The Syfy Online NetworkSCI FI WireDVICEFidgit
 

Related Sections: Interviews  News  TV

Lennie James: AMC's new Prisoner answers questions

Lennie James: AMC\'s new \<i\>Prisoner\<\/i\> answers questions
Lennie James as Oberon in BBC's production of A Midsummer Night's Dream

AMC's upcoming remake of The Prisoner is big on issues, metaphors and action, and it's up to Lennie James' 147 to add a bit of human emotion to the proceedings, the English actor told us.

Based on Patrick McGoohan's groundbreaking 1967 ITV series, the miniseries again focuses on Number Six (Jim Caviezel) as he tries to escape the mysterious Village and face off against Number Two (Ian McKellen).

James' part is specific, he said. "I call it the Morgan Freeman role," James joked in a group interview this week in Pasadena, Calif., during the Television Critics Association summer press tour. "I play the heart and the soul of the lead character. When Jim's character first arrives in the Village, almost his first stop is my taxi. From then on in, both of our lives are inextricably linked together throughout the six episodes."

Six resolves that keeping people prisoner in a village, no matter how nice the accoutrements, is just plain wrong, and he is going to put a stop to it. 147 teaches him there's more to life than that.

"I think because of the sense that he is a rebel, and he is fighting the system, and he's a man involved in a battle, every now and then, he needs to be reminded that it's possible to care about people," James continued. "You don't have to fight everybody, and sometimes you need a friend. That's what my role provides him."

Jim Caviezel is Number Six

147 also represents the complacent side of the Village, somebody who has every reason to like it there. "I think one of the things that [writer] Bill [Gallagher] wanted to explore, he said quite early on that he is [the] Village," James said. "My character is the ideal Villager. There are a lot of rules in the Village. There are a lot of places you're not allowed to go. There are a lot of things you're not allowed to see. There are a lot of things you're not allowed to say. My character is absolutely comfortable with that."

Maybe if Six just met a nice Villager and settled down, he'd enjoy it, like 147? "His life revolves around and is made complete by his wife and his child," James said. "He has a wife he adores and a child who is the center of his universe. He is totally and utterly happy in that world. In fact, he believes that his family has saved him. He has no reason to rebel, he has no reason to question until Jim gets into my taxi."

James added that 147 is based on a character from the 1967 series, but is more involved with the overall story of the remake. For the new version, James did not create a backstory as to how he met a woman and married in the Village.

"Those are questions we don't ask," James said. "I didn't necessarily need to do a backstory, because during the course of the six episodes, you will find out why my character accepts his position, or why he did."

Though James hails from London, his character, like Caviezel's new Six, is American, and James had to use a U.S. accent for the role, not unlike the one he employed in his last TV series, CBS' Jericho. "I was told not to be [English]," James said. "There is a reason for it, but I can't tell you why. The Village is a very eclectic place, so some characters are English, but most of us are American."

Viewers will only have to wait six hours to find out all the answers, as opposed to the original show's 17. At least James promised there will be some satisfying answers. The ending of McGoohan's series still baffles some of its longtime fans.

"This version is a little bit different," James said. "I think McGoohan, in his brilliantly kind of Irish tricksterness, enjoyed the fact that no one understood it. This is a kind of reworking for the year 2009/2010. There is a conclusion to the whole thing. There is a conclusion that people will be satisfied with, but it's not definitive. We couldn't just kind of wrap it all up."

The Prisoner premieres on AMC in November.

Send-A-Friend
(10) COMMENTS

artzylady:
I loved the original series and am so looking forward to this. The fact that it has a couple of my favorite actors...More »


Comments

By DirectorSloan at 9:36 AM ON 07/31/09

I was always intrigued by this remake but I have to say that after hearing that Lennie James will be involved I'll definitely go see it. He provided the mystery, intrigue, man on the inside aspect to Jericho and was my favorite character on the entire show.

By asfm at 10:22 AM ON 07/31/09

I haven't seen the original, but I love Sir Ian and Jim Caviezel is pretty great, and right now with stuff like Mad Men and Breaking Bad, it seems AMC can really do no wrong, so I'm definitely going to check this out.

By Kevin at 10:26 AM ON 07/31/09

McGoohan's Prisoner was made in 1967, not 1976. Very much a Sixties statement.

By DOlz at 10:44 AM ON 07/31/09

Having watched the promo it looks like a mash up of "The Prisoner" with "Pleasantville" and a supersized rover.

By Thom at 10:50 AM ON 07/31/09

67 or 76--All that matters is that it was "really old" and before Fred Topel's time.

By Klijpo at 1:02 PM ON 07/31/09

I also love the way that every British show is a BBC show on this here SyFy. The Prisoner, like Primeval, was originally on ITV, a commercial channel, along with classics like UFO and Space: 1999, Hammer House of Horror, and Sapphire and Steel, all of which, I think, SyFy (or formerly SciFi) has claimed were BBC shows in articles over the past few years. Please, while ITV is no longer in any fit state to make any telly, and the BBC is producing a fair bit of sf goodness, just do not assume that every British show is from the BBC, whther it is shown on BBC America or not.

By numberxl5 at 1:08 PM ON 07/31/09

Actually The Prisoner was not produced by the BBC but by ATV (which was part of ITV)..
If anything hopefully the new production will attract a new generation of fans to the original. BCNU

By Answers? No. at 2:55 PM ON 07/31/09

Ugh. The beauty of the original is that it did not give answers. Why does everything made today have to be dumbed down? Leave it open-ended and open for interpretation!

"Queastions are a burden to others, answers a prison." - from the original series.

By SS Crompton at 11:42 AM ON 08/01/09

I love the original Prisioner and own the full set on dvd, the last episode of the series is a mess. I don't mind that it isn't all fully explained, but singing "dem bones dem bones" was just stupid and the final confrontation bewteen 6 & "1" could have been so much better. Plus they just walk away into London - that episode was dumb and still explained nothing. So just becuase there's an explanation doesn't mean something is "dunbed down."

By artzylady at 9:21 AM ON 08/03/09

I loved the original series and am so looking forward to this. The fact that it has a couple of my favorite actors involved in it, is frosting on the cake. Can't wait for it to air in November.


Leave a Comment


Type the characters you see in the picture above.

(Please be patient, it may take a moment for your comment to appear.)

Text WIRE to 72434

Visit mobile.syfy.com/wire on your mobile device.
SCI FI Wire on your iPhone
Follow SCI FI Wire on Twitter
Editors
Patrick Lee
News Editor
patrick@scifiwire.com
Scott Edelman
Features Editor
scott@scifiwire.com
©2010, Syfy. All rights reserved.