

Science-fiction movies and TV shows with something to say are a dime a dozen, but ones that actually say something are infinitely rarer. The reason for this is that the ideas behind them are intriguing, but seldom are those successfully explored or executed; for every District 9, there are a dozen movies like The Box that just never manage to capture an audience's attention, much less the essence of their core concept, in a way that resonates, much less entertains.
For my money, Logan's Run is one of the genre's revered "classics" that's terminally guilty of being a great premise with some of the worst possible execution; Hollywood evidently agrees, which is why a number of filmmakers have tried in the past several years to remake or reinvent it for contemporary audiences. Now that Logan's Run is being released on Blu-ray, we decided to revisit it to see precisely what it is that's so potent in its mishmash of cultural commentary and futuristic fun, and consider what it is (other than obvious legal entanglements and such) that keeps a reimagining from coming to the silver screen.
The original film was adapted in 1976 by David Zelag Goodman from William F. Nolan and George Clayton Johnson's novel of the same name, was directed by Michael Anderson (Around the World in 80 Days) and starred Michael York and Jenny Agutter. The story takes place in the 23rd century and follows a "sandman" named Logan (York) who becomes a fugitive, just like the people he once hunted, after he is assigned to find Sanctuary, a mythical place where people over the age of 30 survive instead of subjecting themselves to "judgment," or termination, at a ceremony called Carousel.
Enlisting the help of a young woman who allegedly knows the secrets of Sanctuary, Logan flees from the idyllic pleasures of the futuristic, domed city where Earth's survivors dwell and embarks on a dangerous and shocking journey to discover the truth about the world outside.
What seems most ready to be revisited about Logan's Run is its idea and examination of a youth-based (if not -consumed) culture. Suffice it to say that contemporary pop culture thrives on youth and cannibalizes anything perceived to be old or out of date, which is why creating a story about the cost of celebrating that young and inexperienced life—such as the wisdom to understand it, the maturity to appreciate the value of it or even the ability to preserve it—could be so powerful. Framed by the media saturation that consumes and obsesses over every aspect of youthful indiscretion and immaturity, the population of this futuristic society could almost literally be paralyzed by their fascination with the shortcomings of others, writ large via technology that brings it into every aspect of their lives.
As a result, Logan and Jessica would essentially be battling the infantilization of their own society, attempting to force it to advance and evolve beyond the ongoing gratification of our most base desires, and their fleeing from it would be an initial step away toward achieving greater understanding of themselves and the world around them. If the story followed even part of its original narrative, Logan and Jessica could ultimately stage a revolt against the voluntary terminations of Carousel and use the wisdom and experience of older members of their society to help rebuild a new world that uses their available technology instead of being used by it.
Further, in the film, the world in which Logan and his fellow survivors live is post-apocalyptic, which one supposes is intended to explain why humans now live a life of pure hedonism—a collective psychological response to the horrors of nuclear war, perhaps. But in the book, the world became overpopulated, and as a result people voluntarily subjected themselves to termination in order to maintain equilibrium with the planet's resources. While the idea of a culture responding to terrible acts with wanton escapism is certainly not far afield of reality (look at post-9/11 America, for example), the conception of a new film focusing on these same story elements could revisit them from a more fertile and interesting perspective, either by (in a way similar to Wall-E) showing how indulgence of our laziest tendencies results in our intellectual and physical atrophy or using the post-apocalyptic setting as a wake-up call for the damage we're inflicting upon our planet.
Interestingly, the closest successful contemporary counterpart to Logan's Run is probably Steven Spielberg's Minority Report, which also focuses on a man falling prey to the system that he has sworn to enforce, and that film examined some interesting ideas while also loading the film with more aggressive and exciting action. Even if the film's ideas were simply a foundation, there seem to be countless opportunities even among the scenarios in the original film to enhance the action, and ultimately the energy, of a remake. The initial pursuit of a runner, which shows not only the "process" of the futuristic world but Logan's complicity within that structure, could be a spectacular, pre-credits pulse pounder; Logan's own escape from the domed city could be a series of chases through various areas of the world, including (as is the case in the original film) locations even Logan is unfamiliar with.
