all of the momentum out of the best show on television by forcing us to wait and wait and wait for new seasons and new episodes mid-season.
I DVR every episode because I'm tired of rolling my eyes every time I see an ad for GHOST HUNTERS, or whatever idiotic half-man/half-scary creature movie of the week. The Sci-Fi Channel has made straight-to-video movies look appealing in comparison.
Well, this is the last straw, and I hope your sponsors are listening. Not because I think that term should be associated with your brain-dead programming, but because it proves you truly, deeply, no longer care for what was once your core audience. I will officially be cancelling my cable package that includes the SyFy channel because it's no longer necessary.
Frak off.
By harmonyfb at 6:01 PM ON 03/17/09
I was certain this was a prank. Guess not. I'm not sure I can adequately express my contempt for this marketing move. Let me try:
1. Why in the name of all that is holy would you go with a name and slogan that are miss-spelled and grammatically incorrect, respectively? You might as well have named it "The Moron Channel: WiiRSMrt"
2. Thanks for insulting your frelling fan base. You know, those of us that have been watching since SciFi came on the air?
3. You know (expletive deleted) about Science Fiction and its fans. This fan is a grown woman who owns her own business, is married to a chemist who is *also* a geek, has three lovely children who are fans, play video games, are avid readers, write their own short stories, and yet are still socialized just fine.
My friends are all fans. All of them are grown women who own their own homes, work in such diverse fields as construction, teaching, insurance, journalism, sewing, freelance editing, art, fiction writing - heck, some of them are even in the army.
Sorry to burst your pathetic superiority complex, but most Science Fiction fans are intelligent, well-read, highly educated, and successful individuals.
4. This will be my last week watching the SciFi Channel, as it's clear you despise your viewership.
By Hurmmmmm at 6:04 PM ON 03/17/09
It's not just a new name, primarily useful to "Kids Who Can't Read Good And Wanna Imagine More Greater Too".
It's ONLY about: "firmly establish[ing] a uniquely ownable trademark". And I thought they were just dumbing down for the sake fo the spelling challenged.
By Scythean at 6:05 PM ON 03/17/09
When I heard about this on G4 I thought it was a joke or something. Now that I know its real I'm amazed and not in the good way. I have been a loyal fan of sci-fi for as long as I can remember. I used to watch sci-fi movies with my mom on weekends (this was before all the strange B-movies which have flooded the network as of late). Stargate, Battlestar, Sanctuary, Farscape, have all been utterly amazing shows which existed on the network. Changing the name of the network in order to change the content that the network is able to provide is the same as saying that all of those good memories I had of watching shows on the Sci-Fi network were an accident on the Sci-Fi networks part. So you accidently gave me good entertainment which kept bringing me back. Well if it was an accident to be Sci-Fi it might just be an accident for me to stick around after you change to Syfy. Horrible decesion on the network executives parts.
By Richard at 6:12 PM ON 03/17/09
I was working in Orlando when the new SciFi Channel was announced (it was originally based in Orlando). WOO HOO! A cable channel devoted to science fiction programming! At last. I did my best to get information on how to get a job with SciFi. Alas, it was moved to California.
When I moved to Nashville, I had to pay Comcast for an extra tier to get SciFi. But it was worth it. Miniseries like Taken and other great science fiction fare became staples in my house. Then we moved and got DirecTV and SciFi was included! Fridays were SciFi nights with programs like the Stargates and Doctor Who. I even got my wife hooked on Stargate Atlantis. Then came BSG and recently Sanctuary.
It has suddenly occurred to me that I don’t watch much of SciFi anymore except for Friday nights. Oh, the occasional weekend marathon and sneaking a look at some afternoon programming while at work. Eureka is pretty cool, too.
Now comes “something for everyone”. There goes SciFi. Instead of focusing on one main idea and doing it better than anyone else, let’s pander to the lowest common denominator (i.e. crappy unreality shows because they cost less). TNT has been doing a great job of branding themselves as the drama channel with great inventive shows like The Closer, Leverage, etc. Sure they run SVU way too much. But at least they have good quality shows and movies.
In a day and time when movies are mining comic books and science fiction for ideas with fairly consistent success, wouldn’t you think that NBC Universal would say “Hmmm. Maybe we need to do the same thing with the SciFi Channel?”
Even though I don’t like the new name, I understand the change from a business identity standpoint. But, just as the most successful science fiction properties are those who center around characters instead of machines, the SciFi Channel (or SyFy) will only be as good as its programming. And I am afraid it doesn’t look good.
By harmonyfb at 6:15 PM ON 03/17/09
Thanks for insulting your frelling fan base.
By the way, this fan is a 45 year old woman who owns her own small business, is married to a chemist who is *also* a geek, has three lovely children who are fans, play video games, are avid readers, write their own short stories, and yet are still socialized just fine.
My friends are all fans. All of them are grown women who own their own homes, work in such diverse fields as construction, teaching, insurance, journalism, sewing, freelance editing, art, fiction writing - heck, some of them are even in the army.
Sorry to burst your superiority complex, but most Science Fiction fans are intelligent, well-read, highly educated, and successful individuals.
This will be my last week watching the SciFi Channel, as it's clear you despise your viewership.
By harmonyfb at 6:19 PM ON 03/17/09
Sorry about any duplicate posts - I've been seeing screens which indicated that my post didn't go through, so I refreshed and tried again. And again. And possibly again?
FYI to those who post after me.
By Rob at 6:28 PM ON 03/17/09
harmonyfb, don't sweat it. It's a glitch & has stricken everyone who posts on these boards. BTW, I still think the name change is beyond stupid.
By jimspar at 6:36 PM ON 03/17/09
At least when Sci-fi is dead and buried we won't have any more posts from you know who, about how sh1tty life is with out the Dresden Files.
Also it's great to know i'm not the only one who hates the captcha thing.
By malohombre at 6:37 PM ON 03/17/09
Is the first show on SYFY going to have an idiot kicked in the balls for the whole 30 minutes or hour?
By Alessar at 6:39 PM ON 03/17/09
Stupid choice, and kind of insulting to the fanbase. Really this network puts the cart before the horse in so many ways. About the only things done right in years are: The Lost Room, Stargate, Sanctuary, and Battlestar Galactica. Syfy? How about "Sowhat?
By skullskull at 6:41 PM ON 03/17/09
Hi
Jump the shark is back in more ways than one
Even drunk I could do better
This name is to save money-reality tv is cheap,worthless, and who doesn't 12 "Idol" or "Dancing with the Stars" shows so all "news" shows can promote it. Stargate Atlantis, Or the New Battlestar Gal sp? is only hip when Tv Guide has it on cover.
Again, don't pay for cable when you have DVD's and the 'net
Again, not every star trek, or wars,or l&o was a hit.
Dr Who,and Indy Jones took years to come back,not the same as they were(IQ) wise ,cause they have to sell it.
Not thinking,"This is the product and keep the fans loyal
We have to brand it"
It shows when "reality tv"-most from The Uk/Europe is overdone,"Fox Reality Channel",anyone? I spend more time on the Net
By apantalones at 6:42 PM ON 03/17/09
The dumbest thing I have ever heard, and really, really sad. I absolutely give up watching this network. But I doubt they care, I'm not in their coveted demo that they are changing their name for anyways. Fuck them. I got a million other channels to watch with nothing on.
By Arc at 6:47 PM ON 03/17/09
And so, TV becomes even more irrelevant.
By SciFiFan at 6:53 PM ON 03/17/09
The new name is horrible. Whoever thought it up should be fired. Also, the execs that approved the name should be fired. They should all be replaced by people who actually enjoy science fiction. Oh, and fire the people responsible for wrestling being on SciFi.
By SuckFy at 7:01 PM ON 03/17/09
Idiots. Thousands of comments on how stupid this is, you think they will listen at all? No! You guys are idiots, syfy is retarded.
By tant at 7:17 PM ON 03/17/09
I've been disgusted with the programming the Sci-Fi has run the past few years considering that some of the stuff isn't so much Sci-Fi as trash-fantasy and 'reality show' smut. Why not go fo i-Fy or i-Fi and spare us the lame attempt to maintain the original brand loyalty and at least be honest with the viewers in regards to what they will be broadcasting.
By Ttech at 7:17 PM ON 03/17/09
Thank you Sci-Fi for helping dumb down America SyFy is hard to look at let along type! SiFi is not good enough for you?
Brilliant choice!
Keep up the bad *cough*- good work.
By sryarmon at 7:36 PM ON 03/17/09
For once listen to the very fans that make it possible for you to have a high-paying job. THIS IS A BAD IDEA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! You freely admit to the best ratings and you want to go and ruin the formula that has made you so much money????? Obviously the top requirement for a CEO position at Sci Fi channel is to be a complete dumb-ass!!!!!!
By GoldenAge56 at 7:36 PM ON 03/17/09
Unbelievable. Pure marketing hubris vs. a rapidly departing viewer base. Anyone here hear of the phrase, "shutting the barn door after the horse escaped"?
SciFi / NBC Universal, you lost me about two years ago, althought I didn't realize it at the time. I thought it was life pressures getting the better of my time management. I missed the entirety of Season 10 for SG-1, lost interest in SG:A about the same time, and without Battlestar Galactica's occasional appearances, I had NO reason to stay on the channel.
Now, there is no reason to even stop by. Wrestling? Ghost hunting? When did Spielberg start that?
The Sci-Fi Channel Original Movie? Oh my gods, THAT'S WHY the frantic effort to rebrand! The absolute gold standard "Made for TV" watermark, like the hardwater stains in a third-world stadium toilet, and a more apt description escapes me. The inferred quality of that channel staple has become THE laughingstock of the Internet.
The sun has set on this channel. I lobbied hard and long with my local provider to get both Sci-Fi and Sci-Fi HD on our cable system. Unless they are both part of a "must-carry" agreement, it'll be my suggestion that they both get banished to the DirecTV "super-compression" pit of despair when we run into bandwidth issues.
I'd say, "Fair thee well, Sci-Fi!", but you left us long ago.
By Wat at 8:01 PM ON 03/17/09
WAT?
Seriously, stop the Syfylis madness. Bring back old sci-fi channel that showed xfiles and other good stuff, not wrestling and crappy monster movie of the week.
By queeneve at 8:02 PM ON 03/17/09
Wow, scifi, everytime I think you've shown me the dumbest possible thing, you surprise me!
Congrats Skiffy, you win again!
By BlueMonday at 8:02 PM ON 03/17/09
Um Yeah... more like SIGH-FIE to me...
By LOLOLOLOLOL at 8:11 PM ON 03/17/09
Wow.....I thought SciFi execs were sniffing glue when they put wrestling on The "SciFi" Channel. This is absolutely hilarious. One of the blogs actually said they when through almost 300 name variations before they landed on this idiotic one. Long live The "SciFi" channel.
By Ohrmazd at 8:18 PM ON 03/17/09
No. Just no.
That is so.. awful.
Step away from the Reality. You have failed it.
Syfy sounds like a venereal disease
Syfy will die
Goodbye SciFi. You could have been something great.
Maybe they could rename themselves again if they don't want to fix the problem. There are a lot of other options.
The Special Needs Channel.
The Reeree Channel.
The Paint Chip Eater's Network.
By Change the name on Sat 3/21/2009 at 8:19 PM ON 03/17/09
They might as well change the name of the channel to this new idiotic one this coming Saturday 3/21/2009 at midnight because after the last new episode of Battlestar airs Friday night there is anything left watchable on SciFi.
By Clarko at 8:27 PM ON 03/17/09
As long as we get more episodes of Jericho (like the rumors have been saying), I'm all for this new name.
By con at 8:38 PM ON 03/17/09
cool syfy stuff to come, watch sue ellen going all syfy in brand old episodes of dallas!
Check out the plural of syf http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/syf
By Sydney at 8:43 PM ON 03/17/09
Once again the channel continues to prove that it in no way understands the world that it chose to live in. And also, that its marketing department may actually be clinically insane.
My sympathies to Tom Vitale.
By capedog at 8:45 PM ON 03/17/09
Another bad move by the folks at NBCU. The flagship network is already in disarray ratings wise.So know they want to drag down there cable networks as well.
By TheLastChance at 8:53 PM ON 03/17/09
just one quick request...could you please post the names of all companies that support your so named Syfy channel so that i can write them and kindly request that they cease all advertisements of all kinds with you, until the time that you and your bonehead idea are cleared by at least two doctors and no longer pose a threat to yourselves and the community at large
By icarius at 8:54 PM ON 03/17/09
This blows. But, it doesn't surprise me. I remember the old school SciFi, it had some great stuff. Kolchak the Night Stalker was on during the day. Now, that was hokey but it was still better than the current fare that they continue to put out. Some of the made for TV Movies are pretty much tripe, SS Doomtrooper. I'm an Indy Film Maker and I can come up with CGI like that. This is a major TV Channel? More like a Major Disappointment.
At least I still have NetFlix for my SciFi fix.
"What are you people? On Dope?
Mr. Hand
By Kenvee at 8:58 PM ON 03/17/09
Wow. I'm glad to know that I shouldn't have been watching SciFi all this time because after all, I'm just a girl. Why would I like all that yucky BOY stuff?
Good grief, SyFy. Talk about misreading your core audience. Good luck in the ratings dump.
By IsoTek at 9:04 PM ON 03/17/09
More like Sigh Lie channel. I think the biggest favor you could do to your fans is fire Bonne Hammer. Its obvious after years of her running the channel, that she is running it into the ground. This whole concept of "Imagine Greater" which you think is fresh and new now, was actually fresh and new years ago when you brought us series like Farsape, Exposure and FTL Newsfeeds. All the things you imagine this new brand name doing now, you were doing years ago. You actually had weekend movies worth watching that weren't just lame "mockbusters" of true blockbuster films and you brought back classics that old and new could love. What is wrong with you, you are like the grown up child that thinks it needs piercings and tattoos so he can fit in with all the other looser kids out in tvland.
By Forrest Gump at 9:08 PM ON 03/17/09
Like Forrest Gump said, "Stupid is as Stupid does". SYFY.......fraking hilarious
By Blacksmithking at 9:12 PM ON 03/17/09
I haven't heard of a name this bad since Moland and Gleemax.
Since I started downloading BSG, I've had no reason to actually watch SciFi (or Syfillis, or whatever they want to call themselves now). I've recently found better science fiction on other channels: Primeval, TSCC, Dollhouse, Life on Mars, Ashes to Ashes, Torchwood, Dr. Who, Being Human, etc. Other channels are just doing it better.
By Jez at 9:22 PM ON 03/17/09
I think it's horrible that you are comparing SyFy to syphilis.
After all, syphilis has some redeeming social value.
By Vexxarr at 9:22 PM ON 03/17/09
Yay! Now someone serious can come along and start a REAL Sci-Fi network. Down with SyFy. Long live Sci-Fi!
By Tibbetts at 9:30 PM ON 03/17/09
This has to be one of the dumbest decisions ever, Sci-Fi Channel.
Wonder if someone will actually create a true sci-fi channel now? I hope so.
By This is your brain on SyFy at 9:40 PM ON 03/17/09
I agree with the post a little earlier.....at least if you get syphilis it can be cured with antibiotics and your probably had some fun getting it along the way.
SyFy is such a stupid branding idea....I can actually feel my brain shrinking from the pure stupidity when I think about it.
By skyforge at 9:43 PM ON 03/17/09
"Most of our shows are crap; let's make better shows."
"Ridiculous! Let's rebrand instead."
"OK. Since our shows are crap how 'bout 'The Crap Channel'?"
"Not bad but we can't own that brand. What about a synonym in another language?"
The next day, after consulting linguists at major universities in Europe:
"I've got it. One of the meanings of the the Polish word 'syf' means 'filth'."
"Yes...yes! Add a 'y' -- Syfy. It's almost like one of those texting shorthand word thingies like LOL or WTF. I don't know what they mean but it's so Web 2.0!"
"The only problem is that it can also mean syphilis."
"Only you, me and 40 million Poles have to know that. It's not like there's a web site where you can look up that kind of stuff."
"Great. 'SyFy' it is. I'll organize a focus group to test it."
"Not necessary. It's perfect; everyone will love it."
"But the executives will want documentation."
"Well then, find those people that helped us develop 'Shark Attack 3: Megalodon'. If they like it we can't go wrong. Or crackheads; everyone trusts a crackhead. I'll bet they'll even come up with a great tagline for us."
"Yeah, a tagline like 'Imagine greater quality by pretending our shows are good'."
"Too many letters. But maybe the crackheads can do something with it."
"Should we maybe float this idea on the the blog on the off-chance we're wrong?"
"Hell no! They're just a bunch of science fiction geeks. I hate them. I hate them so much I can't even stand the idea they watch our channel. I wish we could just make them go away."
"Perhaps we just did."
"Man, our bonuses are going to be HUGE this year!"
By Syberwolf at 10:02 PM ON 03/17/09
I don't like it...but I agree with alot of postings. We got SG1, Atlantis and BSG out of it...the new name just signifies it's time to bail. At least they gave us a nice big new name that gave us a heads up to move on. It's funny at first I thought it was one of those fake Onion news network posts....so sad...
By rewinder at 10:09 PM ON 03/17/09
It's interesting how everything runs in cycles. I remember a time when I was so starved for science fiction on TV I watched the same Star Trek episode every Sunday for months (It must have been the only episode they had) and over the years my patience was rewarded as the genre eventually grew. When the SciFi channel debuted I was delighted. It was exactly what I had waited for all those years. Then it slowly dwindled away. If not for the Friday night lineup I'd have said goodbye to the goofy monster channel a long time ago. Sadly, now that, too, is gone. Disappointing, especially now that they've removed all hope for recovery. We're not quite back to the days of watching that old Star Trek episode over and over, but we're not that far off, I think. Goodbye, SciFi channel. By the way, you can keep your silly SyFy channel. Everyone's right, it does sound like a venereal disease.
By alaethancar at 10:23 PM ON 03/17/09
I've noticed quite a few ironies keeping up in this thread...
1) the reason the scifi channel will fail is that the execs have lost all touch with reality.
2) this thread has actually been more entertaining than ANY scifi original movie.
3) In trying to sound "cooler" they end up branding their channel what it is quickly becoming... $hit.
