

There's always been plenty of loss and death in the Harry Potter series, but Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince—the sixth film adaptation of J.K. Rowling's book series—arguably features one of the most gut-wrenching character losses of the entire epic story. (Major spoiler alert if you haven't read the book or seen the movie!)
When Hogwarts headmaster Albus Dumbledore (Michael Gambon) is felled by a killing curse administered by fellow professor Severus Snape (Alan Rickman) as Harry Potter (Daniel Radcliffe) looks on helplessly, it's a seminal moment that rocked the world of readers. In capturing that moment on film, director David Yates and his cast hope they earn the same reaction from moviegoers as well.
Last week at a New York news conference, Radcliffe and Gambon talked about how Harry and Dumbledore have evolved together as characters leading up to the professor's demise.
"The big change for Harry this [film] is his relationship with Dumbledore," Radcliffe said. "Previously, it's always been very much teacher and student. This year, it changes to a general with his favorite [lieutenant]. Harry has become a foot soldier in this movie and is happy to be so."
Radcliffe added: "Also, in all the other [movies], you see Harry going, 'We're going to get Voldemort!' But he never really does anything towards it, whereas this year he actually is part of the planning in trying to do something about the actual destruction of Voldemort."
With four Potter films together under their belts, Radcliffe and Gambon found that their real rapport made it easier to play the changing relationship between the characters, Gambon said. "Dan and I get on very well together, and we have to in this film, because he takes over, and I get weaker," he said. "Every time we do a take, we then go outside and laugh, then go back and do another scene. And it sounds a bit churlish, but I have deliberately developed a relationship with Dan in order to achieve some harmony between us. I think that's the only way to do it."
Radcliffe said that one of his favorite moments with Gambon came while shooting the scene in which Harry falls into a lake infested with the undead Inferi and rises out of the water to find a restored Dumbledore wielding his magic.
"One of the coolest moments of my career was bursting through the surface of the water, being surrounded by a circle of real fire," Radcliffe said. "Then I get to climb up onto the central island, where I look up and see Michael Gambon there looking like God or Moses swirling fire around his head. It was one of those moments where I went, 'I will never—it does not matter how many more films I do—I will never have this scene or anything like it ever again."
Lamenting the loss of his acting partner, Radcliffe offered, "it's very sad for me, because I won't get to work with Michael much in the seventh film. We have a great time together."
But Radcliffe said he is very satisfied with how Dumbledore is remembered by the Hogwarts family in a final stirring tribute to their leader. "I think it's actually a really moving moment, when our wands are raised in salute, and the Dark Mark in the sky is slowly eroded by this white light," he said. "It's a wonderful moment. It was a hard scene for me, because at the time of filming, I had never lost anybody close to me. You can never hope to imagine what that must feel like, so I was in a way having to imagine the feelings, and I hope if it came even a third of the way close to it being real, I am happy, to be quite honest."
As for Gambon, when asked if he was able to nick anything from the set as a keepsake, he laughed and said, "You can't take anything off that set! Everyone wants a wand, but you can't get one. I think the only successful guy at that is Rickman."
Gambon said that he will miss his stint as Dumbledore. "I'll miss everything, even the costumes," he said. "When I saw Richard Harris [the original Dumbledore] in the first two films, he wore very heavy costumes. You could see the weight of them. My costumes were made of silk and were very fine and easy to wear. It goes on in two seconds. I will miss that," he said with a laugh.
Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince is in theaters now.
By bigbenzo at 9:49 AM ON 07/20/09
good movie i liked it but wish the battle at the end of the book was in the movie
By xdeathknightx at 10:39 AM ON 07/20/09
When all is said and done I do hope they give the actors a prop they used as a little remembrance. I do know most of the main actors in LOTR got to take something home.
By juicysmooch at 12:33 PM ON 07/20/09
I was really disappointed in this one. The first ones where much better. It left me hanging in the air. I thought this was to be the last one. But evidently there is to be another. Is that correct?
By nabrendel at 1:00 PM ON 07/20/09
I saw the movie Friday night with my wife and we loved it except for the ending. Seriously, you get on the epic high with the finding of the cavern, drinking the potion, the emotional anguish, the fighting of the zombies, teleporting back.. confronting the death eaters, dumbledore dying.. and then.. they.. just walk out?
honestly... thats B.S. sorry pathetic ending went from an A to a B- just for that
By rdw722 at 1:12 PM ON 07/20/09
Yes there will actually be two more movies. the last book is so long and involved that they are splitting into two movies.
By Marlowe at 2:27 PM ON 07/20/09
I also think the battle at the end was incredibly anti-climactic. Considering the intense efforts put towards invading the castle, kicking over a few plates and for some unknown reason burning Hagrid's hut, what was the point? (Other than the obvious, of course.) Where was the battle?
By Acceler8 at 9:40 PM ON 07/20/09
Just tell me that Harry doesn't have another slow-motion "NOOOOOO!" like he did when Sirius Black died.
By parkin at 12:09 PM ON 07/21/09
The whole film was awful save for the (as ever) great production value. The fact that the book was called 'The Half Blood Prince' must have passed Steve Kloves by as very little was made of the 'mystery' until the end when all was revealed (by which point we'd forgotten who the HBP was and why we should even care!)
Instead of exploring and unraveling this mystery we were 'treated' to endless and dull scenes of the kids all secretly lusting after each other but not being able to tell the one they love.
Emma Watson is proving more and more that she can't act for toffee (though, granted, her role has always been shamelessly underwritten) and the rest of the cast look generally bored. The only surprise for me was that Tom Felton who plays Draco finally stopped sneering and showed us that he can, in fact, act.
I'm only hoping this was a 'blip' before the grand finale of the last 2 movies!
By geeksrawesome at 3:39 PM ON 07/21/09
hey nabrendel, read the books/ watch the last two movies. EVERYTHING becomes clear. Don't judge too soon
By kerrsutherland at 5:09 PM ON 07/21/09
I thought the movie was by far the best one yet. That said, there were two things I was disappointed in. 1) They didn't have the Dursly scene with Dumbledore. That would have been far better than that stupid flirt scene Harry had with the Muggle waitress. 2) Fawkes, in the book, had wonderful music after Dumbledore died. They didn't have that and they should have.
I do understand why they didn't have the battle at the end of this movie. They were saving their funds for the really big one in #7 pt. 2
By WA at 11:16 PM ON 07/22/09
This is definitely the 'Empire Strikes Back' of the Harry Potter movies...
By havok50202 at 4:23 PM ON 07/23/09
WA....how do you compare Harry Potter to Star Wars? seriously ridiculous
havok50202:
WA....how do you compare Harry Potter to Star Wars? seriously ridiculous...More »