Overall, it seems that short of creating a personified villain, rather than the original's godlike use of technology, a new film would similarly need to eventually become a rally for the people to reclaim their lives and escape the shackles of a life half lived, in this case literally. In which case there might not be a classically bombastic set piece at the end, but for a film about the ways in which we focus on the frivolity of youth culture instead of the reality of our own lives, offering a more thought-provoking finale might be thematically and narratively more cohesive.
Finally, there are, of course, the special effects, which even allowing for the primitiveness of mid-'70s technology are in desperate need of an upgrade. While the miniature sets are expertly navigated by director Anderson, most of the other effects are subpar, including guns that seem to fire only about half the time and human-sized sets and locations that, reality aside, need more depth and detail. Personally, I'd be happy if they just went back and redid or completely removed Box, the "ice robot" that is really a man in a refrigerator box; even for the time, the effects on his makeup and mobility simply did not work, and they're all the more egregious now.
Ultimately there is hope for a remake; at last report, Tron Legacy director Joe Kosinski will tackle a version written by The Usual Suspects screenwriter Christopher McQuarrie. But even as a failure itself, either at the time or particularly in retrospect, there's surprising value in science fiction tomes that don't work, because they often inspire as much as the ones that do. Logan's Run is no different, and the release of this Blu-ray provokes thought precisely because it offers as much cultural and social relevance to today's audiences as it did in 1976, even if it sadly doesn't offer the same entertainment value.
By Wolftech at 10:19 AM ON 11/16/09
No. No remake. There are hundreds of SciFi/Fantasy books that deserve to be made into films. It is time Hollow-Wood to stop remaking the past and move forward on new IPs.
By Shayd at 10:49 AM ON 11/16/09
Don't remake the film, adapt the original book (or, if done well, the entire trilogy) If you go back to the source material (no domed cities, no illusion of renewal, just The Thinker and a world where the ultimate crime is to turn 22) you could have a Sci-Fi version of the Bourne films with a social commentary slipped in sideways.
By jdmimic at 11:13 AM ON 11/16/09
I think Shayd, that what Gilchrist was advocating would be something more along the lines of what you suggest than a remake of the original film. I think Wolftech, that any remake of this movie, if done as advocated here, would be truly more a reimagining than a remake. The movies, while sharing the central themes, would be so totally different that calling it a remake wouldn't really be true. While I often deride the supposed differences between "remakes" and "reimaginings" and would rather have original stuff as well, in this case I would like to see it. The central themes are even more relevant today than when the first movie came out. It has been over thirty years, so they wouldn't be remaking something recent, and the movie if done right would be updated and rewritten to the point that it would really share very little other than a conceptual jumping off point.
While I would normally say if that is the case, dispense with trying to tie it in with the original at all and just make it its own thing, here I would actually argue to keep it. Logan's Run as a concept is iconic science fiction and grabs people's attention and awareness that a completely new movie would not. People would come in to the movie with some understanding of the concept which the movie then expound upon.
On the other hand, the very same thing could also unfairly prejudice people against the film in today's market and could be seen by the younger crowd as just old folks whining about "the good old days" and trying to make themselves seem relevant.
That's the problem with being a Gemini, I'm of two minds about everything:) (and just to clarify, no, I don't give any credence to astrology whatsoever, my comment is of humorous value only, even if only to me)
By MCP-001 at 11:49 AM ON 11/16/09
"Reimaging"?
"Remaking"
Groan........
Here's an idea, look for new material!!!
By scjessey at 11:56 AM ON 11/16/09
The "escape from domed city" stuff was recently explored in the awful "The Island", so it probably isn't worth revisiting for a while.
By PALADIN at 1:54 PM ON 11/16/09
The`76 film is an edited, flawed take on the Logan books, and as such cannot be used as representative of Nolan`s story. Too many changes, too many shortcuts. It`s a dumbed-down version of the source material.
