The Syfy Online NetworkSCI FI WireDVICEFidgit

Get news, articles, reviews and the latest SCI FI Weekly features. Get wired. Check out SCI FI Wire, the newly expanded information hub for the Syfy Channel.

Video
 

Related Sections: Columnists  Movies  Opinion

Columnist Wil McCarthy counts on District 9's numerology

Columnist Wil McCarthy counts on \<em\>District 9\<\/em\>\'s numerology

Readers too young to remember the 20th century may not realize the special significance the year 1999 has always held for those of us who do. As the end of both a century and a millennium, and the ticking over of a grand odometer, it was the dividing line between past and future.

Back in the '20s and '30s it meant simply "a really long time from now." In the 1970s, with movies like 2001: A Space Odyssey and TV shows like Space 1999, it meant "a generation from now"—enough time for certain aspects of our civilization to be transformed, while leaving the fundamentals intact.

But by the mid-'80s, with Prince's pop music hit 1999 and the John Carpenter movie Prince of Darkness, it had begun to take on a different tone. 1999 was tangible, actual—a year that most of us would to live to see. And of course in the '90s it was something imminent, and like any graduation date it was anticipated with equal parts elation and dread— the special dread that comes from knowing things are about to change. The zeitgeist was a little off; people were more worried about impeachment and protesters and the Y2K bug than about terrorism or the fragile state of the global economy, but there really was a feeling in the air that we'd had it too easy for too long, that our fortunes were poised to take a turn for the worse.

McCarthyPrince.jpg

Well, now it's 2009—a less magical date, but still a vaguely portentous one. Numerologically speaking, nine means you're about to make room for another digit. It means change, dislocation, uncertainty. Of course, the universe couldn't care less what numerals we assign to things, but our own minds are not so equable. Even the skeptical among us can't help believing, at least metaphorically, in the power of certain numbers, certain times and seasons and phases of the sky to affect our lives. And even if we don't believe, enough people around us do that the prophecies become self-fulfilling anyway. Yes, the crazies really do come out for the full moon, if only because they've been told they're supposed to.

Also, nine is a lucky number in China, being associated with leadership and longevity (but not, sadly, with peace or tranquility), and the number 99 forms a kind of dirty joke in pinyin. And September, the ninth month, lies under the stars of Virgo, the virgin (another joke?). Caught between Leo and Libra, it's the end of summer, the start of autumn and of the school year, a time when frivolity gives way to seriousness, when leaves change color, crops are harvested and laid in for winter, and the chirping of the crickets has a sort of doomed quality to it.

Nein also means "no" in German, and "nigh on" means "almost" or "about to be" in olde tyme English, so it's not a huge psychological stretch to feel these meanings at the back of our minds when we think of that largest of single-digit numbers.

Thumbnail image for District9Reasons9.jpg

Against this backdrop debuts Neill Blomkamp's new movie, District 9. Produced by Peter Jackson, the film is actually an extended, gussied-up version of Blomkamp's 2005 short film Alive in Joburg. South Africa's answer to Alien Nation, the film depicts alien refugees herded into crime-ridden camps and shantytowns, their skills and knowledge dismissed, their (highly realistic) anatomy mocked, their civil rights abused.

For better or worse, D9 appears to be both a critical success and a box-office hit, despite some rather glaring credibility problems. Without making a whole thing out of it, I'll just say that with 20 years to reverse-engineer an alien spaceship and its associated weaponry, I'd expect the Afrikaaners to make a leeetle more progress than the film says they have. Just because the technology is biomechanical and requires alien DNA to function does not mean we can't identify and learn from its different components. Here a power pack, there a magnetic coil ...

Similarly, I really can't understand why literally all of the "prawns" are in a refugee camp. Maybe they're "just" displaced worker bees with bad attitudes and minimal education, but even so, wouldn't every university in the world want to host a family or two, to pick their alien brains for random tidbits of astronomy and physics and galactic cultural history?

But then again, the movie is trying to make a political point rather than a technical one, and details like that simply get in the way. We're meant to read this as allegory, and so we shall—whatever you say, Neill and Peter—and on that basis it's not a bad flick. Just don't ask too many questions.