I've been part of a LOT of forums and seen a LOT of fanboy arguments which scifi fans in particular are famous for.
bsg or stargate?
kirk or picard?
ps3 or xb360?
new dr who or old?
the arguments have been endless and theres ALWAYS people that even back the other answers. Some people think sliders is the best show ever. I personally like Janeway more than Kirk OR Picard.
But this the first time in the history of scifi I have ever seen UNANIMOUS agreement of ALL fans, and yet inevitably the-powers-that-like-to-f*ck-us-over wont listen or change their minds.
Please. Let them make this name change. and everyone who is a fan of any of the few good shows left or yet to air, PLEASE write to the producers of those shows and ask them to take the shows to a network where they will be appreciated, as you will likely NOT be watching any network called "syfy". I'll be writing bridge studios tonite myself.
By RedLeader at 10:30 PM ON 03/17/09
What? No. Just, no. SyFy? Is there something wrong with the letter 'i', some bogus ratings that phonetically spelled stations do better? Si-Fi was short, simple, and you really didn't have to explain it. Granted, you wouldn't have to anyhow, but seriously. This isn't texting, and there's nothing wrong with the regular channel name. I doubt many people would care for a channel called 'SyFy'.
By BobManGM at 10:35 PM ON 03/17/09
Wow...I was angry over the wrestling. But this is bad.
Hey...Mr. TV Ex...you read your own home page? I hope so.
Did you know SciFi did you know that a lot...I won't say all, but I know many...people who like SciFi (and I'll throw Fant in there too), don't like reality TV. Very little Sci, no imagination and nothing to hang on to (think long term success...Star Trek, Star Wars, StarGate, etc.). Some will buy into the flash in the pan stuff, but it is only fluff and soon forgotten.
Hope: some other channel starts up to do what SCIFI should be doing.
Idea: How about showing older shows? Red Dwarf...old Dr. Who....
Wow...I'll miss you.
By Serious offer at 10:44 PM ON 03/17/09
Hey there execs in charge of programing,
I have an offer for you.
As you can obviously see from the current reaction, your choice in re-naming your station will in fact cost you viewership.
Very bad choice considering the fact that you have magazines, books, and DVDs with your former name on them, and these will be lost to your accounts very soon after the transition. The best you can hope for in merchandise sales with this change of programing will be DVD sales . Consider all the other hard sales that come within the science fiction spectrum, from action figures and statues to posters and novelizations. This will not be a wise write off for your books.
Here is my offer. Get rid of the marketing execs that started you on this road to bankruptcy, and hire me on as an adviser. I'll happily take on the job at a reduced wage. I am currently employed so this is not a cry for help but a helping hand being reached out to you.
You must be aware that the costs implementing this name change will be enormous, with channel guide listings and refurnishing being just the tip of the ice burg.
Here are some basic freebies for you:
- Don't do the name change. Simply state that the fans and viewers don't approve and that you actually care about the current viewers.
- Reestablish your role as a science fiction programing channel by:
*eliminating the non sci fi stuff not under contract
*not being afraid of placing reruns of popular shows of the last few decades into prime time slots
*become directly involved with the viewers by sending representatives of the channel to conventions involving fans, not sales
Want more? You have my e-mail address attached to this post.
Hey, I'll even do lunch and talk it over with you if your buying!
By EpicGilgamesh at 10:53 PM ON 03/17/09
The Biggest branding mistake in the world. This is like when Coke came out with "New Coke." A Disaster. The term SciFi is already branded in our culture to include anything fictional and fantastic. PLUS its already an abbreviation why abbreviate it anymore.
How long did the Execs think about this before they gave it green light? There better have been a long hard fought debate before this decision was made or at least a focus group tested. But I doubt it, reading all these comments, and I can save the rest of you some time, there is not one comment that thinks this is a good idea. Not One.
Fans, the Syphilis Channel (SyFi) is lying to us. As someone who has had vast experience in branding, I can tell this decision was made for alternate reasons. Its a pig of an idea and they are putting lipstick on it by trying to tell us this was a branding decision.
Good job Execs at the Syphilis Channel (SyFi).
--guy edwards
By LeberMac at 11:06 PM ON 03/17/09
bad Bad BAD!.
Please stick to your core competency: Science Fiction.
Thank You,
Everyone.
By HATETHIS!!!!!!! at 11:10 PM ON 03/17/09
HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!! HATETHIS!!!
Ooooh I'm so pissed right now.
Suits SUCK!!!!
By EpicGilgamesh at 11:15 PM ON 03/17/09
Taking the "if" out of SciFi
In an earlier post I mentioned the failure of the Syphilis Channel (SyFi).
I will say they were going in a better direction with the "if" Campaign.
But then again, instead of building on the "if" campaign they have totally destroyed any bridge or connection to the "if" campaign by taking the "if" out of SciFi.
Good Job Syphilis Channel (SyFi).
By Reading this garbage from the SyFy prez and his peeps at 11:17 PM ON 03/17/09
Pulled this from an TVWeek article talking to Dave Howe, President of the SciFi Channel.
Not only is it insulting, but it is so out of touch with the real SciFi channel audience. These marketing geniuses sure earned their paychecks with "SyFy" disaster. Dave Howe should be fired immediately. Can you say "New Coke".
TVWeek article excerpts:
“The name Sci Fi has been associated with geeks and dysfunctional, antisocial boys in their basements with video games and stuff like that, as opposed to the general public and the female audience in particular,” said TV historian Tim Brooks, who helped launch Sci Fi Channel when he worked at USA Network.
Mr. Brooks said that when people who say they don’t like science fiction enjoy a film like “Star Wars,” they don’t think it’s science fiction; they think it’s a good movie.
“We spent a lot of time in the ’90s trying to distance the network from science fiction, which is largely why it’s called Sci Fi,” Mr. Brooks said. “It’s somewhat cooler and better than the name ‘Science Fiction.’ But even the name Sci Fi is limiting.”
“What we love about this is we hopefully get the best of both worlds,” Mr. Howe said. “We’ll get the heritage and the track record of success, and we’ll build off of that to build a broader, more open and accessible and relatable and human-friendly brand.”
The network worked with the branding consultancy Landor Associates and went through about 300 possibilities before selecting Syfy.
“When we tested this new name, the thing that we got back from our 18-to-34 techno-savvy crowd, which is quite a lot of our audience, is actually this is how you’d text it,” Mr. Howe said. “It made us feel much cooler, much more cutting-edge, much more hip, which was kind of bang-on what we wanted to achieve communication-wise.”
Here is a link to the whole article
http://www.tvweek.com/news/2009/03/sci_fi_channel_aims_to_shed_ge.php#comments
Honestly, I would be laughing my ass off if this wasn't a true story. It is amazing how such a clueless bunch of execs could rise to the top and run any cable channel.
By tmp at 11:18 PM ON 03/17/09
Stupid, in fact beyond stupid! Do you hate us? Really Sci-Fi execs do you hate the people who have been loyal all these years, even after you canceled Farscape? Well frak you! Change it and see just how many people drop your ass! Beyond stupid - SyFy - what is that short for syphilis? Just plain ignorant!
By Reading this garbage from the SyFy prez and his peeps at 11:23 PM ON 03/17/09
Pulled this from an TVWeek article talking to Dave Howe, President of the SciFi Channel.
Not only is it insulting, but it is so out of touch with the real SciFi channel audience. These marketing geniuses sure earned their paychecks with "SyFy" disaster. Dave Howe should be fired immediately. Can you say "New Coke".
TVWeek article excerpts:
“The name Sci Fi has been associated with geeks and dysfunctional, antisocial boys in their basements with video games and stuff like that, as opposed to the general public and the female audience in particular,” said TV historian Tim Brooks, who helped launch Sci Fi Channel when he worked at USA Network.
Mr. Brooks said that when people who say they don’t like science fiction enjoy a film like “Star Wars,” they don’t think it’s science fiction; they think it’s a good movie.
“We spent a lot of time in the ’90s trying to distance the network from science fiction, which is largely why it’s called Sci Fi,” Mr. Brooks said. “It’s somewhat cooler and better than the name ‘Science Fiction.’ But even the name Sci Fi is limiting.”
“What we love about this is we hopefully get the best of both worlds,” Mr. Howe said. “We’ll get the heritage and the track record of success, and we’ll build off of that to build a broader, more open and accessible and relatable and human-friendly brand.”
The network worked with the branding consultancy Landor Associates and went through about 300 possibilities before selecting Syfy.
“When we tested this new name, the thing that we got back from our 18-to-34 techno-savvy crowd, which is quite a lot of our audience, is actually this is how you’d text it,” Mr. Howe said. “It made us feel much cooler, much more cutting-edge, much more hip, which was kind of bang-on what we wanted to achieve communication-wise.”
Here is a link to the whole article
http://www.tvweek.com/news/2009/03/sci_fi_channel_aims_to_shed_ge.php#comments
Honestly, I would be laughing my ass off if this wasn't a true story. It is amazing how such a clueless bunch of execs could rise to the top and run any cable channel.
By Reading this garbage from the SyFy prez and his peeps at 11:24 PM ON 03/17/09
Pulled this from an TVWeek article talking to Dave Howe, President of the SciFi Channel.
Not only is it insulting, but it is so out of touch with the real SciFi channel audience. These marketing geniuses sure earned their paychecks with "SyFy" disaster. Dave Howe should be fired immediately. Can you say "New Coke".
TVWeek article excerpts:
“The name Sci Fi has been associated with geeks and dysfunctional, antisocial boys in their basements with video games and stuff like that, as opposed to the general public and the female audience in particular,” said TV historian Tim Brooks, who helped launch Sci Fi Channel when he worked at USA Network.
Mr. Brooks said that when people who say they don’t like science fiction enjoy a film like “Star Wars,” they don’t think it’s science fiction; they think it’s a good movie.
“We spent a lot of time in the ’90s trying to distance the network from science fiction, which is largely why it’s called Sci Fi,” Mr. Brooks said. “It’s somewhat cooler and better than the name ‘Science Fiction.’ But even the name Sci Fi is limiting.”
“What we love about this is we hopefully get the best of both worlds,” Mr. Howe said. “We’ll get the heritage and the track record of success, and we’ll build off of that to build a broader, more open and accessible and relatable and human-friendly brand.”
The network worked with the branding consultancy Landor Associates and went through about 300 possibilities before selecting Syfy.
“When we tested this new name, the thing that we got back from our 18-to-34 techno-savvy crowd, which is quite a lot of our audience, is actually this is how you’d text it,” Mr. Howe said. “It made us feel much cooler, much more cutting-edge, much more hip, which was kind of bang-on what we wanted to achieve communication-wise.”
Honestly, I would be laughing my ass off if this wasn't a true story. It is amazing how such a clueless bunch of execs could rise to the top and run any cable channel.
By DRayburn at 11:41 PM ON 03/17/09
By Zardoz at 11:58 PM ON 03/17/09
Bwa ha!!!! You guys suck.
It's not bad enough that the SciFi channel barely does SciFi. I get more SciFi off TBS than I do you.
The possibilities for SciFi are endless. You could dig deep into the past and reintroduce old programs and themes to your viewers. You could have specialty programs to analyze concepts and trends in SciFi. You could pick up the old TechTV crew and media and make it a haven for futurism, technology and the techno-educated in society. You could have Cyberpunk theme days...you could have Rosy Happy Future days... You could have Robots gone wild days...you could have AI gone mad movie days. You could make being absorbed in SciFi and technology into an Uber-cool thing. You could bring in Science Fiction authors to discuss wildly fantastic ideas which would blow away your audience.
You could merchandise with SciFi book publishers, merchandisers and retailers. You could see what the Japanese are doing to merchandise this stuff if you're unable to jumpstart those puny imaginations of yours.
You could have a program where game designers talk about the future of their technology and video. You could position SciFi with the latest computer games. You could mix SciFi and video games in a way better than those lard-butts at G4.
You could bring back the MST3K-type programming which pokes humerous fun at crummy old programs (including much of the crud that you guys have "produced").
You could have 60 years worth of old programming targeting children and make every day like Saturday Morning cartoons (except with SciFi stuff and merchandising).
You could pull out the hundreds of forgotten movies from the past (which are probably pretty cheap to air these days). If you could capture the audience you're pretending to appeal to...we have money. I have thousands of dollars worth of scifi movie merchandise sitting on the shelves of my computer room. Guess what? I didn't buy it from YOU because you're too lame to sell it.
The possibilities for making money from this targeted audience are enormous. You could be THE source for all manner of SciFi merchandise such as posters, books, etc. If George Lucas showed everyone anything, it's that there's a lot of money to be made in merchandising this stuff. You obviously haven't learned anything from his example. Your website could merchandise all sorts of Science Fiction paraphernalia.
Instead...you put on wrestling, John Edwards, Ghost Hunters and all sorts of crap. Even your sorry attempt at merchandising BSG leftover crap almost seems like a garage sale to dump the stuff. Seriously...you guys are amateurs. You could have made tons of money if you'd released the videos for BSG in a timely manner. Instead, you delayed that until we'd almost forgotten about the series before making them available.
Really, I wish you would just lose any pretense of actually doing SciFi so that someone else could pick it up and do it right. There's no doubt you've failed and are continuing that trend. Go all the way, change your name to the Ghost Wrestling Channel and put on more Enzyte and Extenz commercials.
It's a really BAD move....I have even less respect for you now (of what little remained). Fire your marketing crew and put them in a Robot Wars arena; film their pathetic attempts to save their lives for our amusement. Get someone who can stick to the charter of the channel. Hire Leo Laporte or John Dvorak or people with a real passion and love for niche marketing to consult for ideas.
Please, either live up to your promise or just die already...
By Rick at 11:58 PM ON 03/17/09
“When we tested this new name, the thing that we got back from our 18-to-34 techno-savvy crowd, which is quite a lot of our audience, is actually this is how you’d text it,” Mr. Howe said. “It made us feel much cooler, much more cutting-edge, much more hip, which was kind of bang-on what we wanted to achieve communication-wise.”
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!
So the real reason they wanted to change the name was to appease thumb-typers and to feel cool and hip.
EPIC FAIL.
By tmp at 12:05 AM ON 03/18/09
In response to the concept about Sci Fi representing only geeks and dysfunctional boys in their dark basements - I say rubbish! I am female and forensic psychologist and attorney [don't know if that makes me a geek or not] and I have been watching Sci Fi for years. The only thing that influences my decision to watch the channel is the quality of programs that are shown. I could care less what it is called, but Sci Fi had a cool, hip and intelligent connotation. This new name, SyFy is just ridiculous, but when last have Sci Fi execs responded to anything that their fans have requested? Pity that we don't have an alternative to their channel otherwise I would have retaliated years ago with the cancellation of Farscape. But who knows, with BSG going off the air there is nothing to keep me watching anyhow. SyFy - just an absolutely stupid idea!
By bluto182 at 12:22 AM ON 03/18/09
I don't have much to say about this. Might as well change the name to Syfy since there is virtually no science fiction programming left on it.
But "Imagine Greater"? Like what ECW? Idiots running around with flashlights filmed in nightvision? Low budget movies with worse CGI than a NES game and even worse acting? Endless reruns of old black and white TZ eps from when my parents were kids? This channel has just been getting crappier and crappier since NBC Universal got their hands on it.
Farscape, Stargate, and BSG were some of the best shows on television. All cancelled.
Like another poster said somewhere: "Syfyllis"
By Not a geek living in my parent's basement at 12:24 AM ON 03/18/09
This is a stupid idea and insulting to the channel's fan base. I hope someone actually reads all these comments and gets the hint. What idiot thought up this idea?
By worker at 12:29 AM ON 03/18/09
Sigh Fi.... This is dumb. My IQ dropped 20 points after reading about this name change. Please keep scifi for the name of the channel.
By anom at 12:31 AM ON 03/18/09
Cancelled my cable the day of the last stargate episode. Was going to get cable again mainly for the SciFi channel, but not any more after seeing this.
By boogerman at 12:53 AM ON 03/18/09
SyFy will do for science fiction what TRU did for Court TV. (coff)
By Saiidin at 1:02 AM ON 03/18/09
+1 to the number of outraged Science-Fiction geeks who grew up reading Poul Anderson, Isaac Asimov, Orson Scott, and Arthur C. Clarke, only to see the channel that should be our shining beacon in the void of cyberspace be overwhelmed by the dark, creeping tides of insanity and mediocrity.
RIP Sci-Fi TV. May your ghoulish, soul-sucking undeath be short-lived.
By Saiidin at 1:12 AM ON 03/18/09
Also, I hope Isaac Asimov returns as a lich to [engage in forcible bumsecks with] Mr. Howe with Rowdy Roddy Piper's bagpipes over this.
By saris at 1:15 AM ON 03/18/09
Wonder what would happen if we all wrote to the sponsors who buy ads an SciFi and tell them not to waste their money on SyFy because we are all leaving?
Hey, I was almost able to read that last batch of 20 bloody captcha's, security is getting really lax!
By b0bh0pe at 1:54 AM ON 03/18/09
Food TV should also change its name to "Fewd" or even better "Fud" as an homage to the Far Side. They should soon realize this idea is crap and announce it as a joke.
By byodredd at 2:50 AM ON 03/18/09
I'm pleased to announce that as of Saturday morning I will be SyFy free. Comcast is coming to pull the plug on Saturday morning after I've seen the final episode of Galactica.
In publicizing this fiasco on my personal website, most of my friends are also cancelling their upper-tier of channels so they don't have to endure this disaster any longer.
By Horrid at 2:59 AM ON 03/18/09
NO NO NO ... what's it really stand for 'Syndicated Fynance' ??? You bunch of Brand Name Turkeys
By DialogueGuy at 3:49 AM ON 03/18/09
I guess the next channel re-naming will be the
USA Network to the GILBOA Network. Fracking stupid.
By Nate8 at 4:04 AM ON 03/18/09
Play my Wii, watch something on the SyFylis channel... Is America great or what!!
By GetAClue at 4:11 AM ON 03/18/09
Imagine GRAMMAR!
By Like-wow at 5:27 AM ON 03/18/09
The creativity and intelligence of this core audience is wonderfully displayed in this amazing collection of comments. It is clear, the name change is stupid beyond understanding.
