

Fox gave journalists a taste of what Fringe's parallel dimension is like at the Television Critics Association summer press tour in the form of a fictional newspaper called The New York News, similar to the New York Post glimpsed on the table in William Bell's office in the season-one finale. (Check out a comparison of the two papers after the jump.)
The front page, dated May 12, 2009, features stories about the Obamas moving into the new White House—in this dimension, the original White House, not the World Trade Center, was destroyed on Sept. 11, 2001— former president John F. Kennedy will address the United Nations, and 1986 draft pick Len Bias hasn't died of a drug overdose but rather becomes the NBA MVP. And inside, we learn that Star Trek is still the number-one movie for the weekend of May 8 (and was presumably still written by Fringe co-creators Roberto Orci and Alex Kurtzman).
That tantalizing glimpse of the parallel universe teases what viewers can expect when Fox's sci-fi series returns in the fall, but Orci says the parallel universe will differ from our own only when it's significant. (Spoilers ahead!)
(Click to enlarge the images)
![]()
![]()
"You only want to change something if there's a really good thematic reason to have it be different," Orci said in a group interview Thursday in Pasadena, Calif. "It can't just be 'red is blue' just for fun. Let it really resonate, because it's something major, like what you see in that paper. Things like, 'Oh my God, that's different.' We're trying to have the big events in history altered. So Kennedy's alive, the World Trade Center is standing, some of these things that are hopeful in a way, actually."
Also at the end of last season, we saw Walter Bishop (John Noble) visiting the grave of his son, Peter, who apparently died as a child. The implication is that the adult Peter (Joshua Jackson) from the parallel universe has somehow found his way into our reality. Does that mean there's an alternate-universe Walter whose son has been kidnapped?
"I'd be pissed, right?" Orci said. "So that feels like a juicy train to collide into. That's looming somewhere."
In the parallel dimension—which the writers call Over There among themselves—did the government also assemble a fringe science team to investigate strange phenomena? Are said phenomena even considered strange on that side?
![]()
"Nothing we've done yet makes that distinction," Orci said. "Until we determine otherwise, let's try and start with the same laws of physics. But you were right that that's an area to play with, that's very interesting."
Orci also sees an opportunity to comment on today's controversies—President Obama's birth certificate, universal health care, financial bailouts, etc.
"We're playing with those ideas," Orci said. "Part of the benefit of doing something that's sort of genre is that you can disguise it a little bit. We're already sort of turning into it by even featuring the World Trade Center as being around, by even touching on JFK. So we're trying to test the water slowly. That's always been one of our interests. If you're going to have the time on TV to do whatever you want, you might as well make it a little bit challenging, too, in that area as well. We're slowly sticking our toe in there; obviously, you're sensing it."
For at least the early part of season two, FBI agent Olivia Dunham (Anna Torv) will be the only character crossing back and forth between universes. "So far, she's the only one," Orci said. "Gotta play that carefully."
How did Olivia travel from a building in central Manhattan to the World Trade Center in the parallel universe? "We already had teleportation earlier in the season, so it's already out there," Orci said.
While Olivia, and the viewers, will be figuring out the parallel universe, Walter will be having some fun in our world. "Walter is going to explore freedom that maybe he shouldn't have," Orci said.
Fringe returns Sept. 17 at 9 p.m. on Fox.
By msmith2701 at 1:08 PM ON 08/07/09
Can't wait. Absolutely love this show!
By "the Chemicals are Good" at 6:59 PM ON 08/07/09
Why did it take the "other side" US eight years to rebuild the Whight House.
By Gill Avila at 9:31 PM ON 08/07/09
Probably because the contractors needed to hide the AA missiles and metalstorm guns, and bombproof safe rooms. Anyway--ever try to get the Washington ball rolling? It's all angles; doesn't roll worth a damn.
By Omen at 10:42 PM ON 08/07/09
Excuse me.
But if JFK is alive & served 2 terms that means the historic time line of POTUS would have been altered. Therefore no way BO is prez. So the writer's politics is showing.
By spaceage whizkid at 2:51 AM ON 08/08/09
say what? why couldn't he be prez? JFK would have left a strong Democratic influence on the nation and perhaps LBJ or Bobby would have been elected afterwards but with the swing voting of this country, it is equally possible that they lost to Nixon and things continued almost like ours until today. It's a different world but politics has a life of its own also.
35. John F. Kennedy
36. Lyndon Johnson
37. Richard Nixon
38. Gerald Ford
39. James Carter
40. Ronald Reagan
41. George H. W. Bush
42. William J. Clinton
43. George W. Bush
44. Barack H. Obama
By geekofallmediums at 4:17 PM ON 08/08/09
So in this univerise Kennedy was never assinated nor was he secretly dying of Hodgens disese?
By spaceage whizkid at 12:53 AM ON 08/09/09
not if he's addressing the U.N.
By Omen at 5:37 PM ON 08/09/09
What I'm saying is that once you change that everything changes. Was RFK killed? Did LBJ succeed JFK? No Nixon no Ford. What if Carter instead of Reagan dealing with the USSR? Then maybe no Bushes. Really think about it.
By AngryJonny at 6:26 PM ON 08/09/09
Omen,
No Bushes? Gosh, that would be awful. :)
By spaceage whizkid at 6:57 PM ON 08/11/09
RFK was the Bobby I mentioned, his possible death was why I said he might not have been elected. Would LBJ have been elected after a 2 term Democrat, maybe, maybe not. Historically, we tend to vote for the alternate major party after a number of years.
We were actively at war in the Viet Nam Conflict during those years and yes I do know many were against it but many were also for it: Bringing Democracy to Northern Viet Nam. Sound familiar, Bringing Democracy to Iraq? The more things change, the more they stay the same.
Politics is a strange place and many voters basically flip a coin when they enter that booth since they don't know the issues or the candidates. Sometimes, it is just that random.
I enjoy alternate history and have read the Alternate Presidents collection of possible presidents edited by Mike Resnick:
http://www.amazon.com/Alternate-Presidents-Anthologies-Mike-Resnick/dp/0812511921
I like to think Ben Franklin would have been a good choice for president at some point.
spaceage whizkid:
RFK was the Bobby I mentioned, his possible death was why I said he might not have been elected. Would LBJ have bee...More »