McCarthyPlan9.jpg

Anyhoo, the thing that really catches my attention is that an MST3K-ified version of Ed Wood's C-classic Plan 9 From Outer Space is scheduled for release later this month. This is not a remake but a reshowing of the original film with comedians shouting prerecorded insults at the screen, and following closely on its heels is Tim Burton's animated 9, and another nine movie (this one not science fiction but a rebooted Fellini musical) called Nine.

Even by the standards of faddish Hollyweird, it's a little strange to have five movies out at the same time with essentially the same name. Is there something in the air? A whiff of nervous energy, a fear of impending change?

There's Spanish 9 coming up as well—a short movie for the film festival circuit—although it's pronounced "nueve," which sounds to American ears like "new" or "nerve" or "wavy," and there's an Argentinian Nueve for the fall season as well. Are these movies trying to tell us something? Is reality due for a churn?

I'd like to say more—numerology is a rich topic I've never addressed before—but numerology itself encourages me to cut this short. Just to be safe, I'm keeping this column to exactly 999 words.


Sources:
Wikipedia: The Free Encyclopedia (en.wikipedia.org): "Numerology"
The Internet Movie Database (www.imdb.com): "District 9", "Prince of Darkness", "Alien Nation", "9", "Nine"
www.rottentomatoes.com: "District 9", "9", "Nine"

Wil McCarthy is a rocket guidance engineer, robot designer, nanotechnologist, science-fiction author and occasional aquanaut. He has contributed to three interplanetary spacecraft, five communication and weather satellites, a line of landmine-clearing robots and some other "really cool stuff" he can't tell us about. His short writings have graced the pages of Analog, Asimov's, Wired, Nature and other major publications, and his book-length works include the New York Times notable Bloom, Amazon "Best of Y2K" The Collapsium and most recently, To Crush the Moon. His acclaimed nonfiction book, Hacking Matter,is now available as a free download.
Send-A-Friend
(26) COMMENTS

chris_evans:
boycott movies and the mpaa. ...More »


Comments

By arkj at 3:22 PM ON 08/25/09

This is the worst film that I have seen in a long time. Really bad.

By psipher at 3:39 PM ON 08/25/09

This is the best film that I have seen in a long time. Really good.

By EastBay at 3:54 PM ON 08/25/09

Yep, this is a really bad flick. I managed to sit through about the first 30 minutes before walking out.

By Kikstad at 3:58 PM ON 08/25/09

Yep, this is a really great flick. I actually sat in the theater for another 30 minutes after the movie was over, unable to leave, awed by its magnificance.

By Bill S. at 4:18 PM ON 08/25/09

People who think a movie like this is "really bad" clearly have never seen a really bad movie before. I think it was excellent; brilliant idea, great shooting style, great FX, very unique "hero," original concept (HEY a movie not based on a graphic novel, a video game, etc.). But even if I didn't like it, I couldn't call a film with this kind of effort and talent "really bad." Such words should be reserved for movies that show little effort or talent and no originality.

By cwg at 4:22 PM ON 08/25/09

I second, third and fourth comments two and four!

By misguided at 4:23 PM ON 08/25/09

To the haters: you better get prepared to be sick of D9 because it isn't going anywhere. :p

20 minutes? You can't judge a movie by the first 20 minutes! If so, you miss a lot of great movies. Keep your snap judgement for your children.

By Rick at 4:39 PM ON 08/25/09

Wait, people hate this movie? Seriously? It's not only a pretty amazing story (without pulling too many punches), but it has some of the most beautiful realistic CG work ever put to film. Weird. What do you haters prefer?

By Rick at 4:41 PM ON 08/25/09

Also: who could hate a movie where there are guns that turn people into bloody pulp explosions in the blink of an eye?

By RobbieRobb at 4:48 PM ON 08/25/09

What Bill said. If you want to see a really bad movie get your hands on the movie Lost Angels. Or just watch X-Men: The Last Stand.

By allison&jack at 4:48 PM ON 08/25/09

How can you call it a bad film if you didn't even stay to watch the entire thing?

That critique says more about the person critiquing the movie than it does the movie itself.

By Pelican at 4:58 PM ON 08/25/09

Wow if this is a bad movie I hope they like 10 more equally as bad then. I'll bet the haters loved Land of the Lost!