Here's a thought. The modern world is careering down the worst economic crises in living memory. Science fiction and speculative fiction has always explored the what ifs: new worlds, new ideas, new possibilities. People need to be challenged and encouraged by good SF, now more than ever. And what do the suits do? Display the greed that created the current global financial mess.
You reap what you sow.
By Sadly Yes at 6:28 AM ON 03/18/09
I hope at least one SciFi exec reads these comments. An institution that ignores the people that made it what it is today is showing its true colors. Thats right, institution, that is what this channel has become to us fans. We watch (or at least used to) the programming in this channel almost religiously to connect us into the imagination that we once loved as children, and to this day appreciate as adults. But, as we are shown, in their inability to even respond to a single email, they cast us aside to succumb to a purpose so blatant in its impurity, that even the name cry's at its filth. A genre of the most passionate viewers has been corrupted, tossed aside to make way for wrestling, reality shows, reruns, and other forms of cheap time filling programming. Stargate Atlantis and Battlestar Galactica, 5 seasons, that seems fitting... maybe. The Dresden Files 1 season, and looks like Dollhouse is going for just 1 season, terrible. All great shows, all cut at their prime. Lets just hope that there will be a new network that can step up to the void that SciFi left. I know i speak for many fans of the good times when i say, like an ex-girlfriend/wife, we had our good times, we had our fun, but when disappointment starts to turn into resentment im sorry to have to say that this is goodbye. Unfortunately I do not think this will make a difference. Like many other fans this fridays last episode of Battlestar Galactica will be the last time i turn to the SciFi channel for indulgence in one of the few true joys in this world, imagination.
By dysfunctyonal at 8:02 AM ON 03/18/09
Ugly, Ugly, Ugly branding
By dysfunctyona at 8:12 AM ON 03/18/09
If you must change how about:
SFI
Cyfi
SFZ ( Scifi Zone)
By Realety at 8:40 AM ON 03/18/09
So after 16 years of trying to create a great brand name, the channel is going to change it's name so something that is only sci-fi in phonetics. There is already a shortage of great classic science fiction on the channel recently in favor of new straight to dvd low budget movies. For instance, the longest running sci-fi television show in history is Dr. Who. Two years ago it was advertised heavily and now it is barely in the rotation. Even if the show is currently between seasons, there are 40 years of season in the vaults. Don't turn your back on the classics.
By Kunte Kinte at 8:41 AM ON 03/18/09
By naysayer at 3:16 PM ON 03/17/09
honestly, i don't know what is up with all you haters out there. i don't think the name change is so HORRIFIC like someone stabbing you or something. it's just a name change FFS. If you want to complain about the programming or wrestling and such, go ahead cause at least that makes sense. but to ramble on about the name being changed? I just don't get it. who cares.
*************************************************
Anyone who uses the word "haters" as part of their argument has already lost the argument.
Oh, and SyFy SUCKS.
By ggb667 at 10:12 AM ON 03/18/09
This is to f*****g stupid I am at a loss for a more intelligible comment. It's obvious the people running the show over there don't actually like science fiction. I can not think of a better way to slap the users in the face.
By Tracy at 10:39 AM ON 03/18/09
I read this and my only thought is this...
Since they aren't going to be seeking out shows that appeal to the Science Fiction lovers any longer and rather are going for this broader vision where anything that is NOT Science Fiction is brought it, they left out at least one thing that appeals to their new core audience... you know the ones that think they are in the know and totally missing it.
MUSIC VIDEOS
By Histrion at 11:36 AM ON 03/18/09
"Without abandoning our legacy or our core audience" - would those be the ones your founder is labeling "geeks and dysfunctional, antisocial boys in their basements with video games and stuff like that?"
By rmd at 11:51 AM ON 03/18/09
Forget the awfulness of 'SyFy', what about grammar? Exactly what does 'Imagine Greater' mean? It sounds like Chinglish, something you'd see on a T-shirt. It makes no sense. Imagine greater what? Greater profits? A greater channel?
On the positive side, maybe someone will step in and fill the gap and create an actual science fiction channel now. One without wrestling.
By tcode at 12:01 PM ON 03/18/09
say what you want, this one article has generated more posts than any other. and while every one has been unflinchingly negative, it at least got some notice. if nbc thinks this is good or bad who knows. they may think any publicity is good. its been a few days and no new notice about the name change and no follow up to the concerns thats not good
By smtownscifi at 12:11 PM ON 03/18/09
Did you even do a focus group on this idea? Who did you target? Obviously your core-consumer and audience - the ones who care enough to come here - are more than a little put off. NBC shows like Heros and Fringe expand your audience - THOSE are good shows and attract demi-scifi fans. SciFi Channel has always been about the core group. Don't abandon us now by disregarding us as unimportant. And yes, I'm a woman, I have a real job and a social life AND SciFi Channel is my #1 programming choice.
It's not too late to turn back and retract this. I'm afraid you will regret it.
By malohombre at 12:16 PM ON 03/18/09
Imagine Greater...ok I imagine whoever pulled this campaign out of their collective asses have been fired since you originally posted the name change.
By malohombre at 12:54 PM ON 03/18/09
By gushing over the fact that "SYFY" is how the "techno-savy 18-34 demographic" text made you feel cool showed you're the biggest nerd here. I'll even throw in Douchebag to make you feel even more important. Or is that more importanter?
By Tracy at 1:04 PM ON 03/18/09
Now I want to put a serious comment.
Separating from Science Fiction (the roots of this channel - yes I remember when it was first being bandied about and all those who loved science fiction and it's way of looking at the world around them in a new light were celebrating, I was one of the one's who just waited with baited breath), really lousy idea.
Actually posting you opinion of all of us who love and cherish science fiction (have these execs read one science fiction novel in their lives?) when you are an exec of the channel that was originally created for them, even worse idea.
In one fell swoop, you managed to so alienate this community, male and female alike. That has got to be a record. I'm actually impressed.
Oh, and I won't be watching the misnamed channel any longer. I'll wait for the final episode to show up on Hulu and watch it there. They don't mind us geeky science fiction fans - oh, and nice stereotyping of us by the way. Thanks a lot.
By the way, I'm 43 years old as of next Tuesday, and female with a Masters Degree in Special Education you brainless twits.
By wtfbbq at 1:13 PM ON 03/18/09
exactly lolwat?
this is just stupid.. someone in your organization needs to be fired for being completed out of touch and just retarded.
SyFy.. liek OMG WTFBBQ U GIT PWNED HOWZ?
dumb is dumb.. you guys are dumb
By tiburon at 1:22 PM ON 03/18/09
Youthenize yourself with Syfy
By grayone at 1:24 PM ON 03/18/09
Maybe this is all a ploy to make everyone so grateful that they'll watch the network when they decide to drop this "Syfy" farce.
By tekhmaster at 1:45 PM ON 03/18/09
Just gonna say, Bye Bye SiFi (or SyFyless if your prefer).
Your programming has been going downhill for some time. This is just the final nail in the coffin. I'll be pulling the plug on your useless programming ASAP.
By DCS at 2:06 PM ON 03/18/09
Um, OK..."SyFy" means what exactly? It signifies what? Your point/goal in this seemingly absurd change is what? It looks more like the alphabetic construction of a moron who doesn't know how to spell and simply abbreviated "science fiction" phonetically. Should go over well though with the ignoramuses we graduate by the millions from today's public education system.
By GladstoneDNA at 2:12 PM ON 03/18/09
Formulaic marketing. Stop standing for something so you can stand for nothing. But now you can appeal to mass market that is glazing over at the lack of distinction in the market.
By Kerri at 2:18 PM ON 03/18/09
I'm sorry but the new name doesn't even make sense, "Syfy". Why take something that's so recognizable and indicative of what it is and make it sound like a vague technology or pharma company? The proposed new "acronym" or whatever you want to call it doesn't even stand for anything...rendering it pointless, really, and a bit too overachieving.
By interstellarmind at 2:39 PM ON 03/18/09
i started to worry about The Sci Fi Channel since they got rid of Quantum Leap in favor of Wrestling (did they ever explain that, by the way? why is there wrestling on The Sci Fi Channel?). Bad move, "SyFy." You've lost me as a viewer. I'm not going to repeat what others have said. But, really, "SyFy" don't forget you got as popular as you have BECAUSE of your science fiction programming. it's that Science Fiction, and Science Fiction alone tht's gotten you your 16 years. don't kill off what really gave you success, now. Go back to Science Fiction. Give us more shows like Farscape, BSG, ST: TNG, Quantum Leap. Get rid of the wrestling, Fantasy B.S.
P.S. why not just create a Fantasy Channel? you could still make $$ and not mess with our Sci Fi.
By SeeFee at 2:46 PM ON 03/18/09
If I didn't know it was SciFi I would read it like my handle. See Fee. See Fee Tee Vee. See Fee change it's name so no one knows how to pronounce it.
By mizmedia at 2:57 PM ON 03/18/09
Siffy? Oh, lovely. Stop tinkering! It's perfectly fine -- even cool -- as is!
By NarcoSleepy at 3:00 PM ON 03/18/09
Most. Stupid. Thing. Ever.
By Greyias at 3:16 PM ON 03/18/09
I think the real question here is... why not "Ymagyne Greater"?
By Pooter at 3:36 PM ON 03/18/09
WOMYN execs!
By Bogs at 3:46 PM ON 03/18/09
Can you say New Coke!...if it's not broke don't fix it.
By nogoodshows at 4:03 PM ON 03/18/09
As a previous fan (not as long as some who have posted here) I am completely disheartened to hear of this change. I mean, Really?
If you want to "re-brand" so that you can have a registered trademark, why not change it to something like "Sci-fy" for Science Fiction, Fantasy, et al.
Of course, if the show goes the way of reality TV it won't matter what you call it because none of the current fans (with the exception of wrestling) will likely watch it. Personally I have gone down from about 4 shows a week to none. Unless they bring Eureka back I have no reason to tune in. Sanctuary is hokey but I have to admit I still DVR it if it is on. As an SG fan I am intrigued about the new Stargate Universe, but it is so far off that, well, I can buy it on DVD if I really want to see it.
If any of you execs actually read this (or have your minions do it for you) pay attention to your core audience. This much feedback in so little time has got to mean something to you. At least I am sure your advertisers will think so if you lose a large portion of your audience.
And a note, as much as I appreciate having a HD channel in my area, it won't matter if you have no shows worth watching.
By jervin at 4:17 PM ON 03/18/09
I just think it's a way of further widening the gap from their roots. But who should be surprised after the solid chain of stupid decisions they've made over the years. I think they are trying to see how much they can slap their science fiction fans around w/o them actually leaving.
By Littlehippie at 5:19 PM ON 03/18/09
Wow. This is beyond stupid. Yet another stupid move by sci-fi to destroy its audience.
By Rbectel at 5:40 PM ON 03/18/09
New Coke anyone? What a foolish move by blind executive leadership.
By tvs televisions at 5:57 PM ON 03/18/09
I don't know how you based your decision on whoever recommended this new name and sold it as being able to more clearly capture the mainstream appeal of the world's biggest entertainment category and broaden the perception of the brand. "SYFY" what the heck is that. Everyone that enjoys science fiction certainly knows what sci-fi stands for. what in the world convinced you to eradicate a 16 yr successful brand and replace it with a phonetic spelling that poorly educated people could identify with!!
By steve at 6:08 PM ON 03/18/09
FANTASCIE would have been a good one :D
"You are watching the FANTASCIE channel!"
Does SPIKE own a part of SCIFI? They used to have a lot of star trek shows on all day, and now its a channel for college-ish frat douchebags. Who the hell watches wrestling ?!?
By sebasrojas at 6:16 PM ON 03/18/09
This is the stupidest, dumbest, most out-of-touch move ever. I guess you guys really don´t care loosing viewers. Might as well, after fridays BSG finale there is nothing else to watch on Sci-Fi or PoopFy or whatever you first semester marketing geniuses want to call it now.
By snowdon at 7:58 PM ON 03/18/09
As someone who works in brand and marketing, I can tell you didn't test this with your customers. Don't get swept away by high-minded ideas, just be real.
And as one of your customers - I hate it. 'Imagine greater' is clumsy (especially when 'if' is so good). 'Syfy' is unpronouncable, pretentious twaddle.
By SciFiGeek at 8:21 PM ON 03/18/09
Would someone please go figure out what loony bin the corporate suits at SciFi (I will *NOT* use "Syfy") Channel escaped from? They are so far removed from reality that they really are a danger to themselves and society. I know this because they think a nickname for siphilis is a cool sounding brand for a network, WWF wrestling is scientific because it is a study is on why we shouldn't take steroids, and "original programming" that has the same entertainment value as watching monkeys fling their poo at each other is something people will race to their couches to see. Oh, and they think ghosts are real too. Someone seems to think snakes are really scary too because giant reptiles have been the monster of choice for years now. This is just the sad, pathetic end to a cable channel that used to have programs people looked forward to watching each week.
By Geomaniac at 8:42 PM ON 03/18/09
Dumb!
By Wil at 9:19 PM ON 03/18/09
And what exactly is SyFy supposed to stand for? This is such an asinine idea I almost can't believe it's really happening. Why don't they just hire Oprah to rebrand their image to get the women? It's not like she could do a WORSE job of alienating the core body of followers. By the way I happen to be one of those core followers, and am also a women, and think this new push to get away from the fringe in pursuit of the mainstream is truly sellout pathetic.
By skarwars at 10:27 PM ON 03/18/09
Please do change the name to SyFy.
The channel that is currently broadcasting should no longer be allowed to use the name SciFi.
When the programming really gets worse that what it currently is, just another cable channel that might have just one hour of programming to watch a week, it won't be connected to the term SciFi.
Just remember folks you can still try and get that $40 coupon from the government to use that antenna to get free TV, cause cable or sat just won't be worth pay for any more.
By kscott56 at 10:49 PM ON 03/18/09
Well now I know why I will stop watching this channel. Thanks for making it easy. What's next? Dissolving spelling in general?
By Paranormal Kat at 11:19 PM ON 03/18/09
LOL I seriously thought this was a joke. Seriously!? SyFy? Whoever thought this one up was either high or hit on the head waaaay too hard. I Don't know if I can take the channel seriously with a name like SyFy... with the stupid bubbly logo! haha WTF?! Then again... it was obvious they were up to something when they thought SciFi should air wrestling. *tsk tsk* I seriously hope this is one hell of an april fool's joke LOL
By elstrausso at 11:21 PM ON 03/18/09
SyFy has been trying to get out of the Sci-Fi genre for some time now. If it were not for the success of "BSG", this re-brand would have happened long ago. Look at their history of programming decisions - they have canceled shows like "Fire Fly", "Farscape", and the like , only to replace them with "Joan Of Arcadia", and ECW Wrestling. This Network obviously wants out of the genre, and that's fine with me. There is a very large, and vocal group of dedicated sci-fi fans out there, and they deserve a NEW network, not Syfy, that respects them. Now that SyFy has ditched the name SciFi (because they can't "own" it) hopefully a new network will emerge, and pick up the old moniker and do it justice!
By WTH? at 11:35 PM ON 03/18/09
I'm sorry, but that has to sound like some yuppie gay kind of guy that would think up such a gayest idea for a new logo.
I hope the staffs is reading these comments and hopefully save face by realizing how stupid this idea really is and pull the plug on it.
By SML at 11:44 PM ON 03/18/09
To me this sounds like sci-fi will become just another cable channel. I saw this coming when they started showing wrestling last year. Whats next, Law and Order and Reba ? What a waste.
By Tru at 11:50 PM ON 03/18/09
This is pretty horrible - why after having your best year watched ever would you ever want to go around and mess up something that you've finally got right?
By robotnut at 11:59 PM ON 03/18/09
Lovely. They were showing a lot of low budget junk before the change. Now the vvariety of crud will be greater. I can see their point: there are only so many low budget, pooely written SF ahows out there,
The sci fi channel had such great promise. I remember local SF fans waiting anxiously for the local cable system to carry it. And for a while there were a few shows worth watching. Then the sci fi channel rejected all of the wonderful old shows, and replaced them with low budget junk. But it was *new* junk.
I think most SF fans have simply given up on the channel. The changes will drive off the few remaining fans.
Bjo Trimble talked of starting a SF cable channel. I guess she abandoned the idea when sci fi came on. Hopefully she will change her mind.
By Jorg at 12:00 AM ON 03/19/09
Possibly the dumbest move yet from the channel that is responsible for some of the poorest imitations of science-fiction ecer.
By Dave at 12:00 AM ON 03/19/09
This has to be the worst idea ever. I'm really disappointed in you, SCIFI.
At least i'll still have my memories....
By Forge at 12:08 AM ON 03/19/09
As far as the logo and name goes, if its not broke then don't fix it. The original name and logo isn't broke. If you really feel the need to change some thing, get rid of that damn wrestling crap. That way the programing might more closely match the original name "Sci-Fi" Channel.
By elstrausso at 12:58 AM ON 03/19/09
If you want to really vent your displeasure about this distasteful re-brand you should not only comment here, but also send an email to the leader of this campaign, the president of SciFi: davehowe@scifi.com
By Bold Diomedes at 1:02 AM ON 03/19/09
Seriously?
Way to piss off your fan base in the already overfragmented digital television landscape... but given that science fiction ain't your focus anymore, I suppose you wouldn't have much an understanding of how the evolution of information technology favors niche audiences. Knowledge is for nerds, and loyalty is for chumps.
By tha_artist at 1:08 AM ON 03/19/09
all I can say is I'm grad student in college with a degree in graphic design and if I turned in a logo that was #1 that lame and #2 poorly designed i'd have never graduated. anyway the people in charge should really pay attention to what everyone is saying. I understand that they want to reach a wider audience but anyone that's taken a marketing class knows you should alienate your original client base.
By robregon1 at 1:14 AM ON 03/19/09
I seriously thought my cousin was playing a joke when she told me the news until I saw it being made fun of on a couple of well known cable channels but I must say that I was stunned... feeling little beyond disappointment and disgust.
This is yet another example of our society and our media "dumbing down" things that are presented to us... another "fine", "brilliant", "well thought out" example of lowering the standards. It's not bad enough that our news media presents information to the public that is at an 8th grade level in order to hold a segment of the population with an ever shrinking attention span, but now we get this... SYFY?!?!?! I would imagine that this is an attempt at securing the text messaging crowd... the same crowd that can't compose a coherent sentence together enough to fill out a legible employment application?
