

Stephen King's apocalyptic horror novel Cell told of a signal sent out to cell phones that turned all who heard it into homicidal monsters. Now a different sort of cell phone message has gotten King's book publisher, Simon & Schuster, embroiled in a horror story that's far more frightening that fiction—one involving the legal system.
An appellate court ruled Friday that Simon & Schuster might have violated federal law by allegedly sending unsolicited text messages promoting Cell, Online Media Daily reported.
The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals held that sending SMS messages potentially violates the federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act, which prohibits companies from using automatic telephone dialing systems to make calls to cell phones unless the owners have consented.
New York resident Laci Satterfield filed a class-action lawsuit against Simon & Schuster and mobile marketing firm ipsh! in 2006. According to the court ruling, Satterfield had signed up for a free ringtone service from Nextones at the request of her son. As part of the enrollment process, she agreed to receive promotions from Nextones affiliates and brands. After registering for this service, she received an unsolicited text message inviting her to join the "Stephen King VIP Mobile Club" and directing her to www.cellthebook.com.
She alleged that this message violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act's ban on using automated dialing systems to reach wireless devices. She sought class-action status and a minimum of $500 damages per incident for each cell phone customer. Simon & Schuster argued that the text messages weren't covered by the Telephone Consumer Protection Act and that Satterfield had consented to receive the ads. Friday, the 9th Circuit ruled against the book publisher on both points.
We here at SCI FI Wire never claimed to be lawyers, so if you're looking for further analysis, we suggest you visit Online Media Daily.
By mimbutcher5513155 at 10:13 PM ON 06/23/09
Let's see if we get this story straight,someone doesn't agree about getting tex's about novels from a ferm,that invalved Steven King books,i don't think it's that bad.After all most companys sell a product,for a company,why not them.But whom do we rest the blame on,how about the son who agreed to this program in the first place,it was part of the deal,wasn't it?
By Scanner at 1:29 AM ON 06/24/09
That's assuming that Simon & Schuster is an affiliation or brand of Nextones. I'd have to assume it's not, if "the 9th Circuit ruled against the book publisher on both points". Otherwise I'd have thought it'd be an open and shut case.
But then I'm not a lawyer.
By Jonas72 at 6:29 AM ON 06/24/09
Only in America... (Oh no, hope I don't get sued for that remark!)
By Stan W at 8:24 AM ON 06/24/09
I think you're kinda missing (or ignoring) the point. I don't know about you, but not everyone (myself included) have enough money to afford unlimited texting (much less call minutes). So each text I received costs me money. And since my family has 5 cell phones, I get charged for it 5 times. If one company can do it, what's to stop everyone will a product to sell from doing the same.
Granted that I always make sure to select the option to NOT received ads, etc... whenever I sign up for anything, but the ads I would expect are usually in the form of junk mail or e-mail - not a cell call or text message. I don't think it's wrong to prevent advertisers from causing people to pay to receive their messages.
By kchenault at 1:35 PM ON 06/24/09
This case should rely on one fact and one fact only. Is S&S an affiliate or brand of Nextones? If so, she has no legal standing, because she agreed in the contract to receive solicitations. If not, she will get her $500 per number texted for those who sign up for the class action. Pretty cut and dried.
kchenault:
This case should rely on one fact and one fact only. Is S&S an affiliate or brand of Nextones? If so, she has no le...More »