It is also of course, fun to watch.
I`ll give it points alone for featuring one of the most impressive hand-held props in sci-fi film history; The Sandman Gun. The so-called 'flamegun' is one of teh rare instances that a prop actually did function without added effects. The pistol-shaped Acetylene Gas props are impressive as hell when fired, but quite dangerous as Richard Jordan found out on the set. The irony is that the film Sandman Gun is one of the changes from the books, but it is one that works so well visually that I cannot bring myself to care about the difference.
I`ld like to see a better cinematic take on LOGAN`S RUN......
But keep those flameguns !
By frankcohen at 2:50 PM ON 11/16/09
Wow, Todd, you wrote a very interesting and insightful article on Logans Runs. Thank you.
My introduction to science fiction writing came from an experience I had at my first science fiction convention in 1978. The conference was at the Bonnaventure Hotel in Los Angeles. It was a very futuristic design for a hotel in the 70's. I was 16. I walked in to find people dressed as Sandmen using working (flaming) guns to tag others dressed in Logan's Run costumes.
How fun is that!, I thought. But I also had a strange attraction to the women - mostly high school and college girls - dressed like Jessica 6 and Holly. The costumes were more or less silk togas without bras. Wonderful for this 16 year old!
I sat in on a panel discussion hosted by D.C. Fontana. She was there is about 3-4 other writers from the Logan's Run television series. The series had already aired a few episodes and it was clear that things weren't going so well.
The panel was poorly attended. There were maybe 20 people in the audience, in a room that could handle 200+.
About 10 minutes into the discussion a very short man, with a long stringy beard, wearing orange tennis shoes and a green down vest, stood up at the back of the room. It was George Clayton Johnson. He could have been perfectly cast as a demented Howard Hughes.
"You're ruining the show and not being truthful to my story!" George yelled at Fontana. He let out a tirade about the lack of imagination and quality in the show. After a couple of minutes Fontana broke into tears. She walked off the small stage and left the room crying.
George walked out too. I hope it was to console Fontana.
I was simply amazed by all of this. And the experience showed me how much depth there is to science fiction writing, production, and delivery. I am a fan of the process.
By the way, Star Trek, the motion picture, was already in pre-production then as a television series. (It later became the movie.) I remember nervously looking at Logans Run on television and wondering nervously about Star Trek.
-Frank
By veritas at 4:37 PM ON 11/16/09
A new Logan's Run movie need not be a remake but rather a new adaptation of the source material. As much as the original movie is a classic, I would love a new, more faithful adaptation of the original.
Unfortunately that wouldn't be done. Whoever they hired to pen the screenplay would just rent the movie and then write his or her own take in an "re-imagining" thereby completely missing what it is that has kept the original in the memories of people for decades.
No more ron moore type crap please.
By AngryJonny at 6:02 PM ON 11/16/09
Ooooo... Jenny Agutter.
By Ken Morrison at 6:07 PM ON 11/16/09
Todd -
That's the most interesting article I have ever read on this website.
Thank you.
By Gilveron at 7:24 PM ON 11/16/09
While I'm generally against remakes, I think Logan's Run is an idea that is screaming for a modern retelling, particularly for the reasons extolled by Mr. Gilchrist. The themes of youth obsession, examining morality and mortality, and the abandonment of wisdom for the pleasure of the now are all perhaps more relevant today than in 1976. I'd advocate doing this as a TV Miniseries (on pay cable) rather than as a feature or TV movie though, so the entire mythology could be explored at the pace it deserves.
By McTex at 3:47 PM ON 11/17/09
As a kid I sometimes got to go to the Dallas apparel mart where most of the interiors were filmed. I would have an absolute blast running around and being chased by sandmen (my friends). Now the place looks so old and dated, lol.
McTex:
As a kid I sometimes got to go to the Dallas apparel mart where most of the interiors were filmed. I would have an ...More »