As an advertisement major, art director and business owner I know you're supposed to think outside the box when marketing a business, but as you can see by the negative responses you're getting to this gem of "news" you're not only NOT thinking very well outside the box but you are apparently digging inside an entirely new box... filled with cat litter!
In your attempt to reach a broader audience, rather than look for a wider range of material or improve production values, storytelling, scripting of original shows or change the logo or develop a savvy ad campaign to appeal to that target goal, you've opted to go with what the mainstream channels are doing... jumping on the same old programming bandwagon! I mean, wrestling... reality shows in growing numbers? MTV did that and eventually got lost from the path that their name is supposed to stand for and thats music videos which they show little to nothing of.
I sincerely hope that you come to your senses and opt for something TRULY innovative, I hope you develop a path of innovation rather than renovation and not go with this sickeningly simple minded idea. You're not only going to alienate a lot of viewers, you're going to lose a lot of them too... but then again, what do I know? For that matter, what do any of the multitude of negative commenters with similar opinions to mine know? We're only the viewing public, your fans that have been watching all along.... till now.
By MJ at 1:35 AM ON 03/19/09
It seems to be pretty obvious that this change is doing exactly what they say it won't, and that is alienating the core audience. Statistically, those who are fans of the science fiction genre tend to be more on the intellectual side of fangroups. (how many times have you heard a sci-fi fan point out technical inaccuracies in a particular show or movie?) It's understandable that the network wants a name that they can stick onto merchandise but why is the Saturn Logo not viable as a marketing tool? Why not go with something such as SFC or even changing SCI FI Channel to SCI FI Network and then use something such as SFNet or simply SFN similar to the "Game Show Network" changing to GSN? That would be something people could recognize, apply to product lines along with the Saturn logo and it wouldn't be an insult to the intelligence of the core fanbase.
If the network execs are looking at the ratings falling, they should step back for a moment and see that the reason they are falling is not because they are not showing a wide enough variety of programming, it is because they have diversified the programming so much that it deviates so far from the core of the network that it has turned off those who helped build it.
As far as a catchphrase or a slogan, I don't see what's so wrong with something like "Science Fiction and Beyond" or "Imagination 2.0" or "Imagination Upgraded".
There are already too many networks devoted to the promotion of shows that only require a 12 second attention span and we as fans don't need another one.
In order for a network to appeal to a target audience it helps if those making the decisions are actually a fan of the genre they are promoting, and SciFi has, over the past few years, given the impression that those making the decisions really don't care that much about the genre. It almost feels like the network itself is just "phoning it in" half the time.
I, like all those who have posted here, am a big fan of science fiction and used to watch the Sci Fi Channel quite often, but since shows like wrestling started to show up, my viewership of the network has drastically fallen. In fact, since the canceling of Stargate Atlantis, I have stopped watching the network all together. It saddens me to see that the once great Sci Fi channel has fallen so far from grace and appears to be falling further.
If the network is lacking in actual fans in their employ who could help make informed decisions, there are so many of us out here and, given the unemployment rates, I'm willing to bet that there are many who are available too.
I understand that there is a lot happening behind the scenes that we probably don't know about and those happenings may be what is truely behind this change, but what has to be weighed is, if this is the general response of those who have been long term viewers of the network, you should ask yourselfs one question. Is the quest to find new potential viewers worth the loss of those you already have.
By tom swift at 2:10 AM ON 03/19/09
Well, after BSG ends, might as well end the network, too.
By imajoebob at 2:14 AM ON 03/19/09
It's pretentious, condescending, insulting... it pretty much sucks, except for one (overriding) reason: branding. Being able to leverage the name has a lot of value. This will set them back at least a year until they can establish the new brand. Plus, the "if" campaign was remarkable and this kills it. "Imagine Greater?" Too bad no one at SciFi took that advice.
They should be spending this money on new shows. Except Friday, prime time is unwatchable. And if I have to see another snake movie on Saturdays I'm going to put the remote through my screen. The daytime repeats are almost all better than anything on most nights. Even Tales From The Darkside is better than Ghost Hunters. After that insulting "Leprechaun" marathon on Tuesday (for both the ethnic insult and the insult to my intellect) they're lucky I didn't burn down their offices.
Now both Stargates and Galactica are dead; Dr. Who won't be back for at least a year - and Tennant is leaving. They skipped Torchwood, probably because they're afraid of Harkness' overt omnisexuality (cowards). They peddled Sarah Jane Smith, but that's a KID's SHOW for heaven's sake! And don't get me started on the latest tripe: Moonlight and Sanctuary. Amanda Tapping probably had to cut her Nerd Convention fees in half after that embarrassing performance.
Above all, I wish they invested some of this money and brainpower into getting Eureka back on the air sooner than July.
By imajoebob at 2:23 AM ON 03/19/09
Oh, for all the crap we're giving the brain trust, keep in mind that NBC made more off their cable channels than the network. They're even talking about moving some shows to NBC (Burn Notice is at the top of the list). Eureka might do well with a good pairing (Life?). I don't expect the big boys at GE will give them any second chances if they tank the revenues while they re-brand.
By Henry at 2:33 AM ON 03/19/09
The correct pronunciation is "skiffy" anyway.
They should be ashamed, but obviously they're idiots. "Let's be SciFi, but not be SciFi..' Why not PsyPhi (I just copyrighted that...) or SiFy (nobody wants that...) ECW still doesn't have anything to do with the channel, except for the fantasy part.
Just change the channel name to UPN and be done with it.
Hey, maybe somebody will start a channel with science fiction as its core programming after these guys get done changing things and I can drop them and subscribe to the new science fiction channel.
I bet they hired the guys that said New Coke would be a hit, didn't you? 'Luzer' is the new spelling - it's still pronounced the same way, though.
By SmackMyForehead at 2:39 AM ON 03/19/09
I say we go with the Syphilis channel reference from now on. Show of hands?
By Ablane at 2:41 AM ON 03/19/09
Here's a place with a valid email address http://www.nosyfy.com (at least it doesn't bounce) and fax #
By Henry at 2:53 AM ON 03/19/09
I'm sorry. It's just sad.
By Tereya Chan at 2:54 AM ON 03/19/09
Hey Scifi, SyFy, whatever you choose to call yourself. I'm a tech-savvy 25 year old female that started watching SciFi as soon as I got a chance to when I was a kid. I ate up the old movies, the Twilight Zone marathons, MST3K, the crazy sci-fi anime, and all the Star Trek I could handle. Unfortunately, you've done a pretty good job of isolating me and other people like me that grew up enjoying real science-fiction over these past years. Why is it that I end up watching the 80s syndicated episodes of the Twilight Zone on the Chiller channel and not on your network? I hardly find anything that appeals to me anymore that I can't find on other channels. I barely watch anime as it is anymore, but if you're going to continue to show it could it hurt to focus on some of the quality science-fiction animation that's been produced? It's not like the shows aren't out there.
I don't know your motives. I don't know if this is a case where some executive got handed a network and was told to find programming with little to no interest in the actual focus and content of said network. It does feel like this network has given up on its real demographic, nor does it understand what its demographic is. It's a shame, because this is a time where I see a great potential for science fiction. There's a growing interest in the genre, as well as a plethora of source material if you've been following the news. I'd love to see some great writers getting tapped to produce worthwhile shows and movies. I can tell you there are a lot of people who would love the chance to have their ideas out there.
Anyway, that's digressing, but it does speak to the fact that the network is clearly dismissing its base and boy is it a vocal base. There are young women out there, lots of us, that enjoy science fiction and have looked to it as a positive genre. We don't want the scifi version of Lifetime, we want Deep Space 9 and Doctor Who, The Outer Limits, and Battlestar Galactica. We want our science fiction to be as political and scientific as the rest. Quality counts above all else.
By ken_wilsonii at 3:02 AM ON 03/19/09
"The Sci-Fi Channel" wasn't cutting it. All of you fans do not seem to understand that the Sci-Fi genre simply squeezes the demographic too thin to actually make a decent amount. "
This above is from a previous commenter..your an idiot.
OF course it's about money, but they have consistently made bad, moronic, stupid decisions with canceling of and non support of sci-fi shows that should still be on.
This has led alienating the audience and splitting it enough where nobody watches the channel anymore. I watch once and a blue moon now. Used to tune in regularly, I'm down almost never now.
Changing the name will not help, it will just fade away. SyFy = bad, moronic, stupid
Yes, suits with no brains. Pretty soon they will want a bail out because they failed too.
By ZER0C00L at 4:14 AM ON 03/19/09
I think everyone else has already said what needs to be said. We are insulted and disgusted. You're slapping your core audience across the face. This is a mistake and you're going to regret it.
By Melgish at 6:28 AM ON 03/19/09
Survival Tip: 101:
If you want to keep the respect of your viewers, don't change your name to something some 3rd grade waterhead thinks is kewel.
By LWms at 7:43 AM ON 03/19/09
We're losing too many genre-specific channels too quickly. It smells like a 2009 version of a 1980's Leverage Buyout scheme. Back then, corporate management ran companies to the ground to lower their value then they would buy them cheaper using Junk Bonds. Thus the new, updated version of the making money tech seems to be the Government Bailout. Pay TV has become a market saturate with many channels providing the same trash. "5000 channels and nothing to watch." I guess I'll have to tune to the new MLB channel and miss Sci Fi as I miss TechTV, MTVm etc. I hope that TCM doesn't follow Spify/SyFY/Sissy's name-and-programming change example too.
By CopperJenny at 7:43 AM ON 03/19/09
Count me in amongst those who think this is a silly and pointless action. What in the world would possess TPTB to do something like this?
Who, exactly, did the marketing geniuses actually market? 11-year-olds?
By jkorn at 8:35 AM ON 03/19/09
How do you kill a brand? Try to make it appeal to a broader audience. Try to be everything to all people. Stop doing what you do best, and alienate your core constituency.
Way to go guys. I gotta say, this is the best rebrand I've seen since Wolff Olins got their hands on the 2012 London Olympics.
By vasman at 9:58 AM ON 03/19/09
Not much more I can add to what everyone else has already said. Just wanted to add my -continued- disappointment with this channel over the past couple of years. Most of my favorite shows already ended (Stargates, Farscape) or ending (BSG) and the 1 left (Eureka) might soon follow. No reason to watch, particularly moronic fare like Wrestling, Ghost Hunters, Scare Tactics, etc...
So long SciFi Channel it was good while it lasted, but it's getting more sour by the day...
By Kaliena at 10:43 AM ON 03/19/09
This is a horrible, horrible idea. I hope SciFi reconsiders this rebranding attempt before it is too late. Everyone from Colbert to the Digg Nation is ripping this idea to shreds. Whoever did your polling was paid off by the person who brain stormed this idea. It's wretched.
By Aluvendale at 10:43 AM ON 03/19/09
Wow, nothing I can say that hasn't already been said, I just want to add my name to the "I'm disappointed" category.
By IMac at 11:21 AM ON 03/19/09
'Sticks and stones, may break my bones...'
I agree - stewphid name - but it's just a name!
The only thing that's going to stop me from watching is if my SciFi shows stop airing.
By Strongbow at 11:28 AM ON 03/19/09
and still there is no comment back from NBC/Sci-Fi executives.
Basically this leads me to 2 conclusions, 1) they truly do not care what their core audience thinks, in which case we will leave the channel and find our Sci-Fi fix elsewhere (Hulu possibly); or 2) This is indeed a very elaborate (and early) April Fool's gag (possible as a smoke screen for something else).
Either way, not a real bright idea to get your core audience ticked off like this. I guess we'll know in 12 days if conclusion number 2 is valid or not.
Either way, after the BSG finale tomorrow night, there is nothing currently on Sci-Fi that holds my attention anymore. My wrestling (live-action cartoons in my opinion) fandom is several years past, and I have no interest in whether or not old New England Mansions or ancient Scottish castles are haunted.
Sanctuary will attract my DVR back this Fall, and I might check out Caprica (Dynasty in space?). Beyond that, I am done scanning for anything remotely interesting in the current programming on Sci-Fi.
If you ever bring back Logan's Run or Planet of the Apes (the originals), drop me a line.
Signing off.
By Alain at 12:18 PM ON 03/19/09
Who cares?
I work in the TV industry. Networks do this all the time to cater to whatever demographic brings them the most money. In these times of economic hardship, they're just doing what they have to do to get by.
The presence of WWE programming on their network has been a blessing for them financially, as the wrestling has proved itself to be one of the highest grossing, highest rated, stable programming on Sci-Fi.
while I agree, the new nomenclature is a bit vague, perhaps a bit stupid, it's just keeping with modern trends. What the hell is a Flikr, or a Twitter, or a Hulu anyway? And some might argue that those are websites and not TV networks, but if you've been astute, you'll note that the lines are becoming more blurry every day.
So stop whining, Trekkies!
By Obongo at 12:26 PM ON 03/19/09
This is the most retarded thing the sci fi channel has ever done. Phewking idiots!
By Jayster at 1:16 PM ON 03/19/09
OK. I think we are all being scammed. There is NO WAY anyone could ever be stupid enough to ever think this was a good idea. It's impossible. Even the dumbest Marketing guy on the planet could not be this dumb. This is part of a secret plan. The goal is to launch the new (its hard to even type the "word") SyFy Channel. Then all viewers will rebel and stop watching. There will be huge newsworthy protests. Then the "powers that be" will have a big press conference where they admit they were wrong and say they have listened to the fans and are going back to SciFi. All of the news generated by this controversy will peak interest by the two people who have never heard of the SciFi channel and maybe one of them will start watching. Now their ratings have just gone up by enacting this secret plan. You dont think the New Coke idea was really the whole plan...it was always about bringing Coca-Cola Classic back. Either that...or this is an evil plot to take over the world....LOL. Seriously, though...I hope enough of you are angry enough by the stupid name and the insults hurled by the executives at REAL SciFi fans to start banning SyFy from any TV.
By atlGeek at 1:24 PM ON 03/19/09
Dumb name, dumb business plan.
Better plan: Keep name. Bring back Farscape, and begin showing Torchwood.
By Farcaper at 1:32 PM ON 03/19/09
Why is it tv channels have to go away from what they are supposed to be about. TVLand - barely any classic tv, they'd rather push their new reality programs and awards crap than show old tv shows. History - stop showing me movies, I want history. TBS TNT, both adopted their own crap and became more about their original programming. USA - Law and House network anyone? Cartoon Network - Live action programs and shows kids won't watch (6Teen)? What happened to Adult Swim with ANIME and not Tim and Eric bull crap.
And now Scivvy. Why not, hell, join the bandwagon folks. You were the only channel for SCIENCE FICTION and now you're more than likely dumping it. And people wonder why I now only have 6 channels on my tv. Thanks Scifi.
By Seriously at 1:59 PM ON 03/19/09
I read recently that the History Channel has decided to change its name to "Histo-rizzle 'fo Shizzle" in an effort to stave off 'irrelevancy.'
It's new lead show will be 'Pimp My Invention,' which will be hosted by Xzibit and will center around taking famous historical inventions and 'pimping them,' by adding useless, gawdy aesthetics and completely unnecessary devices.
I, for one, think that the Wright Brother's plane could have used a pool table.
I also think that it's good that "Syfy" is keeping pace with the competition.
By geothefaust at 2:13 PM ON 03/19/09
Seriously? This is a horrible, horrible move...
No more SG-1, no more BSG... There will be no reason to watch this network anymore. Especially with comments that were made in a recent interview with a scifi executive make me cringe to see where they content is heading.
This 'water cooler talk' turned reality is horrible. You guys already have wrestling on, which in my opinion was a BAD idea.
Good movie scifi... Err, I mean syfy. (Seriously, it sounds like a STD)
By Traveler at 2:21 PM ON 03/19/09
Ok, so now you're going to roll in the mud with every other worthless channel? Sci-Fi was the only reason I kept my current package. Now you're destroying it with a name that doesn't even make sense! I mean come on! Sci-Fi stands for science fiction, which is a broad genre that encompasses fantasy, adventure, etc by its very nature. It is practically a universally understood term.
SyFy looks like an abbreviation of Syphillis for god's sake! Who cares if it sounds the same phonetically?! It makes no sense.
And another thing, Syfy Kids? Sounds like a lame attempt at a take off of 4Kids! It's total bull!
The only thing that needs to "Imagine Greater" are the people in marketing who decided that changing the name was a good idea, and the people who took them seriously.
At least there is a safe-haven that's willing to overpay those people who aren't worth the dirt on their shoes.
By Rob at 2:26 PM ON 03/19/09
Alain, evidently everyone that matters DOES care. Besides, you have a lot of room to talk, since you send still send protest mail to WWE ever since they changed their name from WWF!
By Synthuman at 3:00 PM ON 03/19/09
I am sure this came down to a marketing thing where it was found that the word "science" scares most of the casual viewers, especially those tuning in for the wrestling.
The network has been going downhill for years, first it was the Star Gate channel for a bunch of years, then as that petered out the heads started to panic... hence trendy vampire crap, wrestling and an overabundance of paranormal investigations.
Hopefully someday some network will pick up the fumbled mantel of SciFi and create a channel devoted to science fiction shows and movies.
I am a science fiction junkie... not a syfy whatever.
By Johnny at 4:10 PM ON 03/19/09
Do it. Battlestar is almost over, and that was the only thing worth watching, the only thing I ever watched on SciFi, actually. So, I couldn't care less what you change your name to because I, more likely than not, won't be returning to your Saturday D-movies and Ghost Hunters crapola. Have fun with your SyFyllis.
By shiplore at 5:22 PM ON 03/19/09
eeek. it makes you want to say it Siffly. and that sounds like a STD nickname.
it looks like a new drug for heartburn.
please.. no need SciFi is branded just fine.
By Window Lickers! at 8:31 PM ON 03/19/09
Wow. This is awesome. Just totally awesome. That is, if you're a moron.
I mean, this is the stupidest thing I've heard in quite some time, and that's saying a lot.
Of course from the channel that cancels Atlantis what do you expect? Unless I was misinformed I beleive that the last season of Atlantis had the highest ratings of any of the seasons. Why would you cancel a show that is getting MORE popular? That's just brilliant. I guess they had to make room for wrestling. You know, because it's just so fun to watch grown men make complete idiots of themselves.