By Mystified at 5:16 PM ON 08/25/09

Try "Wizards of the Lost Kingdom," and then TRY to say that D9 is a bad movie.

By ScienceFictionIsNotSyFy at 5:18 PM ON 08/25/09

I was not the worst movie I have seen but it is no where near a brilliant piece of cinematic art. The part I don't get is this numerology aspect these guys are pushing. This is a silly article and to be honest I have not been impressed with many of the so-called news articles on scifiwire.com lately.

Either way, go rent Enemy Mine and you will have a better movie experience.

By yellow_hause at 5:51 PM ON 08/25/09

ScienceFictionIsNotSyFy: careful with that 'so called news' thing... They've censored me for WAY less...
Lets see if this comment and yours stay....

By lince at 6:13 PM ON 08/25/09

Yes Yes Yes...really good

By Qwerty at 9:54 PM ON 08/25/09

It would be refreshing to see more intelligent comments on this site. There isn't one comment so far about the article itself.... just ridiculous banter about how the first commenter thought 'District 9' was a bad movie. I don't know why I bother to read comments here anymore.

As for the article.... very cool and a little creepy. The Law of Synchronically dictates that this would definitely "mean" something. One book I read stated that whatever sh*t goes down at the end of 2012 is actually supposed to be a culmination of events that get triggered in just a couple of months... now... in 2009. So maybe this year will be pretty significant. Or maybe not. Either way we don't have too much longer to find out.

By chawoott at 10:38 PM ON 08/25/09

"1999 has always held for those of us who do. As the end of both a century and a millennium..." WHAT?!?!

If you cannot get a simple fact correct at the beginning of the article, how do we know the facts in the remainder of the article are correct?

gads...surely you weren't among the foolish in 1999 idiotically watching some mechanical ball slide down a pole thinking this was the best thing ever, then got the last laugh at the real end of the century and millennium in 2000. hmmmm?

By spaceage whizkid at 12:14 AM ON 08/26/09

lol, I was thinking why did everyone think 1999 was the end of the millennium myself. Always makes sad so many people don't know math.

By Killian at 1:02 AM ON 08/26/09

speaking of 9's but not movie related - noticed that Rock Band Beatles game is being released in the US Sept.9, 2009 (9/9/9). I'll be watching Supernatural the next day though when Satan comes out of the ground.

By jolinar at 1:30 AM ON 08/26/09

Tim Burton's 9 comes out on 9-9-09

By Alikhat at 1:50 AM ON 08/26/09

The comment in the article that stuck out the most to me was the very first sentence: "Readers too young to remember the 20th century..." It's 2009, sparky. Just how many eight year-olds do you think are reading this site?

By purplemjcat at 1:21 PM ON 08/26/09

Just to be completely clear, the first day of the 21st century was 1/1/01

By duneboat at 9:04 PM ON 08/26/09

as i have posted on other D-9 wire articles, THIS is the sci-fi movie of the year!!! sorry, Star Trek. And possibly THE over-all movie of the year!

By gunhed509 at 3:08 PM ON 08/31/09

Eeep - people get confused about millennia. Our current millennium began in 2001, NOT 2000! A millennium spans 1000 years, right? So, for example the year 1 AD was the calendar's starting point (no, there was never a 0 AD). So that first millennium ran from 1 AD to 1000 AD, right? 1000 years in total. The millennium that followed began on 1001 AD and ended on – guess what – 2000 (not 1999). The millennium after that? It started in 2001. Hollywood and others like the nice, round figures like 2000 – lots of zeros, but it's not accurate. In the end, though, it's just a number, anyway...

By chris_evans at 12:21 PM ON 11/09/09

boycott movies and the mpaa.


Leave a Comment


Type the characters you see in the picture above.

(Please be patient, it may take a moment for your comment to appear.)

SCI FI Wire continues below
Text WIRE to 72434

Visit mobile.syfy.com/wire on your mobile device.
SCI FI Wire on your iPhone
Follow SCI FI Wire on Twitter
Editors
Patrick Lee
News Editor
patrick@scifiwire.com
Scott Edelman
Features Editor
scott@scifiwire.com
©2009, Syfy. All rights reserved.