Speaking of grown men making complete idiots of themselves: Ghosthunters. WOW. Complete crap. One of the things I used to like about the SciFi channel was the lack of crappy reality shows. So much for that. And then they change the name so they can have MORE reality shows. Awesome.
Maybe they'll start playing rap videos next. And I can't wait to tune in to SyFy every morning for Teletubbies.
My sarcasm aside, the fact that this comment list is this long, all most all of which are negative, should really tell them all they need to know about their genious plan.
Didn't they say this was 'Fan Approved'? Wonder what fans those were? The random people on the street they paid to agree with them?
Dave Howe: you're either a moron or an idiot. Which is it?
By MichaellN at 10:52 PM ON 03/19/09
Remember your channel's differentiator. It's the niche that has value.
Or do you intend to continue diluting your programing while trying to keep the illusion of being a science fiction channel?
Science fiction fans are not stupid.
Looking at the frustration of the comments makes it seem like this is the AIG bonus payment move of cable programming.
Didn't NBC cancel the original Star Trek back in 1969?
Great foresight. That show wasn't going anywhere.
At least I can still read Analog.
By Machias at 11:12 PM ON 03/19/09
This has "New Coke" written all over it except at least 'new' and 'coke' were too real words.
This has to be one of the stupidest things I've seen in a while.
Bye Spiffy!
By doombeagle at 12:45 AM ON 03/20/09
So, the people running your science fiction channel feel that more wrestling and reality tv is the way to go. Oh yeah, I almost forgot, more old wives tale supernatural crap to go with the 18 different versions of ghosthunters. SyFy=Bye Bye
By DustinFloyd at 1:04 AM ON 03/20/09
I suspect this started out as a really great, well-intentioned branding idea. Howe's recent interview comments actually suggest some legitimate marketing concerns.
And then, just like New Coke and thousands of failed ideas before it, the concept was marketed to death. Surveys. Focus groups. Committees. Board meetings. More committees. The trouble is that committees only ever succeed in hand-picking good ideas... then choking all the life right out of them.
Many of the previous comments are right on - with programming diluted and the core audience so turned off by the new brand (which really does suck beans, by the way), most of us don't have a compelling reason to watch the network anymore.
Oh well. I'm sure the advertisers will find their eyeballs elsewhere.
By Drew at 1:28 AM ON 03/20/09
This is the worst idea I have heard of in a long time. Not mutch left after BSG. Time to get my DVDs out.
By deepspace at 3:30 AM ON 03/20/09
Hey,,, E-Bay has ruin their format....
AIG has ruin most of America...
Now the HEAD-CHEESES of SiFi are looking for a BONUS too, and then they'll run off.
Then we're stuck with some dumb hair brain thing like SyFy...........
If the jerks at SiFi would listen to their customers, they wouldn't have a drop-off of watchers later this year.
Hip or NOT, that is the question...... our answer..... it's NOT.
By deepspace at 3:32 AM ON 03/20/09
Hey,,, E-Bay has ruin their format....
AIG has ruin most of America...
Now the HEAD-CHEESES of SiFi are looking for a BONUS too, and then they'll run off.
Then we're stuck with some dumb hair brain thing like SyFy...........
If the jerks at SiFi would listen to their customers, they wouldn't have a drop-off of watchers later this year.
Hip or NOT, that is the question...... our answer..... it's NOT.
By deepspace at 3:33 AM ON 03/20/09
Hey,,, E-Bay has ruin their format....
AIG has ruin most of America...
Now the HEAD-CHEESES of SiFi are looking for a BONUS too, and then they'll run off.
Then we're stuck with some dumb hair brain thing like SyFy...........
If the jerks at SiFi would listen to their customers, they wouldn't have a drop-off of watchers later this year.
Hip or NOT, that is the question...... our answer..... it's NOT.
By deepspace at 3:39 AM ON 03/20/09
SORRY FOR THE REPEATED MESSAGES.. IT STATED I HAD TO USE TEXT AND REJECTED THE FIRST TWO MESSAGES, OR SO THEY TOLD ME...........
BUT I STILL THINK IT'S A TOTALLY LAME IDEA TO FIX SOMETHING THAT AIN'T BROKEN...... SiFi IS SiFi....NOT SyFy !!!!!
By Ldyheat at 3:50 AM ON 03/20/09
What the heck...Syfy? Is this a justification to put wrestling on a station that was supposedly dedicated to science fiction or just an intellectual property ploy?!! Perhaps Dave Howe needs to be one of those ousted CEO's for making bad judgement calls. The fans of your station want science fiction not every other crap that can be thrown into the mix; that is why we watch your station you dunderhead!
By Marvin at 4:08 AM ON 03/20/09
Is that to be pronounced "Siffy"?
(As in "could be a bit siffy": "possibly suffering from a classic venereal disease")
Otherwise, what's the point?
This is oh-too-typical second or third class corporate speak for meaningless, empty, ill-founded optimism. As regularly practiced upon Dilbert.
At least they are not going to "utilise synergy".
"To truly become a global lifestyle brand."
That is not a Star Trek quality split-infinitive but rather approaches Vogon poetry in it's mind-destroying qualities.
It betrays a lack of decent communication skills: they might do better to go back to "Doo-dee-doo-der-dum".
If they want to play with words and feel they are doing something, revisiting a lost fight might have shown more profit.
In the sixties and seventies those who enjoyed it said, wrote, either "Science Fiction" or "SF". "Sci-Fi" was for the outsiders and denigrators only. If you wanted it a little wider, you added "fantasy."
"SFF": a nice, tight, forceful set of letters.
Not siffy at all.
By Dacron at 9:45 AM ON 03/20/09
Likely to become like MTV. All music when it started... then music and shows... then all shows and a complete loss of the music audience... then MTV2 all music.
By Son of a Maui Portagee at 1:36 PM ON 03/20/09
FWIW there did exist a legit reason to change:
http://sciencefriday.com/blog/index.php?archives/376-SciFri-Welcomes-Syfy.html
but I doubt the suits were aware of it or if they were that they even cared.
I suppose the consensus of SF fans would agree that they long ago turned it into: SiGhi
So long and thanks for all the ghoti.
By MrDave2176 at 1:57 PM ON 03/20/09
I am pitching an alternative. UIN Unlimited Imagination Network. Help fill my programming schedule. See here: http://wildandbad.com/article/82/unlimited-imagination-network
By Jane at 2:02 PM ON 03/20/09
ZELLA ! Do not live long and do not frackin prosper !
By Mad Yank at 2:21 PM ON 03/20/09
I've been a science-fiction text fan since 1963, when I discovered R.A. Heinlein. I've been a sci-fi TV fan since Rocky Jones, Space Ranger (oh Lord, am I dating myself!) followed Sky King on Saturday mornings. Star Trek was a later accomplishment discovered in syndication - girls were WAY more important in the late 60's.
Sci-Fi Channel was THE reason for me to go with "Extended Basic" and later with "Full Service" cable, satellite, and now FIOS service. It's BAD ENOUGH you've apparently killed Eureka, as well as Farscape and Firefly. BSG at least was PLANNED for tonight's demise. You keep killing off decent Science-fiction and Fantasy programming, in favor of WWE?
LOOK at the HUGE market you are ignoring, fer gossakes! Alain, don't give me that "I'm in TV, I know what I'm talking about" drivel. I'm part of a club that does a media-based convention every year and we have to CLOSE REGISTRATION early because of Fire Marshal regulations and occupancy limits - and we're NOT CHEAP (but we beat most of the Pro cons)! DON'T tell me there's no market and no profits in Science-fiction programming - WE do it with B-list guests and old series DVDs! Sci-Fi Channel could keep going with Old series syndication, new series production, and classic films.
The BIGGEST problem is the corporate ownership; Sci-Fi Channel is owned, body and soul, by NBC - and they STILL haven't gotten over getting their faces slapped by Star Trek.
Get over it, NBC. Grow UP and get back to where you once belonged.
By CoyoteBeautiful at 2:25 PM ON 03/20/09
WOW...that really awful.
By bluh at 3:01 PM ON 03/20/09
Wow, I'm just glad you're only worthwhile program (The Reenvisioned BSG) will be gone by the time you re-brand yourselves with this horrible new name. The sheer Lamness off that gay spelling has me madder than a one legged waitress at an Ihop. Golf clap anyone? meh...
By THeDude at 3:25 PM ON 03/20/09
SyFy - " Imagine The Network no one watches because it changed its name from something recognizable that people could relate to read and understand to something it thought was hip in a desperate attempt to make up for not being allowed to sit with the cool kids during lunch in highschool "
With 2000 other channels to choose from on fios, you will not be missed. Adios!
By praka1 at 3:55 PM ON 03/20/09
This press release is especially appalling because it is stuffed to bursting with meaningless marketing babble. They honestly expect us to believe that the name Sci Fi could not be "a uniquely ownable trademark that is portable across all nonlinear digital platforms and beyond, from Hulu to iTunes"? (whatever that means) Absolutely ridiculous.
By JayS at 4:52 PM ON 03/20/09
This makes zero sense. It adds nothing, and is confusing.
By Gurn at 4:59 PM ON 03/20/09
Lame. Sci Fi needs to stick to the good stuff, and stop trying to be somebody else.
This is only going to piss off the huge SciFi fan base, and highly unlikely to gain any fans.
You Stupid!
By Etrigan63 at 5:14 PM ON 03/20/09
You do realize that "syfy" (pronounced "siffy") is current British slang for syphilis. Why don't you just call yourself the "STD Channel?" Not what ANYONE would call a smart move.
By Etterra at 5:43 PM ON 03/20/09
Too bad that changing their name to appeal to a broader audience while annoying and further alienating their traditional one won't make their "original movies" suck any less. Did they get bought out by Nintendo or something? Maybe they should have changed it to Fayl-Fy instead.
By Terry at 5:54 PM ON 03/20/09
What! Why the heck would you change the name. There isnt any real reason that i can see to change it. and there are also so many people who agree. Dont change it, SciFi is as a great name. Its easy to remember and tell someone what your showing, just keep it simple and don't change your name
By Valerina at 6:11 PM ON 03/20/09
Yecch.
By Shalekendar at 7:03 PM ON 03/20/09
So, I'm just guessing here, but I gather the change in image is being somewhat less than well received? (As stupid as that sounds, it's still smarter that the decision in question.)
But, I must admit, I have a dream...or is it a memory? Anyway, I remember that back in the day there was this channel that showed nothing but music videos. Then, as time went by, they showed less and less music and more and more...well, let's just call it crap. Eventually it got to a point where all the people who used to watch this channel not only stopped watching it, but began to use it as a running joke. Fast forward a bit (I don't know how far because I too was one of the many who stopped watching) and behold, now there's a channel with the same name (Plus the number "2" tacked on the end of it) and it actually plays, (Gasp!) Music!
Perhaps this is what the powers that be are going to do here? This SyF..Sy... I can't even bring myself to type it, perhaps this rebranding is simply a clever, clever ploy. Several (hopefully short!) months from now, someone will tremble before the powers that be who are puzzled as to why no one watches there channel anymore and say hey, why don't we do what that music video channel did? Why not make a SciFi2 channel? After all, music videos are cool and edgy and hip and the decision to make a second channel that did what the first one was supposed to do worked out so well for them....
Ah, but my dream doesn't end here! Yes, in my extended directors cut ultimate platinum double disk dream (see how I slam not one but several commercial entities there? Neat isn't it?) a year or so after the SciFi channel 2 debuts, the...Original rebranded channel (who's name I still can't type no matter how hard I try) is finally revealed and know to the world by its true name: FOX.
Sadly, this happens on the morning of December 21, 2012....
(I never said my dreams were good!)
By Uncle Spellbinder at 7:32 PM ON 03/20/09
Stunning. Not a positive comment at all. Not surprising though. This "SyFy" move is quite stupid.
Build on what you already have and add some actual science fiction to your programming. That will bring more viewers back. If your intention is to lessen your science fiction programming even more, in favor of adventure and wrestling, then change your name completely and just do away with the name "SciFi Channel". It's turned into a misnomer anyway.
By benjamin_ok? at 7:59 PM ON 03/20/09
I like it.
By j888 at 10:16 PM ON 03/20/09
"What the frak?!" as would Saul say. Seriously why mess with a good thing. I grew up with the Schi Fi channel. The name itself to me means that this is the only place to watch sci fi shows and movies. I hope this name change is just a bad joke and will not happen.
By j888 at 10:19 PM ON 03/20/09
I apologize for the previous misspelling of sci fi.
By scifi519 at 10:22 PM ON 03/20/09
Very disappointed :^(. I have enjoyed Sci Fi, but will not watch Sy Fy. Bad original movies and no more new Star Gates. Goodbye, Sci Fi.
By Tgris at 10:33 PM ON 03/20/09
Sci Fi has been declining in good Sci Fi programming for the past few years. The new name will suit it quite well since it no longer cares about its real fans anymore. I am a 48 year old female Sci Fi fan, who enjoys quality Sci Fi programming. Good-bye Sci Fi. I will not be watching Sy Fy. Net Flix will provide...
By akakillroy at 12:00 AM ON 03/21/09
Why mess with the name, you are already doing Fantasy stuff and fictional drama, leave it SciFi PLEASE!
By hal at 12:14 AM ON 03/21/09
Game over, man.
Game over.
By Lherinor at 12:50 AM ON 03/21/09
I must confess, I love the Sci Fi channel. I watch little else. The network has brought back reruns of great shows and turned out some really terrific original work. (SG1, Atlantis, BSG, Eureka). There were some missed opportunities, like the the Sliders debacle, and WHY WHY WHY didn't you pounce on Firefly? So much potential lost! But still, I got to enjoy a lot of good fun shows.
What happened? More and more we started to see endless variations on giant snake, giant spider, and oddly distorted mythological beast movies. And wrestling? Why not soccer? Might as well, since they both have equal relation to the genre.
Obviously the people up top and in marketing are not fans. Otherwise you would understand the mindset of your viewers. Imagine (not greater, just imagine) walking into a bookstore with one of your viewers. There is a section in the store marked "Science Fiction/Fantasy". That is where your fan is going to go. Not the sports section. Not New Age. Not gardening. The fan is going to gravitate to his genre first. He knows where to go if he needs something else. After all, he's smart enough to enjoy writing that non-fans often shake their heads at and dismiss as geek stuff. We know better. We skim over concepts like black holes and parallel universes without skipping a beat. We don't want to find a romance book or something from the juvenile section stuck in there, they belong somewhere else.
Now take it out of the bookstore and put it on television. The other channels are rarely putting serious sci fi in their programming. No, they are giving us Flavor of Love, and American Idol, and Trading Spouses. That's fine if you want to watch them, but leave them where they belong.
Here's a suggestion: Jump back a few years and use a formula that worked. You took a feature film, Stargate, and got two good series out of it. I'm not even going to complain that you ended them, because I have to acknowledge that a series has to end sometime. Preferably before it starts turning lame. But there should be no end to what you can do in a similar vein. You did an INCREDIBLE job updating BSG. I was seriously concerned when it started, having watched the show in the 80's, but was amazed at how well it came out. Imagine what you could do with Space: 1999. I could outline that for you in no time, and give you much better science. Want a sci fi original movie? Redo Logan's Run, and base it on the book, not the old movie.
I cannot believe that the realm of sci fi is so depleted that you have to change your name and go outside the genre to provide programming. Please reconsider this move. There is already too little worth watching on the rest of the channels.
By Mike at 3:49 AM ON 03/21/09
A few hours ago, I removed SciFi from my channel listings. With the stupid wrestling, giant snake of the week movies, and the recent geek insult from their founder, I no longer give a damn.
By allencharles at 5:05 AM ON 03/21/09
The TRUTH is the number of viewers is to small to support a SciFi only channel. Even if all the folks that like Scifi watched at the same time the numbers would not be large enough to make a network happy. BSG never got more than maybe 4 million viewers at most so we can not hope to have a channel devoted to JUST SCIFI. The second problem is the few views of SciFi are so picky that if a program is not EXACTLY what they want they refuse to support it. No support no programs , very simple. When you ad the contempt of network suits to this , the result becomes no network to watch. A program or two might be showing among the two hundred channels on cable at the same time but not enough to support an entire network.
To ad insult to injury Wrestling has viewers everywhere it is on. Spike, USA, Scifi, MyNetworkTv all successful Wrestling programs that sell ads and make money for the networks. Even the Saturday "B" movies average about 1.5 million viewers most Saturday nights and that is not a bad number for a cable channel, especially when you figure the low cost of these low budget movies.
I am personally sickened that SCIFI is very likely going to no longer be a SCIFI channel, it has not been for a long time because of low viewer numbers and maybe the lack of support of so many of us that really do desire SCIFI programs. Frankly I may consider turning my Directv off and save the money it costs every month and just view the two or three programs on my computer (26 inch monitor) even if I have to pay a small per program fee. I have five DVRS and generally take my TV viewing seriously.
By allencharles at 5:06 AM ON 03/21/09
The TRUTH is the number of viewers is to small to support a SciFi only channel. Even if all the folks that like Scifi watched at the same time the numbers would not be large enough to make a network happy. BSG never got more than maybe 4 million viewers at most so we can not hope to have a channel devoted to JUST SCIFI. The second problem is the few views of SciFi are so picky that if a program is not EXACTLY what they want they refuse to support it. No support no programs , very simple. When you ad the contempt of network suits to this , the result becomes no network to watch. A program or two might be showing among the two hundred channels on cable at the same time but not enough to support an entire network.
To ad insult to injury Wrestling has viewers everywhere it is on. Spike, USA, Scifi, MyNetworkTv all successful Wrestling programs that sell ads and make money for the networks. Even the Saturday "B" movies average about 1.5 million viewers most Saturday nights and that is not a bad number for a cable channel, especially when you figure the low cost of these low budget movies.
I am personally sickened that SCIFI is very likely going to no longer be a SCIFI channel, it has not been for a long time because of low viewer numbers and maybe the lack of support of so many of us that really do desire SCIFI programs. Frankly I may consider turning my Directv off and save the money it costs every month and just view the two or three programs on my computer (26 inch monitor) even if I have to pay a small per program fee. I have five DVRS and generally take my TV viewing seriously.
By Bobgriffin at 9:32 AM ON 03/21/09
If anyone at the network is actually reading all this. Listen up. You already have an identity and a trademark that people know. Long before the big network and studio took over a lot of smart (er) people spent a lot of time and effort branding the Sci-Fi channel with a logo and identity. This led to a core audience. You ignore that core audience at your peril. Look at the postings on this page! I have never seen such an almost unanimous response to an idea. It may be that you can trademark SyFy more easily than Sci-Fi but who cares? Especially if you already have a trademarked logo that everyone identifies with your station. You have had the best year you've ever had and have brought one of the best shows on television to a mainstream audience and now your plan seems to be to evaporate that good-will by disposing of all of that hard-earned product recognition. Science-fiction is a unique form of entertainment. It is responsible for most of the best selling movies ever made and it represents the ONLY form of popular entertainment that makes the assumption that the future will be DIFFERENT to the past. But the hinge on which that assumption swings is that the change will be brought about by the single most powerful force operating in human society, our technology. You have an opportunity to stay aloft of the swamp of mediocre flotsam and garbage that makes up conventional television and actually EDUCATE people at the same time as entertaining them. When was the last time a TV show's cast was invited to address the United Nations? THIS IS IMPORTANT! Do not slide into the quagmire of focus group reports and simplistic bottom-line motivations. Make sure you listen to your audience. Read this board, your audience (and your potential audience) doesn't want to be pidgeon-holed into a demographic. They're smarter than that and they sure don't want to be watching wrestling.
By EQB at 1:11 PM ON 03/21/09
ARE YOU KIDDING!?!
I do not have the words to express just what a highly unintelligent decision this is. I'm all for getting my sci-fi fix over the web, but apparently you aren't about sci-fi at all any more.
R.I.P. Sci-Fi, I will remember for what you once were.
By LawsOfPhysics at 7:43 PM ON 03/21/09
I'm sorry but this new "Syfy" name sounds like the company is trying to cater to those viewers who are partly illiterate. And while I love that SciFi is opening up the channel to other genres (even though it already has; I've seen all the genres you named here already on the line-ups for some time) the idea for "syfy games" and "syfy kids"? That seems more like selling out than opening up.
People watch SciFi for a break from the normal programing but with these new changes the channel is threatening we will be confronted with the same old pathetic shows we see on every other channel. Already we see more ridiculous, money-grubbing reality shows and wrestling (seriously, wrestling?) than good shows like Outer Limits or Twilight Zone. Heck, SciFi hasn't even shown Star Trek (many of us don't count Enterprise as part of the true franchise) until recently! It's ridiculous. Suffice it to say I'm very disappointed.
By SciFan at 8:20 PM ON 03/21/09
It really sounds like a bad cover for a bankruptcy re-organization. They needed somthing that sounded the same but was different. It is rediculous. Anybody remember the predecessor of G4tv????
By NerdFencer at 10:42 PM ON 03/21/09
This is just about the smartest thing since Paris absconded with Menelaus' wife.
By TheDigitalDiamond at 4:50 AM ON 03/22/09
This change is ****ing assanine and offensive to everyone who CURRENTLY PAYS YOUR BILLS. If I want something "Sci-Fi" guess where I go? The aptly named channel?! Probably! If I want patron insulting pretentious ****s, I'll go to Syfy. Do you have any idea how pathetic it is for SpikeTV to be the new Sci-Fi channel? At least they're honoest about who their audience is all around. They put UFC side by side with freaking star trek, and look who's banking. I will no longer subscribe to cable packages on the basis of inclusion of Sci-Fi, ahem, syfy, channel. I suppose all I have left now is the Science channel.
....@$$holes.
By sgsidekick at 6:28 PM ON 03/22/09
This is one of the most stupefying ideas I've ever heard. I'm almost 50, and female, and for some reason I don't fit your idea of what your demographic target audience should be. I'm not a 'geek', nor is my husband, nor are our friends. We like sci-fi. None of us can figure out how you can be called SciFi if you have wrestling! I guess that fits the "fiction" part of SciFi...are you attempting phonetic selling to attract people who don't know how to read yet? There is no need to reinvent the brand: just the programming! How about more science fiction? Wow, what a concept! Horror is not science fiction, it is horror. How about running some of the classic scifi shows from years gone by, and not just Star Trek?
By okinawa at 7:11 PM ON 03/22/09
Interesting times...
By sgsidekick at 7:44 PM ON 03/22/09
okay. AFTER I posted my message I found your Q&A. Figures. I'll admit that now I understand the reasoning behind the change: how do you register s-c-i-f-i? And yes, "sci fi" is a bit generic, but it tells s what the channel is. SyFy holds so much potential for mispronunciation and misunderstanding. Normally I'd have a suggestion that I like better when I write these types of letters, but frankly I can't think of anything that is better than "SciFi". The name change won't stop me from watching the shows I like, just makes me question whether or not a better name could have been found.
By Bob at 10:10 AM ON 03/23/09
Please let the PR people read these comments.
I love it when PR people cry.
By Zomb at 4:06 PM ON 03/23/09
You spend umpteen zillion dollars building that intangible asset called "good will" for Sci Fi which had a great ring to it - "psy-fye". Like rhymes with Wi-Fi. And then you want to switch to SyFy which will be called "syphy" - like in a syphilitic idea. This is one of those New Coke marketing blunders. Even my son said "why are they changing it to syphy - sounds dumb". SyFy = syph-ee, not Sigh-Fi. Keep it Sci-Fi!
By Destronger at 11:55 PM ON 03/23/09
these are the same people who use "Xtreme" on everything too.
can't they just call it "Sci-Fi Channel" and copyright that?
By alaethancar at 12:50 AM ON 03/24/09
@Destronter:
Yes they CAN call it "the sci-fi channel" and in fact HAVE. Before Hammer and Howe took over.
http://tarr.uspto.gov/servlet/tarr?regser=serial&entry=75151175
By Frank at 1:40 AM ON 03/24/09
From: http://blog.frankwales.com/2009/03/21/use-of-language/
“Opening the brand aperture” and disappearing right up it, the Sci Fi Channel uses several paragraphs of run-on sentences and abstract nouns to explain their decision to reduce even further the amount of science fiction they actually show. Sadly, it doesn’t explain why they didn’t just have the guts to rebrand properly, instead of to a mockable homophone; maybe they should have asked Dave for advice. [...]
By notageek at 1:40 PM ON 03/24/09
'geeks and dysfunctional, antisocial boys in their basements'?!?! I love (quality) science fiction, and I'm a 64-year-old female; I don't think I fit that description. Most of my generation grew up with good science fiction and loved it. The SciFi Channel used to be where we went to see that good science fiction, and used to be the one we watched most, but unfortunately it's changed and now it's very difficult to find anything decent to even get us to stop on that station anymore. And that's not because of its NAME, it's because of its PROGRAMMING.
There's very little of science fiction on it TO watch . . . oops, excuse me, I forgot . . . they "spent a lot of time in the '90s trying to distance the network from science fiction," didn't they? Well, perhaps THAT's why we no longer watch that channel. It's a real shame, because science fiction and action-adventure are our favorites genres, and Sci Fi was the place to go--for both, actually.
But that's been some time ago. It never seems to help to send comments to networks; by the time we fans get to hear of a canceled show or a major focus shift, it's too late to affect it. We haven't watched Sci Fi Channel much the last few years--there wasn't much on that appealed to us. Two exceptions: "Eureka," which is entertaining, funny, tense, and all-over one of the best TV shows I think I've ever seen; I'd rate it as the equal of M*A*S*H. And "Enterprise," with Scott Bakula, was a great show; my husband always watches its re-runs, and I liked it maybe because it was so close to 'now', so that you could imagine (oops!, can't use that word now, can I?, it's part of their new tag-line!) seeing Archer suddenly appear around a corner in Seattle or San Francisco.
The article said they went through about 300 possibilities before selecting the new name (I won't even type it, and I agree with several commenters who say we'll now [not] be watching the SyFylis Channel); seems like that's a tremendous waste of time and money (must have cost them to 'test' all those possibilities), why couldn't they have spent it on BETTER PROGRAMMING?!
Guess Channel 59 (in our cable network) will soon be one of those we've deleted with the remote because there's no point in even stopping for a second to see if there's anything decent on it--we know there won't be.
And nobody's faster than me when even a commercial about wrestling appears on a station I'm watching, like Spike. Wrestling and reality shows . . . the two things I avoid MOST on TV.
What a shame. Guess it's "Good-bye, Sci-Fi," and "Good-bye, whatever-you-want-to-call-it Channel," 'cause we sure won't be watching if the few remaining actual science fictions shows disappear. Maybe some other station will start up a REAL sci-fi channel. Good luck to whoever might try; we'd sure be rooting for you!
By ThisIdeaSucks at 4:27 PM ON 03/24/09
This is ridiculous. Someone should be fired over this. This idea is being universally reviewed in the press as the worst idea since New Coke. I would guess that this was thought up by the geniuses who cancelled Farscape back in the day. Or maybe by the brainiac that thinks sci-fi fans won't notice when Sci-Fi tries to reinvent and repackage Torchwood... twice. How many shows do you guys need about small teams of quirky individuals (some of whom don't age) traveling around and collecting artifacts/aliens/etc and putting them in a warehouse or sanctuary. The reason you guys are having to imitate others and spin off your own crap is clearly not bad programming but a fundamental misunderstanding of both the interests and the intelligence levels of your audience. Please choke on your martini olive and die.
By disgusted at 9:02 PM ON 03/24/09
As a 26 year old black female that loves scienc fiction, I must say I am sickened to my soul about this betrayl. I hope this little endeavor of blanding scifi fails miserably and you have to come crawling back to the people that have supported this channel for 16 years with some decent programing!
By winna at 12:04 AM ON 03/25/09
All of the comments I've read on this page so far are completely negative; they're also highly intelligible comments on why changing the branding and name of SciFi is a degrading action towards its viewers. I doubt the marketing people who came up with "SyFy" will ever take the time to read these such comments, but if they did, it should be more than clear to them how ridiculous this idea was, and possibly help them to rethink what direction they really want to take their product in.
/me drops to lowest common denominator.
Also... SyFy looks gay.... and I don't even know how to pronounce that.... Sifffeee? Totally gay. I question the sexual orientation of whomever came up with that!
By SyFy-is-a-gay-ass-name at 4:06 PM ON 03/25/09
Dumbest idea since giving Abrams the keys to something he doesn't know how to drive.
By septer at 4:53 PM ON 03/25/09
By dejected at 7:54 PM ON 03/25/09
Maybe since they are dropping the name some one ELSE can make a real science fiction channel.
By hrcnfloyd at 9:29 PM ON 03/25/09
Thank God that BSG will not be affiliated with watered down crap BS like this
By dumbidea at 3:59 PM ON 03/26/09
Dumbest idea since... Obama
By MorningStar2021 at 7:08 PM ON 03/27/09
Please tell me this is some kind of sick joke. You need to fire your entire marketing staff and replace them with expired yogurt cups. They could do a better job. Seriously. Or maybe some slightly soiled napkins.
By FoolishHeart at 11:23 AM ON 03/30/09
SCI FI: Imagine greater branding. Please.
By Cathy Taylor at 11:40 AM ON 03/30/09
Look at how Sci Fi channel's corporate identity firm has tried to distance itself from the SyFy name:
http://tinyurl.com/d24bez
By appreciative at 11:41 AM ON 03/30/09
THANK YOU SYFY!!!
I was considering purchasing cable just to have the SCI-FI Channel. You've just saved me $40.00 a month, because I have no desire to watch SyFy or programming like Battylstar Galactyca.
With the money I save, I should send you a nice fruit basket or something.
Well, I gotta go, a friend just dropped off a DVD he got from the Hystorie channel - it's all about History's biggest marketing mistakes. I wanna go see if SyFy is included in their top ten Lyst.
By joe4ska at 1:36 PM ON 03/30/09
File under y for Layme
By Charmlessman at 4:36 PM ON 03/30/09
*groan*
Really? How stupid.
By BFG at 1:55 AM ON 03/31/09
I don't know:
-Wrestling became part of SciFi (I know it's fake, but still)
-Sg1 gets an early dismissal
-Atlantis gets a very open ended final
-Gradual shift to reality shows
-semester to year long breaks between seasons
-Filler of old shows for "marathons"
-Repeated Marathons (Highlander's been on at least 5 times this academic year)
-And now this....
SciFi, you will be missed. SyFy, I greet you with many, many reserves. I'll start looking for another channel that doesn't have to be "hip and cool" to keep a fan base.
By The Great Dumbing Down at 1:48 PM ON 04/03/09
Drinking my Mtn Dew, watching the SyFy channel...
We are one step closer to Idiocracy!
By Thandrale at 5:27 PM ON 04/03/09
This is basically a legal change. The term Sci-Fi has been around since the forties and is used by SF mags and internet sites that are older than the Sci-Fi channel so they can't really copyright it.
Anyone who wants to sell merchandise with sci-fi stamped on it can.
SyFy on the other hand is all theirs. Anyone trying to use it without their permission will get a cease and desist notice and a lawsuit.
By CJ at 12:11 PM ON 04/05/09
Yes...let's DO dumb this down for those mental midgets out there that don't know what Science Fiction is or means. The change to SyFy makes you look illiterate. WRESTLING on SciFi? It has no place here. Some of the original movies are absolute CRAP but that can be easily rectified. Talk to those who have the copyrights for the newer SciFi films that have come out as major releases like other networks have done and stop relying so heavily on those really bad originals. Bring back FarScape...there was nothing wrong with the show, but if history teaches us anything, it's that if WE like it, you're going to take it away. We have to wonder what consumer base you're listening to when it comes to what stays and what goes. Then you wonder why your viewership falls off. Hmmmm.
By Casey at 4:23 PM ON 04/05/09
So this is what happens when our "No Chyld Left Behynd" chickens come home to roost! Ignorance reigns and we, the CORE Sci-Fi Audience, are stuck at the mercy of those who cannot ascend above ebonic-and-text-message speak intelligence levels. "Lissen heer now...check dis shid out, mane....SIFFY! Dis heer bes da shiznit! Dey gonna think iz da BOMB, bruh!" Guy with BlackBerry at other end of table, texting another, "IDK, BD. Wt U tnk?" You'll need to see a doctor and get a shot for that. Oh, wait...it's too late. Looks like the syphilis has already made it to the exec's brain tissues. Nice to see how my education tax dollar has come full circle...barely literate people in charge of what I watch with my valuable television viewing time. Someone please explain to me the correlation between science fiction and wrestling...other than the muscle-inflating chemicals involved. And now, for the hopelessly stoned-out crowd who DO try the Jack Ass stunts at home in spite of the disclaimers, we have reality shows that take no real thought and are completely meaningless/mindless as well as uninteresting. I find it hard to believe that there aren't any intelligent people left out there. I find it exceedingly strange that everyone I talk to is sick of reality tv, and yet, it still abounds and proliferates as rampantly as the aforementioned venereal disease. And this is the plan for Sci-Fi?
You've done a GREAT job obliterating your niche, guys! Keep up the good work becoming "just another mainstream network"! Or, in terms you'll understand, "GR8 wk azwps!"
By andrus at 2:58 AM ON 04/07/09
Siffy?? NBC/Universal is insulting us and abandoning us by dumbing down the channel even more than they already have with wrestling and reality shows. I suggest we make our frustration clear at the Siffy booth at the high-profile ComicCon, an event well covered by the media (early this summer in San Diego). It needs to be understood that if NBC/Universal goes ahead with this and turns their back on us, we will do the same to them. People, we need to make some noise about this! Advertisers must get this message.
By TannermoehleCOM at 2:59 AM ON 04/07/09
You have a very valuable lesson to learn from Tropicana. If it's not broken, don't fix it.
By Jimmy St. James at 7:38 AM ON 04/07/09
Stupid! Ugly! Stupid! PsyFi would have made more sense than this garbage! I don't know if I can continue watching this station anymore.
By Jodeca at 2:42 PM ON 04/07/09
What a load of crap from a bunch of whiny, idiotic simpletons. Why would you boycott the station that brings you the only sci-fi / fantasy series that actually stay on the air? Why would you gripe about a name change? Ok, I'll agree that I hate that they brought wrestling to the channel. So, I don't watch it. I hate that they have those stupid realty shows. So, I don't watch them. However, they have given (and continue to give) me some of my favorite shows on TV. Battlestar Galactica was awesome. It didn't go the direction I would have taken but I still loved it. Eureka is one of the most interesting, funny, and intelligent shows I have seen in years. It is one of the few shows that I want to own on DVD so I can watch it again and again. Stargate SG-1 and Stargate Atlantis were both very enjoyable. And, what I have seen so far for the new Stargate Universe and WareHouse 13 looks amazing. This channel also provides you with some great mini series that you would NEVER see on another network. So, why are you complaining? Let them change their name. Who cares? They have some crappy shows. So do all of the rest of the networks; so, don't watch them. Take all the rest of the good stuff and enjoy it. Thank God for it. If all you watch is the SciFi channel then you should broaden your horizons. If the network doesn’t have sci-fi / fantasy substance to sustain you then maybe you should read a book. As long as they continue to feed my need for intelligent and entertaining programming that is outside the “normal” prime time fare, then they will continue to get my support and viewership.
By TrepS at 10:42 PM ON 04/07/09
Why would they do that? I feel very much insulted by this, that they feel the "general public" won't accept the SciFi channel unless they shed the geekiness somehow associated with SciFi. There is no need to change the name just to play different content, when was the last time MTV play music? Bad Move :'(
By nuttynurse at 5:46 AM ON 04/08/09
SciFi was a great source of entertainment in the begining. Then came wrestling followed by other non scifi shows. Looks like a lot of us will be searching for a new channel to watch. Maybe they need to get a new honcho who knows the definition of science fiction
By HeighU at 6:47 PM ON 04/09/09
In this day and age, where we are in a recession, people like to spend money in stupid ways, while others are without jobs, here is another example of a waste of money and time. The Scifi channel already has a strong visibility factor with its name and logo. Take into account the cost in rebranding the channel and its product....I think Scifi would be better off taking that money and putting it where it should be....into the programming, putting more money into the quality and content of its shows, especially its movies. Some of the original programming is embarrassing. (I am still trying to figure out what wrestling has to do with science fiction.) Leave the logo alone, make better shows. 'Nuff said.
By Marc at 3:11 AM ON 04/10/09
In reading the many response to articles about this change one thing strikes me the most - who were the test group used to qualify this new name? There are already references to STD's and Polish interpretations of this flying wildly on forums everywhere and (like it or not) these will stick.
The timing is also unbelievable. Doing this is bad enough, but doing it when all of the flagship franchise shows have been cancelled and nothing new in an established position to maintain a 'drawcard' seems to be complete lunacy.
I guess we can expect nothing more from network execs who are probably former classmates of the same execs in Wall Street at present.
My real hope is that there are more enlightend execs at the other networks that will see this as an opportunity to snatch market share from NBC by introducing quality Sci-Fi content. Sci-Fi had the opportunity to display excellence in a core competency and have failed dismally as a result of ignoring it. Surely this is not the pinnacle of the American entertainment industry in relation to this particular genre - or is it?
By Mike at 7:54 PM ON 04/11/09
The new name is probably to prepare the channel for sale to Proctor & Gamble, after all, SyFy sounds like a new European toilet cleaner or detergent, not a serious programming choice.
By AG at 5:21 AM ON 04/12/09
What an incredibly stupid series of decisions. I do not see this channel as an alternative to my regular viewing.. along with Cartoon Network this IS my regular viewing. Well, that is until now.
Never watch Ghost Hunter, or wrestling, or monster-of-the-week shows. Farscape, Galactica, Stargate, Star Trek, Buck Rogers, Sliders, Eureka, Franklin Reuhl!
For the love of Pete, get a clue! At this point we all realize it does not read "Skiffy."
By jenocin at 12:25 AM ON 04/15/09
Forget the stupid name change and just get some good programming. Heck, with all the big names killing off shows, you'd think they'd have a lot to choose from. Instead we get wrestling and really bad b movies. Was for the most part the only channel I watched on standard cable.
By mukesh11 at 5:56 PM ON 04/17/09
The legal arrangement for the right to occupy a dwelling is known as the housing tenure. Types of housing tenure include owner occupancy, Tenancy, housing cooperative, condominiums (individually parceled properties in a single building), public housing, squatting, and cohousing.
Residences can be classified by if and how they are connected to neighboring residences and land. Different types of housing tenure can be used for the same physical type. For example, connected residents might be owned by a single entity and leased out, or owned separately with an agreement covering the relationship between units and common areas and concerns.
------------
mukesh11
real estate - real estate
By Michael at 5:12 PM ON 04/18/09
I really hate this new name. You had the perfect name for the genre - you shouldn't mess with it. Get used to people referring to "the Syphilis Channel".
Please - no more ghost hunters or wrestling. We need more imaginative, speculative, creative fiction writing.
Also, bring back Dresden. Since seeing the series (and buying it on DVD), I've been reading the novels and listening to the audio books. The series was a treasure.
By Brad at 3:14 PM ON 04/28/09
I stuck by scifi for a long time. From the days of MST3K, anime run saturdays, Farscape, Invisible man, stargate SG-1/atlantis and many other series. Hell when I sit at home during the weekend and do chores I cant get enough of what i've deemed "bad movie marathon weekends". I never understood how wrestling has to do with SCIFI. and the producers of ghost hunters need to have thier palms wacked by a nun for making bad tv and really annoying commercials. I am so glad i have a tivo.
Also of which just to complain some more. Why the hell is the commercials 10 times louder then the show? I have to turn up the volume for shows and then commercial break happens WHAM! my speakers blow. just for certain channels and SCI FI is the worst one. i don't mind commercial breaks. it gives me a chance to do something while still somewhat pay attention. I bought a TIVO just because of this simple reason...
Now the name change doesn't bother me. im sure it only cost someone a few hundred bucks and a bucket of cocaine to come up with it. but when you say you want to get away being thought of as the channel where geeks go to... i mean come on... you play star trek every monday night for 5 straight hours... how is that not geek. I am a geek. and saying you do not want to include me in your programming ideals is very hurtful. So you want the dawsons creek gang along with moronic rednecks wrestling shows? I thought thats what FOX and WB were for. If i want shows like Law and order ill go to USA or TNT. If i want to see misguided emo teens ill turn on WB. If i want to see Misguided Emo teen with father problems and watch thier torso getting bitten off by a giant lizzard creature I'll watch sci-fi.
you shut down Farscape with no ending. then there was an uproar. then you rectified it with peacekeeper wars. it was brilliant. Same goes with the Stargate SG1/Atlantis movies. i know there are people over there in Sci-FI or SYFY that actually do care about the nerd viewers.
no more wrestling... please... i think your sister/brother/retardedcousin station SPIKE TV can handle that garbage...
rant over...
By momsprettyold at 6:38 PM ON 04/30/09
already I have noticed wrestling events etc drifting in to the scifi schedule, now with new branding for allowing more imaginative programming, does this mean kickboxing too????
so much for science fiction.
By elvira at 9:41 PM ON 05/03/09
Wow-- what a bonehead move. Time for a new channel to woo the sci fi audience. Our money spends as good as anyone else's, a new king will be chosen. SyFy will dye after this for sure.
By Wilren at 2:20 PM ON 05/04/09
They said the name change was to appear less geeky...isn't that basically trying to pull away from their #1 viewers?
Seems about as sensible as using a guillotine to deal with a headache if you ask me.
By geekette57 at 12:29 AM ON 05/19/09
This is supposed to sound LESS geeky?
By PLERST at 1:43 AM ON 05/21/09
can we pronounce it "sifee"??
By Janewoohoo at 7:00 PM ON 05/21/09
What a numbskull idea, probably the same genius who cancelled Farscape and/or added wrestling and those really , bad, ridiculously lame, and stupid plot movies made for t.v.on the weekends.
By Jim C at 10:02 AM ON 05/26/09
What garbage. Seriously, what corporate nonsense. Pointless. They might as well rebrand themselves that Oxygen network II. It makes about as much sense.
By jeffgian at 8:35 PM ON 05/29/09
I haven't had the time to read all the comments, but just scanning over them tells me one thing: WE DO NOT LIKE THIS STUPID NAME CHANGE!! Please leave it the way it is...You dont have to OWN the trademark. just play better movies and your ratings will go thru the roof and into outer space, and then you may start raking in the bucks. WE LOVE SCI-FI.......PERIOD!
ARE YOU GUYS LISTENING[reading] TO WHAT WE ARE SAYING???
By Morph at 1:43 AM ON 06/10/09
This is exactly what happens when some retard comes up with some REALLY stupid idea, like showing wrestling on the scifi channel, and all you guys just like idiot sheeple that you are just take it up the rear with a grin on your face and your back on the couch, pretty much like for example continuing to support the scifi channel. Exactly the same sort of b.s. that's happening all over america, what with bush and moron-monkeys like him.
I cancelled scifi immediately once they started airing wrestling. It seems like the journey downwards just continues. Now I can't laugh hard enough after hearing of this new level of stupidity.
Viewers deserve all they get. If those network idiots would've been stopped right the minute they started to show "john edwards", wrestling and such shows, this wouldn't be happening today.
Don't forget that you're paying for this b.., all of ya.
You guys deserve all you get.
By Maire at 12:27 PM ON 06/10/09
SyFy ...just too precious and way too stupid.
By Michelle at 12:56 PM ON 06/12/09
But yet nothing will ever come of your griping and complaining because we will still all watch the channel and the shows on it.
To all you asking ARE YOU LISTENING TO WHAT WE'RE SAYING??? The answer is no, because until enough people with those Neilson devices in their homes boycott the channel they don't care. Why should they? They're still making the big bucks.
By PsFy vs. Dresden Files Really? at 7:07 PM ON 06/12/09
Yep they are right Sci fi limts the perameters to the universe. It leads to silly useless shows like BSG, Eureka,Stargate, Doctor Who,Sanctuary,Farscape, Firefly,Primeval,and of course mindless shows like Dresden files for pitys sake. Where SyFy has no real meaning so they are now open to put on meaningful, thought provoking, original, and creative shows like ghost manchin, ghost forest, ghost beach, famous haunted bathrooms, wresting, and So you thing your ghost can dance. Now these shows make you use your mind. Expand the brand and you do not have a special network, not a core fan based haven for the sci fi community but a run of the mill syndication hub, for repeats of Top ghost hunter model. I mean Dresden Files really, NO REALLY come on wake up!!! Stop canceling the shows this community invests in. If you show them we will watch... religiously. If you show ghost hunter reality dribble we will glance at it and change the channel. This network has an issue Sci Fi fans are not stuck with the same dribble on every other network. Mess with us and we will turn off the TV and read a book that wont be canceled before the conclusion of the story. Where is my Sci Fi Prime Fridays? You started something good and then abandoned us. We began to think ahh finaly they are getting it. then........ Wake up!!!!
By MasterGuns at 10:24 PM ON 06/14/09
This basically means that at gradually they will start airing new shows that have ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with science fiction in order to make more money. Case in point: Ice Road Truckers, AxMen on History Channel...
By bericb at 9:17 AM ON 06/18/09
So last year it was SciFi, this year it's SyFy, next year it's SpiFy, the year after that it's SpikeFy...uh...
By Clark at 11:04 PM ON 06/20/09
Maybe someone will start a sci fi channel.
One can only hope.
By Aesus at 11:18 PM ON 06/20/09
The SciFi channel has changed quite a bit over the years, but unfortunately, not for the better. They canceled many of the shows we've grown to love and replaced them with things like wrestling and soap operas. I'm not saying all of their shows are bad, but there are quire a few that I'd swear they went dumpster diving for.
By Raverkid00 at 11:57 PM ON 06/20/09
The sole purpose of this change is to allow the channel to start showing non-sci-fi /horror/fantasy programming. I knew when I saw Sci-Fi testing the waters with shows like WWF and James Bond movies a change was coming. I literally ask cable companies if they provide Sci-Fi before I buy cable, and spend at least 50% of my time watching it. Apparently these geniuses don't realize that turning Sci-Fi into another basic cable clone means there's no reason for people like me to continue preferring it over any other channel. I stopped watching MTV, I'll stop watching "SyFy" too.
By clove at 6:43 PM ON 06/22/09
Same MO as MTV..build a brand with a purpose, alter format and morph into alternative reality programming. I think there are actually more "sci-fi" shows on Chiller..which is supposed to be the horror movie channel.:-) Ridiculous. Syfy..pwnd IMO. All nonsensical word groupings. Newspeak indeed...I can apparently watch science fiction anywhere except for the sci-fi channel..which now imagines itself greater. I don't. When did ghosts and wrestling become science fiction anyway? Why can't I see something like..ohh Firefly, or old Six Million Dollar Man episodes..or Space 1999, BABYLON 5!! How's this for an idea..pick a subject..and STICK TO IT! Personally..i will pronounce this station as Syphy from now on. Obviously the corporate slugs responsible suffer from the neurological degradation of said disease.
By teachernana at 5:24 PM ON 06/24/09
Oh, well. These changes opens up the cable market for a new channel. I'd love to see a channel that actually show science fiction televison, since there doesn't seem to be one out there anymore.
By DC at 7:44 PM ON 06/26/09
This is another great example of how new is NOT better. SciFi should leave their name alone. It isn't broke, and there's no need to fix it. The SciFi name says exactly what it is, and that's the way it should stay!!
By Sugarat99 at 11:08 AM ON 06/28/09
The name change makes them think that they are legitimizing the showing Law & Order: SVU, "Wrastling", and James Bond movies. They'll be showing "On Golden Pond" and Rachel Wray before long. They've completely forgotten who was involved in starting the channel in the first place; folks like Issac Asimov, Ray Bradbury and many others. They forget the history of the channel and the struggles and work that went into getting it off the ground. Now they're turning it into a "variety" network: a clone of it's parent, USA Network. It just makes me sick.
By mudcat at 7:28 PM ON 06/28/09
What a waste of monet trying something new like a name change. Thats all we need in the world more change like in DC. At least this year they have some new movies that do not have big rocks walking around.
By boiler man at 11:13 AM ON 07/02/09
I have noticed in the past several years sifi has been moving towards blood and guts and away from true science fiction who knows what they are thinking. I think its is the Peter Principle a person will rise to the in ability of there position.
By Dronetek at 11:22 AM ON 07/02/09
Oh my, bad move sci fi. Its a pretty transparent attempt to justify a bunch of programming that people can get elsewhere. If this goes through, I'll switch to watching stargate online only.
By dronetek at 11:23 AM ON 07/02/09
By the Way, You guys really need to bring back MST3K! IT was one of the best sows you ran on this god forsaken network.
By Bishop at 7:17 PM ON 07/02/09
I have been elected as spokesperson for my family. Who's dumb idea was this? The reason we watch the SciFi channel more than any other channel is because of what was your traditional programing. Take a few shows out of moth balls and get rid of wrestling which has nothing to do with Science Fiction. You do this and your rep will go down hill.
By candigirl at 2:22 AM ON 07/03/09
When I wanted to watch TV Sci Fi channel was the first channel I checked to see what was on. Notice I said "was". Never anything good on now.
By DanEboy at 6:34 AM ON 07/03/09
Has the SyWhy channel lost it's Fracken mind
First it was Martial Arts then Comedy now Raslin(Wrestling) and James Bond. What a sell out you Capitalist Porkers.
By Scott Sheaffer at 6:18 PM ON 07/03/09
Syfy? What's this? An appeal to semi-literates who only read text messages?
By caribulou at 11:50 PM ON 07/03/09
I have had enough. Crappy programming wrestling reality shows. Now this. People joing me send them an email and boycott the chanhel. We geeks built this channel now they are telling us to piss off. Well i say screw them. Lets leave.
By Craig at 1:22 PM ON 07/05/09
Besides the reality TV stupidity, what does wrestling have to do with SciFi? Or SyFy? BSG was good; now it's gone. The Dresden Files was good; now it's gone. Eureka is still good, but I'm just waiting for it be taken off the air. Prime Time playhouse was good, and it was nice to see things like War of the Worlds (TV show), and other shows that will never air anywhere, and which got yanked because some suit decided that it wasn't worth airing something just because it didn't have universal appeal. Now SyFy is that very same thing. You just air the same movies over and over again. Once their might have been entertaining for their novelty. Now they are just down right boring. There is so so much you could show even beyond what I've already mentioned (black and white horror movies from the 50's for example, and things like Star Blazers that would appeal to kids) put probably never will.
By Craig at 1:35 PM ON 07/05/09
Oh, and for the love of God find something else to show on holidays. I have now seen every episode of The Twilight Zone far more times that I would ever want to.
By James at 3:45 AM ON 07/06/09
What a horrible idea.
By TheGreatOrange at 5:37 AM ON 07/06/09
I'm tried for the past month or so (maybe longer, I don't remember when this was announced) to come up with an adequate way to describe how stupid this SyFy rebranding is. I would liken it to creative genius on the same level as some of the original movies that come on the channel, but that would be insulting to their various creators as I at least derive some form of pleasure from those lame movies.
I guess all I can say is that it's moronic. If I had been in the meeting where this was suggested, I would have gone completely berserk with blind rage over how much time and money had been wasted coming up with this tripe. I would probably have to have been pulled off whoever suggested it by security, because I would have lost myself to the fury.
A bit dramatic and more than a bit of an exaggeration, but I think it conveys how stupid I think this is. I have not seen any positive feedback for this idiocy anywhere, and I think Sci Fi (which is what I will be calling it and how I will be spelling it in the future) should probably take that as a sign. They won't though, because hey, they are too cool to listen to the bleatings of the average nerd.
By rere at 1:56 PM ON 07/06/09
ghost hunters is a waste of time...
By xsile at 2:58 PM ON 07/06/09
Ghost plumbers is more like it. SyFy is going the way of all the other sheep networks. reality TV baby yeah! Syfy will become like cartoon network where your lucky if you even see a single cartoon anymore.
By Vicky at 12:26 AM ON 07/07/09
SYFY??? what does that even stand for?? at least you know that with Sci Fi, its the science fiction channel! This is the DUMBEST NAME CHANGE not to mention POINTLESS!
So SYFY (siffy) exec's it appears that you guys are now catering to the dumb and stupid crowd now, Just like every other station...
By the way did I mention HOW DUMB the NEW NAME IS??? DUMB! Plus it is phonetically incorrect siffy execs!!!
Thank goodness for the Discovery channel!
By Samantha L. at 1:03 AM ON 07/07/09
Seriously SciFi, do you people even listen to your viewers or do you care so little about us that you're willing to change your name to something we all hate and potentially ruin a perfectly wonderful channel by polluting it with lame ghost hunting shows and wrestling??? Seriously 'syfy'?
Did someone's illiterate eight-year-old pick that one out for you?
By Serious at 5:52 AM ON 07/07/09
Epic Phail.
By Anon at 6:35 AM ON 07/07/09
This comment made me laugh.
"Still, Howe is unfazed. He believes that "Sci Fi" was a barrier to possible viewers and that if the programming is good, the viewers will follow."
When the hell has it been good? Everything that had a shot at being considered "good" has already been canceled.
By really at 10:08 AM ON 07/07/09
I dont think they should do this. the scifi channel has always been scifi. If they start changing that, there true fans are going to leave
By cryoforever at 11:38 AM ON 07/07/09
How incredibly stupid. I will be embarassed to tell friends I watch programs on silly named network such as that. Are they really that desperate? And P.S. where are my Farscape webisodes that I was promised?
By CodeWarriorz at 1:48 PM ON 07/07/09
I have been a viewer of the SciFi Channel since day ONE. Of COURSE "SyFy" is lame, and is not welcomed. After reading the comments of the head of the channel, it appears it boils down to the fact that one cannot trademark "Sci Fi", but can trademark "SyFY", so, as it has been said, when it doubt, follow the money, so it all boils down to branding, merchandising, and control. Welcome to the 21st century, where the Golden Rule means, "He who has the Gold, Rulez".
Ghosthunters and Destination Truth Rule!
By justanerd at 4:33 PM ON 07/07/09
This makes as much sense as them having an HD channel and rarely if ever showing programming that was shot in HD. At they are consistent in their cluelessness.
By Hydrazine at 6:34 PM ON 07/07/09
SYFY = NEW COKE
Your programming is 50/50 at best and your new name sucks bawls.
By STIMULUSXRESPONSE at 9:13 PM ON 07/07/09
Every time I've seen the commercials talking about the name change I just roll my eyes and thought 'how lame' ... so I finally tried to look up some info on the reasoning behind the change and found this page... it looks like the majority of people agree that the name change is lame and pointless... and probably the result of a bunch of lame people that work there trying to make it look like they are doing something so they can keep their jobs... I got some news for the suits... the problem with the SciFi channel isn't the name... it's the cancellation of the great shows that were on the network .. like Stargate... and continually wasting money and airtime on truly HORRIBLE 'original movies' that never cease to amaze me just how bad they are... the people in charge are obviously idiots...
By hurriedcorgi at 10:18 PM ON 07/07/09
I quit actively watching the sci-fi channel like 8 years ago because it became crap programming but the name, "SyFy," literally annoys me so much for some reason that I had to block the channel from my on-screen guide. I don't know what it is but something about looking at that word just really really annoys me and like I said besides watching the occasional movie on sci-fi I stopped watching the channel years ago and it still upset me enough to take the time to post on here. In my opinion SyFy is now the most poorly named channel on television. I also agree with the poster above me that this channel tanked when they started producing their original movies? Who watches the crap they put on tv now? Seriously, not one person in this entire corporation stood up and politely informed these people that this was the worst idea for a tv channel name ever?
By Dman at 10:18 PM ON 07/07/09
This has got to be one of the corniest, silliest ideas I've seen in a long time. And the long list of negative comments regarding the "re-branding and re-naming", show you how stupid this move was. I'm not sure it's possible for me to even tune into something called "SyFy".
By Hydrazine at 11:48 PM ON 07/07/09
I think the name sucks bad... so bad that it motivated me to search it on the internet... leading me here to tell you how much you suck.
...this was a really bad PR move on your part.
Can I call you by any stupid random name now? SlyFry...StupidFly...SmegmaFy...SryFgg...
I can make up stupid stuff too...
By ottahere at 12:12 AM ON 07/08/09
Someone needs to SyFyire the guys that thought this up. I've been watching less and less since Mystery Theatre 2000 was dropped. Wrestling? Come-on...
I'm out of here.
By Annoyed at 12:17 AM ON 07/08/09
I agree with the other posters.
Pointless, stupid, and lame as a duck. Quack, quack.
All they have to do is add 'n' and another 'f' and it is Snyffy like Coke.
By pixie289 at 12:23 AM ON 07/08/09
Okay bonehead programmers and marketing executives- if you have any sense in your head you will READ THESE COMMENTS because these are the people who WATCH YOUR CHANNEL-PAY ATTENTION TO THEM-the one new viewers that you are trying to attract already are spewed across the channel line up with the carbon copy channels like USA, SPIKE, TNT etc. Instead why not take a real imaginative approach and develop intelligent interesting programs like Farscape, BSG ,Eureka ,Taken, The 4400, Jericho, even just pick up any Ray Bradbury book of short stories and you can pitch hundreds of cool thought provoking shows that will KEEP YOUR AUDIENCE AND DRAW NEW ONES BECAUSE YOUR SHOWS ARE CUTTING EDGE, EDGY AND OMG OUTSIDE OF THE BOX. WHAT SCIFI MEANS. There are soooo many amazing shows to rerun too, Dark Shadows, Twin Peaks, Lost in Space, Smallville and so many more that still hold their salt. The whole SyFy is just plain unappealing, did you even do a focus group test on that one???
So WISE UP !! BE SMART!! AND FIX IT BEFORE YOU SINK THE NETWORK. WE LIVE IN A TIME OF THE FUTURE RUN WITH IT.
By kerri at 1:38 AM ON 07/08/09
I'm not liking it.
By Fred Evil at 2:08 AM ON 07/08/09
Once again, idiots in suits are duped by 'Marketing Gurus' who insist the re-branding will revive the station. Never mind you just completely alienated your core audience.
No matter, you don't show much of what they want to watch anymore as is. Now it's time for Alf marathons, and maybe we can pick up Small Wonder for cheap!
By Torf at 2:53 AM ON 07/08/09
Sounds like a Venereal Disease!
By PJ at 8:58 AM ON 07/08/09
Tried to watch Wharehouse 13 and frankly could not finish it. I did give it a try. You all seem so hell bent on being hip and cool. If that is what this channel wants to be, then stop pretending that Wrestling, Ghosts and Really bad reality scare things are Sci-Fi. I seem to get more Sci-fi from other channels that aren't pretending to be so cool.
By Watcher at 11:37 AM ON 07/08/09
I don’t really care what they call themselves.
I just want good new shows.
I want shows that have staying power and also shows that have an evolving storylines
( Sci-Fi Soap-Operas ).
Shows that make you think and shows that are just escapism.
Shows that require a long term investment, not just trash to fill time slots.
Lets face it the BBC has had better quality SCI-FI, mystery shows, and even SCI-FI Comedies, than this channel ever had and for the foreseeable future ever will.
Even though we here in the US may have to wait a year or more to get them, most of the time it is worth the wait.
The only real competing programs Sci-Fi Channel has ever presented are the Stargate Series and Eureka, all other has been dribble, re-runs or re-makes.
Please SyFy stop picking up shows from other Networks unless there are plans to continue the story.
Also, Even though the so-called wrestling you show is Strictly Fantasy(SyFy) it does not have a place on this channel.
If you have to have reality shows, come-up with a way to have more interactivity with the audience.
At least Ghost Hunters have had specials where the audience can get involved
but GH needs more audience involvement.
One more thing drop Ghost Hunters International now. We don’t need GH and GHI
I have seen stone statues that have had more personality than the cast of GHI.
By mddg at 12:01 PM ON 07/08/09
As a woman I am insulted that the Sci Fi channel is trying to gain female watchers by 'disguising' the term sci fi. How stupid do the network execs think women are? I for one am boycotting the channel until they realize the name change is an error.
Everyone start e-mailing or snail mailing letters to the corporate offices with "i" and "c" characters. Send hardcopy pages filled with the letters I and C, mail keyboard keys, cut out the letters from newpapers. *maybe* if we start a missing letter campaign someone will get the hint.
By gezortenplotz at 1:27 PM ON 07/08/09
I'll be submitting a treatment to the NBC/Sy Fy next week about a show about real sci-fi fans answering sci-fi trivia questions. The prize? A contestant gets to deliver a knee to the groin to each of the executives responsible for this recto-cranial decision.
I guess I'm imagining greater already.
By entheoss at 4:42 PM ON 07/08/09
Wow, all over the net all i read is how people are angry over the name change. Thousands of posts and yet they "over paid channel execs" still went forward with the name change. Truth is they are not going to listen to us. They dont care what we think. Its there hope that we will get used to it and watch anyways. Thats ok i guess, there is nothing left on SYFY anyways. Looks like the British can do it better anyways. BBC here i come.
By CIE-PHI at 5:26 PM ON 07/08/09
Why should they care? No one has a choice to select channels we like. At best we get "packages" of channels. Until we have a real say in what is put on the idiot box this kind of Faciast programming will continue. Those in charge have no interest in producing quality it's too expensive and what are you going to do? Fire your tv? Cancel your cable service shoot your tv and just use the internet.
By Ridiculous at 11:22 PM ON 07/08/09
I didn't read through all of the comments, so this may have been stated before. First off, I only noticed today that the name was changed to SyFy when I was browsing through the DirecTV guide for something to watch. I'm assuming DTV just updated the guide to show as SyFy, because I didn't notice this last week when I was tuning into Ghost Hunters.
Now on to the point.......When I saw this, the first thing that came to my mind was the "dumbing down of America". This is just another step towards illiteracy. I mean come on already! Sci Fi is the correct spelling of the abbreviation for Science Fiction. What the H*$$ is Sy Fy???? This is just beyond me. If they wanted to change their name, they should have changed it completely (MISC as other's have suggested would be fitting). That would be much better than this "dumbing down" move. Geez, really, Sy Fy sounds just like Sci Fi, just spelled WRONG. Figure it out you idiots and stop trying to bring the rest of us down to your level!
By speaksthetruth at 12:17 AM ON 07/09/09
1. Get rid of wrestling, they are not part of the Fi crowd.
2. Bring back Farscape.
3. Fantasy is OK, GOOD Fantasy that is.
4. Finish series that you start (i.e. Invasion)
5. Save the $$$ for every five bad original movies you make and make one that's decent.
6. Keep the old name, it's what set you apart. The new name won't draw more viewers, good Sci-Fi programming will.
7. For the record, I enjoy both Ghost Hunter series. I think they have a place on this channel. (Wrestling does NOT).
By GlitteringSnowflake at 1:37 AM ON 07/09/09
Symphonitron, I agree with you about the wrestling. I was flabbergasted at the changes. First it was that soap opera Passions, then it was wrestling and now the name change. they also missed the boat at getting some really good scifi shows, Sara Conner Chronicals, Dollhouse etc. I still watch the scifi channel, but not as much. I'm stock piling some of my favorite scifi TV on DVD shows and I recommend everyone else that has commited to do the same. Go to your nearest DVD store that sells them or nearest retail store. If they are not going to listen to the fans then this is the best way to go.
By nomadicrhombus at 2:52 AM ON 07/09/09
sounds like they just want a unique name so they came distinguish their products with, and not really change anything except add shows that have nothing to do with the genre people are originally tuning in for.
By Paranoia at 11:12 AM ON 07/09/09
They say the name change is to "shed its Geeky side" and draw new viewers with its lame new name, Hey Morons !!! the Geeks are the ones who built your network to what it is. How about you care about what your viewers want rather than the people you hope to attract.
Anyone with half a brain is going to look at this as a stupid and failed marketing gimic.
Thank god BSG is over, because now with this new name i have even less of a reason to watch your channel.
By DoctorWho at 1:58 PM ON 07/09/09
I think that this is a bad idea completely. They say they are trying to shed the 'geeky' point of the channel but the only reason I watch the now "SyFy" channel is for the cool, different shows. If they start to change the shows and schedules I'm going to stop watching it because then it will be like every other channel on TV. I liked the unique way that they showed shows that no one else would or ever show. THAT was the reason I watched SCIFI! You guys are going to loose viewers because now all of the so called "geeks" are going to get annoyed and stop watching and anyone with half a brain will know that this is still a science-fiction network and will continue not watching it. You are not getting any new ratings or viewers! You are just going to go downhill if you change it too much. If you were smart you would know that people DO NOT like change.
By FUNWIZ at 12:08 AM ON 07/10/09
SCI-FI FANS ALERT! Now that the name has changed, along with the crappy programming, maybe someone with a vision can take back the old name, and relaunch the science fiction and fantasy channel! Bring back the shows that made it to begin with. Something that can take on the Brits as well.
The execs dont have a clue where the real money $$$$$ is, or where it comes from, us! THE WORKING FANS! We 'the big kids' are the ones that go to conventions, get into role play in a big way, buy the collectible gear and gadgets, and spend the big bucks, not the kids.
I read hundreds and hundreds of COMMENTS made right here on this page, and NONE, I mean NOT A ONE said they liked the name change. 4 months worth.... Guess the execs dont even read their own website, that is why they dont have a clue on what programming needs to be implemented to keep this channel alive another season..... I sure hate to see this channel go. I waited weeks, days, and watched the hours count down on a timer on the screen for its first broadcast, before it started broadcasting the first show. I was right there from the very start, seen only on the large sats. :0( This looks like the beginning of the end for this channel.....
By Josh at 12:10 AM ON 07/10/09
will not watch the channel with this name.
scifi please, not leet speak
By parker at 8:28 AM ON 07/10/09
I have read a lot of what has been written here and as a overwhelming number of you have already mentioned...the name change sucks, not just because it is idiotic, but it symbolizes the wholesale failure of what this network use to be when it first started. And on that note I can be sure at this point that if any of those who first started this network are still with the network have sold out long ago. I can sit here and cry (and I have) about the shows that have been lost: Farscape, Stargate, BSG, Firefly (why didn't they continue that series?) and the old classics (including the ones that they didn't air like Red Dwarf, at least to my knowledge) Dr. Who the original, Land of the Lost.... Does Ghost Hunters belong on this network...by strict definition no, by generalized definition yes. Is it a good show, not really, it is filler which is to be expected on any network...primetime worthy...HELL NO. But, I take hope, although most here seem to bashing the USA model, I actually spend most of my time watching it...instead of Sci Fi (or whatever you want to call it) and what they have done with their own original series gives me hope that, maybe just maybe, they might follow that model and actually bring in good writers, with interesting story lines and good concepts. Maybe they will stop hurting the genre that they are trying to sell (i.e. the boa movies, the crocs in New England and every other movie they have released that re-enforce the typical "Sci-Fi" crappy storyline and even worse acting and dialogue). There are interesting shows out there they could pick up (Jericho from Universal...Heros) but, at the moment there aren't that many "good" sci-fi shows out there right and that is the problem. They have killed off Stargate (a Showtime original show by the way) and it spin offs...we will wait and see on BSG, but my hope is that take the model the USA has done (I mean come on they have come along way from "USA Up all Night...with Gilbert Godfrey). Maybe I am an optimist but, I have hope that they might bring some decent sci-fi programming into the world. But, the first sign that they are going to try to stay to the sci-fi genre would be ending the wrestling...I mean seriously for the last five years or so...really? I have hope, hope for a better sci-fi world...
By Cindy at 11:46 AM ON 07/10/09
I am so happy to read all of these comments. Syfy is utterly stupid. It just goes along with the dumbing down of America that is so prevalent today (as already stated on many of these posts.) My first thought was...I have SEEN parts of some of the sci fi movies, and they are so utterly stupid that the name kind of FITS. But STILL, PLEASE get rid of the silly name and give us back Sci Fi, or I WILL never even glance at your offerings ever again.
By EndofAnEra at 5:03 PM ON 07/10/09
R.I.P. Sci Fi Channel. Imagine Less, this channel is dead.
My girlfriend, whose favorite channel is Lifetime, is not a geek, but will watch GOOD SF, and loved BSG, thinks this name change is moronic. Congratulations, not only have you alienated your core audience, but your "broadened" target audience will not watch it either now.
“SyFy” just hurts my head looking at it. It sounds like it would fit perfectly into a media empire of the future, in a future as envisioned in the movie “Idiocracy.”
By eliterequiem at 7:00 PM ON 07/10/09
dear lord sci fi (oh pardon me, Sy Fy, bleah) is just selling out and it makes me absolutely sick. they just want to "broaden" there horizon, meaning that they just want to make more money and lose there sci fi genre fans. i pray they wont get rid of things for us.
Go Geeks!
By Stratman at 10:06 PM ON 07/10/09
Imagine Greater : This is what you do when your watching their programming, you imagine something greater, then you SYgh and you FYnally change the channel
By brenna at 11:14 PM ON 07/10/09
I don't see what the fuss is all about. It sounds to me like they are going to keep scifi shows and integrate other genres (such as those mentioned above). It seems like this will draw more viewers in and maybe hook those who didn't previously understand how interesting science fiction could be.
By lynn at 7:11 AM ON 07/11/09
I didn't know about this until I was watching something on what I thought was SciFi this week and found I was watching SyFy instead. What a stupid idea....
I haven't been watching the channel as much as I used to anyway. Too many giant whatevers eating the world movies always seem to be airing.
It is the continuing dumbing down of America. Working for a library system, I have found that this is happening everywhere. Soon people in this country will be too stupid to tie their own shoes.
By quarterStar at 10:36 AM ON 07/11/09
'Was so hoping that this SyFy thing would be a zen leap into something unpredictable and captivating with BSG-level writing and production; however, If SyFy's introductory series Warehouse 13 (like a step-sibling of Fringe) is a harbinger of the new direction, then I believe this is a flat-out betrayal and dumping of the channel's faithful sci fi literati core.
It's just not that into us. Anymore.
It's over.
SyFy doesn't care if we don't watch. In fact, they're probably contemplating restraining orders to keep us away if the new programming and their God-awful giggly SyFy promos don't work...! What they want now is their new loves, those fresh, light-hearted, comedy-loving, Eureka-toting viewers who roll their eyes at serious science fiction... SyFy wants THEM to claim those TV seats that used to be reserved for us... As Heidi Klum says, "We're out!"
But I say, "take heart." Sometimes things don't always go as planned. Sometimes old flames that dance out of our lives upright, all strong and glib and dismissive, come crawling back -- bent and broken.
By quarterStar at 10:43 AM ON 07/11/09
Stratman:
"...you imagine something greater, then you SYgh and you FYnally change the channel"
LOL (Excellent!)
By bcc at 10:52 AM ON 07/11/09
This is nearly as stupid as CBS buying The Nashville Network "because it was cheaper and easier to buy a cable franchise with an established viewer base", and gradually alienating that base via name and programming changes until it transmogrified into "Spike TV". Although they've managed to build a viewer base strong enough to survive on, they absolutely destroyed a unique and worthwhile cable channel for no less time or money than if they'd started from scratch.
What next? RFD-TV becomes "The Fashion Channel"??
By suez1040 at 12:05 PM ON 07/11/09
SyFy? Sounds more like 'Silly' or "Sissy'. Obviously, the marketing personnel came from the auto industry - they have no clue!
By Sammers at 12:34 PM ON 07/11/09
I am think about canceling TV service. I dont waste time trying to find quality shows with depth,intelligence,imagination and creativity. The plus side ,I also dont have to be force fed commercials. It is a sad time to see the Scifi channel siding into mindless programming.
By Lawless at 4:03 PM ON 07/11/09
Seems that in a bid to gather a larger "more diverse" audience Sci Fi's Marketing Dept has managed to anger and alienate it's original loyal viewers. We tolerated the completely non-scifi addition of wrestling to the line up and numerous cancellations of great shows. You can only abuse your viewers so much before it comes to a head.
The reasoning for the change from Sci Fi to SyFy comes as an overly worded slap to the face. The equivalent to, "We were too geeky and want to draw in a 'hipper' demographic". Did the cooler networks bully you too much? I think most viewer's fear that "SyFy" is the beginning of an MTV-esque change to something tainted and unwatchable is well founded.
JackHoff:
I haven't been watching TV for a few months. A great summer of sailing and a new girlfriend with lots of new things...More »